Does neurodegeneration start when blood vessels are damaged?
Our brain depends on a finely tuned network of neurons, signals, and protective barriers to function seamlessly. This intricate setup underpins every thought, memory, and movement we make. But as we age, or under certain conditions, this system can break down.
Neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) slowly damage neurons and over time these conditions lead to severe memory loss, confusion, and loss of independence. Despite decades of research, the precise mechanisms driving these diseases have remained elusive.
Shifting away from the traditional neuron-centric view of brain diseases, two studies published recently in Science Advances and Nature Neuroscience, offer a compelling new piece to this puzzle. The teams' research reveals a startling possibility: what if the trouble begins long before neurons die?
The studies suggest that damage to the blood-brain barrier (BBB) may in fact be the first domino to fall in neurodegenerative diseases.
First line of defence
The BBB is one of the brain's most critical protections. It is made up of tightly packed endothelial cells that line blood vessels in the brain. Their job is to gatekeep: letting in vital nutrients while keeping out toxins, pathogens, and harmful immune cells.
'Endothelial cells are the first cells exposed to what we eat, what infections we carry, or even the medications we take,' Ashok Cheemala, lead author of the Science Advances study, said. 'If these cells become inflamed or damaged, the barrier becomes leaky. When that happens, harmful substances can slip into the brain and trigger inflammation.'
This inflammation, in turn, can lead to neuron death, which causes memory loss and cognitive decline — the hallmarks of diseases like Alzheimer's and frontotemporal dementia (FTD).
Helpful and harmful
The TDP-43 protein regulates RNA and ensures proper gene expression inside cells in a process called splicing. Under healthy conditions, it is located in the nucleus of cells. But in people with neurodegenerative diseases, it goes rogue.
'If it accumulates in the cytoplasm, it starts to form toxic aggregates that can spread from one cell to another,' Cheemala said. While these aggregates have primarily been studied in neurons, researchers have been wondering whether endothelial cells that make up the BBB are also affected.
King's College London neurologist Jemeen Sreedharan said, 'TDP-43 is found in virtually every cell in the body, not just in the brain. It's been detected in the skin, liver, kidneys, even reproductive organs. So its presence in endothelial cells isn't surprising. What's interesting is the idea that its dysfunction in these cells could kickstart the disease process.'
Leaky in the barrier
To investigate, the team used genetically modified mice carrying a disease-causing mutation in the Tardbp gene that encodes TDP-43. 'Even a single point mutation in TDP-43 in endothelial cells was enough to cause BBB leakage, brain inflammation, and behavioural changes in mice,' Cheemala said. As they aged, these mice showed increased leakage of molecules from the bloodstream into the brain, evidence of a compromised barrier.
The researchers found that key proteins holding the BBB together, like claudin-5 and VE-cadherin, were lost, allowing molecules from the bloodstream to leak into brain tissue. These mice also displayed memory problems. The team also injected fluorescent dyes and tracked their penetration into the brain, analysing changes in the structure and protein composition of the BBB to verify their findings.
'This mutation is present from early development, even before birth,' Sreedharan said. 'These mice don't develop obvious brain disease but they do have vascular abnormalities. That points to blood vessel dysfunction as a possible early driver of neurodegeneration.'
The human connection
The team also analysed over 130,000 individual brain-cell nuclei from postmortem human brain samples from 92 donors aged 20-98, including both healthy individuals and those with certain neurodegenerative conditions. They profiled the RNA and nuclear proteins at the single-nucleus level and examined molecular changes in various brain cells. 'We specifically looked at TDP-43 levels in the nuclei of endothelial cells. In patient samples, the nuclear TDP-43 was dramatically reduced compared to healthy controls,' Cheemala said.
The findings mirrored those of the mouse model. Loss of TDP-43 caused β-catenin to disintegrate, ramping up inflammatory signalling. The team also identified a specific group of damaged capillary cells that had low TDP-43 and high inflammation, suggesting they'd shifted from maintenance to damage mode.
Still, the human data came with caveats. 'Post-mortem studies are limited by variability in tissue quality and timing,' Sreedharan said. 'But combining those with controlled mouse models makes the case much stronger.'
'It'll be important to see if this endothelial phenotype is specific to neurodegenerative diseases or a more general response to brain injury. Studying non-genetic conditions like multiple sclerosis or traumatic brain injury could help clarify this,' he added.
