
From Laos to Brazil, Trump's tariffs leave a lot of losers. But even the winners will pay a price
The closest thing to winners may be the countries that caved to Trump's demands -- and avoided even more pain. But it's unclear whether anyone will be able to claim victory in the long run -- even the United States, the intended beneficiary of Trump's protectionist policies.
'In many respects, everybody's a loser here,' said Barry Appleton, co-director of the Center for International Law at the New York Law School.
Barely six months after he returned to the White House, Trump has demolished the old global economic order. Gone is one built on agreed-upon rules. In its place is a system in which Trump himself sets the rules, using America's enormous economic power to punish countries that won't agree to one-sided trade deals and extracting huge concessions from the ones that do.
'The biggest winner is Trump,' said Alan Wolff, a former US trade official and deputy director-general at the World Trade Organization. 'He bet that he could get other countries to the table on the basis of threats, and he succeeded -- dramatically.' Everything goes back to what Trump calls 'Liberation Day' -- April 2 -- when the president announced 'reciprocal' taxes of up to 50 percent on imports from countries with which the United States ran trade deficits and 10 percent 'baseline' taxes on almost everyone else.
He invoked a 1977 law to declare the trade deficit a national emergency that justified his sweeping import taxes. That allowed him to bypass Congress, which traditionally has had authority over taxes, including tariffs — all of which is now being challenged in court.
Trump retreated temporarily after his Liberation Day announcement triggered a rout in financial markets and suspended the reciprocal tariffs for 90 days to give countries a chance to negotiate.
Eventually, some of them did, caving to Trump's demands to pay what four months ago would have seemed unthinkably high tariffs for the privilege of continuing to sell into the vast American market.
The United Kingdom agreed to 10 percent tariffs on its exports to the United States — up from 1.3 percent before Trump amped up his trade war with the world. The US demanded concessions even though it had run a trade surplus, not a deficit, with the UK for 19 straight years.
The European Union and Japan accepted US tariffs of 15 percent. Those are much higher than the low single-digit rates they paid last year — but lower than the tariffs he was threatening (30 percent on the EU and 25 percent on Japan).
Also cutting deals with Trump and agreeing to hefty tariffs were Pakistan, South Korea, Vietnam, Indonesia and the Philippines.
Even countries that saw their tariffs lowered from April without reaching a deal are still paying much higher tariffs than before Trump took office. Angola's tariff, for instance, dropped to 15 percent from 32 percent in April, but in 2022 it was less than 1.5 percent. And while Trump administration cut Taiwan's tariff to 20 percent from 32 percent in April, the pain will still be felt.
'20 percent from the beginning has not been our goal, we hope that in further negotiations we will get a more beneficial and more reasonable tax rate,' Taiwan's president Lai Ching-te told reporters in Taipei Friday.
Trump also agreed to reduce the tariff on the tiny southern African kingdom of Lesotho to 15 percent from the 50 percent he'd announced in April, but the damage may already have been done there.
Countries that didn't knuckle under -- and those that found other ways to incur Trump's wrath -- got hit harder.
Even some poorer countries were not spared. Laos' annual economic output comes to $2,100 per person and Algeria's $5,600 - versus America's $75,000. Nonetheless, Laos got rocked with a 40 percent tariff and Algeria with a 30 percent levy.
Trump slammed Brazil with a 50 percent import tax largely because he didn't like the way it was treating former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, who is facing trial for trying to lose his electoral defeat in 2022. Never mind that the US has exported more to Brazil than it's imported every year since 2007.
Trump's decision to plaster a 35 percent tariff on longstanding US ally Canada was partly designed to threaten Ottawa for saying it would recognize a Palestinian state. Trump is a staunch supporter of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Switzerland was clobbered with a 39 percent import tax -- even higher than the 31 percent Trump originally announced on April 2.
"The Swiss probably wish that they had camped in Washington' to make a deal, said Wolff, now senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. "They're clearly not at all happy.' Fortunes may change if Trump's tariffs are upended in court. Five American businesses and 12 states are suing the president, arguing that his Liberation Day tariffs exceeded his authority under the 1977 law.
In May, the US Court of International Trade, a specialized court in New York, agreed and blocked the tariffs, although the government was allowed to continue collecting them while its appeal wend its way through the legal system, and may likely end up at the US Supreme Court. In a hearing Thursday, the judges on the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit sounded skeptical about Trump's justifications for the tariffs .
