
Trump's new version of Oval Office meetings has rattled some foreign leaders
But President Donald Trump's public pillorying of Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky in February has upended Oval Office norms, sparking panic among some foreign leaders.
'You're not acting all that thankful,' Trump scolded Zelensky, with Vice President JD Vance piling on in front of the international press.
As the Ukraine leader pushed for more help in the country's war with Russia, Trump at one point threatened to give up on Ukraine entirely, the meeting devolving into little more than a shouting match.
Foreign dignitaries took that visit – as well as Trump's unfounded accusations of genocide against South African President Cyril Ramaphosa and tense exchanges with Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney – as a sign that Oval Office visits in Trump's second term called for a different type of preparation.
Five former senior diplomats who have handled preparations for these types of meetings likened Trump's White House to a boxing ring or a TV set.
The dignitaries said leaders should now mentally prepare for diplomatic 'jiu jitsu,' trolling or even 'North Korean' style adulation. And never, ever say Trump is wrong in front of a camera.
'You never contradict Trump publicly, because he will lose face and that's something that he can't accept,' said Gérard Araud, who was France's ambassador to the US during Trump's first presidency.
There are signs ahead of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's planned White House visit Monday that even he is looking to avoid any chance of a fight, despite his close relationship with Trump. After Trump said Tuesday that he planned to be 'very firm' with Netanyahu on the need for a ceasefire in Gaza, an Israeli official indicated they accepted the terms of a 60-day ceasefire proposal about 24 hours later.
For Lithuania's former foreign minister, Gabrielius Landsbergis, Oval Office visits from foreign leaders are 'chances for Trump to portray himself as this alpha leader, you know, pushing aside others and belittling others,' he told CNN. 'This is a show.'
Trump himself indicated the last point as his meeting with Zelensky ended, quipping: 'This is going to be great television.'
Arturo Sarukhán, Mexico's former ambassador to Washington, described the meetings as 'diplomatic vandalism and trolling.'
Foreign dignitaries say Trump 2.0 is at a different level even compared to his first term. In 2017 he was, 'learning the ropes of government. And I think he was learning the boundaries of his power,' said Joe Hockey, former Australian ambassador to the US.
Ex-French envoy Araud said that Trump in 2017 was 'insecure, he didn't know the job. He hated to be patronized.'
Trump has also acknowledged that he's much more confident in exercising his powers the second time around – and he's made it clear he's less concerned about potential limitations or criticisms.
The returned president is 'far more overtly transactional,' Hockey said, as well as 'a far more formidable negotiator.' Since January, allies and foes alike have been subjected to unprecedented tariffs and the ignominy of placating Trump for preferable trade terms.
And it's rattled some leaders, according to Araud: 'European leaders especially are in a sort of denial. They are panicking.'
Glitzed out in gold details, the Oval Office exudes Trump, its walls reflecting his particular vision of US history. His office is as much showplace as workplace.
That's not the only way the office has changed.
Unlike the bureaucratic machine of past presidencies, the Trump White House functions more like a royal family or a king's court, Araud said. Without 'personal access' to Trump or his close family, leaders won't make much progress on requests. And even if heads of state do get that one-on-one time, 'it doesn't mean you're going to influence the guy.'
During past administrations, 'there were rules,' Araud added. Meetings at the White House, which typically involve months of planning, were seen as a unique opportunity for foreign leaders to meet with the US president – and be seen doing so.
'You were supposed to respect some basic decency,' he said.
Such visits were 'about treating foreign leaders with dignity and respect and, frankly, making sure that these visits are a win-win for both sides,' Rufus Gifford, who was the US ambassador to Denmark until 2017 and chief of diplomatic protocol under former President Joe Biden, told CNN. As chief of protocol, Gifford was responsible for coordinating meetings between the US president and foreign leaders.
'Our advice, very simply, was take advantage of the very few moments that you have,' Gifford added. 'This should be a nice meeting where you get to know each other as human beings.'
Sarukhán, one of Mexico's ambassadors to the US during the Bush and Obama presidencies, said that his team would provide icebreakers and areas of shared interest to their president ahead of a visit — anything to lubricate the wheels of diplomacy.
