Alaska wins lawsuit that could open Arctic refuge to oil exploration
A federal judge in Anchorage has ruled in favor of Alaska's state-owned investment bank in a lawsuit that could clear the way for oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.
In an order published Tuesday, Judge Sharon Gleason wrote that the U.S. Department of the Interior acted illegally when it canceled oil and gas leases held by the Alaska Industrial Development and Export Authority on land within the refuge.
'Having reviewed the parties' arguments, the court concludes that DOI was required to obtain a court order before canceling AIDEA's leases,' Gleason said in her 22-page decision.
AIDEA did not immediately respond to a request for comment, but Cori Mills, Alaska's deputy attorney general, called the decision a victory.
'The state looks forward to working with the current federal administration on fully realizing the vast potential of ANWR to grow Alaska's economy and help America's energy independence,' she said by email. 'It is unfortunate we have lost a significant amount of time litigating, instead of moving forward with field studies and development. We will continue to review the decision in more detail but it's definitely a victory.'
Tuesday's order was the result of a lawsuit filed by AIDEA against the federal government last year, when the Biden administration canceled oil and gas leases that AIDEA won in a January 2021 sale.
Two other companies also won leases during the sale but later surrendered them to the federal government, leaving AIDEA as the only company holding leases within the refuge's coastal plain, which is believed to hold significant oil and gas reserves, just as nearby state land does.
The Biden administration claimed that the sale — conducted under the auspices of the first Trump administration — was flawed and thus illegal.
It first suspended, then canceled the leases, prompting AIDEA to sue in 2024.
Gleason had upheld the Biden administration's suspension order, but when it came to the cancellation, she ruled in AIDEA's favor, citing a provision of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act that enabled the ANWR leases.
That act said in part that the Interior Department 'shall manage the oil and gas program on the Coastal Plain in a manner similar to the administration of lease sales under the Naval Petroleum Reserves Production Act of 1976.'
Gleason wrote: 'Among the NPRPA's implementing regulations is a regulation that provides that '(p)roducing leases or leases known to contain valuable deposits of oil or gas may be canceled only by court order.''
But the Interior Department didn't obtain a court order, Gleason noted.
'Accordingly, federal defendants' cancellation of AIDEA's leases was not in accordance with law because it failed to seek a court order,' she wrote.
Several environmental and tribal groups sided with the federal government during the course of the lawsuit and had requested the ability to offer alternative solutions if Gleason ruled in favor of AIDEA.
She turned them down, writing, 'DOI's error is serious: DOI cancelled AIDEA's leases without following the congressionally mandated procedure for doing so.'
In light of that finding, she vacated the department's lease cancellation decision, saying the department — now back in the hands of the Trump administration — may decide what to do next.
In a statement released last week, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said he intends to open the refuge's entire 1.56 million-acre coastal plain to development, indicating that AIDEA will be given a free hand on its leases.
For its part, AIDEA has said in multiple court filings that if allowed to proceed, it will conduct seismic testing and other preliminary work necessary to determine how much oil and gas lies within its leases.
Among the various environmental and tribal groups that stood with the federal government in opposition to AIDEA was the Gwich'in Steering Committee, represented by attorneys from Trustees for Alaska.
'This disappointing ruling ignores the destruction oil drilling will do to our communities and only deepens our resolve in fiercely defending the coastal plain from oil and gas extraction,' said Kristen Moreland, executive director of the Gwich'in Steering Committee. 'We will always protect the caribou, our way of life, and future generations.'
