UAE Denies Amnesty Claim of Arming Sudan's RSF
DUBAI: The United Arab Emirates on Friday denied an Amnesty International report accusing it of providing Chinese-made weapons to Sudanese paramilitary forces at war with the regular army.
'The UAE strongly rejects the suggestion that it is supplying weaponry to any party involved in the ongoing conflict in Sudan,' said Salem Aljaberi, the UAE's assistant minister for security and military affairs.
'These claims are baseless and lack substantiated evidence,' he said in a statement posted on the foreign ministry's X account.
On Thursday, Amnesty said it identified 'Chinese GB50A guided bombs and 155mm AH-4 howitzers' through analysis of footage of attacks by the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) on Khartoum and Darfur.
The London-based human rights group said the UAE was the only country to import howitzers from China, in a deal in 2019.
It relied on data from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute for its report.
'The howitzer referenced in the report is a system manufactured outside the UAE and has been available on the international market for nearly a decade,' Aljaberi said, labelling the Amnesty report as 'misleading'.
'The assertion that only one country has procured or transferred this system is invalid,' he added.
Amnesty's report came as the RSF pressed its long-range drone attacks on army-held cities in Sudan.
Abu Dhabi has repeatedly denied arming the RSF, despite reports from UN experts, US politicians and international organisations.
On Tuesday, the army-aligned government severed ties with the UAE, accusing it of supplying the RSF with the advanced weapons systems it has used to strike Port Sudan.
The UAE denied the allegation, saying the internationally recognised administration 'does not represent the legitimate government of Sudan'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
US Treasury chief says trade talks with China to continue this week in Sweden
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has said that he would meet his Chinese counterparts in Sweden this week to continue trade talks between the two countries, suggesting the current pause in sky-high tariffs aimed at each other could be extended. Bessent told Fox Business that he would speak with Chinese officials on Monday and Tuesday for a third round of high-level talks in Stockholm – following face-to-face discussions he held with Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng in Geneva and London – to work out a likely extension of the pause beyond mid-August. Beijing has yet to confirm the Stockholm talks, but Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson said in a post on X on Tuesday that his country would play host to the US-China negotiations next week. After US President Donald Trump's announcement of 'reciprocal' tariffs on April 2, Washington and Beijing raised punitive levies on each other's exports to triple-digit percentage levels. Since then, trade relations have thawed somewhat as the countries have engaged in talks, marked by a June telephone call between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping. On Monday Bessent said that the talks were 'in a good place', a sanguine take on negotiations echoed by Beijing's embassy in Washington, which said 'new progress' had been made in resolving each other's economic and trade concerns. Separately on Tuesday, Trump told reporters that Xi has invited him to visit Beijing and that he would accept. He added that exports of rare earth and magnets to the US may no longer be a thorny issue. 'President Xi has invited me to China, and we'll probably be doing that in the not too distant future, a little bit out, but not too distant. And I've been invited by a lot of people, and we'll make those decisions pretty soon,' he said during a meeting in the Oval Office with Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jnr. 'We have a very good relationship. In fact, the magnets, which is a little complex piece of material, but the magnets are coming out very well. They're sending them in record numbers. We're getting along with China very well,' said Trump. In a possible signal of improving ties, China's market administration watchdog said earlier on Tuesday that it had suspended its anti-trust probe into American multinational chemical company DuPont. Beijing launched its investigation into DuPont in early April, after Trump began slapping new levies on Chinese goods. Bessent said on Monday that he hoped to raise in future talks the issue of China's purchases of Russian and Iranian oil. Beijing's embassy in Washington responded to those comments by saying that 'the international community, including China, has conducted normal cooperation with Iran and Russia within the framework of international law. 'This is reasonable and lawful without harm done to any third party, and deserves to be respected and protected,' said the embassy. China observers said that Beijing would oppose Washington's bid to link tariff talks to Chinese relations with US adversaries. 