logo
The US is stripping its forests of decades-old protections

The US is stripping its forests of decades-old protections

The Verge24-06-2025
The Trump administration wants to open up tens of millions of acres of national forest to development. The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) announced yesterday that it's rescinding a landmark rule that prevents road construction and timber harvesting in the last unfragmented stretches of national forest.
The USDA says the move will boost timber production, while helping officials manage wildfire-prone lands. Conservation groups say this is simply an industry-led land grab that could level pristine forests and increase the risk of wildfire.
'Make no mistake: this administration will do whatever it takes to sell off the places where we hunt, fish, recreate, and partake in long-standing traditions,' Andy Moderow, senior policy director at Alaska Wilderness League, said in a press statement. 'Today's announcement is a clear attempt to sell off public land for industrial-scale clear-cut logging.'
'A clear attempt to sell off public land for industrial-scale clear-cut logging'
In a move that's likely to face legal challenges, the USDA is tossing out the 'Roadless Rule' that Bill Clinton enacted back in 2001 and that Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins called 'overly restrictive' in a press release. It follows an executive order signed by President Trump in March to expand timber production. Getting rid of the roadless rule will remove protections from nearly 59 million acres of forest, or roughly 30 percent of National Forest System lands, according to the USDA.
Some forests will be more affected than others. The rule impacts 92 percent of the Tongass National Forest in Alaska, the largest old growth forest still standing in the US. It's been one of the most contested areas since Trump first rolled back roadless rule protections there in 2020 before the Biden administration restored them a few years later.
The USDA also claims that 28 million acres of the land previously protected under the roadless rule are 'at high or very high risk of wildfire.' But allowing new roads and logging there won't lessen wildfire risk — it'll do the opposite by raising the risk of forest mismanagement, environmental groups contend.
'When they say we will open [forests] up for responsible management. I almost laughed out loud when I saw that … It's the height of irresponsible management to open them up to roads and logging,' says Randi Spivak, public lands policy director at the Center for Biological Diversity. Wildfires are likely to start near roads, she explains — perhaps from a stray cigarette butt or campfire. Loggers also target mature trees that tend to be more resilient to fires rather than smaller saplings that are more likely to burn.
'It's also a very nuanced topic, and it's completely being exploited by the timber industry and the current administration,' Spivak tells The Verge.
There's an old-school mentality to firefighting that the logging industry has advocated for historically to preserve areas where they harvest timber. The old strategy has been to suppress any kind of forest fire, which has inadvertently exacerbated blazes in certain forests by allowing dry vegetation to build up into loads of tinder. In parts of the western US, fires are a natural part of the landscape that clear out debris that might otherwise turn into fuel for larger infernos.
The timber industry has also promoted the idea that thinning forests will lessen fire risk. 'Thin is just a euphemism for log, it sounds nicer, but there's no difference on the ground,' Spivak says.
More modern fire-busting tactics emphasize making communities less likely to burn. Climate change has led to more widespread wildfires in the western US, but tackling that problem is another protective measure that the Trump administration has thrown by the wayside. Trees and plants naturally store carbon dioxide, keeping the greenhouse gas from heating our planet. Forests in the US sequester more than 800 million metric tons of carbon each year. But they can only keep doing that if they stay intact.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Several US executives to visit China this week: sources
Several US executives to visit China this week: sources

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Several US executives to visit China this week: sources

By Laurie Chen BEIJING (Reuters) -A high-level delegation of American executives will travel to China this week to meet senior Chinese officials in a trip organised by the U.S.-China Business Council (USCBC), two sources with knowledge of the visit told Reuters on Monday. The visit coincides with the latest round of U.S.‑China trade negotiations in Sweden, where China's Vice Premier He Lifeng is meeting U.S. officials from July 27 to July 30 for a new round of economic and trade talks. The delegation will be led by FedEx Chief Executive Rajesh Subramaniam, the council's board chair, one of the sources briefed on the trip said. The South China Morning Post first reported the visit on Sunday, saying that executives from firms including Boeing would be part of the delegation. Reuters could not confirm other CEO members of the delegation or which Chinese officials they would meet. Boeing declined to comment on the trip and deferred to USCBC. The U.S. government was not involved in the organisation of the visit, one of the sources said. The trip comes as Beijing and Washington work towards a summit between the two countries' leaders later this year, probably around the time of the APEC forum in South Korea October 26 - November 1, sources previously told Reuters. USCBC did not respond immediately to a request for comment. The business lobby previously organised similar visits to China by American CEO delegations in 2023 and 2024. The 2024 trip, also led by Subramaniam, included meetings with He and Foreign Minister Wang Yi, where executives discussed issues including market access. China faces an August 12 deadline to reach a durable deal with the White House or risk higher U.S. tariffs. U.S. officials are likely to extend the deadline by another 90 days as both sides work towards a more comprehensive deal, sources previously told Reuters. An extension of that length would prevent further escalation and help create conditions for the potential meeting between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Trump pauses export controls to bolster China trade deal, FT says
Trump pauses export controls to bolster China trade deal, FT says