The Native Village of Venetie Tribal Government, Arctic Village Council, and Venetie Village Council, represented by the Native American Rights Fund, said in a statement that they will continue to oppose drilling in ANWR and that 'multiple legal and administrative pathways remain to ensure proper environmental review before any ground-disturbing activities could occur.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
TikTok can shape America's next generation and Beijing knows it
If Washington doesn't act urgently, content pushed by TikTok and consumed by young Americans will result in future U.S. leaders unwittingly parroting China's talking points, advocating warped views and, most dangerously, acting in ways that are in Beijing's interests but undermine U.S. national security. There is admittedly no 'smoking gun,' but TikTok represents a highly plausible vector of intelligence collection. ByteDance, TikTok's parent firm, claims it is committed to U.S. national security, but is legally bound to cooperate with the Chinese Communist Party. The People's Republic of China almost certainly uses TikTok, at a minimum, as a collection platform to monitor public opinion. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. and TikTok agreed in January 2023 to maintain all U.S. data within the U.S., but there are concerning reports of leaks. With 170 million U.S. users, TikTok provides Beijing with real-time, granular insight into American public opinion. That real-time data collection would prove enormously useful, for instance, in assessing U.S. willingness to fight in a hypothetical conflict over Taiwan. But the challenge from TikTok with America's youth is not just collection, but influence. Early evidence suggests this is already underway. A Rutgers study found TikTok suppressed unfavorable accounts of sensitive topics, including Tibet, Tiananmen Square, Uyghur rights and Xinjiang. 'Heavy' users expressed elevated positive attitudes toward China's human rights record and greater interest in traveling to China. Given that the company's black box algorithm thwarts independent verification, we likely have seen only the tip of the iceberg of Beijing's efforts to sway the U.S. public. The algorithm could convulse U.S. domestic politics by sowing discord and highlighting divisions, an outcome that serves Beijing's interest in undermining U.S. cohesion and painting D.C. as an unreliable partner. Indeed, rather than bolstering one candidate or another, TikTok may act as an anti-incumbent tool. In the 2024 election, TikTok contributed to President Biden's low approval ratings, according to one Democratic strategist. In that election, President Trump's support among 18-29-year-olds, which disproportionately comprises TikTok's user base, rose by seven points from 2020. And yet, by April, only three months into office, Trump's support among young people has declined markedly — by up to 27 points. While there are admittedly many variables at play, TikTok can amplify alienation and short-term sentiment swings. Whatever one's politics, it's dangerous for China to retain levers that can subtly shape American public opinion, especially by amplifying dissatisfaction. It's worth noting that as Beijing uses tools to manipulate the U.S. public, especially its youth, it's taking meaningful steps to protect its own young people. Douyin, the version of TikTok used in China and also owned by ByteDance, is required by authorities to enforce a 'youth mode,' limiting users under 14 to app usage for just 40 minutes a day. It also locks them out between 10 p.m. and 6 a.m. daily. The contrast is stark: China exports attention-fracturing content while shielding its own youth from it. China's use of TikTok may allow it to influence mass and elite opinion. And in fact, TikTok may be uniquely effective at influencing elite views, by enabling microtargeting. Given TikTok's effectiveness and deniability, as well as Beijing's determination to supplant the United States, Chinese security services are likely tweaking TikTok's algorithms to micro-target key users. Chinese security services can directly shape TikTok's algorithm — rather than merely exploit one built by others — giving it a deniable, end-to-end influence over what users see. Crucially, any elite-focused information operation via TikTok would be even more difficult to detect in the unclassified domain than efforts to shape mass public opinion because of how narrow and precise the targeting would be. For far too long, U.S. leaders on both sides of the aisle have failed to take action against the platform. And the reported decision by President Trump to tell U.S. companies they can ignore the law barring American companies from engaging with TikTok represents a new and immediate danger to U.S. national and economic security. At a minimum, it is imperative to ensure the U.S. is not allowing companies or individuals to engage with TikTok so long as its algorithm is controlled by a Beijing-linked company. But U.S. policymakers need to go even further and consider, for example, more ambitious measures such as national limits on short-video screen time for minors. The status quo is incomprehensible and dangerous: Young Americans are being asked to unwittingly face off against an algorithm that may be a tool of Chinese intelligence services. Allowing this dynamic to persist risks eroding the cognitive, civic and strategic foundations of American leadership. Jonathan Panikoff is a senior fellow in the Atlantic Council's GeoEconomics Center and the former director of the Investment Security Group, overseeing the intelligence community's CFIUS efforts at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Joseph Webster is a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council and editor of the independent China-Russia Report.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
'There's something else going on here, and it's an injustice,' NewsMax host Greg Kelly said.
A prominent MAGA TV host says convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell may be innocent. The British former socialite, 63, is currently serving 20 years behind bars for sexually exploiting teenage girls alongside disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein. 'People are horrified when I say there's a possibility that this individual just might be innocent,' NewsMax host Greg Kelly said. 'But think about it. Who told us about her? The most reviled institutions in America: the media and the Biden Justice Department.'
