UK government guts key welfare reforms to win vote after internal rebellion
Starmer had already staged an authority-sapping climbdown last week on controversial plans to slash disability and sickness benefits, following a major revolt from Labour MPs who argued the proposals went too far.
The ruling party enjoys a huge majority in the lower House of Commons, with more than 80 of its MPs needing to rebel to defeat a bill.
Despite agreeing on Friday to water down the changes, an ongoing backlash from his MPs forced further major concessions just hours before a crunch vote on the legislation late on Tuesday.
They included delaying cuts planned for 2026 until after a review led by social security and disability minister Stephen Timms.
That ensured the vote easily went the government's way, with 335 MPs backing the legislation compared to 260 voting against - a majority of 75.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
But the series of big concessions left the bill - which had aimed to save billions of pounds from the country's ballooning welfare bill - in tatters and critics branding the revised legislation 'farcical'.
'This is an utter capitulation,' Kemi Badenoch, the leader of the main Conservative opposition, said on social media.
'Labour's welfare bill is now a TOTAL waste of time. It effectively saves £0, helps no one into work, and does NOT control spending. It's pointless.'
'One year of u-turns'
Work and Pensions Minister Liz Kendall had unveiled the new-look bill to parliament on Monday, just as newly-released government data estimated an extra 150,000 people would be pushed into poverty by the watered-down reforms.
Starmer - who later this week marks one year in Downing Street - had hoped the legislation would cut £5 billion (S$8.8 billion) from the welfare budget.
That estimate fell to £2.5 billion after last week's initial concessions and it was unclear what, if any, savings would now be made.
It means finance minister Rachel Reeves, who has struggled to generate growth from a sluggish UK economy, will need to find more money elsewhere.
The parliamentary wrangling has also clouded the first anniversary of Labour's return to power after 14 years in opposition, while renewing questions about Starmer's political acumen and the purpose of his centre-left government.
Starmer has had meagre success in the government's central mission of boosting economic growth, and in recent months made a series of damaging U-turns.
'One year of Starmer, one year of u-turns,' Nigel Farage, leader of the surging far-right Reform UK party, posted on Tuesday.
On June 9, the government declared it had reversed a policy to scrap a winter heating benefit for millions of pensioners, following widespread criticism and another rebellion from its own MPs.
A week later, Starmer - a former chief state prosecutor in England and Wales - announced a national inquiry focused on a UK child sex exploitation scandal, after previously resisting calls.
The prime minister has a massive majority of 165 MPs, meaning he should be able to force whatever legislation he wants through parliament.
But many of his own MPs complain of a disconnect between Starmer's leadership, which is focused on combatting the rise of Reform UK and Labour's traditional centre-left principles.
A YouGov poll of more than 10,000 Britons released last week found that while Labour is losing voters to Reform, it is also forfeiting supporters to the Liberal Democrats and the Greens on the left. AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
UK government backs finance minister Rachel Reeves after tears in Parliament
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox A video grab shows Britain's Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves looking tearful during a weekly questions session in Britain's Parliament with Prime Minister Keir Starmer. LONDON - The British government said on July 2 that fFinance minister Rachel Reeves was 'going nowhere' after she appeared visibly upset in Parliament as rumours swirled around her future. Tears rolled down Ms Reeves' face after Prime Minister Keir Starmer declined to guarantee that she would remain in place until the next general election, likely in 2029. It came after Mr Starmer's Labour government U-turned over key welfare reforms, wiping out a multibillion-pound boost to public finances and triggering speculation that Ms Reeves could lose her job. The pound slumped more than 1 per cent against the dollar on July 2 and London's stock market retreated amid the speculation. A spokeswoman for Mr Starmer later told reporters that Ms Reeves had his 'full backing', while a spokesman for Ms Reeves said she had been upset due to a 'personal matter'. 'The Chancellor is going nowhere. She has the Prime Minister's full backing,' Mr Starmer's press secretary said. Asked why he had not confirmed faith in Ms Reeves when asked in the House of Commons, she said: 'He has done so repeatedly.' 'The Chancellor and the Prime Minister are focused entirely on delivering for working people,' she added. Asked about Ms Reeves's tears, her spokesman said: 'It's a personal matter, which, as you would expect, we are not going to get into.' 'The Chancellor will be working out of Downing Street this afternoon,' he said. Mr Starmer backed down on the welfare plans on July 1 after a rebellion by MPs from his own party, in a major blow to his authority. It has also left an almost £5 billion (S$8.6 billion) black hole in Ms Reeves' plans, leading to the possibility that she will have to raise taxes on 'working people', something that she has repeatedly ruled out. Ms Reeves has also ruled out tweaking her self-imposed rule that day-to-day spending should be met through tax receipts rather than borrowing. AFP
Business Times
4 hours ago
- Business Times
The surprising tariff lesson buried in inflation data