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump pauses export controls to bolster China trade deal, FT says

(Reuters) -The U.S. has paused curbs on tech exports to China to avoid disrupting trade talks with Beijing and support President Donald Trump's efforts to secure a meeting with President Xi Jinping this year, the Financial Times said on Monday. The industry and security bureau of the Commerce Department, which oversees export controls, has been told in recent months to avoid tough moves on China, the newspaper said, citing current and former officials. Reuters could not immediately verify the report. The White House and the department did not respond to Reuters' requests for comment outside business hours. Top U.S. and Chinese economic officials are set to resume talks in Stockholm on Monday to tackle longstanding economic disputes at the centre of a trade war between the world's top two economies. Tech giant Nvidia said this month it would resume sales of its H20 graphics processing units (GPU) to China, reversing an export curb the Trump administration imposed in April to keep advanced AI chips out of Chinese hands over national security concerns. The planned resumption was part of U.S. negotiations on rare earths and magnets, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has said. The paper said 20 security experts and former officials, including former deputy US national security adviser Matt Pottinger, will write on Monday to Lutnick to voice concern, however. "This move represents a strategic misstep that endangers the United States' economic and military edge in artificial intelligence," they write in the letter, it added. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

US, China Officials to Meet in Sweden for Trade Talks
US, China Officials to Meet in Sweden for Trade Talks

Bloomberg

time6 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

US, China Officials to Meet in Sweden for Trade Talks

00:00 Is now sort of a sense of optimism in the air. I think the expectation is that we are likely to get another extension on the US-China fronts, which implies there's no final deal yet. So what are still the sticking points between the US and China right now? Yeah, well, I think there is a sort of open question as to conceptually what a final deal with the United States is on trade. But certainly the Chinese are further away from one than the Europeans from what they clinched over the last the last 24 hours. And the Chinese basically are trying to get another a further extension on the runway for that trade deal that would expire, that truce that would expire on August the 12th. And just to remind everybody where we are, because it's hard to keep track of all of these numbers, the U.S. had imposed 125% tariffs on China that basically foreclosed any ability to have any trading between the two biggest economies in the world. And that was sort of talked down to this truce. And now we're stuck at these 30% tariffs, ten of which are sort of universal retaliatory tariffs and 20% of which are from these sort of fentanyl tariffs that the Trump administration has put forward. What we will get today is the beginning of the third talks between the vice premier of China and the US Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessen, who will be here over the next couple of hours in Stockholm to have those negotiations. The desired outcome here is probably another 90 day extension truce to that truce. We have some reporting from the Chinese media that that is already basically almost fully secured. The question will be then what will come next? Where will they be able to make progress on the other issues that they would like to discuss and they would like to see some changes? There is, of course, the main sort of elephant in the room here, which is a rare earth minerals and those advanced AI chips that the US has capitulated on agreed to sell to China in exchange for those rare earth metals. What they will also likely be discussing is the continued purchasing of crude oil and fossil fuels from Russia, from Iran, which are sanctioned by the G7 and the and the United States. And of course, there are some other issues like Tik-Tok, right? There is the fact that the US government, that the US there is apparently a US buyer for TikTok that still needs a Chinese sign off. So these are some of the conversations that'll be happening here in Stockholm over the next couple of hours. Yeah, I mean, the thing about President Trump is he also likes to make a big show of having achieved these these trade deals or getting to these trade agreements with various counterparts. And you've got to wonder whether in this case, perhaps he's holding off to make that big announcement side by side with President Xi later this year. What do we know about the prospects of the two leaders meeting at some point? Yeah. So he definitely has an instinct for the sort of showmanship and the sort of TV production side of things. And I think that if you were to get a sort of momentous large deal between the Chinese and the United States, it is the sort of thing that Donald Trump probably himself would like to bring into being. I mean, this is basically what we saw with the EU, right? We had Ursula von der Leyen flying up to Scotland in order to have the person in person meetings that Trump could announce at alongside her, you know, in person. So, I mean, the Chinese, we understand that there was a call between Xi Jinping and Trump. We understand that there has been an invitation extended to the President of the United States and the first lady to come to China at some point. We are probably still some distance away from that. We should say that the fact that these discussions are happening between the Chinese and the United States and, you know, sort of neutral territory was in Switzerland, in the U.K. and now in Stockholm, really wants to sort of demonstrate the idea that nobody wants to be seen to be being pulled in either one of the directions. So I think we're probably still some distance away from that. That being said, this is the kind of announcement, Jomana, that as you expect, you think that the president of the United States would like to make right next to the the premier of China to really have the sort of full impact of what would be really a momentous trade deal and really one of the most important pledges of the Trump administration in that campaign, saying that basically he's going to solve the trade problem with China.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store