Famously, Mexican President Vicente Fox visited former President George W. Bush's Texas ranch for one of their meetings, after Bush came to Fox's ranch in Mexico years earlier. Sarukhán described pictures from the visits as 'visual gold,' adding they were the product of long discussions between both president's teams.
And ahead of former President Barack Obama's inauguration, Sarukhán recalled the Mexican embassy put on a special exhibition of jewels of Mexican art in DC, where the Obamas could meet Mexico's then-President Felipe Caldéron.
'It was an Olympic goal, to use a soccer term,' Sarukhán said.
'Think in terms of television' is how Landsbergis advised preparing for a meeting with the former reality TV star president.
He said that world leaders also have their home audience's public perception in mind. Pushing back or even fact checking Trump may be risky, but it isn't necessarily a losing strategy, Landsbergis said. Similarly, Sarukhán said it can be advantageous for leaders to show they can handle some 'jiu jitsu' with the US president.
'They should not have an expectation that it's going to go smoothly,' said Gifford, the Biden White House official who also worked on Kamala Harris' campaign. 'Donald Trump thrives on keeping these foreign leaders off balance.'
Sometimes, that manifests in actual physicality — often involving aggressive handshakes. That presented a personal challenge for Araud when France's Emmanuel Macron met with Trump for the first time in 2017.
'Beware. He is going to be brutal with your hand. Be ready to resist,' Araud warned.
He now counsels subordination.
'You should first be profusely grateful. You should really compliment the president. There is a sort of North Korean side in the White House,' he said. 'And you should let Trump really talk and talk.'
'A phone call with Trump. It's a minimum 45 minutes, and you have at least 40 minutes of Trump.'
Gifford warned against trying to insincerely charm Trump. 'That works in the moment. It does not work long-term. And he will play you.'
'I don't, in my mind, understand why foreign leaders keep coming to the Oval Office thinking that it's the same as it has been. It's just not,' Gifford told CNN, adding that Trump doesn't value alliances as past US leaders have.
Despite the threat of an Apprentice-style ambush beamed live to the world, Landsbergis reckons the reward of an Oval Office visit outweighs the risk of a Trump smackdown.
It's the 'only chance' for a small country like Lithuania to transmit important messages or risk assessments — for example, about Russia's aggression — directly to Trump.
But navigating the minefield of Oval Office barbs and fraught televized moments with Trump requires treating the most powerful man on earth like 'a whimsical and unpredictable child,' Araud said.
'Trump's the only one making decisions,' he added, 'and he's making decisions from the hip.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Biden aides pushed for early debate to show off Biden's ‘strength,' expose Trump's ‘weakness,' book says
Senior advisors to then-President Joe Biden reportedly urged him to hold a debate against President Donald Trump as early as possible in an attempt to highlight Biden's "leadership" and Trump's "weakness," according to a new book. The book, "2024: How Trump Retook the White House and the Democrats Lost America," is set for release Tuesday and claims that Biden's team dismissed concerns about his age during the 2024 election cycle. The book, authored by Josh Dawsey of the Wall Street Journal, Tyler Pager of the New York Times and Isaac Arnsdorf of the Washington Post, says Biden senior advisors wrote up a memo advocating an initial spring debate, followed by a potential second one in early September after Labor Day. Biden Family Misled Public, Concealed Details On Son Beau's Cancer Diagnosis, New Book Says This strategy would allow Biden to take on Trump before early voting in battleground states kicked off, set the terms of the debate most advantageous for Biden and highlight Biden's "leadership" in contrast to Trump's, according to a memo on the matter. "By holding the first debate in the spring, YOU will be able to reach the widest audience possible, before we are deep in the summer months with the conventions, Olympics and family vacations taking precedence," Biden's senior advisors reportedly wrote in an April 15, 2024, memo, published by Politico Playbook. "In addition, the earlier YOU are able to debate the better, so that the American people can see YOU standing next to Trump and showing the strength of YOUR leadership, compared to Trump's weakness and chaos." Read On The Fox News App Biden's First Public Remarks Since Cancer Diagnosis Honor Gold Star Families Even so, the book reports that some Biden aides were hesitant about an early debate, with some even advocating that Biden shouldn't debate Trump at all. Specifically, the book cites a Biden donor who pressed the White House in May 2024 to find a reason to pull Biden from the debates, after the donor reported being "alarmed" by Biden's behavior at a Chicago fundraiser. Meanwhile, the Trump White House said the debate backfired on Biden, and instead, shed light on Biden's own weaknesses. "The only