CNBC
2 hours ago
- CNBC
How this week's avalanche of news from Washington to Wall Street kept investors guessing
It was a dizzying week on Wall Street. The S & P 500 closed this past Monday at a record high and then went on a four-session losing streak. Friday was particularly unsettling as terrible jobs data slammed the market and triggered President Donald Trump . Trump started the day by slamming Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell for not cutting interest rates on Wednesday. He accused the Fed of cutting rates at the end of last year to help elect Kamala Harris. Later in the day , the president used similar reasoning when firing the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which puts out the employment report. Trump accused BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer, a Biden appointee, of negatively manipulating the numbers during his presidency and inflating them before Election Day to help Harris. Also on Friday afternoon, Fed Governor Adriana Kugler resigned . The Biden appointee didn't give a reason. As if all that were not enough, just before his self-imposed Aug. 1 deadline, Trump set new "reciprocal" tariff rates to go into effect on Aug. 7. The president also on Friday ordered two nuclear submarines "to be positioned in the appropriate regions" after a warning to the U.S. from Russian official Dmitry Medvedev. On Monday, Medvedev said that "each new ultimatum" about the Ukraine conflict is a "threat and a step towards war" between Russia and the U.S. .SPX .IXIC 5D mountain S & P 500 and Nasdaq performance this week It was no wonder the S & P 500 lost more than 1.5% on Friday, in a session even further pressured by a drop in tech stocks following Amazon 's post-earnings stock decline of more than 8%. For the week, the broad market index lost nearly 1%, ending a two-week win streak. The tech-heavy Nasdaq was the big loser Friday, dropping more than 2.2% on the session and more than 2% for the week. It, too, snapped two straight weekly gains. As bad as the calendar page turn to August was on Friday, the S & P 500 and the Nasdaq wrapped July on Thursday with gains of 2.2% and 3.7%, respectively. The S & P 500 completed a three-month winning streak, while the Nasdaq extended its monthly run to four straight. It was certainly a busy week, jam-packed with macroeconomic updates, trade negotiations, a Fed rate decision — and, of course, an earnings onslaught, with four of the Magnificent Seven reporting. Trump trade The week started out with the U.S. on Sunday striking a trade deal with the European Union. South Korea slipped in under the wire before the president's Friday deadline. Both trade partners are now subject to a 15% tariff on exports to the U.S., down from the respective 30% and 25% rates in place prior to the agreements. The deal with the EU will also see the trading bloc purchase $750 billion in U.S. energy, while investing an additional $600 billion into the U.S. The deal with South Korea included an agreement for $350 billion in U.S. investments. Negotiations with China remain ongoing, with the tariff deadline being pushed to Aug. 12. Mexico was granted a 90-day extension of current 25% rates following a discussion with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum. Canada, however, was slapped with a 35% tariff rate . As for the trade partners that have yet to strike a deal, new rates were announced last Thursday evening and are set to take effect this coming Thursday. Weak jobs Just hours after the new tariff rates were announced, the Friday jobs report was released. The July nonfarm payroll growth of 73,000 positions fell way short of the 100,000 additions economists had expected. Worse yet, the June and May readings were both revised significantly lower for a combined 258,000 less jobs than originally reported for those two months. All of that, besides setting Trump off, put a September rate cut back on the table, according to the CME FedWatch tool. The market odds of a cut flipped from about 38% on Thursday to nearly 83% on Friday. Shortly after the weak jobs report, Jim Cramer said that while he has been a big backer of Powell, this number says: "You didn't need to wait" to cut rates. Warmer inflation The day after the Fed held rates steady, the central bank's preferred measure of inflation — the personal consumption expenditure (PCE) price index — was released Thursday morning. Both the headline PCE reading, as well as the core rate excluding food and energy prices, came in one-tenth hotter than expected on a year over year basis, seemingly supportive of the Fed's decision to leave rates unchanged. However, the negative jobs data clouds the picture a bit and will force the Fed to weigh the importance of both parts of its dual mandate — maintaining price stability, around their target 2% inflation rate, and fostering maximum employment. The former currently requires more restrictive or higher rates, given that inflation remains above target, while the latter points to less restrictive or lower rates, because central bankers don't want to see any material increases in joblessness. Economic growth Part of the rationale for holding rates steady came from a strong advance second quarter reading on the economy, which was released Wednesday