Which are the subpostmaster redress schemes and what criticism have they faced?
– Who is eligible to apply for compensation under the scheme?
The GLO scheme was set up for the 555 people who took the Post Office to the High Court in order for the financial settlement from their case to better reflect the effect it had on their lives.
– Who was involved in the High Court case against the Post Office?
Lead campaigner Sir Alan Bates was one of the 555 subpostmasters who alleged the Horizon system had been at fault for shortfalls in their accounts and was a key figure in bringing the case to court.
– How many of the 555 claimants from the High Court are eligible for compensation under the scheme?
A total of 492 subpostmasters are entitled to apply for redress under the GLO scheme, with the remaining 63 ineligible to use the scheme due to their wrongful criminal convictions.
– How much money has been paid out by the Government under the GLO scheme?
As of June 30 2025, a total of £177 million had been paid out to the GLO claimants, including interim payments.
– How many of the claimants have accepted compensation offers from the Government?
From the 452 offers made to GLO claimants, 336 have accepted their compensation offers and 334 claims have been paid.
– What criticism has the GLO scheme faced?
Sir Alan has previously described the scheme as a 'mess' and accused the Department for Business and Trade (DBT) of ignoring advice on how to streamline and speed up the process 'out of hand with the feeblest of excuses'.
Sir Alan Bates has criticised the scheme (PA)
Overturned Convictions Scheme
– Who is eligible to apply for redress under the scheme?
Almost 1,000 subpostmasters were wrongfully convicted as part of the Horizon scandal and those who have since had their convictions quashed are able to apply to the scheme.
– What were subpostmasters prosecuted for?
A large proportion of wrongfully convicted subpostmasters were prosecuted by the Post Office for offences such as theft and false accounting after money went missing from their branch accounts.
– Is the scheme still running?
The scheme was closed by the Government last month in order to make way for the Horizon Convictions Redress Scheme following new legislation which overturned all convictions related to the Horizon scandal.
– How much money was paid out as part of the scheme?
A total of £68 million was paid out to claimants, including interim payments.
– How many claims were made under the scheme?
According to Government data, 111 victims were eligible for redress under the scheme, with the Post Office fully settling 71 of the claims and paying a minimum of £200,000 as an interim payment to the remaining claimants.
The remaining 40 claims are now being administered through the Horizon Convictions Redress Scheme.
Horizon Convictions Redress Scheme
– What is the difference between the Horizon Convictions Redress Scheme and the Overturned Convictions Scheme?
Compensation administered through the Horizon Conviction Redress Scheme is paid out by the Government rather than the Post Office and comes following the blanket overturning of convictions related to the Horizon system.
– What money is on offer for those who have had their convictions overturned?
Victims eligible for the scheme are able to either accept a fixed sum of £600,000 or submit a more detailed individual claim.
All applicants are eligible for a £200,000 interim payment.
– How much money has been paid out under the scheme?
As of June 30 2025, a total of £252 million has been paid out under the scheme, including interim payments.
– How many claims have been settled as part of the scheme?
From the 416 final claims made, a total of 401 have been accepted and 397 have been paid.
– What criticisms has the scheme received?
Many subpostmasters have criticised the way in which the detailed individual claims are held as those who choose that method are no longer entitled to the fixed £600,000 sum and potentially face receiving less money.
Horizon Shortfall Scheme (HSS)
– Who is eligible to apply for the HSS?
The HSS scheme was set up for those who experienced shortfalls in their accounts due to the Horizon system but were not wrongfully convicted or part of the 555 who took the Post Office to the High Court.
– What are the claimants entitled to?
In March 2024, HSS claimants were made eligible for a £75,000 interim payment.
– What criticisms has the scheme received?
Many claimants have said they were forced to accept low offers without legal advice.
– Who administers the compensation?
The initial claims are paid out by the Post Office but appeals are dealt with by DBT.
– Were those who were eligible for the £75,000 fixed sum able to claim more money?
HSS claimants are able to send their claim to an independent appeals system called Horizon Shortfall Scheme Appeals.
– How much has been paid out as part of the scheme?
As of June 30 2025, a total of £601 million has been paid to claimants, including interim payments.
– How many claims have been settled as part of the scheme?
A total of 7,750 claims have been made as part of the scheme, with 5,160 offers made, 4,774 offers accepted by claimants and 4,732 paid in full.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Reeves: Of course you are going to disappoint people as Chancellor
Rachel Reeves admits Labour has 'disappointed' people while in government. The politician said she understood that being Chancellor meant making unpopular decisions. She told an audience at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival that Labour had got the balance right between tax, spending and borrowing. But she said that balancing the books meant making tough decisions, even if the are unpopular. Appearing on the Iain Dale All Talk fringe show, she said: 'The reason people voted Labour at the last election is they want to change and they were unhappy with the way that the country was being governed. 'They know that we inherited a mess. They know it's not easy to put it right, but people are impatient for change. 'I'm impatient for change as well, but I've also got the job of making sure the sums always add up – and it doesn't always make you popular because you can't do anything you might want to do. You certainly can't do everything straight away, all at once.' Ms Reeves pointed to Labour's £200 million investment in carbon capture in the north east of Scotland, which she said was welcomed by the industry. At the same time, Labour's windfall tax, she said, was not liked by the sector. 'I can understand that that's extra tax that the oil and gas sector are paying, but you can't really have one without the other,' she said. Defending Labour's record, she said her party had the 'balance about right'. 'But of course you're going to disappoint people,' she added. 'No-one wants to pay more taxes. 'Everyone wants more money than public spending – and borrowing is not a free option, because you've got to pay for it. 'I think people know those sort of constraints, but no-one really likes them and I'm the one, I guess, that has to sort the sums up.' Ms Reeves said Labour had to deliver on its general election campaign of change, adding that her party did not 'deserve' to win the next election if it does not deliver the change it promised.