highlight from the debate was Joe Biden's inability (to) form a complete sentence," White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said in a Monday statement to Fox News Digital. "American voters got a firsthand look at Biden's weakness, his campaign in chaos, and what it looks like when real leader is missing from the White House." "Unfortunately for the Democrats, no adviser or so-called 'strategic' move could save their incompetent candidates and terrible policies from President Trump's historic, landslide victory," Rogers said. A spokesperson for Biden did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital. Biden Says He Could 'Beat The Hell Out Of' Authors Of New Book Arguing His Cognitive Decline Biden and Trump ultimately did face off in a debate on June 27, 2024 – an event that prompted Biden to exit the election in July 2024 and led to Vice President Kamala Harris to take on Trump in November 2024. "2024" is one of several books that have been released in 2025 detailing Biden's mental deterioration while in office and how Trump won the election. Another example is the book "Original Sin: President Biden's Decline, Its Cover-up, and His Disastrous Choice to Run Again," released May article source: Biden aides pushed for early debate to show off Biden's 'strength,' expose Trump's 'weakness,' book says
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Russian forces claim first foothold in new Ukraine region
Russia said Monday it captured its first village in Ukraine's central Dnipropetrovsk region after grinding towards the border for months, dealing a psychological blow to Kyiv as its worries mount. Moscow launched a fresh large-scale drone and missile barrage before the announcement, including on Ukraine's army recruitment centres, as part of an escalating series of attacks that come as ceasefire talks led by the United States stall. Kyiv also said it carried out a drone attack on a Russian ammunition factory in the Moscow region. Russia announced its forces captured the village of Dachne in the Dnipropetrovsk region, an important industrial mining territory that has also come under mounting Russian air attacks. Russian forces appear to have made crossing the border a key strategic objective over recent months, and deeper advances into the region could pose logistics and economic problems for Ukraine. Kyiv has so far denied any Russian foothold in Dnipropetrovsk. Moscow first said last month its forces had crossed the border, more than three years since launching its invasion and pushing through the neighbouring Donetsk region. Earlier Monday, Ukraine's army said its forces "repelled" attacks in Dnipropetrovsk, including "in the vicinity" of Dachne. Dnipropetrovsk is not one of the five Ukrainian regions -- Donetsk, Kherson, Lugansk, Zaporizhzhia and Crimea -- that Moscow has publicly claimed as Russian territory. Russia used the region's main city, Dnipro, as a testing ground for its "experimental" Oreshnik missile in late 2024, claiming to have struck an aeronautics production facility. - Sheltering in basements - Ukrainian military expert Oleksiy Kopytko told AFP the "situation is objectively difficult" for Ukraine's forces in Dnipropetrovsk and that Russia hopes to create some kind of buffer zone in the region. But he said: "Our troops are holding their ground quite steadily." An AFP reporter in the eastern city of Kharkiv saw civilians with their belongings being evacuated from a residential building damaged during Russia's overnight attacks, and others sheltering with pets in a basement. At least four people were killed and dozens wounded across Ukraine in the latest violence, mostly in the Kharkiv region bordering Russia and in a late-morning attack on the industrial city of Zaporizhzhia. Ukraine's police said a 34-year-old woman was killed in Kharkiv in attacks that wounded dozens in the northeastern city. In the southern city of Zaporizhzhia, regional governor Ivan Fedorov said 20 people needed medical assistance after Russian attacks. "Air defence remains the top priority for protecting lives," President Volodymyr Zelensky said on social media after the attacks, as fears mount over whether US President Donald Trump's government will continue supplying military aid to Ukraine. - 'Counting on partners' - Zelensky said Ukraine was "strongly counting on our partners to fully deliver on what we have agreed". Ukraine's air force said Moscow had launched 101 drones across the country and four missiles. Seventy-five of the drones were downed, it added. Attacks on Monday targeted two recruitment centres in separate cities, wounding four people, the Ukrainian army said, in what appears to be a new trend following similar strikes over the weekend and last week. "These strikes are part of a comprehensive enemy operation aimed at disrupting mobilisation in Ukraine," Ukraine's Centre for Strategic Communications, a government-funded body, wrote on social media. It added that Russia had attacked recruitment centres last week in the cities of Kremenchuk, Kryvyi Rig and Poltava. The Ukrainian army announced it hit the Krasnozavodsky Chemical Plant in the Moscow region with drones, saying the plant makes components for Russian drones used against Ukraine. In Russia, the defence ministry said it had shot down 91 Ukrainian drones overnight, including eight in the Moscow region, with the majority of the rest in regions bordering Ukraine. bur-mmp-oc/dt/jhb
