South Asian restaurant Aslam's Rasoi faces possible closure in San Francisco's Mission District
Co-owner Sonia Aslam, who has been a fixture at the restaurant since its opening, says the restaurant's distinct flavor has made it a favorite among locals.
"Our food is North Indian, and then the chef and owner is Pakistani, so he adds a little different touch to every dish," she explained.
Renowned for its bold spices and tandoori clay oven creations, the family-owned restaurant has upheld a commitment to fresh, high-quality ingredients since its inception.
However, recent changes in the area, including nearby construction and skyrocketing rent prices, have taken a toll on business. Foot traffic has severely declined, and Sonia says the restaurant is now facing a rent hike that could be the tipping point.
"They started doing all these renovations on Valencia Street. And one by one, merchants have been closing, been getting hurt," Aslam said. "That affected us quite a bit, but then not as much as this rent increase that we're going to be getting in May, which is what made us decide that it might be time for us to close."
The situation is particularly painful for Aslam and her family, who were among the first South Asian restaurateurs to open in the neighborhood.
"Over here, everybody says it kind of feels like a second home. We are all family here, so everybody that comes in kind of feels like they are a part of the family," she said.
Despite the difficult circumstances, Aslam is trying to stay optimistic that customer loyalty can help them weather the storm, but she says it will l take a miracle uptick in business and reasonable rent prices to stay afloat.
As the future of Aslam's Rasoi hangs in the balance, the family remains hopeful that the Mission District's strong sense of community will help them not only survive but thrive amid adversity and the evolving neighborhood landscape.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
8 hours ago
- New York Post
Beyond Trump's trade deals, consolation for the little guy and other commentary
Business desk: Beyond Trump's Trade Deals 'Dealmaker-In-Chief' Donald Trump has been 'positively monomaniacal' about trade lately, marvels Freddy Gray at The Spectator. His 'real coup' is the 'new framework arrangement with the European Union,' which is 'not simply a major breakthrough in and of itself,' but also 'a useful piece of leverage in the even bigger tariff struggle with China' — because it pulls 'Europe more towards a western trading orbit and less towards the east.' Trump then slammed India for 'buying up Russian oil and gas,' and pivoted sharply by praising a new deal with Pakistan, 'including an arrangement to invest in Pakistani oil.' Advertisement Meanwhile, his enthusiasm for Pakistan — 'an extension of China's empire' — may be part of a plan to 'ring loud alarm bells' in Beijing. From the right: Consolation for the Little Guy 'For all the political criticism they take, the federal courts keep delivering good outcomes more often than not,' cheers The Wall Street Journal's Editorial Board. In 2016, the Labor Department 'imposed hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines' on a fourth-generation farm, Sun Valley Orchards — first requesting penalties and then approving them itself, thus 'serving as prosecutor, judge and jury.' Advertisement But an appeals court just ruled the proceedings 'should properly be enforced in federal court' — the proper venues for federal agencies to impose fines. Sun Valley has since gone out of business,' but at least its owners 'have the consolation of a ruling that will vindicate the rights of other farmers and small businesses under the boot heel of the bureaucracy.' Libertarian: Get Honest About Gov't Spending 'What kind of government do Americans want seriously enough to pay for?' asks Veronique de Rugy at Reason. 'I suspect that most people aren't willing to pay the taxes required to fund everything our current government does.' Advertisement Yet 'all the benefits and subsidies that we're unwilling to pay for' but keep going 'will eventually have to be paid for in the future with higher taxes, inflation, or both' by our children and grandchildren. 'Growing the economy' can be 'part of the solution,' but it won't be enough, and 'raising taxes on the rich will fall short too,' since higher tax rates 'do not automatically translate to more tax revenue.' 'It's long past time' we 'ask what level of spending we truly want with the money we truly have.' Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Liberal: Hey, Dems — End the #Resistance Advertisement 'Nonstop Democratic fulminations in Trump's second term have been notably unsuccessful in resuscitating the party's toxic brand,' sighs the Liberal Patriot's Ruy Teixeira. Tellingly, 'voters, despite their negative views of Trump's performance on key issues, still prefer Republicans to Democrats.' Also, 'voters neither like nor trust' Dems, and thus don't see them as 'an obvious choice over their opponents.' Yet 'many Democratic politicians persist in reading — loudly — from the #Resistance script.' Why? The '#Resistance trope is what advantages individual Democratic politicians within the party because it generates adulation from activists, media coverage, and gushers of donations.' And taking back the House in 2026 will only 'convince #Resistance aficionados that nothing really needs to change.' Hello, President JD Vance. Health beat: Big Pharma Wins, Patients Lose 'In May, Dr. Vinay Prasad joined the Food & Drug Administration as the top regulator for vaccines,' yet he 'apparently knew the games too well,' gripes Alex Berensen at his Substack: After last week's attacks from Trump's allies, Prasad resigned: 'He was targeted because he posed a direct threat to Big Pharma profits.' Advertisement Just last month, he told Sarepta Therapeutics 'it needed to halt shipments of its gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, or DMD.' 'Sarepta has never shown its drugs actually benefit patients.' The company won the right to a drug trial in 2016; 'nine years later, Sarepta still hasn't completed those trials.' Yet 'that hasn't stopped it from selling the drug — for up to $1.5 million per year.' Advertisement 'Big Pharma scalped Prasad for his honesty.' — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board
