Film claims to name killer of slain journalist Shireen Abu Akleh
Abu Akleh, a Palestinian-American journalist known for her coverage of the Arab-Israeli conflict, was shot dead in Jenin in the north of the occupied West Bank while she worked, wearing a bulletproof vest marked "press."
Al Jazeera and witnesses immediately blamed the Israeli army. Then Israeli prime minister Naftali Bennett said it was probable the shots had come from Palestinian militants.
In the weeks that followed, several journalistic investigations pointed the blame at Israeli gunfire.
Months later, Israel released an internal investigation that found a "high probability" that Abu Akleh was accidentally shot by the Israeli army, which claimed it was targeting armed Palestinians.
Produced by independent news site Zeteo, the documentary "Who killed Shireen?" names for the first time the suspect as Alon Scaggio, an elite soldier.
"Israel did everything it could to conceal the soldier's identity, they wouldn't provide the US with any information. They wouldn't let the US interview him. They wouldn't give the US his statement. And they wouldn't give his name," said Dion Nissenbaum, a journalist who worked on the film.
Assisted by producer Conor Powell and reporter Fatima AbdulKarim -- who worked for The New York Times in the West Bank -- Nissenbaum, a former Wall Street Journal correspondent, consulted testimony from two Israeli soldiers present in Jenin on May 11, 2022 as well as top US officials.
- 'Intentional killing' claim -
The documentary alleges that Scaggio, then 20, had completed training for the elite Duvdevan unit just three months prior.
"He shot her intentionally. There's no question about that. The question is did he know she was a journalist and did he know she was Shireen Abu Akleh? Was it an order from above?" Nissenbaum told AFP.
"Personally, I don't think it was an order. I don't think he knew it was Shireen. Nobody ever has indicated that he could tell that it was Shireen. But she was wearing the blue flak-jacket with the word 'press' on it."
"The evidence (suggests)... it was an intentional killing of Shireen Abu Akleh. Whether or not they knew it was her or not can very well be debated, but they would have absolutely known that it was a media person or a non-combatant at a minimum," said a senior official from the administration of then US president Joe Biden, speaking in the film anonymously.
Washington did not exert significant pressure on the issue, the documentary claims, for fear of antagonizing its ally.
Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen said he called on Biden to declassify documents about the killing -- but went unanswered.
The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) said "it is the first time that a potential suspect has been named in connection with an Israeli killing of a journalist" according to its records dating back to 1992.
Impunity in the case "has effectively given Israel permission to silence hundreds more" journalists, the CPJ said.
Reporters Without Borders estimates around 200 journalists were killed in the past 18 months of Israeli strikes on Gaza.
An Israeli army spokesman condemned the unauthorized disclosure of the suspect's name despite no "definitive determination" of who shot Abu Akleh.
The soldier in question "fell during an operational activity," the army added.
Nissenbaum had initially thought Scaggio died in Gaza, but ultimately concluded he was killed in Jenin on June 27, 2024 almost two years after Abu Akleh.
gl/gw/jgc
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
27 minutes ago
- Forbes
Why Forbes Is Using Our Country's 250th Birthday To Celebrate The American Dream
T wo major surveys recently came out that merit spending time with. First, YouGov revealed its annual Trust in Media report, which encompasses 2,000 respondees, and Forbes again excelled, moving up one spot, to 4th place. The three organizations in front of us – PBS, BBC and the Weather Channel – are essentially public utilities. No traditional American media source boasts more trust than Forbes . Then Pew Research came out with a new survey on America's media polarization, and it turns out that the Forbes audience sits at the center of the political spectrum, almost precisely on the ideological equator, with equal sides on the left and right. Source: YouGov PLC, 2025, © All rights reserved These results aren't a coincidence, nor do they surprise me. Forbes benefits from consistency. While we prize great journalism and factual rigor, we don't pretend to lack a worldview. We champion entrepreneurial capitalism and free enterprise, growth and innovation, the promise of opportunity and self-determination. In a single word: success. Our terrific journalism supports our mission, and we're transparent about our brand. All of this generates massive credibility with a huge swath of the American (and global) public. As with business or political capital, credibility demands utilization. So, as we enter the second half of the year, with an eye towards 2026, we're preparing to do just that. This week, we announced our plans for Forbes 250, coinciding with America's semiquincentennial, in a way that's unique to Forbes : a yearlong celebration of the American Dream. Why do this? Because, as the surveys show, Forbes can uniquely speak to and appeal to America as a whole. At a moment of political finger-pointing, we'll instead point toward something greater: the very essence of what differentiates America, a country founded on an ideal, versus a creed. 