Revealed: the astonishing greenhouse gas emissions that will result from the North West Shelf project
In May the Labor government approved an extension for the project to run for an additional 40 years, from 2030 to 2070.
The extension is expected to be responsible for about 87.9m tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent every year in the decades ahead, after the gas has been exported and burned, according to Woodside's own numbers.
Despite the North West Shelf contributing 'almost nothing' in terms of Australian tax dollars, it will be responsible for emissions greater than dozens of countries and many of the world's biggest companies.
It can be hard to get your head around numbers this big.
This chart represents 87.9m tonnes of emissions (measured in carbon dioxide equivalent, or CO2-e). Each square is 500 tonnes, which is about what you would emit if you drove around Australia 125 times in an average car (which we define below the chart).
Notes and methods:
North West Shelf project extension emissions are scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions set out in the EPA application
Qantas domestic emissions are scope 1 and 2 emissions in 2023-24 as reported to the Clean Energy Regulator
Australian total agriculture emissions are the sum of agricultural emissions in the December 2024 National Greenhouse Gas Inventory
Emissions from all Australian gas plants derived from the primary fuel type in the 2023-24 electricity sector emissions data
Switzerland and Ireland total 2023 emissions sourced from Our World in Data
Apple's emissions based on information from its 2024 environmental progress report, with more information about why renewable energy certificates and offsets are excluded here
Driving around Australia emissions estimated for doing the M1 'big lap' with a fuel consumption of 6.9L/100km
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
7 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Joyce and Canavan call for new coal plants to replace renewable energy projects
Barnaby Joyce and other leading opponents of net zero by 2050 want Australia to build new coal-fired power plants, focus on gas and nuclear energy and abandon all efforts to cut carbon emissions. As the former Nationals leader pushes a private member's bill to block net zero – sparking new divisions within the Liberals and Nationals this week – he said any long-term emissions reduction from renewables would not make a meaningful difference to the climate and would cost households too much. 'If you want net zero, then nuclear can give you net zero at a vastly more affordable rate than intermittents [renewable energy],' Joyce told Guardian Australia, arguing countries including China were not cutting emissions. Sign up: AU Breaking News email 'I absolutely disagree if the rest of the world's not doing it, if it has no global effect, then it's a self-written economic suicide note.' China's emissions dipped for the first time in 2025, down 1% from their peak, amid huge government investments in renewables projects. The country is the world's biggest emitter of greenhouse gases, but is also the world's biggest supplier and installer of clean energy technology. The share of coal in China's power mix has dropped to the lowest level since 2016, to just over 50%. Joyce's bill is scheduled for debate in August when parliament returns for another sitting fortnight. Queensland Nationals senator Matt Canavan is leading the party's review of net zero policies in the wake of the 3 May election. He said Australia should build new coal-fired power stations, like developments happening in China, the US, India and Indonesia. 'I think we should put Australians first because nothing we do is going to change any temperature of the globe one iota by not building a coal-fired power station,' Canavan said. 'But if we do build some new cheap coal-fired power stations, we just may save manufacturing jobs in this country, bring down the cost of energy and bring down the cost of everyday goods for Australians.' According to the CSIRO's 2024-25 GenCost report, renewables, firmed by gas and backed by transmission, remain the cheapest new form of electricity generation technology. Nationals leader David Littleproud said on Thursday the party would have a settled position within 'a couple of months'. Net zero underpins Australia's participation in the Paris climate agreement. Independent authorities, including the CSIRO, say failing to stem carbon emissions will lead to changes in weather including extreme heat, heavy rainfall, coastal inundation, bushfires and drought, while exacerbating health and wellbeing problems and causing destruction of ecosystems and species. Joyce has teamed up with his former rival and another ex-Nationals leader, Michael McCormack. McCormack said emissions should not be curbed at the expense of manufacturing, farming or food supply. 