Robbie Lawler reveals his secret motivation for iconic Rory MacDonald win at UFC 189: 'I didn't say anything'
Robbie Lawler was known as "Ruthless" for a reason.
The 2025 UFC Hall of Fame inductee delivered some of the most epic knockouts and fights in MMA history throughout his 22-year career. Lawler's entry into the Hall later this month will be his second after his legendary rematch with Rory MacDonald entered the Fight Wing in 2023. Arguably the greatest fight of all time, Lawler vs. MacDonald 2 stands out on its own despite being part of one of the sport's most memorable events, 2015's UFC 189 pay-per-view. In hindsight, it's easy to forget the fight preceded the evening's headliner, the interim featherweight title clash between Conor McGregor and Chad Mendes.
Advertisement
Lawler revealed on Wednesday's edition of "The Ariel Helwani Show" how his co-main event position for his first welterweight title defense was much more of a motivational factor than he ever let on.
"Leading up to that fight, Rory never realized it, but we were second fiddle that whole freaking build-up to that fight," Lawler said. "I'm like, 'Oh, they're putting me on the undercard of [original headliner Jose] Aldo and freaking McGregor.' So I'm just freaking training like they're disrespecting me.
"I get it. Aldo's the freaking man, Conor is the up-and-comer. But I'm the heavier guy. So, I'm freaking training hard. Like, really freaking hard. And I actually had time to freaking relax after [having five fights in] 13 months [beforehand]. So I was able to rest and put in a hard freaking camp for him — and I had something to prove. Then, two weeks before the fight, Aldo's out and they put in freaking Mendes, and I'm still the undercard. I didn't say anything. I wasn't pissed. I was like, 'OK.' It is what it was, alright. So that's who he (MacDonald) was fighting, too. 'I'm the freaking guy,' was what I was thinking."
Advertisement
If there's one moment outside the cage to summarize the ruthless nature of Lawler, it'd be the famous line he delivered in response to a question about McGregor's loss to Nate Diaz the following year.
Rather than take McGregor's neck and submit the Irishman like Diaz did with a rear-naked choke at UFC 196, Lawler flatly stated he would've instead taken the McGregor's soul.
Lawler, 43, won 22 of his 30 victories by knockout and only once submitted an opponent very early in his pro career. For the former UFC welterweight champion, that was just never his style.
"He (Diaz) did just freaking take his (McGregor's) neck and freaking let him off the hook," Lawler said. "He could have done whatever he wanted. ... I want to beat people up. That's how I fought.
Advertisement
"It's kind of funny because I'm coaching guys, and in the UFC I had zero submission attempts."
"In my eyes, and in my head, I was always thinking, 'If you submit somebody, there's tricks, right?' There's little tricks like, 'Oh, he tricked me.' But if you whoop somebody's ass, then there was really no trick to that."
That train of thought may lead one to believe Lawler went out of his way to prove himself in an old-school "tough-guy" fashion. But Lawler assures that was never a concern. He fought how he felt was right for him. If someone bested him, it was what it was.
Advertisement
"I would tap. I would never go to sleep. That's stupid," Lawler said. "Oxygen away from your brain. What does that prove? If you got, you got me."
Lawler has been enjoying life outside the Octagon since his instantly iconic retirement fight against Niko Price in July 2023. In one of the most perfect sendoff performances ever seen in combat sports, Lawler knocked out his tough-as-nails opponent in a mere 38 seconds, leaving the fight world begging for more.
Nearly a year and a half later, Lawler has stayed true to his retirement promise, but not without a little enticement to return. Bare-knuckle boxing leader BKFC has openly done its best to bring Lawler back sans gloves for a showdown against the promotion's top star, Mike Perry. And while Lawler likes the concept, he's still under contract with the UFC and hasn't seriously entertained a return.
"Not really," Lawler responded when asked if BKFC is a real possibility. "They touched base probably January of last year, and this is where we are today. So, you tell me. I never say never to anything, but I'm retired. We have to cross those paths [with figuring out his UFC status] when we need to.