Early detection opportunity
The findings open a window for early diagnosis and prevention. 'It's compelling to think a disease we've long considered neuron-specific may actually start in the vasculature,' Sreedharan said.
The team is now working on potential blood-based biomarkers, especially proteins that are regulated by TDP-43 and may be secreted into the bloodstream when endothelial cells are affected.
'One candidate is HDGLF2, a protein that changes when TDP-43 function is lost. If we can detect that in blood, we may be able to identify the number of years an at-risk individual has before their symptoms appear, Cheemala said.
The researchers are also exploring whether exosomes — tiny particles released by cells, which may carry distinct protein signatures from damaged blood vessels — could serve as early indicators of disease. This could lead to non-invasive tests for diagnosing neurodegenerative diseases in their silent stages, long before symptoms appear and while interventions may still be effective.
Manjeera Gowravaram has a PhD in RNA biochemistry and works as a freelance science writer.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Is your brain aging faster than you? New science offers clues
Dan Jones of Cedar City, Utah, has resumed playing the bagpipes after lifestyle changes. Dan Jones liked his job as a quality-control inspector and loved his hobby even more: playing in a local bagpipe band. Then he started making mistakes in the pieces he played. He found himself having to write tasks down if he wanted to remember them. In 2021, at age 56, he was diagnosed with dementia. The future he had plotted with his wife, Darla, suddenly seemed to evaporate. 'We had lots of plans, and they all ended," he says. Jones packed up his bagpipes for good and moved to a work role that offered a more predictable schedule. Then his wife learned about a study testing whether lifestyle changes could reverse early-stage Alzheimer's disease. Enrolling meant Jones had to give up his favorite foods, like roast beef, homemade spaghetti and ice cream, for a plant-based diet with minimally processed foods that are low in refined carbs and sugars. He had to do more exercise, meditate daily and meet regularly with a support group. Several months into the study, Jones picked up his bagpipes again, and by July 2022 he was performing in a parade in his hometown of Cedar City, Utah. He stopped waking up confused about where he was while traveling. Cognitive assessments showed that aspects of his memory had stabilized or improved. 'You could not pay me to quit eating the way I eat now, or to quit doing the exercise," he says. 'It made that big a difference." Jones has adopted a plant-based diet with foods that are low in refined carbs and tries to meditate for 30 minutes most days of the week. Jones wasn't alone. The full study, published in 2024 and led by the nonprofit Preventive Medicine Research Institute, found that brain function and cognition significantly improved in patients who made lifestyle changes. As tools and tests that gauge brain health become more accessible, a growing body of research suggests we can actually do something about it. The research comes as the gap widens between lifespan and healthspan—the number of years spent in good health. Americans are living longer on average, leaving more time to develop age-related diseases including dementia. New cases of dementia will double by 2060 to roughly one million annually, according to a recent study, Dr. Dean Ornish, founder of the Preventive Medicine Research Institute, spent decades testing whether and how lifestyle changes could affect other diseases such as prostate cancer, heart disease and aspects of aging itself. For the Alzheimer's study that included Jones, Ornish and a team of researchers randomly assigned 51 participants to one of two groups: a control group with no lifestyle changes, or an intensive program. Patients were tested at baseline and retested after 4½ months. In a test measuring changes in brain function over time, 71% of patients who made lifestyle changes showed improvement or no deterioration in their condition. In the control group, none improved, and 68% got worse. The study's small sample size makes the findings difficult to generalize, according to Ornish, but the results show a big difference. 'The earlier you intervene, the less intensive the lifestyle changes likely need to be to prevent it," Ornish says. 'It's really giving new hope and new choices to people who didn't have that before." A separate study published in 2024 looked at healthy people. It found that even modest levels of physical activity, as low as 25 minutes of moderate to vigorous activity a week, are linked to bigger brain sizes—a marker for better brain health. Jones says increased exercise has contributed to his improved health. 