Trump hosts gala for crypto memecoin buyers despite corruption concerns
The unprecedented melding of U.S. presidential power and personal business will take place at Trump's golf club outside Washington, where the 220 biggest purchasers of the $TRUMP memecoin will have dinner with the president.
The top 25 investors, according to an event website, will get a private session with Trump beforehand and a White House tour.
Trump launched the memecoin three days before his January inauguration, quickly increasing his net worth by billions and raising major ethics concerns, including over possible foreign influence.
Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren and colleagues called Thursday for Trump to disclose who is attending the dinner.
Calling the dinner "an orgy of corruption," Warren told a press conference that Trump "is using the presidency of the United States to make himself richer through crypto."
Data analytics firm Inca Digital has confirmed that many transactions occurred through international exchanges unavailable in the United States, suggesting foreign buyers.
Chinese-born crypto entrepreneur Justin Sun claims the top investor position, having committed $20 million to the memecoin as part of his $93 million total investment in Trump-linked crypto ventures.
Sun, founder of top 10 cryptocurrency TRON, was under investigation by U.S. authorities for market manipulation, but regulators, now controlled by Trump appointees, agreed in February to a 60-day pause to seek a settlement.
According to the website Popular Information, a few weeks before that decision, Sun purchased $30 million in digital assets from a venture backed by Trump and his family.
"Honored to support @POTUS and grateful for the invitation to attend President Trump's Gala Dinner as his TOP fan!" Sun wrote Tuesday on X.
Justin Unga of advocacy group End Citizens United described the crypto dinner as a blatant example of Trump profiting from the presidency while roiling the U.S. economy.
"Some say this is a back door to corruption," Unga said.
"I would argue it's the front door with valet parking, and it's got a red carpet... and a slap in the face of hard working Americans."
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt dismissed the allegations of impropriety Thursday, telling a briefing that Trump is attending the dinner in his "personal time" and abiding by applicable conflict of interest laws.
The dinner comes as the U.S. Senate is pushing through legislation to more clearly regulate cryptocurrencies, a long-sought request of the industry.
Senators on Monday advanced a landmark bill known as the GENIUS Act that proposes a regulatory framework for stablecoins, a type of crypto token seen as more predictable for investors as its value is pegged to hard currencies like the dollar.
That legislation had faced roadblocks in part because of Trump's dabbling in cryptocurrencies; a rising sector he once dismissed as a scam.
His stance reversed during the 2024 presidential campaign when crypto tycoons, frustrated by perceived unfair treatment under the Biden administration, became major contributors to his campaign.
Bitcoin's price hit a new all-time high on Thursday, climbing above $111,000 before falling slightly.
Trump's newfound enthusiasm for digital currencies has expanded into multiple ventures led primarily by his eldest sons.
Their growing portfolio includes investments in Binance, a major crypto exchange whose founder seeks a presidential pardon to re-enter the U.S. market.
This investment flows through World Liberty Financial, a Trump family-backed venture launched last September with significant Mideast deals.
The company's founding team includes Donald Jr. and Eric Trump alongside Zach Witkoff, son of Trump's diplomatic adviser.