"A fight's a fight, right? [Bare-knuckle is] how I first started fighting. ... To me, a fight's a fight. Knees to the head of a grounded opponent, soccer kick, stomps, that's fighting. When I fought in Hawaii, we had all those rules. You weren't safe anywhere. If you were in a front headlock position, you probably shouldn't hang out there because you'd probably be getting kneed in the head. So there's just more stuff to worry about and no resting spot."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Arman Tsarukyan: 'You gotta delete' Paddy Pimblett from UFC rankings
Paddy Pimblett shouldn't get the next title shot, or even be in the rankings, according to fellow UFC lightweight contender Arman Tsarukyan. After Ilia Topuria won the lightweight title by knocking out Charles Oliveira at UFC 317, Pimblett (23-3 MMA, 7-0 UFC) entered the cage for an intense faceoff. The interaction has led many to believe Pimblett will jump the queue in the lightweight division to get the next title shot, given the bad blood between him and Topuria. Tsarukyan (22-3 MMA, 9-2 UFC) believes the next shot is his, and doesn't believe the moment in the cage will change that. "Nobody said he's getting the title shot," Tsarukyan said on "Overdogs Podcast." "So, they are still figuring out who's fighting for the title – me, (Justin) Gaethje, or Paddy. But I know they got to put me because I'm the No. 1 contender right now." Tsarukyan is currently ranked No. 2 in the promotion's official lightweight rankings. The No. 1 spot is held by Islam Makhachev, who recently vacated the title and is expected to fight Jack Della Maddalena for the welterweight title soon. While making a case for his own shot at the title, Tsarukyan torched Pimblett's UFC resume and doesn't even view him as a top-ranked fighter. "You gotta delete him from the rankings, even," Tsarukyan said. "He's not even deserving to be in top 10." Tsarukyan went down the list of recent names that Pimblett has faced, criticizing the strength of schedule. "He beat the last three guys, it was (Michael) Chandler, he had three losses," Tsarukyan said. "It was Bobby Green, he had three, four losses. It was Tony Ferguson, he had eight losses. That's crazy, and like, you want to bring that guy and fight for the title? I don't know. You shouldn't even mention his name, you know? He doesn't even deserve even mentioning his name." Pimblett's last three opponents have a combined UFC record of 30-26-1, while Tsarukyan's last three, Charles Oliveira, Beneil Dariush, and Joaquim Silva, are 46-22-1. To Tsarukyan's point, Pimblett's recent opposition experienced rough stretches before he fought them. Chandler was 1-4 over his previous five, Green fared better at 3-2, but Ferguson was on a six-fight skid, which extended to eight before his exit from the UFC. Tsarukyan was set to challenge Islam Makhachev for the lightweight title at UFC 311 in January, but withdrew during fight week due to an injury. Topuria recently stated he would vacate the title before facing Tsarukyan.
USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
Stephen Thompson responds to Muslim Salikhov's 'old guys' callout at UFC on ABC 9
Stephen Thompson is down for a matchup of the oldest active fighters in the welterweight division after being called out at UFC on ABC 9. Following a 42-second upset knockout of Carlos Leal on Saturday's card in Abu Dhabi, Muslim Salikhov called for a showdown against Thompson (17-9-1 MMA, 12-9-1 UFC) in what would be a pairing of two of the division's most decorated strikers. It didn't take long for the 42-year-old "Wonderboy" to respond to the callout from 41-year-old Salikhov (22-5 MMA, 9-4 UFC), and he seemingly obliged immediately (via X): Thompson is coming off a controversial split decision loss to Gabriel Bonfim at UFC on ESPN 70 this month in what was the second-to-last fight on his current UFC contract. Although Thompson admitted in a pre-fight interview with MMA Junkie that he's unsure if he'll be signed to a new deal, a clash with a fighter of similar age and style would be fitting matchmaking.