'By constructing tens of thousands of kilometres of transmission lines across rural and regional Australia in pursuit of a false ideology, the government is industrialising fertile rural farmland on a massive scale,' he said. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion During their 48-hour split with the Liberals in May, the Nationals included nuclear energy policy as a key demand for reuniting the Coalition. Many of the opponents of net zero are advocates for nuclear being included in Australia's energy supply. The shadow energy and emissions reductions minister, Dan Tehan, confirmed this week his review for the Liberal party would take nine to 12 months. 'The key focus between now and Christmas is going to be on gas,' he said in a press conference with the opposition leader, Sussan Ley. 'We need to bring more gas on to the system, but also we need to explore carbon capture and storage.' Coalition frontbencher Andrew Hastie helped win support for an anti-net zero motion at last weekend's Western Australia Liberal state conference. He did not respond to requests for comment from the Guardian about alternatives to net zero, but said in an email to supporters his opposition 'reflects a growing concern from mainstream Australians about our expensive energy bills, unreliable supply, and the erosion of our national sovereignty'. Former prime minister Tony Abbott is cheering on anti-net zero moves from outside parliament, including in an Institute of Public Affairs podcast this week. 'If we are in favour of net zero, all of these economy-damaging measures are justified. If we want to avoid the economy-damaging measures, perhaps we do need to make that very symbolic act of saying, 'well, actually, we're not committed to net zero,'' he said. In an interview with former Canadian conservative politician Derek Fildebrandt in June, Abbott said Australia should continue to rely on fossil fuels. He said cutting emissions would cause 'us to live like the Amish, or worse'. 'If climate change is approached as a moral issue, the left wins. If climate change is approached as an economic issue, the right wins,' he said. 'Yes, I accept that climate does change, that mankind does make a difference, and that we should do what we can to reduce emissions, but I would always add this critical rider – but not if it costs you your job, costs us our industries, and puts up your cost of living.'
The Guardian
7 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Western United's multimillion-dollar loss highlights A-Leagues' ongoing struggles
Western United is haemorrhaging cash at a rate of close to a million dollars every month, but as the A-Leagues pivot to focus on financial sustainability officials are confident the competition's conga line of outgoing transfers is a positive sign for the local game. The Tarneit-based outfit reported a loss of almost $11m for the 2023/24 financial year in accounts lodged to Asic this week, following a deficit of more than $12m for the preceding period. Liabilities exceeded assets by more than $55m, underscoring the urgent need to conclude the deal announced in May to sell the club to the US-based Kaminski group and its local affiliate, KAM Melbourne. The club is due to appear next week at the latest hearing in a winding-up process in federal court brought by creditors. 'The injection of capital from KAM Melbourne is progressing well and conversations are ongoing with all relevant stakeholders,' Western United said in a statement on Friday. 'With A-League Men pre-season well under way, we are looking forward to finalising this process shortly and sharing some positive developments in the near future.' The state of Western United remains a concern to A-League officials, but the off-season has not been all doom and gloom for Australia's main domestic leagues. The existence of Canberra United in the ALW has been secured for another year after the ACT government agreed to a new funding package for the 2025/26 season. While League operator Australian Professional Leagues (APL) reported crowds in the ALM were up 10% last season, along with a 9% increase in Channel 10 audiences, and cumulative attendance of almost 1.6 million fans, the highest since 2016/17. However, there is tension between the A-Leagues' identity as a development league and its standing as an entertainment product in the Australian marketplace, particularly competing against the BBL which is preparing for a possible private equity injection. The APL's executive chair, Stephen Conroy, has largely avoided press since taking on the role in February, and the organisation declined to comment about the state of the A-Leagues on Friday. Conroy announced in April a lower salary cap would be introduced in an effort to reduce club costs, but failed to consult Professional Footballers Australia prior to the announcement. The PFA chief executive, Beau Busch, said the next 12 months 'offer a pivotal opportunity to reset and strengthen' the ALM and ALW. 