'Beijing sees its ties and transactions with Russia and Iran as just and fair and conforms to international laws and may be unlikely to make compromises for the sake of US lowering tariffs,' said Xin Qiang, an international studies professor at Fudan University in Shanghai. 'Beijing is mindful not to fall into the trap as US uses tariffs to pursue its geopolitical agenda.' During the Fox Business interview Bessent also mentioned his expectations for China's government to rein in manufacturing overcapacity and launch structural adjustments to stimulate domestic consumption to benefit American manufacturing. 'President Trump is remaking the US into a manufacturing economy. If we could do that together – more U.S. manufacturing, more Chinese consumption – that would be a home run for the Chinese Communist Party and the global economy,' he said. - SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST
The Star
5 hours ago
- The Star
China, EU need to make the right choice as ‘two big guys' on world stage, says Xi Jinping
At a meeting in Beijing recently, President Xi Jinping urged European leaders to 'make the right strategic choice' as the world grapples with profound changes. He made the remarks to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and European Council President Antonio Costa, who are in Beijing for a summit that some Chinese analysts expect to be tone-setting for China-EU relations. 'Amid the accelerating transformation unseen in a century and an international landscape fraught with turbulence and transformation, China and Europe must once again demonstrate vision and responsibility by making the right strategic choices that meet people's expectations and stand the test of history,' Xi said. The first face-to-face EU-China summit since December 2023 convenes as the two sides mark 50 years of diplomatic relations, though celebrations are tempered by escalating trade disputes. Beijing is seeking to present itself as a stable alternative partner for Europe, particularly as US President Donald Trump has slapped steep tariffs on the 27-nation bloc. He added that the two sides should reinforce their partnership as a cornerstone in bilateral ties, saying that the West should judge China in a correct way, according to a Chinese statement released after his meeting with senior EU officials. 'If China is measured by the paths taken by the West, perceptions of China will inevitably be skewed,' Xi said, adding that the challenges Europe was facing 'were not from China'. 'It is our hope that Europe will likewise respect China's chosen development path and political system, duly acknowledge China's core interests and major concerns, and support China's pursuit of development and prosperity.' Xi also stressed the autonomy of China-EU relations, which he said were 'not targeted at, dependent on, nor subject to any third party'. 'The two sides should enhance strategic communication, strengthen mutual understanding and trust, and foster a correct perception of each other,' the Chinese leader said. Xi described China and the European Union as 'two big guys' in the world, adding that they should combine their efforts to 'firmly grasp the right direction of China-Europe relations and work together to usher in an even brighter next 50 years'. 'China and the EU must once again demonstrate foresight and responsibility, making strategic choices that meet the expectations of their peoples and stand the test of history.' In his opening remarks, Costa reaffirmed that the EU was committed to 'deepening our bilateral partnership, making concrete progress in addressing concerns with respect, goodwill and honesty and working together to uphold multilateralism'. However, he added that the two sides needed 'concrete progress' to address challenges in trade and the economy, according to an official transcript. 'We need concrete progress on issues related to trade and economy. We both want our relationship to be balanced, reciprocal and mutually beneficial,' he said. Costa also raised the hope of reaching a deal with China on climate change after Thursday's meeting. 'Our cooperation on climate change is an important example, and I look forward, as a result of today's summit, to a strong joint political message ahead of Cop30 in Brazil,' he said. In her remarks, von der Leyen referred to the growing imbalances and declared that the relationship was at an 'inflection point'. 'Rebalancing our bilateral relationship is essential. Because to be sustainable, relations need to be mutually beneficial,' von der Leyen said, adding that it was 'vital' for both China and Europe to acknowledge respective concerns so as to come forward with real solutions. She also reaffirmed the EU's strong commitment to the Paris Agreement, the climate change treaty Trump ordered the US to quit when he returned to the White House in January. After a meeting with Premier Li Qiang in the afternoon, the two sides released a joint statement on climate change, which is widely seen as one of the few areas where the two sides might make progress. While China and the EU agreed that they would lead global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions with pledges of cooperation in green technologies, the seven-point document offered no concrete actions or goals. Still, it could offer a much-needed confidence boost in Beijing and Brussels' ability to cut their emissions further before the Cop30 UN climate change summit in Brazil in November. 