Forbes
3 hours ago
- Forbes
Artificial Authenticity And The Humblebrag Industrial Complex
Andy Warhol poses with his beloved dachshund Archie in November 1973. (Photo by Jack Mitchell/Getty ... More Images) Getty Images A now-viral screenshot (below) of a satirical LinkedIn post from four years ago has been shared thousands of times—mocking the platform's ecosystem of manufactured inspiration, where every mundane encounter becomes a profound lesson in leadership. Yet scroll through your feed today, and you'll find posts nearly indistinguishable from the parody. We've reached peak professional performance theater, where the line between genuine insight and algorithmic optimization has dissolved entirely. And what's notable is that more and more people are now using AI to draft their LinkedIn posts, outsourcing their inner monologue to machines that have never had an inner anything. Posts today are more than twice as long as they used to be, and a 2024 study by Originality found that over half of these long-form English language posts on the platform were AI generated. LinkedIn hasn't just digitized networking—it has industrialized authenticity, outsourcing even emotional labor to algorithms and turning professional identity into a content genre. This goes beyond LinkedIn's occasional awkwardness or self-indulgence. It's about how professional identity itself is evolving in an AI-saturated world, and the economic stakes are higher than we realize. Screenshot of LinkedIn post by Lumko Solwandle Nathan Pettijohn Before LinkedIn digitized professional networking in 2003, career advancement relied on physical proximity and institutional gatekeepers. Professional relationships were built through alumni networks, industry conferences, golf courses, and corner office introductions—spaces that inherently favored those with existing social and economic capital. LinkedIn democratized access to professional networks while simultaneously industrializing the performance itself, making visible what was once private and measurable what was once intuitive. Today, LinkedIn has over 1 billion global members, with only 1% posting content weekly, yet generating 9 billion impressions weekly. This platform has industrialized what sociologist Arlie Hochschild calls "emotional labor"—the management of feelings to create a publicly observable facial and bodily display. Except now, we're outsourcing even that labor to artificial intelligence. The platform's ecosystem of " broetry "—those distinctive LinkedIn posts formatted with short, dramatic line breaks for maximum impact—represents something deeper than mere narcissism. The typography itself performs sincerity, mimicking the cadence of spoken vulnerability. When someone writes: "I made a mistake. And it changed everything. Here's what I learned..." They're not just sharing a professional insight. They're using visual formatting to simulate the pauses and emphasis of authentic emotional revelation, turning genuine human moments into content optimized for algorithmic consumption. LinkedIn's algorithm can identify robotic responses but remains surprisingly vulnerable to AI-generated thought leadership. When machines can successfully impersonate human professional insight, what does that say about the original insight? We've reached a point where artificial authenticity reflects back on itself so thoroughly that it's difficult to recall what unmediated professional wisdom even sounded like. The Humblebrag Industrial Complex LinkedIn has transformed what was once a social faux pas into a legitimate digital marketing strategy. The platform rewards what sociologists might recognize as ritualized vulnerability—a scripted performance of authenticity that has crystallized into genre: "I'm humbled to announce..." (success disguised as modesty, the linguistic equivalent of covering a Ferrari with a tarp) "A stranger did something kind and restored my faith in humanity..." (virtue signaling through anecdote, usually involving coffee shops or airport encounters) "I was rejected from my dream job, and it was the best thing that ever happened to me..." (destiny disguised as disappointment, the professional equivalent of "everything happens for a reason") These posts function as modern parables, teaching us how to navigate professional success while maintaining the illusion of humility. But the economic implications are worth noting. Research by Edelman found that thought leadership influences decision-makers' purchasing behaviors, with their B2B Thought Leadership Impact Study showing that strong thought leadership content not only strengthens a company's reputation but also positively impacts RFP invitations and pricing. LinkedIn's audience has twice the buying power of the average online user, and four out of five people on the platform drive business decisions. This creates what amounts to the Instagramification of the cubicle, where every career move becomes content, every professional insight becomes engagement bait, every human moment becomes a potential case study in leadership. The performance actually matters—posts with 50 comments from engaged users prove far more impactful than those with 1,000 likes and no conversations, suggesting that authentic dialogue (however performed) still carries economic weight. Unlike other social media platforms where influence might translate to brand deals or Patreon subscriptions, LinkedIn performance has direct B2B economic consequences. Consider the case of Justin Welsh, who reports building "$10.3M+ in business revenue at ~86% profit margins" largely through LinkedIn