IF THE Trump administration's tariff policies result in higher overall inflation – a scenario that will play out in the coming weeks – the question is who will pay for it. A surge in prices will presumably raise the cost of doing business. Less clear is whether, and to what extent, companies will pass on those higher costs to consumers. Any inflationary impact from tariffs should first show up in the Producer Price Index (PPI), which reflects changes in the cost of producing goods and services sold to consumers. Over time, producer inflation is passed on to consumers and shows up in the better-known Consumer Price Index (CPI). The PPI and CPI's long history shows that the two are closely related. They have grown at roughly similar rates – the PPI by 2.8 per cent a year since 1913 through May, and the CPI, at a slightly higher rate of 3.2 per cent a year. Annual changes in the two indexes have also been highly correlated over that time (0.8, counting monthly). The relationship was as strong during the past 30 years (0.81), marked by the increasing globalisation of trade, as it was during the first three decades of the data series (0.79). That long and consistent history supports the intuition that in the long run, businesses do – indeed, must – pass on their higher costs to consumers. Looking at shorter periods, however, the numbers tell a more nuanced story. The first thing that jumps out is that annual changes in the PPI have been twice as volatile as those of the CPI, as measured by annualised standard deviation. This suggests that businesses have routinely shielded consumers from much of the turbulence in producer inflation. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Notably, most of that shielding occurred when producer inflation spiked. The median annual change in PPI has been 2.3 per cent since 1913. During 12-month periods when producer inflation was lower than the median, roughly half the time, CPI outpaced PPI more than 90 per cent of the time, and by a median of 2.2 percentage points. But when annual producer inflation was higher than 2.3 per cent, it was just the opposite. On those occasions, PPI outstripped CPI more than 70 per cent of the time and by a median of 1.6 percentage points. The results are nearly identical when annual changes in PPI and CPI are compared on a six- or 12-month lag. In other words, the higher the inflation, the more likely businesses were to absorb most of the higher cost, at least in the near term, and vice versa. One way to understand that divergence is that there may be a limit to how much price inflation consumers can digest at one time. It would explain why businesses seem to have little trouble passing on their own higher costs to consumers in normal inflation environments, but struggle to do so when inflation spikes. Companies may also have a strategic incentive to internalise cost surges, given competing considerations of volume and margin. Raising prices would protect profit margins in the near term, but could imperil them down the road if higher prices result in lower volume and market share. Passing on higher costs to consumers gradually might be a way to protect both, particularly if companies have margin to spare. Fortunately, many big US companies do – the profit margin for the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index is near an all-time high, and expected to grow this year and next. That may explain why the stock market has been so sensitive to tariff news this year. The White House's Liberation Day announcement was greeted with one of the worst two-day US stock market routs on record, and the tariff delays were routinely celebrated with surging stock prices. The seemingly single-minded focus on levies makes sense if companies have the most to lose. One countervailing consideration is that heightened inflation expectations may give companies more room than usual to raise prices. A notable outlier in the data is that during the hyperinflationary years of the late 1970s and early 1980s, CPI mostly kept pace with PPI despite double-digit producer inflation. Businesses may have been able to raise prices more aggressively because consumers had come to expect big price hikes. Memories of the pandemic's price surge are a big reason Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell has called for caution on cutting interest rates until the implications of tariffs are more clear. With inflation expectations for next year nearly double the long-term inflation rate, businesses may be able to push costs to consumers more quickly. The PPI and CPI do not overlap perfectly, so they can only be a rough guide to the way businesses and consumers navigate higher prices. But given the behaviour of producer and consumer inflation during previous periods of surging prices, do not be surprised if any tariff-related inflation is initially absorbed mostly by companies. BLOOMBERG
Business Times
5 hours ago
- Business Times
Schroders picks Singapore for global digital assets hub
[SINGAPORE] International investment manager Schroders has chosen Singapore as the base for its new Global Digital Assets Centre of Excellence. The centre will focus on applying tokenisation – which is the process of representing assets digitally – to the firm's existing business operations, with the aim to improve client outcomes and enhance operational efficiency, it said on Wednesday (Jul 2). Led by Schroders' global head of digital asset strategy, Marita McGinley, the centre will also explore use cases that complement active asset management. These include tokenised investment products, digital collateral management, and modern treasury solutions. The move accelerates Schroders' shift towards tokenised investments and composable finance – underscoring its commitment to modernising portfolio construction and expanding its digital infrastructure worldwide. For instance, the Singapore-based centre will build simplified, scalable digital infrastructure through the development of reusable tools such as smart contracts, data modules and integration frameworks that can support future growth across multiple platforms. Gopi Mirchandani, Schroders' Asia client group head, said the launch of the centre 'marks a pivotal milestone in our journey to drive the evolution of asset management through digital innovation'. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'As Asia continues to accelerate its leadership in digital asset innovation, Singapore's dynamic fintech ecosystem provides the ideal platform for us to reimagine how digital assets can unlock personalised, agile investment solutions at scale,' she added. To balance innovation with compliance, the centre intends to engage with regulators and policymakers, the asset manager said. It will also participate in industry groups to support the creation of standards and best practices for digital assets, and collaborate with academic institutions to promote research and knowledge sharing. Listed on the London Stock Exchange, Schroders has £778.7 billion (S$1.4 trillion) in assets under management.