'Joining forces here will send a powerful message to the world,' von der Leyen said about climate change cooperation during the meeting with Li. In the meeting at the Great Hall of the People, Xi also tried to ease concerns on the trade imbalance but said that the European Union's push to 'reduce dependence' on China should not undermine bilateral cooperation. 'The essence of China-EU economic and trade relations is complementary advantages and mutual benefit and it should be, and is entirely possible to achieve, a dynamic balance in the course of development.' Despite their shared concerns over Trump's unpredictable and aggressive tariff and security policies, tensions have been mounting between China and the EU on areas from trade to security. The EU, which has long complained about China's lack of progress to ensure a level playing field for a balanced economic and trade relationship, has increased tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs) to as much as 45 per cent for state-subsidised Chinese manufacturers. Meanwhile, China's recent restrictions on rare earth exports – introduced during the trade war with the US – have added to the frustration in Europe as industries have faced an 'alarming situation' due to a shortage of the minerals, which are essential to making everything from EVs to military tanks and aircraft. China's deep ties with Russia also cast a shadow, with senior officials in Brussels, including von der Leyen, openly accusing Beijing of supporting Moscow in its prolonged war in Ukraine. In a move that touched a nerve in Europe, Foreign Minister Wang Yi told EU officials earlier this month that Beijing did not want to see Moscow lose the war because it feared the US could then shift more attention to China. While expectations for a breakthrough in Thursday's meeting have been low, there is hope that the talks could be a tone-setting moment for China-EU relations. Earlier on Thursday, von der Leyen said on social media that Thursday's summit was 'the opportunity to both advance and rebalance our relationship'. 'I'm convinced there can be a mutually beneficial cooperation. One that can define the next 50 years of our relations,' she wrote. Cui Hongjian, head of European Union studies at Beijing Foreign Studies University, said Beijing and Brussels should use the occasion to establish a shared understanding of their 50-year relationship and outline guiding principles to drive the relationship forward. 'It is hoped that Beijing and Brussels can come up with better and pragmatic ways to manage the interplay of competition and cooperation alongside the bilateral relationship – whether in trade or geopolitical differences – and turn competition into new opportunities for collaboration,' he said. 'I believe this highest level engagement will mark the start of a new phase in bilateral ties, where they must work to find a mutually acceptable way to engage meaningfully.' The meeting offers both China and the European Union a valuable opportunity to understand the concerns and priorities of each side, according to Feng Zhongping, director of the Institute of European Studies at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. 'China-EU relations are still undergoing changes, and we should view them objectively. They have cooperation and competition at the same time, but both sides have the willingness to engage in dialogue and negotiate,' Feng said. Cui, a former Chinese diplomat, said the two sides should 'adjust their previous approaches to communication and cooperation'. Noting the cancellation of a high-level EU-China economic and trade dialogue earlier this year, Cui said there had been a gap in terms of each side's goal for the talks, with Brussels seeking tangible outcomes and Beijing viewing the dialogue as a platform for talks, cooperation and management of competition. 'If high-level dialogues are no longer Europe's preferred approach, the critical question is whether China and the EU can identify a mutually acceptable framework to address their persistent challenges.' Observers in Europe said they were less optimistic about the future of bilateral relations. Abigael Vasselier, director of policy and European affairs at the Mercator Institute for China Studies, said on Monday that Europe was entering the summit 'with no illusion that it is going to be a deal-making moment', given that there was a mismatch over various disputes. She said she expected the summit would not change the long-term course of EU-China ties, which were deeply troubled by structural issues. - SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST
The Star
6 hours ago
