From the archive: Democracy in action at Oxford
Polling took place at Oxford yesterday for the election of a new Chancellor of the University to fill the vacancy caused by the death of Lord Curzon of Kedleston. The candidates were Lord Cave (the Lord Chancellor) and Lord Oxford and Asquith.
There is a quaint medieval flavour about voting for a Chancellor, and Oxford — not always successful in the management of its ceremonies — had staged the drama well. The Divinity School and the inside of the Sheldonian are a good setting for any play, and gave an impressiveness which is conspicuously absent from the ordinary polling booth.
Proceedings opened early: from a quarter to 9 this morning the bell of the University Church rang for its accustomed half-hour to summon members to a meeting of Convocation — for such the assembly technically is. Already at 9.15 there was a fair gathering of voters, mostly residents, but with a mixture of MAs 'from the country', including at least one Cabinet Minister, even at that early hour. Outside the Divinity School were stationed College porters with a supply of gowns, ready to be borrowed. Duly clad, the voter entered the Divinity School and found his voting-paper ready to be filled up.
To one accustomed to the secrecy of the ballot it was something of a shock to find that his first duty was to write his own name, but the shock was mitigated by the unique pleasure of delivering his vote in Latin. 'Ego … e Coll. nomino …': there is something splendid in the formula, which for all its old-world ring seems to lay a wonderfully democratic emphasis on the importance of the individual vote.
The voter now advances across the quadrangle and enters the great door of the Sheldonian. There he finds the Vice-Chancellor and the Proctors seated in all their majesty at small tables with bedels surrounding them leaning on 'pokers' erect. The Vice-Chancellor receives the vote with a gracious bow, looks at it, and hands it to the Asquithian or Caveite Proctor, and the deed is done.
After the close of the poll at 8.30 the result was known as follows: Lord Cave, 987. Lord Oxford and Asquith, 441.
Explore 200 years of history as it appeared in the pages of The Times, from 1785 to 1985: thetimes.co.uk/archive
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
22 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Labour's NHS plan: it is right to celebrate medical science, but delivery is the hard part
The NHS is a totemic institution in Labour's history and that of the country, and voters care more about it than most things the government does. So the publication of Labour's 10-year plan for health in England was a crucial opportunity for ministers to show that they are in tune with the public. Given that satisfaction with the health service has hit a record low of 21%, and doctors are again threatening to go on strike, the announcement was also a moment of peril – even before the damage suffered by the prime minister and chancellor earlier this week, when rebels forced a U-turn on planned cuts to welfare. The overarching principles of Labour's reforms were set out last year: more prevention, more technology, more care delivered in the community (as opposed to in hospital). So the challenge was to find something fresh, original and hopeful to say. The promise of science and the potential of localism are what Wes Streeting's team has come up with. The strand of DNA pictured on the document's cover points to high expectations of genomic medicine and other cutting-edge technology. Neighbourhood clinics, by contrast, represent a prosaic recognition of demand for more ordinary services and treatments, from an ageing and increasingly unhealthy population. The aim is to deliver most outpatient care away from hospitals by 2035. This could mean GP surgeries becoming more like hospitals, or hospital trusts taking a bigger role in primary care. The plans for new contracts make it clear that both are possible. But while this sounds fine in theory, questions remain over how, and by whom, such crucial decisions will be taken, and whether the new model will be better than the old one. With the abolition of NHS England, and scaling back of integrated care boards, the existing administration is being radically downsized. One of the risks of the next few years is that this backstage upheaval will distract time and energy from the frontline. Plans to shift resources from richer areas to poorer ones deserve an unequivocal welcome. There is no great secret about expertise being concentrated in prestigious teaching hospitals, or about richer, better educated people being more confident advocates for themselves and their loved ones. Shifting the 'best to the rest' is both a neat slogan and an acknowledgment of present unfairness. Plans to integrate employment support and services such as debt advice into healthcare hubs signal an encouraging awareness that illness and disability have socioeconomic as well as biological causes. The plan tells a promising story. Healthcare is an area of human progress that all can celebrate. It is plausible that proactive Labour ministers can both drive advances and ensure that they are more equitably shared than in marketised systems. Embedding more healthcare workers in communities, and focusing on outreach, could help to improve population health. But there are some worrying gaps. Social care reform is due to be tackled separately, but worsening mental health, particularly in young people, also needs dedicated attention and research. Ministers should also be pressed on the contradictions between their health plan and their pro-growth, anti-regulation message to businesses – including those that sell alcohol and the high-sugar foods that cause obesity. Having brought control of the NHS in England back in-house, to the heart of government, Mr Streeting must now find the people with the imagination to further develop his plan, while turning it into action.
Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Switzerland warns of Iran threat as diplomats' deaths re-examined
Switzerland's intelligence service has warned that Iranian espionage poses a growing threat to Swiss diplomats in Tehran. The warning comes after an investigation re-examined the mysterious deaths of embassy staff and a tourist in the Islamic Republic. The Federal Intelligence Service listed Iran alongside Russia, China and North Korea as states that had intensified intelligence activity against Switzerland. It said Switzerland's role representing US interests in Tehran 'increases the visibility of Swiss personnel to hostile service'. The warning followed an investigation by the Swiss broadcasters SRF and RTS that examined four deaths in Iran – a diplomat's fall from a balcony, a military attaché's sudden illness, a local employee of the Swiss embassy who was stabbed and shot in the hand while walking to work, and a Swiss tourist's alleged suicide in prison. Sylvie Brunner, a diplomat, fell from the 17th floor of her Tehran flat in May 2021. Iranian authorities ruled it suicide, citing mental-health problems. But in the investigation by SRF and RTS, a man who identified himself as a former officer in Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) alleged that the diplomat was pushed after a surveillance operation went awry. Initial Iranian emergency responder statements about insufficient evidence for suicide were later retracted, and the official responsible was removed. Ms Brunner's brother said Iranian security agents had visited her apartment before her death, deliberately leaving boot prints. A suicide note was found, but was unsigned. Her body was returned without major organs, preventing comprehensive toxicology tests. A Swiss pathologist said suicide was 'plausible' but could not exclude involvement of others. In 2023, a Swiss military attaché suddenly fell ill in Tehran and was transferred to Switzerland in a coma before dying in hospital. The investigation revealed he was actually a covert intelligence officer. Experts suggested he may have been identified and poisoned during operations in Iran. A former Iranian intelligence officer told a Swiss broadcaster: 'My colleagues in the IRGC intelligence unit openly talked about the death of the Swiss female diplomat. They said it was an operation by IRGC intelligence that resulted in murder – a spy mission that went wrong.' In another incident around the embassy, a local employee was stabbed and shot in the hand while walking to work. Tehran police blamed a robbery, an explanation Swiss analysts say is rare in the heavily policed capital. In a fourth case, a Swiss tourist in his 60s was arrested for espionage earlier this year after allegedly photographing a military site and collecting soil samples. Iranian authorities announced two months later he had committed suicide in Semnan prison. Swiss officials were denied access during his detention. After his body was returned, an autopsy was performed but results have not been released. An Iranian judiciary spokesman said the Swiss embassy staff had 'confirmed' their citizen's suicide in prison. Increased risks due to regional conflict Swiss officials now consider the cases linked. A Swiss security source cited IRGC 'paranoia', saying Iran viewed the Swiss embassy as a CIA infiltration point. Since 1980, Switzerland has represented US interests in Iran, handling consular affairs and passing messages between Washington and Tehran. The role makes Swiss diplomats prime surveillance targets, former intelligence officials said. The intelligence service warned that regional conflict had increased risks of 'direct pressure' on Swiss personnel abroad. Switzerland's foreign ministry said it 'continues to seek full clarity' but lacks investigative authority in Iran. The attorney general closed its criminal probe into Ms Brunner's death in November due to lack of evidence. Opposition lawmakers said they would raise the deaths at parliament's next foreign affairs committee meeting. No date has been provided for the meeting.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Austria set to deport man to Syria, marking first for EU since Assad's fall
BRUSSELS/PARIS, July 2 (Reuters) - Austria is preparing to deport a Syrian man whose asylum status was revoked due to a criminal conviction, in what an EU official and rights groups say will be Europe's first forced deportation to Syria since the fall of President Bashar al-Assad. Rights groups are concerned that Austria's plan could set a precedent, encouraging other European Union member states to follow suit amid rising anti-migration sentiment across the 27-nation bloc. The 32-year-old man, who was granted asylum in Austria in 2014, lost his refugee status in February 2019 because of his criminal record, his legal adviser Ruxandra Staicu said. She declined to specify the nature of his conviction. The Austrian Interior Ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Deportation to Syria was not possible during the country's civil war as it was considered unsafe. The Austrian government argues that Assad's fall means the situation has changed and it has begun proceedings to strip some refugees of their status, though rights groups say it is premature to do so. Austrian and Syrian authorities agreed for the man to be deported last week, but the closure of airspace due to the Iran-Israel conflict delayed the process, Staicu and a Western diplomat said. The diplomat, who requested anonymity, added that the deportation would now go ahead once the airspace reopened. Since 2015, European countries have received around 1.68 million asylum applications from Syrian nationals. Some governments, most notably Germany, initially welcomed them warmly as civil war ravaged their homeland. But rising public concern over the scale of immigration has fueled support for far-right, anti-migrant parties. With the fall of Assad last December, many EU governments were quick to suspend the processing of Syrian asylum applications, and some have called for the security situation in Syria to be reassessed to enable deportations to resume. In Austria, former Chancellor Karl Nehammer, from the ruling Austrian People's Party (OVP), is among those calling for such a reassessment, amid pressure from the far-right Freedom Party. Some rights groups and lawyers say it is still too dangerous to begin returning people to Syria. "... there are attacks against people and we have no idea in which direction (Syria) will go," said Staicu, adding that her client's deportation would violate the European Convention on Human Rights that prohibits torture and inhumane treatment. The United Nations refugee agency (UNHCR) told Reuters: "Syrians... must not be forcibly returned from any country, including those in the European Union, to any part of Syria" due to the overall situation there. Rights groups cite attacks against minorities since Assad's fall. Syria also remains in the grip of a severe humanitarian crisis, with 90% of the population living below the poverty line, according to UN estimates. Staicu said her client had received a negative asylum decision in April. He has filed another asylum application and is awaiting a response.
