logo
Trump's China 'truce' is nothing of the sort

Trump's China 'truce' is nothing of the sort

RNZ News12-06-2025

Analysis by
David Goldman
, CNN
Xi Jinping and Donald Trump.
Photo:
AFP
Analysis:
At long last, the United States has reached a trade agreement with China.
Again.
After a testy war of words that escalated into a tit-for-tat restriction on key exports, American and Chinese officials this week met in the United Kingdom with a singular goal: Find a way to agree to what they had agreed to a month earlier in Geneva.
It appears the countries' top trade negotiators have accomplished that. On Wednesday (NZT) , both Chinese and Trump officials said they had agreed to a framework to implement the consensus they reached in May, and the trade truce would be sent to their respective leaders for their approval.
Businesses, consumers and Wall Street investors will no doubt breathe a sigh of relief: Burdensome tariffs have raised significant anxiety, and easing trade barriers between the world's two largest economies should lower costs and help inject some much-needed certainty into an economy that has been demonstrating some signs of strain.
President Donald Trump on Wednesday said in a Truth Social post that a "deal" with China has been completed.
"Our deal with China is done," Trump said in his all-caps social media post.
Trump said both countries agreed to ease export restrictions, per the prior arrangement agreed upon in Geneva in May. The president also confirmed on Wednesday in his post that the deal included "full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China."
But in reality, the trade truce - if that's really what was accomplished this time around - is mostly just a return to the already-tense state of affairs from before 2 April. Tariff rates from both countries remain historically high, and significant export restrictions remain in place. The United States has not opened its doors to China's autos, nor is it going to sell its high-end AI chips anytime soon. And, in Trump's parlance, China isn't treating America much more "fairly" after this agreement than it did before.
Without a doubt, a trade agreement was much needed. After Trump's 2 April "Liberation Day" announcements, tensions ran so high that trade between the United States and China came to an effective halt. A 145 percent tariff on most Chinese imports made the math impossible for US businesses to buy virtually anything from China, America's second-largest trading partner.
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, America's chief negotiator in both trade talks with China, said previous tariff levels were "unsustainable."
On 12 May, delegates from China and the United States announced they would significantly roll back their historically high tariffs on one another. Economists pared back their recession forecasts, and moribund consumer confidence rebounded.
But Trump and his administration in recent weeks grew increasingly hostile toward China, accusing the country of breaking the promises it made in mid-May. China similarly said the United States failed to live up to its obligations under the Geneva agreement.
The Trump administration had expected China to lift restrictions on rare-earth materials that are critical components for a wide range of electronics, but China has only very slowly allowed them to return to the open market, causing intense displeasure inside the Trump administration and prompting a series of export restrictions on US goods to China, three administration officials told CNN last month.
China has a virtual monopoly on rare earths, without which cars, jet engines, contrast dye used in MRI machines and some cancer drugs cannot be manufactured. Trump told reporters Friday that Chinese President Xi Jinping had agreed to allow exports of rare earth minerals products to begin, but industry analysts said the crucial materials had not been flowing to the United States as they once had.
If both countries satisfy the terms of the agreement this time around, the de-escalation should prevent the direst warnings about the trade war, including potential pandemic-level shortages.
Despite the good vibes, the United States and China remain in an economic standoff.
The Trump administration - and the Biden administration before it - have maintained that Chinese companies are more than happy to sell inexpensive products to the US market but that China places significant restrictions on US businesses operating in the country and encourages Chinese companies to steal American intellectual property. China has long disputed those claims.
Trump, in his first term, raised tariffs on China based on national security concerns. Biden maintained many of those tariffs and doubled down on some.
But the second Trump administration has taken trade barriers to an unprecedented level. It has placed a 10 percent universal tariff on virtually all goods coming into the United States. It put in place an additional 20 percent tariff on Chinese goods in an effort to get China to take action to reduce the flow of fentanyl over the US border. Both of those extraordinary tariffs remain in place on most Chinese goods, with the exception of some products like electronics.
In addition, the White House closed the so-called de minimis exemption that allowed packages with a value of under $800 (NZ$1381) to come into the United States tariff-free. Hefty new tariffs remain in place on small packages, undermining the business models of Chinese ecommerce giants Shein and Temu.
The compounding tariffs create significant trade barriers with America's second-largest trading partner, raising prices for American businesses and consumers with no easy fixes or clear market alternatives. Some gigantic companies, such as Apple, have complex supply chains that can withstand some of the price pressures. But even Apple, which has said it would ship most US iPhones from India as Chinese tariffs rise, said it would face a $900 million quarterly cost increase because of tariffs - at their current levels, not at the sky-high 145 percent rate.
Other businesses, such as Boeing, have been completely shut out of China's market. Even without any tariffs or other formal barriers by China on purchases of US aircraft, Boeing has made virtually no sales in China, the world's largest for aircraft purchases, since 2019.
But Trump sounded a hopeful note about the path forward.
"President XI and I are going to work closely together to open up China to American Trade," Trump said in a post Wednesday morning. "This would be a great WIN for both countries!!!"
A trade truce may be better than the alternative - if it lasts this time. But if the deal leads to reduced trade barriers, that could boost both economies.
-CNN