Miami Herald
a day ago
- Miami Herald
India responds to U.S. penalty over Russia oil
Aug. 2 (UPI) -- Indian officials confirmed Saturday the country is not altering policy and will continue buying oil from Russia, despite threats of a financial "penalty" from U.S. President Donald Trump. India's government has not given any directive to the country's oil refiners to stop or reduce the amount of Russian crude oil, the New York Times reported, citing two senior Indian officials. Trump earlier this week said he would impose a financial "penalty" on the South Asian country if it did not cut back on its reliance on Russian oil. The sanction would be in addition to a 25% American tariff on Indian goods. The president did not elaborate on the extent of the additional financial "penalty." "Remember, while India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their Tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the World, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary Trade Barriers of any Country, " Trump said in a Truth Social post. "Also, they have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of ENERGY, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to STOP THE KILLING IN UKRAINE." Trump on Friday said it was his understanding "that India is no longer going to be buying oil from Russia. That's what I heard. I don't know if that's right or not. That is a good step. We will see what happens." Indian officials told the New York Times the country has "not given any direction to oil companies" to change direction. Publicly, Indian officials said they are considering options without confirming or denying the Times report. "We have taken note of the sanctions, and we are looking into it," Ministry of External Affairs of India spokesman Shri Randhir Jaiswal said during a news conference Friday in New Delhi. "On the other question about proposed oil sale, I would say that I have no comments to offer in this particular matter. As far as sourcing our energy requirements is concerned, you are well aware of our broad approach, meaning our overall approach and stance. We take decisions based on the price at which oil is available in the international market and depending on the global situation at that time. As for the specifics of your particular question, I am not aware of it. I don't have details of these specifics." Jaiswal also attempted to avoid further escalating the situation. "I would also like to underline this particular point that this is a sensitive and complex case and therefore, I would urge all to be mindful that media reports based on speculation and misinformation are not helpful at all," he told reporters. "In so far as the reports claiming that there has been certain developments etc., such reports are incorrect. Please wait for an update from us, this is a sensitive matter, and we urge all sides to stay away from misinformation." Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
UPI
a day ago
- UPI
India responds to U.S. penalty over Russia oil
Aug. 2 (UPI) -- Indian officials confirmed Saturday the country is not altering policy and will continue buying oil from Russia, despite threats of a financial "penalty" from U.S. President Donald Trump. India's government has not given any directive to the country's oil refiners to stop or reduce the amount of Russian crude oil, the New York Times reported, citing two senior Indian officials. Trump earlier this week said he would impose a financial "penalty" on the South Asian country if it did not cut back on its reliance on Russian oil. The sanction would be in addition to a 25% American tariff on Indian goods. The president did not elaborate on the extent of the additional financial "penalty." "Remember, while India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their Tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the World, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary Trade Barriers of any Country, " Trump said in a Truth Social post. "Also, they have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of ENERGY, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to STOP THE KILLING IN UKRAINE." Trump on Friday said it was his understanding "that India is no longer going to be buying oil from Russia. That's what I heard. I don't know if that's right or not. That is a good step. We will see what happens." Indian officials told the New York Times the country has "not given any direction to oil companies" to change direction. Publicly, Indian officials said they are considering options without confirming or denying the Times report. "We have taken note of the sanctions, and we are looking into it," Ministry of External Affairs of India spokesman Shri Randhir Jaiswal said during a news conference Friday in New Delhi. "On the other question about proposed oil sale, I would say that I have no comments to offer in this particular matter. As far as sourcing our energy requirements is concerned, you are well aware of our broad approach, meaning our overall approach and stance. We take decisions based on the price at which oil is available in the international market and depending on the global situation at that time. As for the specifics of your particular question, I am not aware of it. I don't have details of these specifics." Jaiswal also attempted to avoid further escalating the situation. "I would also like to underline this particular point that this is a sensitive and complex case and therefore, I would urge all to be mindful that media reports based on speculation and misinformation are not helpful at all," he told reporters. "In so far as the reports claiming that there has been certain developments etc., such reports are incorrect. Please wait for an update from us, this is a sensitive matter, and we urge all sides to stay away from misinformation."
