Sudan paramilitary forces kill almost 300 in village raids, say lawyers
The RSF has been fighting the Sudanese army in that area, one of the key frontlines of a civil war in Sudan that has raged since April 2023.
The Emergency Lawyers human rights group said on Monday that the RSF had attacked several villages on Saturday around the city of Bara, which the paramilitary controls.
In one village, Shag Alnom, more than 200 people were killed via arson or gunshot. Looting raids of the other villages killed 38 civilians, it said, while dozens of others had gone missing.
The next day, the group said in its statement, the RSF attacked the village of Hilat Hamid, killing 46 people, including pregnant women and children.
More than 3,400 people were forced to flee, according to the UN.
'It has been proven that these targeted villages were completely empty of any military objectives, which makes clear the criminal nature of these crimes carried out in complete disregard of international humanitarian law,' Emergency Lawyers said, placing the responsibility with RSF leadership.
The army has taken firm control of the centre and east of Sudan while the RSF is working to consolidate its control of western regions, including North Kordofan.
The US and human rights groups have accused the RSF of war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide. Its soldiers have carried out a series of violent looting raids in territory it has taken control of across the country.
The RSF leadership says it will bring those found responsible for such acts to justice.
Sudan's civil war has created the world's largest humanitarian crisis, driving more than half the population into hunger and spreading diseases including cholera across the country. A global reduction in aid spending has stretched the humanitarian response.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Boy's Grindr romance ends in violent murder as youngster's stricken mother watched
A 17-year-old boy was allegedly shot and beaten to death at a Florida truck stop by his jealous boyfriend - as the teen's horrified mother watched the killing unfold live on FaceTime. Henry Jonathan Valencia, 23, was arrested Friday and charged with murder for the killing of 17-year-old, Nosiah Santos, who deputies confirmed was in a relationship with the suspect, reports Ocala News. Valencia became enraged after discovering that Santos had been messaging other men on Grindr. The couple had traveled together from Jacksonville to the Petro Travel Center in Marion County, arriving around 2:25 p.m., according to the sheriff's office. They began arguing at the gas pump, and at one point, Valencia drove off - leaving Santos stranded at the station. But he returned moments later and confronted the teen again. Surveillance footage shows Valencia pacing back and forth from his car to Santos multiple times, growing increasingly agitated. At one point, Santos appeared to try to walk away and disengage from the fight. Instead of backing off, Valencia allegedly pulled out a gun and shot the boy in the head at point-blank range. The teen's mother was connected on FaceTime and helplessly watched her son collapse. Valencia then struck Santos in the head multiple times before fleeing the scene in his vehicle and driving back to Jacksonville. Emergency responders rushed to the scene and transported Santos to a nearby hospital, but he died shortly after from his injuries. The brutal murder sparked a weeks-long investigation that culminated in Valencia's arrest on July 11. Valencia is currently being held without bail at the Marion County Jail and faces a second-degree murder charge. His next court appearance is scheduled for August 12. Investigators confirmed the couple were romantically involved, and the killing was triggered by jealousy over Santos's online interactions with other men. No additional charges have yet been filed. The age of consent in the state of Florida is 18.
The Independent
3 hours ago
- The Independent
Federal agency shifts stance on transgender discrimination complaints, but hurdles remain
The federal agency responsible for enforcing laws against workplace discrimination will allow some complaints filed by transgender workers to move forward, shifting course from earlier guidance that indefinitely stalled all such cases, according to an email obtained by The Associated Press. The email was sent earlier this month to leaders of the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission with the subject line 'Hot Topics,' in which Thomas Colclough, director of the agency's Office of Field Programs, announced that if new transgender worker complaints involve 'hiring, discharge or promotion, you are clear to continue processing these charges.' But even those cases will still be subject to higher scrutiny than other types of workplace discrimination cases, requiring approval from President Donald Trump 's appointed acting agency head Andrea Lucas, who has said that one of her priorities would be 'defending the biological and binary reality of sex and related rights.' Since Trump regained office in January, the EEOC has moved away from its prior interpretation of civil rights law, marking a stark contrast to a decade ago when the agency issued a landmark finding that a transgender civilian employee of the U.S. Army had been discriminated against because her employer refused to use her preferred pronouns or allow her to use bathrooms based on her gender identity. Under Lucas's leadership, the EEOC has dropped several lawsuits on behalf of transgender workers. Lucas defended that decision during her June 18 Senate committee confirmation hearing in order to comply with the president's