'Lifestyle matters," says Rudolph Tanzi, a professor of neurology at Harvard Medical School and director of the McCance Center for Brain Health at Massachusetts General Hospital, who studies Alzheimer's disease genes and who worked on the study including Jones. Advances in diagnostic and prognostic tools are helping doctors and scientists gain new understanding of how to measure and modify cognitive function. Andrei Irimia, an associate professor at USC Leonard Davis School of Gerontology who has studied brain aging for more than a decade, co-developed an artificial-intelligence model that uses MRI scans to calculate how fast a patient's brain is aging relative to chronological age. The model takes into account variables linked to brain aging, such as the size of the hippocampus, which is involved in memory, and the thickness of the cortex, the brain's outermost layer. Irimia says the model can monitor in real time how the brain reacts to problems or improvements in lifestyle. A reminder list in Jones's home. Faster brain aging is linked to a higher risk of cognitive impairment, he says. In May, the Food and Drug Administration approved the first blood test to help diagnose Alzheimer's disease. It is designed for people who are already having memory problems, not healthy people without symptoms. Various companies are developing blood tests that would let anyone determine 'brain age." NeuroAge Therapeutics, a longevity biotech company, makes a $700 blood test that tracks dozens of RNA molecules. A more expensive package includes the blood test, a brain MRI, genetic testing, memory games and an analysis that offers a comprehensive brain-age score. NeuroAge was founded by Dr. Christin Glorioso, a neuroscientist. Glorioso carries one copy of the APOE4 gene, which carries an elevated risk of developing Alzheimer's, and she says she started putting a priority on sleep after seeing her results. There is a link between insufficient sleep and dementia risk. Many doctors and researchers say biological-age testing requires rigorous research and validation before it should be widely adopted. It is also expensive—many of the blood tests cost hundreds of dollars out of pocket, and elective MRIs can cost hundreds to thousands. 'I would be extremely cautious as a consumer, and I would want to see scientific evidence that whatever they measure is relevant," says Tony Wyss-Coray, a professor of neurology at Stanford University. His lab has developed a protein-based blood test to measure the ages of the brain and other organ systems. With refinement, these tools could one day make a big difference for patients like Dan Jones. 'The people who can know those things sooner have an advantage," says Jones, who adds that he didn't take any genetic or brain health-specific tests before his diagnosis. 'I would have made the changes a lot earlier. Write to Alex Janin at


Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Brain scan reveals why Parkinson's drugs don't always work: Study
Washington: Simon Fraser University Researchers are using an advanced brain imaging method called MEG to understand why Parkinson's drug levodopa doesn't work equally well for everyone. By mapping patients' brain signals before and after taking the drug, they discovered that it sometimes activates the wrong brain regions, dampening its helpful effects. This breakthrough could pave the way for personalised treatment strategies, ensuring patients receive medications that target the right areas of their brain more effectively. The new study by the Simon Fraser University (SFU) researchers, published in the journal Movement Disorders, looks at why levodopa - the main drug used in dopamine replacement therapy - is sometimes less effective in patients. The drug is typically prescribed to help reduce the movement symptoms associated with the neurodegenerative disorder . While it is effective in improving symptoms for the vast majority of patients, not everyone experiences the same level of benefit. In order to find out why this is the case, an SFU collaboration with researchers in Sweden has used magnetoencephalography (MEG) technology to determine how the drug affects signals in the brain. "Parkinson's is the second most prevalent neurodegenerative disease worldwide and it is the most rapidly increasing, in terms of incidence," says Alex Wiesman, assistant professor in biomedical physiology and kinesiology at SFU. "Treating this disease, both in terms of helping people with their symptoms, but also trying to find ways to reverse the effects, is becoming more and more important. If clinicians can see how levodopa activates certain parts of the brain in a patient, it can help to inform a more personalised approach to treatment," added Wiesman. The study was a collaboration with researchers at Karolinska Institute in Sweden, who used MEG to collect data from 17 patients with Parkinson's disease - a relatively small sample size. Researchers mapped participants' brain signals before and after taking the drug, in order to see how and where the drug impacted brain activity. MEG is an advanced non-invasive technology that measures the magnetic fields produced by the brain's electrical signals. It can help clinicians and researchers to study brain disorders and diseases, including brain injuries, tumours, epilepsy, autism, mental illness and more. Using this rare brain imaging technology, Wiesman and team developed a new analysis that lets them "search" the brain for off-target drug effects. "With this new way of analysing brain imaging data, we can track in real time whether or not the drug is affecting the right brain regions and helping patients to manage their symptoms," says Wiesman. "What we found was that there are sometimes 'off-target' effects of the drug. In other words, we could see the drug activating brain regions we don't want to be activating, and that's getting in the way of the helpful effects. We found that those people who showed 'off target' effects are still being helped by the drug, but not to the same extent as others," said Wiesman. Parkinson's disease is a neurodegenerative disorder, meaning parts of the brain become progressively damaged over time. It affects predominately the dopamine-producing neurons in a specific area of the brain called the substantia nigra. People with Parkinson's disease may experience a range of movement-related symptoms, such as tremors, slow movement, stiffness and balance problems. Wiesman hopes that a better understanding of how levodopa affects an individual's brain signals could improve how drugs are prescribed to treat Parkinson's. This new type of brain imaging analysis is not only for studying Parkinson's disease; any medications that affect brain signaling can be studied using the method developed by Wiesman and colleagues. (ANI)