President Trump has taken concrete steps to reduce regulatory barriers, including an executive order establishing a "Strategic Bitcoin Reserve" for government holdings of the leading digital currency.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- Indian Express
China price war, lack of clarity on US ‘penalty': What Indian exporters are discussing in tariff talks with American importers
Amid a sudden escalation of trade tensions between India and the US, with American President Donald Trump threatening to impose tariffs 'substantially' higher than the 25 per cent announced earlier, Indian exporters face a two-pronged challenge in maintaining access to their largest export market — the US. On the one hand, China has begun aggressively undercutting prices to outcompete other countries; on the other hand, the undefined 'penalty' over and above the 25 per cent reciprocal tariffs has complicated negotiations between US importers and Indian exporters, especially in low-margin products such as apparel and footwear. The uncertainty over the 'penalty' on India for purchasing Russian oil has come at a time when Indian exporters typically receive bulk summer orders, including for cotton garments, lightweight footwear, and linen clothing. Normally, exporters and importers share the burden of additional tariffs, but exporters said contracts have stalled due to the unknown penalty amount. 'A lot of exporters, particularly from the apparel and footwear sectors, are facing uncertainty because summer season orders are set to be placed very shortly. They are in touch with buyers, and some of them have even visited the US. But neither the buyer nor the seller is in a position to state what they are willing to negotiate, as the 'penalty' amount is unknown,' Ajay Sahai, director general & CEO of the Federation of Indian Export Organisations (FIEO), told The Indian Express. US retailers and apparel companies typically begin shipping merchandise from global suppliers at least two to three months before the summer season starts in April. Traders, typically, begin negotiating contracts much earlier. 'China has become a little more aggressive because they are outpriced by 5 per cent, and they are looking at the extent to which they can reduce the price. That's also a challenge. It may not be entirely possible for the exporter to absorb the duty, and therefore they are requesting that the government should chip in for a limited period only, as we hope that a bilateral trade agreement (BTA) will be concluded by September or October,' Sahai added. However, after Trump threatened to raise tariffs on Indian goods over its purchase of Russian oil, New Delhi on Monday said the targeting of India was 'unjustified and unreasonable', and that the country would take 'all necessary measures' to safeguard its 'national interests and economic security'. 'India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian oil, they are then, for much of the oil purchased, selling it on the open market for big profits… They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian war machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the tariff paid by India to the USA,' Trump said in a post on his social media platform, Truth Social. Rating agency ICRA said that the higher-than-expected US tariffs on India — and the potential penalty linked to India's crude and defence purchases from Russia — are likely to pose a headwind to India's GDP growth in the current fiscal. 'We have lowered our growth forecast for India for FY2026 by 20 basis points to 6.0 per cent; the extent of the said penalties could result in a further downside,' the agency said. Simon J Evenett, Professor of Geopolitics and Strategy at the International Institute for Management Development (IMD), an independent academic institute in Switzerland, said in a LinkedIn post that tariff threats against India have 'nothing to do with economics'. He said that the United States has now antagonised all five of the original BRICS nations, home to more than 3.2 billion people. 'I struggle to see a coherent grand strategy here — other than to take on every possible pole of alternative power. None of the BRICS have the defence dependence on the USA that the EU, Korea, Japan, and the UK have — and that probably played the greater part in the latter's acquiescence to recent US tariff threats. So what is the US offering to the BRICS?' Evenett said. 'Access to the US market isn't a compelling answer. Take India. Its largest export to the USA is smartphones — does anyone else on the planet buy smartphones? Next biggest export is a variant of diamonds — there are other buyers for these too. Medicines are third on the list — same argument. Light oil next — you get the picture. Only one-sixth of Indian goods exports go to the USA. Big deal,' he added. As Trump has threatened several countries with additional tariffs over the re-routing of goods to the US, Deborah Elms, a trade and economic policy expert with the Hinrich Foundation, said in a LinkedIn post that one key complaint from the business community is the lack of clarity on what the US currently means by 'transshipment'. 'Given that tariffs are about to be 40 per cent on anything deemed to be transshipped, definitions are critically important. Typically, firms are required to 'substantially transform' products. In other words, you aren't allowed to simply take a box, slap a new label on it saying 'from country X', but must take raw materials, parts, and components to create something transformed. The amount of transformation is critically important. In a free trade agreement, officials spend months or years wrangling over these rules. Is there a value threshold that needs to be crossed? Is it a change in tariff heading? Subheading? Unfortunately, with new tariffs coming on August 7, we have no guidance at all on these rules,' Elms said. Ravi Dutta Mishra is a Principal Correspondent with The Indian Express, covering policy issues related to trade, commerce, and banking. He has over five years of experience and has previously worked with Mint, CNBC-TV18, and other news outlets. ... Read More
Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- Indian Express
US Justice Department open probe into Obama officials over allegation of Russian interference in 2016 polls
US Attorney General Pam Bondi has ordered federal prosecutors to launch a grand jury investigation into allegations that members of the former Democratic President Barack Obama's administration manufactured intelligence on Russia's interference in the 2016 presidential elections. Also known as the 'Russiagate conspiracy', President Donald Trump had long claimed that the claims of Russian intervention in the 2016 elections was conspired by his political opponents in order to smear his image. However, it remains to be seen what could be the charges levelled in the probe and who would be charged in the 'Russiagate' investigation. Bondi has directed a prosecutor to present evidence to a grand jury after referrals from the Trump administration's top intelligence official, Associated Press reported on Monday. 🧵 New evidence has emerged of the most egregious weaponization and politicization of intelligence in American history. Per President @realDonaldTrump's directive, I have declassified a @HouseIntel oversight majority staff report that exposes how the Obama Administration… — DNI Tulsi Gabbard (@DNIGabbard) July 23, 2025 The Justice Department had said in July that they are going to form a strike force to assess claims made by the Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard about 'alleged weaponization of the US intelligence community.' Gabbard accused Obama and his national security team of a 'years-long coup' against Trump while releasing a declassified report which the Democrats claimed was false. Gabbard alleged that intelligence inputs about Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election was politicised by the White House then led by the Obama administration to falsely link Trump with Russia. Trump reacted to the revelations made by the National Intelligence director and accused Obama of 'treason'. A spokesperson for Obama had called the claims 'bizarre' and said 'the allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction.' Democrats discredited the findings released by Gabbard and said nothing invalidated a US intelligence assessment in January 2017, which said that Russia had sought to damage Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton's campaign and boost Trump's campaign three months prior to voting in 2016. The assessment concluded that the actual impact of Russia's meddling with 2016 polls were limited and had no evidence to show if Moscow's efforts actually changed voting outcomes. However, Russia had denied it played any role during the 2016 US presidential elections.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
13 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump's war against the world comes at America's expense
Trump seems to visualise that what is good for the globe is not good for the US. AFP President Donald Trump has unleashed an economic war against the rest of the world from the very inception of his second administration. American people, American companies and the entire political class of the United States are not with President Trump's economic policies—domestic or foreign. However, the principal difficulty lies in the fact that not many within the United States who oppose Trump's tariff tantrums are able to counter, resist or confront an administration that is vindictive against the opponents and resorts to retribution or revenge. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD President Trump does not spare anyone who makes statements or brings out reports on issues that run counter to his policies. The latest example is the quick removal of the head of the Bureau of Labour Statistics, Erika McEntarfar, after the bureau released the job statistics showing that the US labour market is not as resilient as expected. The latest job report indicated that Trump's tariff war and other economic policies have begun to demonstrate the negative consequences of Trump policy. American consumers are yet to feel the adverse impact of high tariffs on imports, partly because some of the US' importers bought foreign goods in bulk and put them in stores before the new tariff would kick in, and partly because some of the import duties are yet to be systematically implemented, as many countries are still in the process of negotiating with the officials of the Trump Administration. The price pressure on consumers will certainly pose a serious political challenge to President Trump. But in order to deal with that possible outcome, the Trump supporters can come up with false data and build an untruthful narrative. Unfortunately, the Democratic Party also appears to be a bystander and unable to counter Trump effectively. The big American companies that contribute to election campaign financing are also mute spectators for fear of becoming the target of Trump's wrath. President Trump's dislike for foreigners is clearly vindicated in his harsh treatment of the immigrants. His aversion for foreign countries is reflected in his call to American companies to return and base their manufacturing activities at home. But this Trumpian drive would harm US companies that have invested around the world, taking advantage of cheap land and labour, by implication, making America richer than other countries. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Trump's anxiety about a rising China that would ferociously compete economically with the US is explicable. But when the Apple company sought to exit from China and enter the Indian market, Trump threatened high duties on the products of the company! It gives the impression that his main goal is not to allow India to grow, even if it is in American interest. Indian economic performance is viewed by President Trump as a 'dead economy', not because he lacks basic knowledge about India but because he would not like to see an India that would question his false statements or assert itself as a country that stands by its policy of strategic autonomy. Trump seems persuaded that his vision of 'America First' would be good for his country. Actually, his America First policy would benefit him and his supporters but harm the United States and the world. He wrongly assumes that in a globalised world with complex interdependence among countries, the US economy can thrive all by itself. He seems to visualise that what is good for the globe is not good for America. Otherwise, he would not have embarked upon a journey that would make the US allies suffer, make the strategic partners reassess the value of partnering with the US and induce the competitors to resolve to stand up to the US. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD By his decision to withdraw the US membership from global institutions and initiatives, such as the World Health Organisation, the Paris Climate Accord, Unesco and the disrespect for the World Trade Organisation, Trump seeks to make America a bolted island country in a deeply interconnected world. Can such an America protect itself against the next pandemic? Can the Americans breathe safe air when the world gets progressively polluted along with rising earth temperature? Can it sustain a durable trading relationship by browbeating countries to accept its policies and diktats through bilateral networks? So far Trump has been in the commanding position for a little above six months. He has a distance to go before he is supposed to step down in January 2029. His recent contemplation for an unconstitutional third term in the White House appears to have been abandoned for the time being. Yet, whether there will be a peaceful transfer of power after the 2028 presidential election in Washington, DC, cannot be predicted now. He pardoned many who were convicted and sentenced to jail due to their involvement in the insurrection of January 6, 2021. Will there be another insurrection? STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD A lot will depend on how the political scene unfolds within the United States. There is an opportunity for the American voters to send Trump a message in the November 2026 congressional election. There are still openings for Corporate America to press upon him to abandon his damaging tariff policies and other economic measures. The think tanks and the American universities, where academia plays a constructive role in the policymaking ecosystem, are struggling hard to make compromises with the Trump Administration to ensure restoration of federal funding. But still, the American academia can elucidate whether the proverbial emperor is without clothes. But how the international community responds will also determine if the current American imperial presidency is a passing phenomenon. The European allies have been left high and dry by Trump and are clamped with a 15 per cent tariff, which is much higher than the 2.5 per cent tariff that was imposed earlier. The Nato member countries have been bulldozed into spending 5 per cent of their GDP on defence when they are undergoing economic downturn and energy shortages. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Japan and South Korea are forced to pay more to keep the alliance structure alive. India was one of the first countries in 2025 to start negotiations with the Trump team on bilateral trade. After months of negotiations, the Trump Administration keeps pressuring India to open its agricultural sector, which would surely hurt the millions of Indian farmers. This pressure is compounded by its insistence on India to stop buying Russian energy resources, which would again grievously affect India's energy security. China stood firm and responded by restricting rare earth materials. It pinched the US, and Trump promptly relaxed its restrictions on technology and chip trade. But China's export controls hurt many other countries, including India. As the world is facing Trump's tariff war, it remains utterly divided. There were some whispers about the EU, China, Japan and many others coming together to confer on how to manage the uncertainties in international trade and overall political economy. But whispers have not given way to any concrete steps. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The international community rightly thinks that Trump is not America. Numerous countries around the world seem to be interested in waiting him out. But the big question is whether Trumpism will survive Donald Trump. All major countries look prepared to work for a truce with Trump. However, the truce should not be at the cost of the stability of the international trade ecosystem. Trump's economic war against the world will not end soon unless there are countermeasures against Trumpian unilateralism. The author is founding chairperson, Kalinga Institute of Indo-Pacific Studies, and editor, India Quarterly. The views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect Firstpost's views.