South Wales Argus
6 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Aberthaw Power Station £5m settlement 'blindsided' cllrs
The £5.25m sum was paid to a company that brought a legal challenge to how the Cardiff Captial Region, which is made up of 10 councils in South East Wales including those in Gwent, awarded a contract for the demolition of a former power station. Earlier this year a High Court judge declared the contract to demolish Aberthaw Power Station for the Cardiff Capital Region was awarded unlawfully but the size of the settlement was only revealed in June and a councillor said he only learnt about it from news reports. Councillors who sit on the region's overview and scrutiny committee. who met this week, complained they hadn't been fully informed of the proceedings, and accepted they had failed to properly scrutinise the region's leadership and its executive. Armand Watts, a Labour councillor from Monmouthshire council, told the meeting: 'There's nothing worse as councillors than the feeling of being blindsided. That is how we felt. The first I properly understood this was reading about it in the newspapers.' Cllr Watts said it was 'embarrassing' for himself and Monmouthshire's Conservative representative on the committee, Cllr Jan Butler. He said: 'People were saying what's going on? And we didn't know as we hadn't discussed it.' He added: 'We should fear our electorate, they are reading headlines in newspapers and asking how did it ever get to this point?' Susan Lloyd-Selby, a Labour councillor for the Vale of Glamorgan which includes Aberthaw, said she wanted to know more about the independent review the region has commissioned and said there are also local concerns around the ongoing demolition work which she said were causing 'reputational issues' for the body. Cardiff Labour councillor Peter Wong said he'd been unhappy from the start with how the region had handled the £38m purchase of the former coal fired power station, in 2022. It intends developing the site as a renewable energy park and is doing so through Cardiff Capital Region Energy a limited company in which the Cardiff Capital Region is the only shareholder. Cllr Wong said: 'At the very first meeting at Aberthaw I asked can we see the business case and was told no, not even in confidence. That didn't help the level of transparency. 'I'm not saying that wouldn't have led to the issues at Aberthaw but that lack of transparency doesn't help. I genuinely think there needs to be more transparency and more effective scrutiny than we've currently been doing.' Later in the meeting Cllr Wong criticised the draft annual report of the South East Wales Corporate Joint Committee, which is the formal name for the capital region as one of four joint committees established across Wales. He compared it to the highly controlled decision making of the former Soviet Union and said: 'I don't think the report in front of us reflects what happened. It feels very much politburo stuff.' During the meeting Monmouthshire County Council's Labour leader, Mary Ann Brocklesby, who is the chair of the capital region said the 'procurement issue around Aberthaw' was 'without question' the body's 'low point' of the year. Chief executive Kellie Beirne said the independent review is being conducted by accountancy firm Deloitte and is about 'half way through' and is expected to be delivered in the early autumn. Ms Beirne also stated she isn't a board member of Cardiff Capital Region Energy and also reminded members the legal proceedings were against Cardiff council and said the region is bound by a confidentiality agreement. It has previously said the £5.25m settlement has been funded from commercial returns on interest generated on balances it holds, and there was no requirement for further public funding.
The Herald Scotland
7 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Good news on the fight to tackle scourge of council tax debt
Firstly, following years of campaigning by Citizens Advice Scotland, the Scottish Government is funding a national project, which we are leading. Local CABs are working hand in hand with their councils to develop policies and practices that will reduce the impact of council tax debt on people who are financially struggling, while helping council tax collection rates. This project is still in its early stages but already we're seeing some fantastic examples of collaborative working, for example to increase awareness of council tax discounts and to focus on ways of identifying people who need support before they explicitly ask for it. Secondly, the governments in the UK and Wales are consulting on reforming council tax collection processes. Positive proposals include more time to pay, more time for advice and support, provision of alternative payment arrangements, and avoiding excessive enforcement action. We have written, with the support of others, to the Scottish Government to urge them to join with the other nations of the UK to conduct a similar consultation and drive forward this kind of change. Allowing people more time to pay their arrears is perhaps the most important reform we would like to see. The debt recovery process is too quick and needs slowing, and a pause in the process is key to helping those who are struggling. This would allow people time to seek advice from agencies such as their local CAB to get budgeting help and income maximisation support so they're in a better position to meet some, if not all, of the arrears. This would benefit the council too, as it will get council tax income it may not otherwise have received while reducing the costs of recovering the arrears. As I say, it is hugely promising to see to see momentum and movement in the right direction on this issue. And it's real proof that our type of rational, compassionate evidenced-based advocacy can get results that will make a real difference to peoples' lives. There is growing support across civic Scotland for a fairer system of council tax collection, one which puts a clearer emphasis on helping those in arrears but who are willing to pay, while balancing the needs of councils to collect their income. With the Holyrood election less than a year away, we – along with other charities – will be aiming to make sure that tackling council tax debt, and public sector debt more widely, is on the agenda of party manifestos and campaigns. Watch this space. Myles Fitt is head of the Financial Health team at Citizens Advice Scotland
