Kiren Rijiju targets Mamata govt for refusing to implement Waqf Act
He told reporters, "We are working in a federation structure. If the CM of a state declares that she will not follow the Act passed by Parliament, it will only instigate protests. The West Bengal CM is fully responsible for all the violence. She can oppose, but can't say that she will not implement the Act."
The Union Minister said rules would be framed to ensure that Waqf properties are used for the welfare of poor Muslims.
The minister slammed the Congress and other opposition parties for running a "misinformation" campaign against the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, saying that the government will "expose" them in the days to come.
"We will soon expose those who looted poor Muslims and misled them about the provisions of the law. Such elements and some politicians interested in vote bank appeasement have been spreading lies that Muslims will lose their burial grounds or mosques, and that their land will be seized. Speaking such lies is a sin," he said.
He said the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, ensures justice, transparency and social responsibility, particularly benefiting poor Muslim families and women.
He told reporters that the legislation empowers marginalised sections of the Muslim community without interfering with religious practices.
"We will bring transparency in the transactions as the management will have to give all the documentation. Look at what they have done in Murshidabad in West Bengal. They are insulting Babasaheb Ambedkar. This kind of behaviour is damaging the nation," said Minister Rijiju.
He alleged that those who use Muslims as a vote bank are misleading them.
He further claimed that lakhs of people from the Muslim community are thanking Prime Minister Narendra Modi for the Waqf (Amendment) Act.
To a question on non-Muslims in the Waqf Board, the minister asked, "How did Azam Khan (Samajwadi Party) leader become in charge of Kumbh Mela in Uttar Pradesh earlier? We never questioned that."
He further alleged that the Opposition had spread misinformation that Muslims' citizenship would be revoked under the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). "Has anything like that happened, even though the CAA has been in force for more than a year?" he asked.
To a question on the National Herald case, the minister said Congress workers should realise that their funds were looted by their leaders.
Earlier, he addressed a public gathering as part of the Waqf Reform Public Awareness campaign.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
27 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Delhi Confidential: Sweet offering
DMK's Arun Nehru, a first-time MP from Perambalur, has a sweet trick to make new friends in Parliament. The 41-year-old is popular among Opposition benches for his delicious homemade chocolates that he generously distributes among his colleagues. Nehru is also promoting a small venture — Kocoatrait, which makes ethically sourced zero waste bean-to-bar chocolates — from his constituency. He says it's one way of supporting a sustainable and circular economy. Nehru's sweet offering has won him praise from the Treasury benches too. While he has introduced some NDA MPs to his homemade delights, the DMK leader says he is still amassing courage to go to the senior leaders. He recently offered a few chocolates in different flavours to Union Minister Manohar Lal Khattar, who said he relished each one of them. Overhaul On Cards Ridden by factionalism, the Haryana unit of Congress may soon get new District Congress Committee (DCC) presidents under the party's Sangathan Srijan Abhiyan (organisational rejuvenation campaign). The party had kickstarted the organisational overhaul in Gujarat, where it appointed new DCCs in June. It recently sent observers to Haryana and Madhya Pradesh to oversee a similar exercise. Sources in the Congress say they are not sure when the Madhya Pradesh appointments will be finalised, but in Haryana the revamp will begin in the next few days. The party high command has meticulously gone through suggestions made by the observers, and will soon announce the appointments. In party circles in Haryana, meanwhile, speculation is rife about which faction — former Chief Minister Bhupinder Singh Hooda or party MP Selja Kumari — will have more people among the new DCCs. Old Office, New Role Senior forest service officer Gobind Sagar Bhardwaj, who was till recently a member secretary of the National Tiger Conservation Authority (NTCA), returned to his former institution — the Wildlife Institute of India — as its director. Bhardwaj had earlier served as a scientist and faculty at the autonomous wildlife research body and has moved there after a one-year stint at NTCA.
