Benjamin Netanyahu vows ‘there will be no Hamas' in post-war Gaza
US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that Israel had agreed on terms for a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza and urged Hamas to accept the deal before conditions worsen.
The US leader has been increasing pressure on the Israeli government and Hamas to broker a ceasefire and hostage agreement, and bring about an end to the war.
Hamas said in a brief statement on Wednesday that it had received a proposal from the mediators and was holding talks with them to 'bridge gaps' to return to the negotiating table to try to reach a ceasefire agreement.
Mr Trump said the 60-day period would be used to work toward ending the war, something Israel says it will not accept until Hamas is defeated.
He said that a deal might come together as soon as next week.
But Hamas' response, which emphasised its demand that the war end, raised questions about whether the latest offer could materialise into an actual pause in fighting.
Hamas official Taher al-Nunu said that the militant group was 'ready and serious regarding reaching an agreement'.
He said Hamas was 'ready to accept any initiative that clearly leads to the complete end to the war'.
A Hamas delegation is expected to meet Egyptian and Qatari mediators in Cairo on Wednesday to discuss the proposal, according to an Egyptian official.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Gaza rescuers say 12 killed in Israeli strike on shelter
Gaza's civil defence agency has said an Israeli air strike has hit a school sheltering displaced people, killing at least 12, mostly women and children. A civil defence official said the strike hit the Mustafa Hafez School, which he said was sheltering displaced people in the Al-Rimal neighbourhood in western Gaza City. The Israeli military said it "will try to look into" the report. Separately, Ireland is to provide €4 million to support children in Palestine access education. The funding will be used to support the delivery of teacher training, provide school materials and help rebuild school buildings in war torn Gaza. it bring to €26m Ireland's support for the people of Gaza and Palestine this year. Ireland has provided almost €80m in funding since October 2023, when the war between Israel and Hamas began following the Hamas attack on southern Israel. In a statement, Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs Simon Harris said Ireland's support for schools is a critical part of the country's "longstanding partnership with Palestine. In Gaza, our ongoing support for UNRWA continues to deliver vital remote learning to almost 300,000 children living in a war zone. "Since Israel launched a military operation in the West Bank in January, more than 40,000 people have been displaced. It is vital that the international community maintains its focus on the violence and displacement occurring in the West Bank."
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Gaza ceasefire hopes grow as Occupied Territories Bill continues to move through stages
Good morning. Hopes of a ceasefire in Gaza are tentatively growing and the story makes our front page lead this morning, even as health authorities there reported that the death toll had passed 57,000 . Sally Hayden writes from Jerusalem that Hamas was examining new ceasefire offers received from mediators Egypt and Qatar, but repeated that it wants an end to the war and the withdrawal of Israeli troops. Gideon Saar, the Israeli foreign minister, cited 'positive signs' in the talks to end the war in Gaza and free the hostages, the New York Times reported, though prime minister Binyamin Netanyhu repeated that there would be 'no more Hamas . . . We are not going back to that.' READ MORE With US pressure for a ceasefire seemingly increasing, we will likely know more today. Keep an eye on Truth Social. And obv. In few places has Gaza roiled domestic politics as it has in Ireland, with the Government under constant pressure from Opposition and campaigners to take action against Israel. The Government has moved slowly and cautiously on the Occupied Territories Bill – though compared to most other European governments, Dublin has been moving at warp speed. The Foreign Affairs Committee continued its pre-legislative scrutiny of the Government's new Bill last night, with Senator Frances Black among others urging the inclusion of services in the scope of legislation. The committee is expected to conclude this phase next week and then issue a report – it could yet recommend that services are included, posing a significant conundrum for the Government. The possible consequences of the bill continue to worry some in Government. Their worries will be heightened by comments yesterday by an influential US senator . It's 'blatant anti-semitism,' says foreign relations committee chairman Jim Risch. * The row about third level fees rumbles on, with Sinn Féin leader Mary Lou McDonald and Social Democrats acting leader Cian O'Callaghan raising the issue again on Leaders' Questions, where Fianna Fáil deputy leader Jack Chambers – also the Minister for Public Expenditure, so not exactly a disinterested observer in all