logo
Murray Watt urged to intervene after accusations proposed Queensland coalmine clearing land in greater glider habitat

Murray Watt urged to intervene after accusations proposed Queensland coalmine clearing land in greater glider habitat

The Guardian3 days ago
Conservationists have called on the environment minister, Murray Watt, to intervene after satellite images appear to show clearing in threatened species habitat at the site of a proposed coalmine in Queensland.
Images and drone footage obtained by the Queensland Conservation Council over the past two months appear to show large areas of bushland cleared at the site of Magnetic South's proposed Gemini coalmine near Dingo in central Queensland.
Public documents released under freedom of information laws show the environment department told the company in 2022 it strongly recommended referral of the project to consider whether it required an assessment for potentially significant impacts on the Brigalow ecological community, and species including the greater glider, koala and bridled nail-tail wallaby.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
The council wrote to Watt last month alerting him and the federal environment department's compliance unit to what it claimed was the removal of 'approximately 200 hectares of greater glider habitat' since late May in an area earmarked for an open coal pit.
The council wrote it had 'urgent concerns' that construction of the mine might have commenced without referral of the project for an assessment under Australia's environmental laws.
The proposed metallurgical coal project, which would produce up to 1.9m tonnes of coal a year, has attracted concerns in the past due to a Queensland government decision not to require an environmental impact statement and opposition from graziers.
In its letter to Watt, the Queensland Conservation Council asked whether the alleged clearing had been approved by the federal government and whether the government needed to take enforcement action.
The council wrote it believed the clearing could be unlawful and that it expected Watt's department 'to take urgent action accordingly to protect this culturally and ecologically significant place'.
The council's coal and gas campaigner, Charlie Cox, said Watt needed to urgently step in.
'There is now drone footage, satellite imagery, and traditional owners on the ground all suggesting that yet another coal corporation has taken it upon themselves to start building their mine without the relevant federal approvals,' she said.
Cox called on the minister to use enforcement powers to stop the alleged clearing and to call the project in for a federal assessment.
'Murray Watt is committed to reforming our environment laws that are woefully failing nature, he needs to actually enforce the existing laws too,' she said.
Sign up to Breaking News Australia
Get the most important news as it breaks
after newsletter promotion
Zhanae Dodd is a Ghungalu woman and founder of Guyala Yimba, an Indigenous human rights consultancy. Ghungalu custodians have a camp at the proposed mine site, where they have been conducting cultural ceremony since early this month.
'We're out there engaging in ceremony and keeping a fire burning,' Dodd said. 'We need to preserve these sites because on our country already there are that many mines destroying country, why do we need one more?'
In a letter the council received on Friday, the federal environment department said it was 'aware of the alleged actions and potential impacts to threatened species and ecological communities protected by the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act'. The department said it was engaging with Magnetic South 'regarding their obligations under the act'.
A spokesperson for the federal environment department said 'the department is in receipt of the allegations'.
'As the investigation is ongoing the department will not provide further comment.'
Guardian Australia sought comment from Watt and Magnetic South.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Plans to demolish 400-year-old Coventry building for new home
Plans to demolish 400-year-old Coventry building for new home

BBC News

time7 hours ago

  • BBC News

Plans to demolish 400-year-old Coventry building for new home

A historic building, parts of which are thought to be more than 400 years old, could be demolished to make way for a new have been submitted to the city council to knock down The Langleys, in Stoke Green, Coventry, which was built in property, most recently used as a care home, was put up for sale for £800,000 in 2023.A statement included in plans submitted by Warwickshire firm Agility Planning & Design Ltd said that once the property was demolished, a self-build house would be put in its place. The replacement building would be of "high-quality design" that would "potentially enhance the conservation", the heritage statement said."The existing building has had extensive alterations and much of the original features have been lost over time," it added."Although the historical age of the property dates to the 17th century, changes have been unsympathetic and diminished the overall quality and attractiveness of the heritage asset."The building, which is located near to the Joseph Levi Clock in the Stoke Green Conservation Area, has been considerably altered and extended prior to being opened as a care home in to the Coventry Society and Stoke Local History Group, owners Jeffrey Graham and his brother Leonard Rawnsley spent £30,000 converting the house into a retirement Graham said he had been told that the house was once known as The Bowling Green Inn, with historic records mentioning a Bowling Alley House at Stoke Green in 1641. This news was gathered by the Local Democracy Reporting Service, which covers councils and other public service organisations. Follow BBC Coventry & Warwickshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.

Chosen Hill campaigners concerned by review of green belt status
Chosen Hill campaigners concerned by review of green belt status

BBC News

time8 hours ago

  • BBC News

Chosen Hill campaigners concerned by review of green belt status

A group of campaigners say an area of green belt land should be protected as it is a "wildlife gem."The Churchdown Hill Alliance is attempting to protect Chosen Hill, between Gloucester and Cheltenham, from being built government announced that 15 areas in the UK would go up for assessment to either remain as green belt or be demoted to 'grey belt', meaning some development is Stevens, from the Churchdown Hill Alliance and Hucclecote Parish said: "The people who do know the hill love it with a passion that's unbelievable." He added: "I think Chosen Hill is an absolute wildlife gem. We think there's a very good case for it being retained as green belt."There are some bits of green belt that could be rezoned for development but I'd be anxious if they were looking at the lower ground around the hill."Mr Stevens said the green belts around the UK are being "assessed remotely" so it doesn't "throw in the reality of the local knowledge".What is the grey belt and how many homes could be built on it?A green belt is a protected stretch of land which cannot be built upon, this can be to protect wildlife, preserve the countryside or for public belts are pieces of land that can exist near or within a green belt that aren't thought to contribute to the purposes of a greenbelt - such as being an area for wildlife - which can be developed upon. 'Awash with wildlife" "I didn't realise how much wildlife there was on the hill," Mr Stevens explained."There's otters, pine martens, all sorts of deer, and badgers. There are 71 different bird species, 18 different butterfly species, three types of snake and newts."It's just awash with wildlife," he said, "but it relies on being able to feed into the field around and the nature reserve to thrive."If development happened and it got cut off, it'd be strangling the wildlife."Councillor Richard Stanley, leader of Tewkesbury Borough Council, said: "We understand that development is a highly-emotive subject, and we want to reassure residents that their concerns are being said, national policy requires "all available sites to be considered - including within the green belt where appropriate - to make sure that development is sustainable and well-planned"."To support this, we are carrying out detailed evidence studies, including updated assessments of the green belt and local landscapes, to help guide where future development could take place," he added.A draft plan will be coming in 2026 where residents with have opportunities to share their thoughts and ideas, added Mr Stanley.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store