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump says he would consider bombing Iran again, drops plan to lift sanctions
Trump says he would consider bombing Iran again, drops plan to lift sanctions

RNZ News

time4 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Trump says he would consider bombing Iran again, drops plan to lift sanctions

By Trevor Hunnicutt and Steve Holland , Reuters US President Donald Trump Photo: SAUL LOEB / AFP US President Donald Trump sharply criticised Iran's Supreme Leader, Ali Khamanei, dropped plans to lift sanctions on Iran, and said he would consider bombing Iran again if Tehran is enriching uranium to worrisome levels. Trump reacted sternly to Khamanei's first remarks after a 12-day conflict with Israel that ended when the United States launched bombing raids last weekend against Iranian nuclear sites. Khamanei said Iran "slapped America in the face" by launching an attack against a major US base in Qatar following the US bombing raids. Khamanei also said Iran would never surrender. Trump said he had spared Khamanei's life. US officials told Reuters on 15 June that Trump had vetoed an Israeli plan to kill the supreme leader. "His Country was decimated, his three evil Nuclear Sites were OBLITERATED, and I knew EXACTLY where he was sheltered, and would not let Israel, or the U.S. Armed Forces, by far the Greatest and Most Powerful in the World, terminate his life," Trump said in a social media post. "I SAVED HIM FROM A VERY UGLY AND IGNOMINIOUS DEATH," he said. Iran said a potential nuclear deal was conditional on the US ending its "disrespectful tone" toward the Supreme Leader. "If President Trump is genuine about wanting a deal, he should put aside the disrespectful and unacceptable tone towards Iran's Supreme Leader, Grand Ayatollah Khamenei, and stop hurting his millions of heartfelt followers," Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said in a post on X. Trump also said that in recent days he had been working on the possible removal of sanctions on Iran to give it a chance for a speedy recovery. He said he had now abandoned that effort. "I get hit with a statement of anger, hatred, and disgust, and immediately dropped all work on sanction relief, and more," he said. Trump said at a White House news conference that he did not rule out attacking Iran again, when asked about the possibility of new bombing of Iranian nuclear sites if deemed necessary at some point. "Sure, without question, absolutely," he said. Trump said he would like inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency - the UN nuclear watchdog - or another respected source to be able to inspect Iran's nuclear sites after they were bombed last weekend. Trump has rejected any suggestion that damage to the sites was not as profound as he has said. The IAEA chief, Rafael Grossi, said that ensuring the resumption of IAEA inspections was his top priority as none had taken place since Israel began bombing on 13 June. However, Iran's parliament approved moves to suspend such inspections. Araqchi indicated that Tehran may reject any request by the head of the agency for visits to Iranian nuclear sites. Trump said Iran still wants to meet about the way forward. The White House said that no meeting between the US and an Iranian delegation has been scheduled thus far. - Reuters

California Governor sues Fox News for $1.3 billion for defamation over Trump call
California Governor sues Fox News for $1.3 billion for defamation over Trump call

RNZ News

time7 hours ago

  • RNZ News

California Governor sues Fox News for $1.3 billion for defamation over Trump call

By Jonathan Stempel , Reuters California Governor Gavin Newsom. Photo: AFP California Governor Gavin Newsom has filed a US$787 million (NZ$1.3 billion) defamation lawsuit against Fox News, saying the network defamed him by lying about his phone call with Donald Trump related to the president's immigration crackdown. The complaint filed in Delaware Superior Court accused Fox of demonstrating "willingness to protect President Trump from his own false statements by smearing his political opponent Governor Newsom in a dispute over when the two last spoke during a period of national strife." Newsom's punitive damages request is nearly identical to the $787.5 million that Fox paid in 2023 to settle Dominion Voting Systems' lawsuit over alleged vote-rigging in the 2020 U.S. presidential election. The governor is also seeking compensatory damages for harm to his reputation, saying Fox acted with actual malice. "Enough of their lies," Newsom said in a video posted on X. In a letter to the network, Newsom's lawyers said he is prepared to drop the lawsuit if Fox retracted the claim he lied about his call with Trump, and if both Fox and host Jesse Watters apologized on-air. Fox said in a statement: "Governor Newsom's transparent publicity stunt is frivolous and designed to chill free speech critical of him. We will defend this case vigorously and look forward to it being dismissed." Newsom is a Democrat and potential presidential contender in 2028, and has made several appearances on Fox News. The network is a favorite of conservatives, and its on-air talent includes many supporters of Trump, a Republican. Its parent, Fox Corp, is incorporated in Delaware. According to the complaint, Newsom spoke by phone with Trump for about 16 minutes late on 6 June, or early 7 June Eastern Daylight Time, soon after protests broke out in Los Angeles following federal immigration raids. Trump later sent National Guard troops and 700 Marines to the state, bypassing the governor. Newsom said he did not speak again with Trump, and confirmed this after Trump falsely told reporters on 10 June he had spoken with the governor "a day ago." The complaint said Fox nonetheless intentionally distorted the facts by making a misleading video clip and multiple false statements about the timing of the last call, in an effort to brand Newsom a liar and curry favor with Trump. "Why would Newsom lie and claim Trump never called him?" Watters said on 10 June on his show "Jesse Watters Primetime," according to the complaint. Watters' report was accompanied by a chyron, a banner caption along the bottom of a TV screen, that said "Gavin Lied About Trump's Call," the complaint added. According to the complaint, Fox's claim that Newsom lied was "calculated to provoke outrage and cause Governor Newsom significant harm," by making people less likely to support his causes, donate to his campaigns, or vote for him in elections. Newsom's lawyers said it was "perhaps unsurprising" that the 79-year-old Trump might confuse the dates, but Fox's decision to cover up the error "cannot be so easily dismissed." To prevail in the lawsuit, Newsom would have to show Fox acted with actual malice, meaning it knew its statements were false or had reckless disregard for their truth. The standard comes from New York Times v. Sullivan, a landmark 1964 US Supreme Court decision. Trump has also turned to the courts to address perceived defamation by news networks. He reached a US$15 million (NZ$25 million) settlement with Walt Disney-owned ABC last December after suing over an inaccurate claim that a jury found him liable for rape, rather than sexual assault, in a civil lawsuit. Trump also sued CBS for US$20 billion (NZ$33 billion) over its editing of a "60 Minutes" interview with 2024 Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris. A mediator has reportedly proposed a US$20 million (NZ$33 million) settlement with CBS' parent Paramount Global. - Reuters