'If (the tariffs) get struck down, then maybe Brazil's a winner and not a loser,' Appleton said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
![[Andrew Sheng] Three-body problem in geoeconomics](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F08%2F04%2Fnews-p.v1.20250804.ac54d99281a14a03865f3e2d5fdb9ec3_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![[Andrew Sheng] Three-body problem in geoeconomics](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fall-logos-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fkoreaherald.com.png&w=48&q=75)
Korea Herald
3 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Andrew Sheng] Three-body problem in geoeconomics
Asian economies are still anxiously assessing how to compete for trade with the United States after missing the Aug. 1 deadline for the Trump administration's tariff negotiations. The Philippines' tariff rate for exports to the US is reportedly down to 19 percent. However, one Filipino lawmaker says it's 6 percent. Indonesia's rate is down to 19 percent; Vietnam's is down to 20 percent. Hours before the deadline, Malaysian, Thai and Cambodian leaders seemed to be on the cusp of reaching deals with the US. Meanwhile, Laos is bracing for stiff tariffs of up to 40 percent. This is MAGA economics in a nutshell. Washington has traded in a multilateral approach to hegemony for a 'divide and conquer' strategy that makes smaller economies compete against each other for the superpower's favor. Against the largest importer in the world, small exporters have no cards, as Trump might say. As governments scramble to negotiate deals, businesses may have to close entire factories or shift to countries with lower tariffs. If current profit margins are too thin, higher tariff rates are likely to put further stress on the cost of doing business. Vietnam, Cambodia and Bangladesh emerged as big winners from the first phase of the US-China trade war in the late 2010s. But Cambodia faced a tariff of as much as 40 percent, compared with Bangladesh's 35 percent rate. On Aug. 1, Trump basically equalized tariffs by putting Cambodia and Bangladesh at 19 percent, versus Vietnam at 20 percent. This climate of fierce geoeconomic competition is ushering in a wave of uncertainty. The unpredictable nature of who will win or lose from the US' 'divide and conquer' strategy produces more questions than answers. Meanwhile, any attempt to use technology to stay ahead of the game may be in vain, even as the US doubles down on its artificial intelligence AI policy. In July, the Trump administration released 'America's AI action plan.' According to Trump, 'As (the US') global competitors race to exploit these technologies (such as AI), it is a national security imperative for the United States to achieve and maintain unquestioned and unchallenged global technological dominance.' In a unipolar order, the hegemon dictates the rules. After World War II, the global economy was comparatively stable. Under Pax Americana, one set of rules governed free trade and capital flows. However, the world system wasn't without contradiction. Europe and Russia began to wield more influence after recovering from World War II. The rise of China, India and emerging economies such as Indonesia and Brazil was also on the horizon. The unipolar world order gradually gave way to a multipolar one. During the Cold War, Mao Zedong divided the world into the 'first world' of superpowers, the 'second world' of advanced economies and the 'third world' of non-aligned countries. One might mathematically approach this fragmentation through the N-body equation, more popularly fictionalized by Chinese author Liu Cixin in his science fiction novel, 'The Three-Body Problem.' When physicist Isaac Newton studied the motion of planets, he was able to predict the trajectory of two bodies mathematically. But the three-body problem has no elegant mathematical solution to predict the outcome of multiple-body gravitational interactions. Each body's motion is influenced by the changing gravitational pull of the other two or more bodies, creating complex interactions that current mathematics cannot accurately explain. The system illustrates chaotic behavior characterized by a lack of information and random variables. The three-body problem illustrates science's limitations, as well as the limitations of historically informed paradigms used to understand contemporary times and predict the future. AI stems from this paradigm as it combines existing data, computing power and algorithms in the form of large language models. The US believes AI could shape the outcome of several geonomic puzzles. Will AI help MAGA return to the unipolar order? Is the bipolar order between the US and China stable? Will a multipolar order comprising three or more powers lead to conflict and more disorder? National security thinkers posit that if they collect real-time data through social media and intelligence-gathering, gain superiority in computing and apply the most advanced learning models, they can beat the opposition. If only life were that simple. Chinese strategist Sun Tzu understood the importance of gathering intelligence. War is all about operating in uncertainty. Decision-making is difficult in a fast-changing environment plagued by misinformation, disinformation and information gaps. AI can use algorithms to generate 'synthetic data,' but all data exporters know the fatal flaw of 'garbage in, garbage out.' Bad data leads to bad decisions. Hence, there is no perfect AI solution. The clash of civilizations and economies on a global scale is a system-wide competition between entangled systems that are not independent of one another. China, being an older civilization compared to the US, understands the need for resilient systems, whether they be supply chains or governing institutions. Ultimately, these systems are underpinned by people and the planet we live on. After all, decisions are inevitably made by people, even if they use AI. Climate change only adds new risks, making outcomes even more unpredictable. The world system will be shaped by how each competitor learns from mistakes or missteps and takes action to be more resilient against future shocks. We have no algorithm to predict how the contest for the 21st century will unfold. As the Spanish poet Antonio Machado profoundly put it, 'Traveler, there is no road, the road is made by walking.' Andrew Sheng is a distinguished fellow at the Asia Global Institute, University of Hong Kong, and chairman of the George Town Institute of Open and Advanced Studies, Wawasan Open University. The views expressed here are the writer's own. — Ed.