this – was asked out straight four times if he would say whether students would have to pay €3,000 for the next academic year, or €4,000. Four times he declined to say . Earlier, the Minister for Higher Education James Lawless, whose RTE interview on Sunday kicked the whole thing off, sought to defuse the situation – a little anyway – on Kildare FM. He'll be seeking permanent reductions in the student charge during budget negotiations, he said. But could he say for sure that fees would come down? He could not . * Souvenir hunters, maybe? A portrait of Michael D Higgins h as been removed from Belfast City Hall , apparently on the orders of the new (DUP) Mayor of Belfast Tracy Kelly. Previously President Miggledy was up beside King Charles on the wall (which he would love) but Sinn Féin noticed recently that he had been deposed. Nothing is too petty for Belfast city politics. * Mayo for Sam: as talks between the EU and the Trump administration on a trade deal head into their final phase ahead of next week's deadline, meet the European Commission's trade spokesman , Mayoman Olof Gill who spent much of his childhood on Clare Island. 'I am proud that we are holding the line for liberal values,' he says. * Poll position: Paschal Donohoe is well-placed to win another term as head honcho of the Eurogroup , the powerful group of European finance ministers, writes Jack Power. Best reads Economic outlook is 'exceptionally uncertain': inside the Government's trade forum . Finn McRedmond on the necessity for the occasional long lunch . Micheal Martin is in Japan, but Irish pubs (and Irish music) got there first: Denis Staunton reports from a trad session in Tokyo . The population of Ireland has grown by a third in 20 years, according to census reports north and south . Playbook Big Jim O'Callaghan is up for justice questions at the ungodly hour – in parliamentary terms at least – of 8.45 am this morning, followed by agriculture PQs and then the final Leaders' Questions of the week at 12 noon. Government business in the afternoon includes EU rules regarding migrations – safe countries of origin, safe third countries, and a 'recommendation on a coordinated approach to the transition out of temporary protection for displaced persons from Ukraine.' There's something similar in the Seanad. It's a quieter day at the committees today. The Defence Committee will hear from a number of witnesses – including three MEPs – about the proposed abolition of the triple lock. Safe to say the witnesses from the Irish Neutrality League, the Peace and Neutrality Alliance and the Irish Anti-War Movement will not be agitating for jumping into bed with Nato. Elsewhere the Public Accounts Committee will interrogate officials from Children's Health Ireland and the National Treatment Purchase Fund. There could be skin and hair flyin' at that one alright. The Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs Simon Harris is heading for the annual Ireland-Wales Forum in Swansea, where he will meet with the First Minister of Wales, Eluned Morgan. This year's Forum will see the launch of a new Ireland-Wales Shared Statement 2030. Exciting, no?
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
Why is the United Nations not doing more to stop the starvation in Gaza?
The prognosis for life in Gaza is unimaginably bleak. A Donald Trump -brokered permanent ceasefire that sees the return of the remaining hostages taken by Hamas on October 7th, 2023 cannot come soon enough. In theory, this will see the cessation of Israel's bombardments. Whether there will be a return to UN-managed humanitarian aid distribution, replacing the death traps of the Israeli and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation aid stations, remains to be seen. Whatever happens, even if tens of thousands of Palestinians were to avoid death by starvation in the coming weeks and months, Gaza will live in rubble for at least a generation, with the permanent effects of malnutrition, war injuries, disease, familial death and PTSD. Basic housing, healthcare, education or social services will not be restored for years, if ever. There is no long-term Israeli vision for Gaza that involves its reconstruction under any form of Palestinian self-government. As Hamas appears to be replenishing itself to the point where some commentators believe that it has as many active fighters now (through new recruits) as it had before October 7th, the worldview of many on the Israeli right has become a self-fulfilling prophecy: any Palestinian or foreign-led protectorate government in Gaza will inevitably become infiltrated by Hamas and cannot be allowed. The Israeli plan, if there is one, appears a deliberate attempt to starve, slaughter, weaken and traumatise Gaza to the point where two million Gazans consider 'voluntary' resettlement elsewhere. We will not find out for years whether the International Court of Justice determines that Israel's actions have met the legal threshold of genocide. Where is the UN in all this? Why can it not do more? There are, in fact, two UNs: the first is the intergovernmental system, where the 193 Member States debate and pass resolutions on various matters under mandates