Mark Carney promised internal free trade by Canada Day. Is that enough?
U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff threats have focused much needed attention on making trade within Canada easier. Prime Minister Mark Carney made a promise soon after the election: To have free trade by Canada Day.
To that end, the federal Free Trade and Labour Mobility in Canada Act, part of Bill C-5 which became law on June 26, aims at promoting the free movement of goods and services interprovincially.
Under the Act, the federal government will recognize provincial requirements such as product standards as meeting federal requirements, when both levels of government regulate the same aspect of a good or service traded interprovincially. Federal regulatory bodies must also recognize provincial regulatory bodies' authorizations to practise an occupation as satisfying their own comparable requirements.
For Mr. Carney, it's a promise kept. But helpful though these provisions would be, they are not enough for Canada to truly have internal free trade. Mr. Carney's bill should be viewed as only part of a broader project.
Opinion: Internal free trade by Canada Day? It'll take longer than that
A guide to The Globe's Canada Day coverage
By itself, recognition by federal regulators of provincial requirements as equivalent to their own does not facilitate trade or labour mobility between provincial jurisdictions with different standards and approval or certification processes that impede trade or labour mobility.
For that, the provinces need to get in on the action. Helpfully, legislation in Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, Ontario and Manitoba adopted this year offers to recognize other provinces' standards and approvals processes when other provinces offer the same treatment to their goods and services.
In turn, this has led to agreement between provinces (e.g. Ontario and Saskatchewan, Ontario and Alberta) to open trade in this way. Western provinces already have a similar arrangement in place between them under the 2010 New West Partnership Agreement.
But even countrywide mutual recognition will not create an integrated market. For that, we need actual reconciliation of some standards and requirements. Even with mutual recognition, a truck transport company moving goods across provincial borders must still conform to many transportation rules unique to the province it is in – it cannot transpose them from the province it originally set out from or the provinces it has driven through.
Similarly, construction or mining companies must operate according to the laws and regulations of the province they are in – not according to those in their home province.
That is why harmonization among provinces is important. For example, Ontario harmonized over 1,700 technical requirements with the new national construction code in January. Single sets of rules for safety equipment in construction or mining, or for truck tire dimensions, are further examples on which the slow but sure mechanisms of the Regulatory Cooperation and Reconciliation Table operating under the 2018 Canadian Free Trade Agreement can help.
One of the valuable features of the CFTA was its use of a 'negative list,' an approach pioneered in Canada by the 2007 Trade, Investment and Labour Mobility Agreement between British Columbia and Alberta. This approach requires parties to list the specific sectors or measures for which the rules of open trade, investment or mobility do not apply – meaning that remaining discriminatory barriers are relatively transparent. Helpfully, the federal government and many provinces have reduced or eliminated their exceptions under the CFTA.
Other important pieces of the internal trade puzzle that need to be solved include greater freedom for Canadians to purchase products, such as alcoholic beverages, from producers across the country, while still conforming to tax and other rules in their province of residence. Only Manitoba allows such sales now, although a 2024 agreement between Alberta and British Columbia allowing B.C. wineries to sell direct to Albertan consumers shows a path forward.
Canada's market cannot be truly open to products from across the country until allocation of production quotas by province under our supply managed systems is ended.
Given the need to 'de-risk' our economic prospects in an uncertain world, Canadian governments should continue to expand mutual recognition, remove discriminatory barriers, and push for greater harmonization of rules affecting businesses and workers.