- The Star
UK made ‘Armageddon scenario' plan for mass Hong Kong exodus in handover run-up
The UK government prepared a secret contingency plan dubbed 'the Armageddon scenario' in the lead-up to the 1997 handover for the evacuation of millions of Hong Kong residents who might have wanted to flee the city, according to newly unsealed documents. The British national archive documents date back to 1989 in the period immediately preceding and following the Tiananmen Square crackdown. A number of scenarios and recommendations for UK authorities were outlined in the event Hong Kong's return to Chinese rule triggered an exodus of people from the city. The documents, which were made public on Tuesday UK time, stated that the United Kingdom could 'not handle a mass evacuation alone' and that other countries would need to help, highlighting the United States as 'particularly important'. Repeated references were made to the 'Official Group on Contingency Planning for Hong Kong', which was said to have been formed following then prime minister Margaret Thatcher's meeting with the governor of Hong Kong on June 8, 1989. The governor at the time was David Wilson. The internal communications, labelled 'secret', categorised the plan into three scenarios – green, amber and red. When the most serious red phase was reached, indicating a mass exodus was under way, the British government would launch an evacuation, reception and resettlement plan, according to the file. In the contingency plan dated November in the released files, air and ship operators should be instructed to deploy earmarked aircraft and ships covered by dormant contracts immediately to Hong Kong in the red phase. Planes were expected to reach Hong Kong within 24 to 48 hours, while cruise ships were likely to have taken at least a week. The plan noted that the basic cost of moving 1 million people by sea to Taiwan would be around £165 million on the most favourable set of assumptions, while that of flying them to the island would have reached about £170 million. It set out that civilian evacuation would require the use of cruise ships and 143 of the vessels were available from 21 different countries. Costs were estimated to reach £200,000 per ship every day. The plan noted that efforts would need to be stepped up to get Southeast Asian governments to offer 'immediate, practical help', such as public appeals targeted at ethnic Chinese communities. It added that military deployments 'might be necessary', including using aircraft and vessels to assist in evacuation, as well as the deployment of land, air and sea assets to 'deter or counter Chinese military action'. But the plan noted that the capacity of military assistance in transporting a large number of people was 'small' compared with the size of the potential exodus and the capacity of the civil sector. The document said the British Royal Air Force had a readily available maximum single lift capacity of about 5,000 people. The team also drew up resettlement plans, in which the cost of reception centres would be about £5 million per 1,000 people and £5 billion per million based on past experience. The figures assumed each refugee would stay in a reception centre for six months, where basic needs would be met with some minimal English language training. The team said accommodation capacity would 'pose severe problems' in the event of an influx of arrivals. It estimated that only 400,000 properties would be available in the UK for resettlement in the short term, of which 300,000 would have to be requisitioned from the private sector. The internal documents outlined four scenarios that could trigger such an exodus, including two before and two after the 1997 handover. The report outlined one potential situation in which there would be a 'steady ebbing away of confidence' among people in Hong Kong before the handover, leading to an outflow of capital and talent from the city. Another pre-handover scenario referenced a 'panic provoked by further developments in China', such as the use of military force against Chinese civilians. It said Hong Kong people would be more sensitive than before to such developments. The post-handover scenarios were predicted to play out largely similarly – one based on people losing confidence in whether the Sino-British Joint Declaration was working, and a second that outlined a 'greater' risk of Beijing directly interfering in the city's affairs after 1997. The declaration is an agreement signed by Britain and China in 1984 to settle the future of Hong Kong. The two governments agreed China would reassume control of Hong Kong from July 1, 1997. One document, signed off by a DG Manning in August, included an attachment to a report commissioned by the South China Morning Post in 1989 outlining 'best case scenarios' on the impact of 3 million arrivals in the UK from Hong Kong. The report was produced by experts from well-known UK universities, who found that the economic costs were not 'dramatic', even in the extreme case of 3.2 million immigrants. -- SOUTH CHINA MORNING POST