'The players are determined to shape the future of the professional leagues through the establishment of a clear, long-term strategic vision,' he said. Sign up to Australia Sport Get a daily roundup of the latest sports news, features and comment from our Australian sports desk after newsletter promotion Outgoing men's transfers tallied $15.7m in 2024/25, an average of more than $800,000 each, confirming the league's as a growing player in the global football economy. In the past two seasons there have been 46 deals worth nearly $38m, compared with the three previous seasons when 39 transfers netted less than $12m. Clubs have earned even more due to sell-on clauses such as the one in Adelaide United's sale of Nestory Irankdunda to Bayern Munich, which was triggered by his move this month to Championship club Watford. Socceroos winger Craig Goodwin has returned to South Australia this off-season as the competition's highest-profile signing after his stint in Saudi Arabia. But the league has lost entertainers such as Marco Tilio, Daniel Arzani, Noah Botic, Adrian Segecic and Nicolas Milanovic, as well as Adelaide's homegrown veteran Stefan Mauk who was allowed to leave for a club in Vietnam under a paid loan arrangement. The exodus continues in the A-League Women with the recent overseas transfers of Matildas Emily Gielnik, Alex Chidiac and Jessika Nash, as well as Kahli Johnson who moved in February. The league continues to face reputational challenges, including concerns around match-fixing and embarrassments such as Perth Glory's 9-0 loss to AC Milan in an exhibition match on Thursday. Momentum for the A-League Women after the 2023 Women's World Cup has also stalled, and the entry of Auckland and Macarthur into the competition has been repeatedly delayed. The APL is preparing to enter negotiations on its next broadcast agreement starting in 2026-27.
The Guardian
7 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Adani promised Australia billions from its Carmichael mine but it hasn't paid a cent in tax. How did we get here?
It was entirely foreseeable, and has resulted in billions of dollars in forgone revenue for Australia. But just how did policymakers fail to extract a single cent in company tax from Adani's Carmichael coalmine, even though it opened during the start of a commodity price boom? To understand how it came about, you must first rewind to 2010, a period that coincided with a sharp escalation in the climate wars that would eventually tear through the political corridors of Canberra. Against that backdrop, the Indian conglomerate proposed a coalmine to extract up to 60m tonnes per year, for 150 years, making it one of the world's biggest. It would also open up the untapped Galilee Basin, ushering in a new period of resources prosperity, especially for central Queensland. The economic promise was enticing. At its peak, such an operation would create more than 10,000 full-time jobs, according to an Adani consultant's report published in 2013. The then head of Adani mining, Jeyakumar Janakaraj, said the Australian operations would deliver $22bn in taxes and royalties to be invested 'right back into frontline services'. The '10,000 jobs [and] $22bn in royalties and taxes' pledge became a mantra that was even featured in Adani TV advertisements. Sign up: AU Breaking News email It would be a win-win for the state and federal governments – royalties would flow to the state and company tax to the commonwealth – both of which needed to issue approvals. The Carmichael emissions would, of course, be colossal, producing 4.7bn tonnes of CO2-equivalent over its lifetime, once the mine, its operations and the burning of its coal were taken into account, according to analysis by the Australia Institute at the time. Annual emissions would be double the average produced by Tokyo, and three times that of New Delhi. The ensuing battle between environmentalists and the coalminer divided communities; but Adani's jobs and economic benefit pledge seemed irresistible – until it changed. In 2015, conservationists went to the Queensland land court, seeking a recommendation that Adani's applications for an environmental approval and mining lease for Carmichael be refused. The research director at the Australia Institute, Rod Campbell, says 'Adani's lawyers realised that the 10,000 jobs claim was unsupportable, so they bit the bullet'. Campbell, who provided economic analysis for the proceedings opposing Adani, says the coalminer changed consultants and argued in court for a more modest jobs claim 'but otherwise sang the praises of