All Canadians should have access to economic opportunities regardless of where they emerge in Canada – and ultimately all Canadian governments are responsible to make sure that they do not thwart access to such opportunities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
A day outside an LA detention center shows profound impact of ICE raids on families
LOS ANGELES (AP) — At a federal immigration building in downtown Los Angeles guarded by U.S. Marines, daughters, sons, aunts, nieces and others make their way to an underground garage and line up at a door with a buzzer at the end of a dirty, dark stairwell. It's here where families, some with lawyers, come to find their loved ones after they've been arrested by federal immigration agents. For immigrants without legal status who are detained in this part of Southern California, their first stop is the Immigration and Customs Enforcement processing center in the basement of the federal building. Officers verify their identity and obtain their biometrics before transferring them to detention facilities. Upstairs, immigrants line up around the block for other services, including for green cards and asylum applications. On a recent day, dozens of people arrived with medication, clothing and hope of seeing their loved one, if only briefly. After hours of waiting, many were turned away with no news, not even confirmation that their relative was inside. Some relayed reports of horrific conditions inside, including inmates who are so thirsty that they have been drinking from the toilets. ICE did not respond to emailed requests for comment. Just two weeks ago, protesters marched around the federal complex following aggressive raids in Los Angeles that began June 6 and have not stopped. Scrawled expletives about President Donald Trump still mark the complex's walls. Those arrested are from a variety of countries, including Mexico, Guatemala, India, Iran, China and Laos. About a third of the county's 10 million residents are foreign-born. Many families learned about the arrests from videos circulating on social media showing masked officers in parking lots at Home Depots, at car washes and in front of taco stands. Around 8 a.m., when attorney visits begin, a few lawyers buzz the basement door called 'B-18″ as families wait anxiously outside to hear any inkling of information. 9 a.m. Christina Jimenez and her cousin arrive to check if her 61-year-old stepfather is inside. Her family had prepared for the possibility of this happening to the day laborer who would wait to be hired outside a Home Depot in the LA suburb of Hawthorne. They began sharing locations when the raids intensified. They told him that if he were detained, he should stay silent and follow instructions. Jimenez had urged him to stop working, or at least avoid certain areas as raids increased. But he was stubborn and 'always hustled.' 'He could be sick and he's still trying to make it out to work,' Jimenez said. After learning of his arrest, she looked him up online on the ICE Detainee Locator but couldn't find him. She tried calling ICE to no avail. Two days later, her phone pinged with his location downtown. 'My mom's in shock,' Jimenez said. 'She goes from being very angry to crying, same with my sister.' Jimenez says his name into the intercom – Mario Alberto Del Cid Solares. After a brief wait, she is told yes, he's there. She and her cousin breathe a sigh of relief — but their questions remain. Her biggest fear is that instead of being sent to his homeland of Guatemala, he will be deported to another country, something the Supreme Court recently ruled was allowed. 9:41 a.m. By mid-morning, Estrella Rosas and her mother have come looking for her sister, Andrea Velez, a U.S. citizen. A day earlier, they saw Velez being detained after they dropped her off at her marketing job at a shoe company downtown. 'My mom told me to call 911 because someone was kidnapping her,' Rosas said. Stuck on a one-way street, they had to circle the block. By the time they got back, she says they saw Velez in handcuffs being put into a car without license plates. Velez's family believes she was targeted for looking Hispanic and standing near a tamale stand. Rosas has her sister's passport and U.S. birth certificate, but learns she is not there. They find her next door in a federal detention center. She was accused of obstructing immigration officers, which the family denies, but is released the next day. 11:40 a.m. About 20 people are now outside. Some have found cardboard to sit on after waiting hours. One family comforts a woman who is crying softly in the stairwell. Then the door opens, and a group of lawyers emerge. Families rush to ask if the attorneys could help them. Kim Carver, a lawyer with the Trans Latino Coalition, says she planned to see her client, a transgender Honduran woman, but she was transferred to a facility in Texas at 6:30 that morning. Carver accompanied her less than a week ago for an immigration interview and the asylum officer told her she had a credible case. Then ICE officers walked in and detained her. 'Since then, it's been just a chase trying to find her,' she says. 12:28 p.m. As more people arrive, the group begins sharing information. One person explains the all-important 'A-number,' the registration number given to every detainee, which is needed before an attorney can help. They exchange tips like how to add money to an account for phone calls. One woman says $20 lasted three or four calls for her. Mayra Segura is looking for her uncle after his frozen popsicle cart was abandoned in the middle of the sidewalk in Culver City. 'They couldn't find him in the system,' she says. 12:52 p.m. Another lawyer, visibly frustrated, comes out the door. She's carrying bags of clothes, snacks, Tylenol, and water that she says she wasn't allowed to give to her client, even though he says he had been given only one water bottle over the past two days. The line stretches outside the stairwell into the sun. A man leaves and returns with water for everyone. Nearly an hour after family visitations are supposed to begin, people are finally allowed in. 2:12 p.m. Still wearing hospital scrubs from work, Jasmin Camacho Picazo comes to see her husband again. She brought a sweater because he had told her he was cold, and his back injury was aggravated from sleeping on the ground. 