executive order declaring two unchangeable sexes. However, she acknowledged that a 2020 Supreme Court ruling — Bostock v. Clayton County — 'did clearly hold that discriminating against someone on the basis of sex included firing an individual who is transgender or based on their sexual orientation.' Colclough acknowledged in his July 1 email that the EEOC will consider transgender discrimination complaints that 'fall squarely under' the Supreme Court's ruling, such as cases involving hiring, firing and promotion. The email backtracked on an earlier policy, communicated verbally, that de-prioritized all transgender cases. The EEOC declined to comment on the specifics of its latest policy, saying: 'Under federal law, charge inquiries and charges of discrimination made to the EEOC are confidential. Pursuant to Title VII and as statutorily required, the EEOC is, has been, and will continue to accept and investigate charges on all bases protected by law, and to serve those charges to the relevant employer." But even the cases that the EEOC is willing to consider under Bostock must still be reviewed by a senior attorney advisor, and then sent to Lucas for final approval. This heightened review process is not typical for other discrimination charges and reflects the agency's increased oversight for gender identity cases, former EEOC commissioner Chai Feldblum told The AP in a Monday phone interview. 'It is a slight improvement because it will allow certain claims of discrimination to proceed," Feldblum said of the new policy. 'But overall it does not fix a horrific and legally improper situation currently occurring at the EEOC.' Colclough's email did not clarify how long the review process might take, or whether cases that include additional claims, such as harassment or retaliation, would be eligible to proceed, and the EEOC declined to address those questions. "This is not the EEOC being clear to either its own staff or to the public what charges are going to be processed," Feldblum said. 'This is not a panacea." ________ The Associated Press' women in the workforce and state government coverage receives financial support from Pivotal Ventures. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Cuomo declares himself ‘anti-billionaire' as he re-enters New York mayoral race
Andrew Cuomo has seemingly declared himself an 'anti-billionaire' as he re-entered the New York mayoral race. Mr Cuomo, the former New York governor, lost the Democratic primary to socialist candidate Zohran Mamdani last month but on Monday announced he would stand as a third-party candidate. Mr Mamdani was propelled to victory by a campaign focused on the cost of living, with plans to raise the minimum wage to $30 an hour, freeze rent for stabilised tenants and build 200,000 affordable homes within a decade. In an interview with New York Magazine on Tuesday, Mr Cuomo likened himself to his 33-year-old rival, claiming they were both 'anti-billionaire'. 'I believe he is authentic in his political ideology… social, anti-business becomes anti-establishment, anti-billionaire,' he said of Mr Mamdani. 'Which, yeah, I'm anti-billionaire. They have too much money. Make them give it back, especially when we're having an affordability crisis.' Claims Cuomo adopted Mamdani's words The comments have prompted a row between the media and the Cuomo camp, who have pushed back on reports of their candidate's apparent adoption of Mr Mamdani's talking points. 'That's a silly manipulation of the governor's words: he was clearly explaining and mimicking Mamdani's campaign messag e and how it resonated with his supporters,' said Rich Azzopardi, Mr Cuomo's spokesman. 'That's not his position at all and both the context of the conversation makes that clear.' However, David Freedlander, the journalist who interviewed Mr Cuomo for New York Magazine, described the former governor's 'anti-billionaire' comments as his 'pitch for Mamdani voters'. As governor, Mr Cuomo pushed back on attempts by fellow Democrats in the state Senate as they attempted to impose a tax on millionaires, claiming it would cause wealthy individuals to flee New York. The state would be able to 'count on one hand the number of millionaires left' if they followed through with the plan, he said in 2019. He has also noted that one per cent of its population pay 50 per cent of its tax revenues, and blocked former New York City mayor Bill de Blasio's attempts to raise income taxes on those earning more than $500,000 in 2014. Elsewhere in the interview, Mr Cuomo said, like Mr Mamdani, he was in favour of freezing rent and introducing 'fast free buses'. 'I was not aggressive enough' Looking back on his failed primary campaign, the former governor said he had failed to cross-examine Mr Mamdani's policies, which he said would mean 'death for New York City'. 'I never really debunked his proposals because I just didn't engage. That was a mistake,' said Mr Cuomo, whom commentators criticised for running a listless campaign. 'I made a mistake. I was not as aggressive as I should be, which is really ironic because my whole life people have been saying about me, 'Oh, he's too aggressive, too combative, pushed too hard'.' He continued: 'It was just a mistake, and it's not a mistake I'm going to make again.' So far, Mr Cuomo faces an uphill battle to win the mayoral election in November, with the anti-Mamdani vote split between Eric Adams, the current mayor, Republican candidate Curtis Sliwa, and Jim Walden, an independent. 'You run a multi-candidate field, Mamdani wins,' Mr Cuomo said. 'One-on-one is the best shot, and the goal is stopping Mamdani. Whoever has the best shot to do that should go forward.'