'The Political Gap in Americans' News Sources.' Pew Research Center, Washington, D.C. (June 10, 2025) We've broken the idea of the American Dream down to six tentpoles, which we'll then delve into across our six print issues next year, surround by six live events, and extend with a stream of digital, video and social offerings. Each of these tentpoles will feature a relevant Forbes ranking of 250 people, and we'll be mindful that celebrating the American Dream means enhancing it. So we're building out six non-partisan advisory boards designed to create recommendations on doing just that. The six American Dream tentpoles, and the questions we seek to address: Equal Opportunity : How can we ensure a level playing field, a prerequisite to American Dream buy-in, with a specific focus on education? : How can we ensure a level playing field, a prerequisite to American Dream buy-in, with a specific focus on education? Upward Mobility : How do we keep the economy thriving for small business, and guard against monopolies and trusts? : How do we keep the economy thriving for small business, and guard against monopolies and trusts? Pluralism : As a nation founded by immigrants and a brand (Forbes) built by immigrants, how do we create a system that continues to attract the world's best-and-brightest to continue that momentum? : As a nation founded by immigrants and a brand (Forbes) built by immigrants, how do we create a system that continues to attract the world's best-and-brightest to continue that momentum? Invention : How do we continue to embody the spirit of the iconic Thomas Edison – continuing to fuel homegrown innovations and technologies that move America and the world forward? : How do we continue to embody the spirit of the iconic Thomas Edison – continuing to fuel homegrown innovations and technologies that move America and the world forward? Reinvention : As a nation of second acts, how do we strengthen America and reinforce its heritage as a land of second acts? : As a nation of second acts, how do we strengthen America and reinforce its heritage as a land of second acts? Self-Destiny: How do we encourage ideas and instill confidence, backed by systems that support entrepreneurial energy and reward individual endeavors? We've already secured some incredible partners. America 250, the official Congressionally-chartered, bipartisan celebratory body, has designated us a partner for innovation and storytelling – their only media partner to date. The Museum of the American Revolution stands with us, as does Harbor Fund, a purpose-driven film financing company, with whom we'll produce an American Dream Film Festival. And there's lots more to come. The goal of this project is grandly simple: ensure that America is an even greater engine of success and creativity and happiness for its second 250 years than it was in its first. America isn't perfect, but it was designed to, as the Constitution states in its very first sentence, constantly strive to be 'more perfect.' Forbes Forbes 250: Celebrating A Nation Of Problem-Solvers, Mavericks And Risk-Takers-Where Hustle, Reinvention And Meritocracy Rule By Forbes Staff
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Student protesters selected for investigation drawn from pro-Israel website
Immigration officials relied in part on a shadowy online blacklist to single out pro-Palestinian campus activists for investigation, a senior Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) official testified Wednesday. Peter Hatch, assistant director of intelligence for Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), said that he was given a list of names for his team to investigate in March, and 'most' of those names came from Canary Mission, a pro-Israel website that is anonymously run. The senior official testified that the list contained more than 5,000 names, though between 100 and 200 reports on people identified there were ultimately compiled. Analysts working on cases involving counterterrorism, cybercrimes and global trade were moved to the so-called 'Tiger Team' to work on compiling reports about demonstrators 'because of the workload.' 'I was not given a deadline, but I knew…that we needed to work through this expeditiously,' Hatch explained. The testimony came on the third day of a trial over the Trump administration's crackdown on pro-Palestinian campus activists. It's the first major trial of President Trump's second term, targeting a policy that has led to arrests and efforts to deport foreign-born students and faculty members. Hatch said that Canary Mission's information was not taken as an 'authoritative source' and the government does not work with the individuals who created the website, whose identities he does not know. The site has been accused of doxxing people protesting Israel's war with Palestinian militant group Hamas in Gaza but describes its mission as documenting individuals and organizations 'that promote hatred of the USA, Israel and Jews on North American college campuses and beyond.' Though Canary Mission's list helped identify 'most' individuals for investigation, Hatch said the team examined leads from 'many different sources.' That included a similar list from another anonymous group supporting Israel, called Betar. The reports compiled by the Tiger Team were submitted to the State Department, which would decide whether to take any action. U.S. District Judge William Young is overseeing the bench trial and will decide whether the administration's 'ideological deportation policy' exists and if it is unlawful. The trial is expected to conclude next week.
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
IDF strike kills Gazan children awaiting food supplements, health officials say
JAFFA, Israel — An Israeli strike blasted through a group of women and children waiting to receive nutritional supplements outside a clinic in central Gaza early Thursday morning, killing more than a dozen people, about half of them children, according to local hospital and aid officials. The Israel Defense Forces said the target was a Hamas operative who participated in the brutal Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel, without identifying the person. The IDF said that it was 'aware of reports regarding a number of injured individuals in the area,' and that it was reviewing the incident.