given to them by themselves. The second is the operational system, under which the secretary general oversees the various secretariat departments and appoints the heads of UN agencies. The latter system has largely done (and continues to do) all it can, as the UN operational system can only do what the member states allow. Senior UN officials, such as human rights commissioner Volker Türk, have documented Israel's grave breaches of international humanitarian law, while continuously calling on Hamas to release the hostages. The UN special rapporteur on the Occupied Palestinian Territories, Francesca Albanese, who is not a UN official and whose pronouncements carry moral rather than legal weight, has used the term 'acts of genocide'. READ MORE [ Francesca Albanese: 'The struggle against the Mafia has marked me and my sense of justice' Opens in new window ] Nevertheless, the UN operational system has been humiliated and sidelined by an Israeli regime that loathes it, believing without evidence that Unrwa was implicated in the October 7th attacks via Hamas infiltration. For the Israeli right, allowing UN agencies to feed and shelter the Gazan population inevitably means feeding and sheltering Hamas. This leaves the UN's ability to work freely in Gaza in serious doubt. But more can be done within the intergovernmental system. While chapter VII of the UN charter authorises member states to use force in their own legitimate self-defence, UN military action 'to restore international peace and order' must be authorised by the security council. This has been done on 12 occasions since 1945, almost always with the tacit approval of the member state most concerned. What has never happened in its 80-year history is for the security council to authorise UN military action against a member state engaged in the mass killing, starvation or ethnic cleansing of either its own people or people living in disputed territory under its occupying control. To do so would require not only the approval of the security council, but also member states to supply military assets and personnel to ensure a successful military outcome, as well as support for a post-military political process. This is the context in which the UN finds itself in Gaza. As long as the Trump administration supports Israel's war aims, the US will wield its veto in the security council and permit only resolutions that call for humanitarian access and the safe return of hostages, rather than mandating action. It is, therefore, to the UN General Assembly, where resolutions are passed by simple majority, that those hoping for greater UN intervention in Gaza must turn. While the assembly has condemned Israel's 'starvation as a method of warfare', it has shied away from considering a stronger interventionist response. It shouldn't. The UN charter clearly gives it the authority to mandate peace operations and it has a track record of doing so ( as in Indonesia in 1962). While the consent of the 'host country' is required for such peace operations deployment, Israel is not the host country in Gaza, which the assembly itself recognises as Palestinian territory. The 1950 United for Peace Resolution gives the assembly the authority to consider peace and security resolutions when the security council has vetoed same. As a result, therefore, the assembly should request the security council to adopt a resolution condemning Israel's violations of international humanitarian law and Hamas's continued illegal detention of Israeli hostages, and mandating Chapter VII UN military action to forcibly open humanitarian aid corridors. Any veto would have to be explained to the assembly within 10 days. Secondly, the assembly should adopt a further resolution appointing a special representative of the secretary general for Gaza, indicating its intention to establish a peacekeeping force to ensure aid distribution and the co-ordination of reconstruction efforts. It should call upon member states to voluntary impose a trade embargo and other economic sanctions on Israel should it resist. Finally, the resolution should request other intergovernmental bodies such as the EU or the Commonwealth to explore military options to open aid corridors. [ Hagai El-Ad: Sanctions against individual settlers are hopelessly inadequate. The real settler organisation is Israel Opens in new window ] Precedents for the UN co-operating with other intergovernmental bodies in the implementation of military activity exist, most notably in Bosnia in the 1990s, where the UN authorised Nato to impose a no-fly zone. Would the EU, the Commonwealth or any individual UN member state be prepared to conduct military operations to open Gaza aid corridors, citing the approval of the general assembly? Unlikely. But such a resolution could just move the political dial and put pressure on Israel to meet its international humanitarian obligations. What is the alternative? Niall McCann worked worldwide in various electoral capacities for the United Nations Development Programme, as well as the United Nations Mission in Liberia, from 2005-2022. He is co-author of The UN at Country Level – A p ractical guide to the United Nations Operational System