Trump ends trade talks with Canada over tax on US tech firms
Trump ends trade talks with Canada over tax on US tech firms

RNZ News

time7 hours ago

  • RNZ News

Trump ends trade talks with Canada over tax on US tech firms

By Beiyi Seow , AFP US President Donald Trump meets with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on 6 May 2025. Photo: AFP / Mandel Ngan President Donald Trump is calling off trade negotiations with Canada in retaliation for taxes impacting US tech firms, adding that Ottawa will learn of their new tariff rate within a week. Trump was referring to Canada's digital services tax, which was enacted last year and forecast to bring in C$5.9 billion (NZ$7.1 billion) over five years. While the measure is not new, US service providers will be "on the hook for a multi-billion dollar payment in Canada" come 30 June, noted the Computer & Communications Industry Association recently. The three percent tax applies to large or multinational companies such as Alphabet, Amazon, and Meta that provide digital services to Canadians, and Washington has previously requested dispute settlement talks over the matter. "Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately," Trump said in a post on his Truth Social platform. He called the country "very difficult" to trade with. Canada may have been spared some of Trump's most sweeping duties, such as a 10 percent levy on nearly all US trading partners, but it faces a separate tariff regime. Trump has also imposed steep levies on imports of steel, aluminum, and autos. Last week, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said Ottawa will adjust its 25 percent counter tariffs on US steel and aluminum - in response to a doubling of US levies on the metals to 50 percent - if a bilateral trade deal was not reached in 30 days. "We will continue to conduct these complex negotiations in the best interest of Canadians," Carney said, adding that he had not spoken to Trump following the US president's announcement. Trump's latest salvo targeting Canada came shortly after Washington and Beijing confirmed finalising a framework to move forward on trade. Beijing said Washington would lift "restrictive measures" while China would "review and approve" items under export controls. A priority for Washington in talks with Beijing had been ensuring the supply of the rare earths essential for products including electric vehicles, hard drives, and national defence equipment. China, which dominates global production of the elements, began requiring export licenses in early April, a move widely viewed as a response to Trump's blistering tariffs. The two sides agreed after talks in Geneva in May to temporarily lower steep tit-for-tat duties on each other's products. China also committed to easing some non-tariff countermeasures but US officials later accused Beijing of violating the pact and slow-walking export license approvals for rare earths. They eventually agreed on a framework to move forward with their Geneva consensus following talks in London this month. A White House official told AFP on Thursday that the Trump administration and China had "agreed to an additional understanding for a framework to implement the Geneva agreement." This clarification came after the US president told an event that Washington had inked a deal relating to trade with China, without providing details. Under the deal, China "will review and approve applications for the export control items that meet the requirements in accordance with the law," China's commerce ministry said. "The US side will correspondingly cancel a series of restrictive measures against China," it added. Dozens of economies, although not China, face a 9 July deadline for steeper duties to kick in - rising from a current 10 percent. It remains to be seen if other countries facing the higher US tariffs will successfully reach agreements to avoid them before the deadline. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that Washington could wrap up its agenda for trade deals by September, indicating more agreements could be concluded although talks were likely to extend past July. Speaking to Fox Business, Bessent reiterated there are 18 key partners Washington is focused on pacts with. "If we can ink 10 or 12 of the important 18, there are another important 20 relationships, then I think we could have trade wrapped up by Labor Day," Bessent said, referring to the US holiday on 1 September. The White House suggested the July deadline could be extended, or Trump could pick a tariff rate for countries if there was no agreement. Wall Street's major indexes, which bounced early Friday (local time) on hopes for deals, lost some ground after Trump called off Canada talks. - AFP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store