content. His posts about entrepreneurship routinely generate hundreds of thousands of impressions and directly drive sales for his courses and consulting services. Welsh's success illustrates how LinkedIn has flattened traditional professional hierarchies—you don't need a corner office or MBA to influence industry conversations. The Shadow Audience Effect Erving Goffman once described everyday life as a kind of stage, where individuals perform identity for an audience. LinkedIn crystallizes this theory in digital form. What makes LinkedIn's artificial authenticity particularly powerful is what we might call the "shadow audience effect." For every person who reads and engages with your post, there are dozens more who scroll past, absorbing your message without leaving any digital trace. You're influencing people you'll never know you influenced, creating ripple effects of professional persona that extend far beyond the platform's ability to track. This invisible influence explains why LinkedIn content often feels like performance art masquerading as professional insight. The poster knows they're being watched by potential clients, employers, and industry peers, even if those watchers never engage. The result is calculated transparency—being selectively vulnerable through frosted glass. For younger professionals or those without traditional credentials, this can create a pressure to perform vulnerability as a career strategy, not as a path to connection. What LinkedIn has accomplished is the digitization of what Pierre Bourdieu called ' cultural capital '—the knowledge, skills, and tastes that signal social status. Professional networking was always about displaying and accumulating this capital, but LinkedIn made the process explicit, quantified, and globally accessible. Your post engagement isn't just social validation; it's the real-time measurement of your professional cultural capital in the marketplace. This is why so many users report career opportunities or new clients from posts that received little visible engagement—because the real influence lies in who's watching, not who's commenting. When Machines Learn Professional Authenticity The integration of AI into LinkedIn content creation represents an evolution in professional identity performance. AI writing tools now offer LinkedIn-specific templates—some trained on large datasets of high-performing posts—designed to replicate the cadence of professional inspiration. The AI learns the cadence of professional inspiration, the rhythm of humble bragging, the precise vulnerability-to-insight ratio that drives engagement. MIT sociologist Sherry Turkle observes : "Technology doesn't just do things for us. It does things to us, changing not just what we do but who we are." This shift is particularly evident in professional contexts, where AI-assisted content creation is reshaping how we construct and perform our professional identities. This shift in how we perform professional identity online doesn't exist in a vacuum. It's emerging in parallel with broader workplace transformations—remote work, pandemic-era burnout, the so-called ' Great Resignation ,' and the rise of solo entrepreneurship. As traditional career ladders collapse or morph into lattices, platforms like LinkedIn have become a kind of stage where we rehearse relevance. In a world where your job title might be in flux and your office is your kitchen table, broadcasting a coherent professional persona isn't just branding—it's survival. The implications extend beyond LinkedIn. As AI becomes more sophisticated at mimicking human professional communication, the premium on genuinely human insights—the kind that can't be replicated by algorithms—may actually increase. We might be witnessing the last gasps of performed authenticity before authenticity becomes the only viable differentiator. The Algorithm Made Me Do It Andy Warhol famously predicted everyone would be famous for fifteen minutes. LinkedIn offers something more unsettling: the chance to remain professionally relevant indefinitely—as long as we never stop performing. The platform has created a new form of professional purgatory where authenticity becomes a competitive advantage precisely because it's so rare. In a feed flooded with AI-generated inspiration and algorithmic optimization, the genuinely human voice doesn't just stand out—it becomes economically valuable. We've reached the point where being authentically yourself is the ultimate professional hack. But here's the deeper paradox: LinkedIn didn't create performed professionalism—it simply made it visible, measurable, and unavoidable. The platform exposed what was always true about professional identity: it has always been performative, from the firm handshake to the power lunch to the carefully curated resume. LinkedIn merely provided the stage and sold tickets to the show. The real question isn't whether artificial authenticity is corrupting professional discourse—it's whether we'll develop the literacy to distinguish between human insight and algorithmic mimicry. As AI becomes more sophisticated at replicating professional wisdom, the ability to offer genuinely original thinking may become the ultimate career differentiator. The humblebrag industrial complex will endure, but so will our fundamentally human need for genuine connection and meaningful work. The challenge is learning to sound like ourselves—even while writing on a platform (and perhaps with tools) designed to make us all sound the same. Just perhaps, the most human thing we can do is think thoughts worth writing ourselves.