Time of India
41 minutes ago
- Time of India
OMC Mining Case: Telangana HC junks AP IAS officer Srilakshmi's criminal revision plea
Hyderabad: Justice K Lakshman of the Telangana high court on Friday dismissed the criminal revision petition filed by senior Andhra Pradesh IAS officer Y Srilakshmi, who is facing allegations of facilitating the illegal mining scam involving mining baron Gali Janardhan Reddy and his company, Obulapuram Mining Company (OMC). CBI, which probed the scam, named Srilakshmi as accused No. 6 in the case. The investigation led to the conviction of Janardhan Reddy and his associates, including then AP mines and geology director VD Rajagopal. However, the trial court acquitted former mines minister P Sabitha Indra Reddy and then industries secretary Kripanandam. Justice Lakshman, in his order, held that the questions relating to mining leases, captive mining, and other factual matters must be examined during trial. He observed that the truthfulness of such contentions could not be adjudicated by the high court in a criminal revision petition, and accordingly, dismissed Srilakshmi's plea. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad In her plea, Srilakshmi contended that she merely implemented policy decisions taken by the then AP govgt, which had already favoured OMC. She assumed charge as secretary of industries and mines in May 2006, succeeding Kripanandam, and claimed she had not initiated any new action of her own. Her counsel further argued that the term 'captive mining' was not used at the time due to a Union govt directive prohibiting it and therefore she could not be faulted on that count. It was also submitted that section 27 of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 provided her legal protection, as it prohibits prosecution for acts done in good faith under the Act. However, the CBI argued that mining leases were granted, and GOs were issued only after her appointment. It accused her of suppressing material facts from the Centre while obtaining permission for the lease in favour of OMC. The agency alleged she took expedited steps to eliminate rival claimants to benefit OMC. The chargesheet named her as a co-conspirator along with Janardhan Reddy, OMC managing director Srinivas Reddy, and Rajagopal. Notably, the high court had earlier discharged Srilakshmi from the case. However, following a challenge by the CBI, the Supreme Court set aside that order, noting that the high court had not heard the agency's arguments. The apex court remanded the matter, directing the high court to hear both parties and dispose of the matter within three months.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
J&K an exception, no delimitation exercise prior to 2026 Census: SC
NEW DELHI: Acknowledging an exception carved out for Jammu and Kashmir , the Supreme Court on Friday said delimitation exercises for other states cannot be conducted prior to publication of data of first census after 2026 as that would be against the mandate of Article 170(3) of the Constitution. "The delimitation process is, by design, a legislative and executive function. If the SC were to compel carrying out of delimitation exercise (in a particular state) through a judicial fiat, it would likely be construed as an interference in the policy-making prerogative of the Executive," said a bench of Justices Surya Kant and N K Singh. Writing the judgment for the bench, Justice Kant said, "The Constitutional edifice carefully balances institutional roles, and any disruption of that equilibrium would undermine both the legitimacy and functional integrity of the democratic process." The bench said the constitutional mandate under Article 170(3) bars any delimitation exercise concerning states of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana or any other state. It dismissed a writ petition challenging the Centre's decision to conduct delimitation only for J&K and not for Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, saying the constitutional mandate - delimitation exercise based on first census after 2026 - does not apply to UTs. The petitioner's counsel Rao Ranjit said that though J&K Reorganisation Act was passed in 2019, the delimitation exercise was carried out under the 2020 notification, but even though the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act was passed in 2014, the delimitation exercise had not been carried out for these two states even after a decade. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Blood cancer is taking our curious baby away from us! Donate For Health Donate Now Undo Solicitor general Tushar Mehta along with ASG K M Nataraj for the Centre said as per the mandate of Articles 80 and 170 of the Constitution, no readjustment of seats or divisions of states into territorial constituencies can be undertaken until the relevant data from first census conducted after 2026 is published. For the Election Commission, senior advocate Maninder Singh said the EC has no jurisdiction to opine on the validity of delimitation exercise as its role is only to facilitate implementation of the process. The SC accepted the Centre's stand and said the AP Reorganisation Act is subject to the constitutional provisions, as expressly provided in the Act itself. If delimitation exercise is allowed to be carried out in some states, then it would open a flood gate of similar demands from the other states, he said. The bench said the petitioner cannot seek to draw delimitation parity between states of AP and Telangana with that of the Union Territory of J&K, to which Article 170(3) has no application. Though it acknowledged legitimate expectations of people of the two states for delimitation exercise, it ruled that such expectations cannot override constitutional mandate.