Korea Herald
12 hours ago
- Korea Herald
FM Cho says US troops in S. Korea to remain as is amid drawdown reports
South Korea's top diplomat has said the US forces stationed in the country and their role will remain unchanged amid ongoing speculation that President Donald Trump's administration may reduce troop levels as part of a military posture adjustment. Foreign Minister Cho Hyun made the remarks in an interview with The Washington Post, as speculation persists over the possibility of the 28,500-strong US Forces Korea being reduced for use in operations outside the Korean Peninsula as the Trump administration prioritizes deterring an assertive China. Such a possibility has gained traction amid a growing view that Washington could push for a troop reduction, alongside other demands to reshape the alliance with Seoul, including increased defense spending, as part of broader efforts to "modernize" the alliance with a focus on countering China. "We are talking with the United States, but there is no concern about the US forces in Korea. We believe that they will remain as such, and their role will remain as of today," Cho said in the interview, published Sunday local time. Asked what the potential troop drawdown would mean for bilateral relations, Cho cast it as hypothetical and said he does not believe it will happen. "I don't think it will happen. I have met a number of senators this time, and they all have assured me that it will not be the case," he said. Cho was visiting Washington last week for talks with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and meetings with US government officials, lawmakers and experts from think tanks. Regarding China, Cho said that South Korea, led by the new Lee Jae Myung government, seeks to maintain good relations with China, although its economic and geopolitical rise has become "somewhat problematic" for its neighbors. "But we will try to send a message to China: 'We want to maintain a good relationship and (see) you abide by international law in not only bilateral but in regional affairs,'" he said. In response, the Chinese Embassy in Seoul emphasized its amicable ties with neighboring countries. "China currently maintains favorable relations with all neighboring nations, and the vast majority of them regard strengthening friendly cooperation with China as a priority in their foreign policy," the embassy said. Cho said that South Korea will work with the neighboring Japan to address various challenges posed by China, noting the need for engaging with Beijing, rather than attempting to contain it. "I've emphasized that all of these things will be in good collaboration with our ally, the United States," he said. On the recent tariff agreement reached with the Trump administration, Cho assessed that it was a "win-win" proposal that aims to reduce the trade imbalance for the U.S. while giving South Korea a chance to "remain at the top" in manufacturing areas. "Korea was not singled out to rebalance the trade imbalance," he said. "We believe it is extremely important for us and for the United States as well because of geopolitical challenges we have in Northeast Asia." On Thursday, the allies agreed to lower the U.S. reciprocal tariff rate for South Korea to 15 percent from the originally proposed 25 percent. South Korea, in return, committed to investing US$350 billion in US industries. (Yonhap)
![[Contribution] Is China equity recovery durable?](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F08%2F04%2Fnews-p.v1.20250730.f513ce50602c41fb9e37a37d8ec73fce_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![[Contribution] Is China equity recovery durable?](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fall-logos-bucket.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fkoreaherald.com.png&w=48&q=75)
Korea Herald
17 hours ago
- Korea Herald
[Contribution] Is China equity recovery durable?