the mine'. The new economic models brought the expected job numbers down to fewer than 1,500. By 2015, the anticipated tonnes coming out of the mine had also reduced, from 60m a year to 40m; it would later reduce to 10m. But the projected corporate tax take still appeared strong, with the project forecast to generate about $400m a year under the new forecasts. Adani's modelling was broadly accepted by the court, even though critics pointed out it didn't account for tax minimisation strategies. By 2017, Adani's bid for a subsidised commonwealth loan was unravelling, and global banks were concerned about the economics and reputational damage of funding the new coal project. The mine's supporters doubled down, led by industry groups including the Minerals Council of Australia (MCA), which called on policymakers to back the project. The MCA chief executive, Tania Constable, said in 2018 the Queensland and Australian economies would benefit from thousands of new regional jobs. 'And through mining taxes and royalties, the Carmichael mine will generate billions of dollars for taxpayers over decades to fund nurses, teachers, police, hospitals, roads and other services and infrastructure for Queensland families and communities,' Constable said. The MCA was contacted for comment. Adani would go on to finance the project itself, although it would be a smaller project than it had envisaged, given the lack of external funding. 'The coal will be sold to customers in the Asia-Pacific region at index adjusted pricing, which means all taxes and royalties will be paid here in Australia,' Adani said in late 2021, after assembling its first shipment of thermal coal at the port. The Indian conglomerate couldn't have timed the project any better. In late 2021, prices for energy commodities had started to surge in line with the rising tension between Russia and Ukraine. Coal prices then spiked to record highs after the Russian invasion in early 2022. In its first few months of operation, Adani's mine generated more than $32.5m in revenue, according to accounts lodged with the regulator. But it recorded an operating loss after costs, leading to zero tax payable. This pattern would repeat, even as revenue increased. In the 2025 reporting period, it earned $1.27bn in revenue, but once again recorded a paper loss, as various related-party transactions and interest payments erased profits. Tim Buckley, a former investment banker and the director of Climate Energy Finance, describes Adani's finances as an 'extremely complex, opaque corporate structure'. Jason Ward, the principal analyst at the Centre for International Corporate Tax Accountability and Research, says the volume of related-party transactions is 'pretty unprecedented' and that it is set up to never pay tax. 'Every page of their financials is like, 'bing, bing, warning bells going off',' says Ward. Adani has paid royalties – payments made to governments to extract state-owned minerals – with a $78.6m payment in the 2025 accounts, and $83.5m in 2024. Its most recent accounts list just 84 direct employees at the mine, however it uses a mining services provider to hire other workers. A spokesperson for Adani's Australian mining business, which is branded Bravus Mining and Resources, says Adani has invested more than $2.5bn into Australia's economy. 'Today, more than 1,200 Queenslanders are employed at the Carmichael mine in full-time operational roles to produce high-quality thermal coal for the export market,' the Bravus spokesperson says. 'Developing nations in the Asia-Pacific region use coal from the Carmichael mine alongside renewables to provide reliable and affordable energy solutions that help reduce poverty and power growth.' While there is no suggestion Adani has acted illegally, several politicians have expressed frustration that a large resources company can pay less company tax than a low-paid worker pays in income tax. The independent senator David Pocock said on X: 'Why on earth do successive [governments] keep allowing giant multinational companies to reap super profits from the sale of our resources without paying tax?' Independent MP Zali Steggall says Adani is a 'cautionary tale', and that policymakers should reform the approvals process to place conditions on miners to meet their stated promises. She says companies invariably overstate project benefits which 'magically disappear once the operations commence, especially when you're talking about foreign-owned corporations'. 'Time and time again, we see state and federal ministers and governments approve projects on flimsy assurances that don't come true,' says Steggall. 'It's time there was proper accountability for Australian resources so that we stop giving it away in the manner we are at the moment.' Jonathan Barrett is Guardian Australia's business editor