morning just hours before the Fed's July meeting wrapped up. The seasonally adjusted annual GDP growth rate of 3% was much better than the 2.3% advance that was expected. While the economy managed to chug along during the April to June period, despite all the fear and uncertainty caused by trade disputes, it's already August. The GDP is a backwards looking data set. That's why more weight is put on the monthly updates noted above, relating to inflation and the labor market — and of course, the most real-time source of data we can get, earnings. Club earnings So, with that, let's take a look at how earnings went this week for the Club. We heard from Starbucks on Tuesday evening, Meta Platforms and Microsoft on Wednesday evening, Bristol Myers Squibb on Thursday morning, Amazon and Apple on Thursday evening, and Linde on Friday morning. Starbucks : Though the coffee giant reported mixed quarterly results, we heard enough positives to confirm that CEO Brian Niccol's turnaround remains firmly on track. Meta Platforms : The social media powerhouse delivered an absolute blow out quarter, with the only thing better than the results being the guidance. Bristol Myers : The drugmaker delivered a solid quarterly beat and outlook raise. However, with the Cobenfy narrative — at the core of our investment thesis— going from being pretty straightforward to a show-me story, investors aren't giving the company the benefit of the doubt. We trimmed our price target following the release. There are also the added questions marks around Trump push this week for lower prescription prices from Bristol and 16 other major drugmakers, including Club name Eli Lilly, which reports earnings next week. The threat of sector-specific pharma tariffs remains in play. Amazon : Overall the tech giant reported a solid quarter. However, shares sold off as investors took issue with Amazon Web Services (AWS) failing to deliver the same type of cloud revenue upside as rivals Microsoft Azure and Google Cloud. Operating income guidance for the current quarter was also a bit lower than expected, though that has historically proven conservative. Ultimately, we think the concerns are overblown and think the pullback represents a buying opportunity . Apple : The iPhone maker reported a very respectable quarter. However, when taking into account the price action of the stock this year alongside the reaction to the results, it's clear that investors are not ready to give management much credit until they deliver more clarity about the company's AI strategy. It was encouraging to hear CEO Tim Cook say he's open to M & A to help with that. Linde : The industrial gas stalwart delivered solid quarterly results in a difficult operating environment, demonstrating the company's resiliency no matter the backdrop. Moreover, management raised the low end of its full-year earnings guidance, despite noting that the high end of the range already assumes an economic contraction. It's another important week of corporate earnings ahead, with about a quarter of S & P 500 companies set to report. Six companies in the Club portfolio are on the docket: Coterra Energy , DuPont , Eaton , Disney , Eli Lilly , and Texas Roadhouse . Week in trades It was also a busy week of trades for the portfolio. Kicking off the week, we added to our positions in Cisco Systems and Honeywell . That was followed up by a small trim of Eaton as the stock hit new high. On Tuesday, we locked in a nice profit on Eli Lilly following disappointing news from Novo Nordisk , its main competitor in the GLP-1 market. We also trimmed our position in Wells Fargo as shares finally recovered from their post-earnings decline. On Wednesday, we added to our position in Dover and called out that we would also be adding to our stakes in Starbucks and Palo Alto Networks , we were not restricted. We'll be keeping a close eye on both in the week to come for an opportunity to step in. Palo Alto finished the week down nearly 15% on a four-session losing streak after reports of talks and its confirmation of a $25 billion deal to buy CyberArk were not well received by investors. We, however, feel that bundling CybarArk's identity security platform will accelerate Palo Alto's platformization strategy. Rounding out the week , on Thursday, we cut our position in Abbott , in line with prior commentary in which we highlighted our concerns about the company's exposure to China. We took the raised capital and redeployed it in Capital One Financial as the move we were seeing in the stock didn't reflect the fundamentals we saw when it reported second quarter earnings. (See here for a full list of the stocks in Jim Cramer's Charitable Trust.) As a subscriber to the CNBC Investing Club with Jim Cramer, you will receive a trade alert before Jim makes a trade. Jim waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling a stock in his charitable trust's portfolio. If Jim has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade. THE ABOVE INVESTING CLUB INFORMATION IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY , TOGETHER WITH OUR DISCLAIMER . NO FIDUCIARY OBLIGATION OR DUTY EXISTS, OR IS CREATED, BY VIRTUE OF YOUR RECEIPT OF ANY INFORMATION PROVIDED IN CONNECTION WITH THE INVESTING CLUB. NO SPECIFIC OUTCOME OR PROFIT IS GUARANTEED.