'He mentioned this morning (that) people were drinking from the restroom toilet water,' Picazo says. On her phone, she shows footage of his car left on the side of the road after his arrest. The window was smashed and the keys were still in the ignition. 'I can't stop crying,' Picazo says. Her son keeps asking: 'Is Papa going to pick me up from school?' 2:21 p.m. More than five hours after Jimenez and her cousin arrive, they see her stepfather. 'He was sad and he's scared,' says Jimenez afterwards. 'We tried to reassure him as much as possible.' She wrote down her phone number, which he had not memorized, so he could call her. 2:57 p.m. More people arrive as others are let in. Yadira Almadaz comes out crying after seeing her niece's boyfriend for only five minutes. She says he was in the same clothes he was wearing when he was detained a week ago at an asylum appointment in the city of Tustin. He told her he'd only been given cookies and chips to eat each day. 'It breaks my heart seeing a young man cry because he's hungry and thirsty,' she says. 3:56 p.m. Four minutes before visitation time is supposed to end, an ICE officer opens the door and announces it's over. One woman snaps at him in frustration. The officer tells her he would get in trouble if he helped her past 4 p.m. More than 20 people are still waiting in line. Some trickle out. Others linger, staring at the door in disbelief.
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Northern Ont. MPP calls on Ford government to spend more on education
At a news conference Wednesday, Sudbury MPP Jamie West called on the province to increase education spending. Northern Ont. MPP calls on Ford government to spend more on education Sudbury MPP Jamie West is calling on the province to increase education spending. Speaking at a news conference Wednesday morning, West said his office receives calls regularly from parents who are concerned with the state of the public school system. 'Our kids need … more funding,' he said. 'We want to ensure that people know it's not because of the educators, it's not the principals, it's not the school boards. It's a result of a lack of provincial funding from the Conservative government.' West said per-capita spending on education has dropped 11 per cent since Doug Ford was elected in 2018. West held a press conference Wednesday morning at the local (ETFO) office, joined by concerned parents and ETFO affiliates. Liana Holm, Elementary Teachers of Ontario Federation (ETFO) Rainbow local president, said the impact of the cuts can be seen in the amount of violence in the classroom. 'I get calls from educators almost every day,' Holm said. 'Seventy-seven per cent have personally experienced violence or witnessed violence against other staff members.' She said students are not being served the way they need. She added classroom sizes are too large, and there are not enough staff to meet student needs. 'The world has changed, so we need to change with it,' Holm said. West education spending Speaking at a news conference Wednesday morning, Sudbury MPP Jamie West said his office receives calls regularly from parents who are concerned with the state of the public school system. (Amanda Hicks/CTV News) 'That requires bodies in our schools to help deal with the dysregulation and some of the violent incidents.' Gina McAfee, president of the Rainbow Designated Early Childhood Educator Local, said children often enter the school system less emotionally and socially prepared for school. 'The children that are coming into school now are not representative of children in the past,' McAfee said. 'Children are coming to us with challenges -- special needs challenges -- that are undiagnosed. Families don't have family doctors. They don't have pediatricians. So, we have a lot of challenges in our classrooms. And not a lot of support.' Jessica Montogomery has an 11-year-old son with a communication disorder who recently required special accommodations for a physical injury. 'We are still on waitlists for supports that he was referred to when he was in Grade 2. We are now in Grade 6,' Montogomery said. 'We've had to privately pay for the therapy that he needs in order to be successful in the classroom, but also outside of the classroom, as well.' During the speeches, statistics were presented showing the impact of education cuts at local schools, averaging roughly $1,500 per student. 'It shows how much money has been deducted from the school board budgets,' she said. 'It's a very eye-opening experience to understand that one school could be $700,000 down in funding, which could be equal to seven adults. Seven adults in a school would make a huge difference.' More information can be found here. Statement from the province In response to a request from CTV News, the province sent this statement: 'Our government has made historic investments in education, including $29 billion in funding to school boards for the 2024/25 school year, the largest investment in Ontario's education system. Rainbow District School Board funding has increased to over $227.6 million, despite relatively stable enrollment, while the Sudbury Catholic District School Board was provided over $104.8 million despite declining enrollments. 'Since coming into government, we have increased special education funding year over year to over $3.5 billion this school year and supported the hiring of 9,000 additional education staff. We've also provided $118 million in mental health supports, representing a 577 per cent increase. We will continue to support student achievement and get students back to basics on building foundational reading, writing, and math skills that prepare students for the jobs of tomorrow.' Holm said she would like to see the province improve recruitment and retention, as well as more occasional teachers, smaller class sizes and resources for special education teachers. She said she'd also like to see specially trained mental health professionals in schools. 'If we had the people and then the mental health support, a lot of what we're seeing in schools right now would be able to put a lid on it,' Holm said. 'And then we'd actually be able to assess where we need the rest of the support to come.'