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk says he's formed a new political party. But it's not clear if he actually has
Elon Musk has said that he's formed a new political party, but it's unclear what steps — if any — he's taken to do so, or how the effort might affect upcoming elections. Musk has not yet released any additional information. Spokespeople for Musk and his political action committee, America PAC, didn't immediately comment Monday. While there are many recent federal elections filings that reference the Tesla and SpaceX CEO or his companies, Musk himself has even gone on his social media platform batting down at least one filing as fake. The possible new political party marks another development in the rift between Musk and President Donald Trump over the Republican's sweeping tax cuts law, which the tech billionaire has called 'insane.' The fissures between Trump and his one-time top surrogate and Department of Government Efficiency cost-cutter-in-chief have exposed not only the fragile nature of relations between two of the country's most visible personalities but also the potential political consequences of disagreeing with the priorities of either man. The squabble could be particularly costly for Musk, whose businesses rely on billions of dollars in government contracts, and whose publicly traded company Tesla has taken a market hit. Here's what we know — and what we don't — about Musk's new political party: Musk says he's formed the America Party Musk said Saturday on X that he had formed the America Party 'to give you back your freedom.' He'd teased the move for days, threatening to make his own party if 'this insane spending bill passes' Congress. He spent part of Sunday taking feedback from X users about the party, which he indicated he'd use to get involved in the 2026 midterm elections. Some new Musk-related parties seem fishy The Federal Election Commission database has teemed with newly formed political entities that make reference either to Musk or one of his companies, but there are details that cast doubts on their authenticity. As of Monday afternoon, there were multiple political parties listed in the Federal Election Commission database formed in the hours since Musk's Saturday X post, with versions of 'America Party' or 'DOGE' or 'X' in the name, or Musk listed among people affiliated with the entity. But none appeared to be real, listing contacts for the organization as email addresses such as ' wentsnowboarding@ ″ or untraceable Protonmail addresses. Several listed Vaibhav Taneja — the chief financial officer of Tesla — as a contact for the party, along with a Texas address for a building affiliated with X. Several pointed to a home in Maryland. When a Musk supporter posted screengrabs of one of the formation documents to X, Musk took to X Sunday to say that the 'filing is false and has been reported as such to the FEC.' What could Musk do with a new party? While indicating earlier this year that he might play less of a role in elected politics moving forward, Musk — the world's richest man who spent at least $250 million supporting Trump in the 2024 election — could use a new party to try to do the opposite. New political parties are often formed but typically struggle to pull any significant support away from the Republican and Democratic parties. But Musk could impact next year's elections determining control of Congress if he is willing to spend significant amounts of money — through a new party or existing ones. During the tax cuts debate, Musk pledged to work toward supporting primary challengers for members of Congress who backed the bill. He also said he would support Rep. Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican targeted by Trump for opposing the measure. What has Trump said about Musk's new party? Trump on Sunday called Musk's proposition 'ridiculous,' going on to tout 'tremendous success with the Republican Party.' Trump later posted on social media that he was 'saddened to watch Elon Musk go completely 'off the rails,' essentially becoming a TRAIN WRECK,' saying the only thing third parties are good for 'is the creation of Complete and Total DISRUPTION & CHAOS.' What does it take to make a new political party? There are official steps, like setting up a tax identification number, bank account and treasurer, who can be held liable if future paperwork isn't filed properly. According to the FEC, any new party that intends to operate in federal elections has to register with the commission 'when they raise or spend money over certain thresholds in connection with a federal election.' Federal campaign finance laws and regulations govern how political parties can take in money. Parties have to file regular reports with the FEC. But even a federally designated political party has to gain access to ballots state by state, making the entire process, according to University of Richmond School of Law professor Carl Tobias, 'complicated and expensive.' ___ Kinnard can be reached at