China's equity rally faces a wall of scepticism after years of false dawns. However, this time could be different: Beijing's crackdown on irrational competition in key industries and sustained stimulus, compounded by moderating US trade rhetoric ahead of a potential Trump-Xi meeting, are setting the stage for a sustainable equity market rebound most are missing. The Hang Seng index and MSCI China index have soared over 25 percent year to date. However, China equities still registered a net fund outflow this year. This illustrates that global investors have yet to gain high conviction in China equities. Such sentiment could mainly be attributable to policy uncertainty and lacklustre equity performance in recent years, among other reasons. We see reasons for optimism for a durable recovery in China equities. Early signs of economic improvement are emerging, including stronger-than-expected 6.4 percent year-on-year retail sales in May. Sceptics may view this as bad news, since this, when combined with the improving market performance, may signal no urgency for further policy stimulus to revitalize domestic demand. We argue otherwise. There are two trends on which authorities are placing increased emphasis: rising savings rates and persistent deflationary pressures. The Chinese are known for saving up for the "rainy day." However, the acceleration in the household savings rate from 44 percent in 2023 to 55 percent in 2024 has been startling, masking concerns about economic uncertainty. This uneasiness is understandable given the challenging global environment. While US-China tensions have eased of late, tariffs on Chinese imports have gone up. Meanwhile, excess manufacturing capacity, after front-loading of exports to beat US tariffs fades, could sustain deflation. For instance, producer price deflation worsened more than expected to minus 3.6 percent year-on-year in June. There is a risk China's retail sales growth could decelerate without incremental stimulus. Subsidized trade-in consumption programs launched last year, which contributed to strong retail sales in the first half, will likely lose steam in the coming months. Given consumption is a key engine of China's growth, we see an increased likelihood of additional policy measures to drive retail growth tactically and structurally. Policies will likely include ways to widen the scope of consumption subsidies and ease restrictions on household registration, or 'hukou.' Hukou relaxation could be strategically bundled with housing stimulus and social safety net reforms. On one end of the demographic spectrum, retirees could be incentivized to shift to lower-tiered cities or rural areas with lower costs of living and better living conditions. The lower-tiered cities suffering the largest housing supply gluts could turn the unoccupied housing projects into social housing developments for older adults. Affordable housing projects could also be developed in the outskirts of top-tiered cities, with the aim to attract younger, educated migrants, who, encouraged by better career prospects, could establish families sooner. Structurally, China is seeking to spur childbirth by recently announcing the first nationwide cash handout program for every child under the age of three. Furthermore, the nation will likely accelerate the upgrade of elderly care goods and health care services to stimulate consumption of the 'silver hair' segment, including the development of humanoid robots for elderly care. Recent official meetings since July have further reinforced our optimism about China's policy outlook. On 1 July, the Central Commission for Finance and Economic Affairs called for the need to curb irrational price competition, accelerate the eradication of obsolete capacity and promote local government standards to support businesses. Following the meeting, the State Council pledged on 16 July to regulate the irrational price competition in the EV industry. The State Administration for Market Regulation also met with major online food delivery platforms to stem unfair competition. We believe these measures align with China's shift in growth focus from quantity to quality. These measures will help mitigate deflation, boding well for China equities. There is no coincidence that the policy-sensitive onshore A shares index, which has underperformed Hong Kong's Hang Seng index YTD, has been catching up with the latter in July. Backed by improving fundamentals, China's equities are at the cusp of a turnaround, with earnings expectations bottoming and valuations ticking up. China equity valuations, partly constrained by low investor positioning, still trail their historical and peer averages, with a price-to-earnings multiple of 12-13x notably below the US level of above 22x. China's earnings prospects are also brightening as pricing and profit margin trends stabilize with policymakers focusing on rationalizing competition and capacity. Rising prospect of a Trump-Xi meeting this year, the dollar's ongoing weakness and a peak in trade tensions are broadly supportive of our positive view on global equities. Within our globally diversified allocation, we are overweight Asia ex-Japan equities. Within Asia, excluding Japan, we believe China equities will generate excess returns (alpha) thanks to Beijing's concerted and targeted policy measures to sustain growth, reduce capacity and overcome deflation. That said, we reiterate the importance of diversifying across asset classes, including quality bonds, gold and alternative investments, to produce optimal returns and protect your wealth against market volatility.