Winnipeg Free Press
an hour ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Trump keeps saying the GOP mega bill will eliminate taxes on Social Security. It does not
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump keeps saying that Republicans' mega tax and spending cut legislation will eliminate taxes on federal Social Security benefits. It does not. At best, Trump's 'no tax on Social Security' claim exaggerates the benefits to seniors if either the House or Senate-passed proposals is signed into law. Here's a look at Trump's recent statements, and what the proposals would — or would not — do. What Trump has said Trump repeatedly told voters during his 2024 campaign that he would eliminate taxes on Social Security. As his massive legislative package has moved through Congress, the Republican president has claimed that's what the bill would do. Trump said on a recent appearance on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures' that the bill includes 'no tax on tips, no tax on Social Security, no tax on overtime.' A temporary tax deduction But instead of eliminating the tax, the Senate and House have each passed their own versions of a temporary tax deduction for seniors aged 65 and over, which applies to all income — not just Social Security. And it turns out not all Social Security beneficiaries will be able to claim the deduction. Those who won't be able to do so include the lowest-income seniors who already don't pay taxes on Social Security, those who choose to claim their benefits before they reach age 65 and those above a defined income threshold. The Senate proposal includes a temporary $6,000 deduction for seniors over the age of 65, contrasted with the House proposal, which includes a temporary deduction of $4,000. The Senate proposal approved Tuesday would eliminate Social Security tax liability for seniors with adjusted gross incomes of $75,000 or less or $150,000 if filing as a married couple. If passed into law, the tax deduction would last four years, from 2025 to 2029. The deductions phase out as income increases. White House touts impact Touting a new Council of Economic Advisers analysis, the White House said Tuesday that '88% of all seniors who receive Social Security — will pay NO TAX on their Social Security benefits,' going on to say that the Senate proposal's $6,000 senior deduction 'is estimated to benefit 33.9 million seniors, including seniors not claiming Social Security. The deduction yields an average increase in after-tax income of $670 per senior who benefits from it.' Garrett Watson, director of policy analysis at the Tax Foundation think tank, said conflating the tax deduction with a claim that there will be no tax on Social Security could end up confusing and angering a lot of seniors who will expect to not pay taxes on their Social Security benefits. 'While the deduction does provide some relief for seniors, it's far from completely repealing the tax on their benefits,' Watson said. Economic effect Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. The cost of actually eliminating the tax on Social Security would have massive impacts on the economy. University of Pennsylvania's Penn Wharton Budget Model estimates that eliminating income taxes on Social Security benefits 'would reduce revenues by $1.5 trillion over 10 years and increase federal debt by 7 percent by 2054″ and speed up the projected depletion date of the Social Security Trust Fund from 2034 to 2032. Discussions over taxes on Social Security are just part of the overall bill, which is estimated in its Senate version to increase federal deficits over the next 10 years by nearly $3.3 trillion from 2025 to 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Administration officials have said the cost of the tax bill would be offset by tariff income. Recently, the CBO separately estimated that Trump's sweeping tariff plan would cut deficits by $2.8 trillion over a 10-year period while shrinking the economy, raising the inflation rate and reducing the purchasing power of households overall.