The Hindu
12 hours ago
- The Hindu
Extreme heat silently accelerates ageing on a molecular level
What if extreme heat not only leaves you feeling exhausted but actually makes you age faster? Scientists already know that extreme heat increases the risk of heat stroke, cardiovascular disease, kidney dysfunction and even death. I see these effects often in my work as a researcher studying how environmental stressors influence the aging process. But until now, little research has explored how heat affects biological aging: the gradual deterioration of cells and tissues that increases the risk of age-related diseases. Research my team and I published in the journal Science Advances in March 2025 suggests that long-term exposure to extreme heat may speed up biological ageing at the molecular level, raising concerns about the long-term health risks posed by a warming climate. Extreme heat's hidden toll on the body My colleagues and I examined blood samples from over 3,600 older adults across the United States. We measured their biological age using epigenetic clocks, which capture DNA modification patterns – methylation – that change with age. DNA methylation refers to chemical modifications to DNA that act like switches to turn genes on and off. Environmental factors can influence these switches and change how genes function, affecting aging and disease risk over time. Measuring these changes through epigenetic clocks can strongly predict age-related disease risk and lifespan. Research in animal models has shown that extreme heat can trigger what's known as a maladaptive epigenetic memory, or lasting changes in DNA methylation patterns. Studies indicate that a single episode of extreme heat stress can cause long-term shifts in DNA methylation across different tissue types in mice. To test the effects of heat stress on people, we linked epigenetic clock data to climate records to assess whether people living in hotter environments exhibited faster biological aging. We found that older adults residing in areas with frequent very hot days showed significantly faster epigenetic aging compared with those living in cooler regions. For example, participants living in locations with at least 140 extreme heat days per year – classified as days when the heat index exceeded 90 degrees Fahrenheit (32.33 degrees Celcius) – experienced up to 14 months of additional biological aging compared with those in areas with fewer than 10 such days annually. This link between biological age and extreme heat remained even after accounting for a wide range of individual and community factors such as physical activity levels and socioeconomic status. This means that even among people with similar lifestyles, those living in hotter environments may still be aging faster at the biological level. Even more surprising was the magnitude of the effect – extreme heat has a comparable impact on speeding up aging as smoking and heavy alcohol consumption. This suggests that heat exposure may be silently accelerating ageing, at a level on par with other major known environmental and lifestyle stressors. Long-term public health consequences While our study sheds light on the connection between heat and biological aging, many unanswered questions remain. It's important to clarify that our findings don't mean every additional year in extreme heat translates directly to 14 extra months of biological aging. Instead, our research reflects population-level differences between groups based on their local heat exposure. In other words, we took a snapshot of whole populations at a moment in time; it wasn't designed to look at effects on individual people. Our study also doesn't fully capture all the wayspeople mightprotect themselves from extreme heat. Factors such as access to air conditioning, time spent outdoors and occupational exposure all play a role in shaping personal heat exposure and its effects. Some individuals may be more resilient, while others may face greater risks due to preexisting health conditions or socioeconomic barriers. This is an area where more research is needed. What is clear, however, is that extreme heat is more than just an immediate health hazard – it may be silently accelerating the aging process, with long-term consequences for public health. Older adults are especially vulnerable because aging reduces the body's ability to regulate temperature effectively. Many older individuals also take medications such as beta-blockers and diuretics that can impair their heat tolerance, making it even harder for their bodies to cope with high temperatures. So even moderately hot days, such as those reaching 80 degrees Fahrenheit (26.67 degrees Celcius), can pose health risks for older adults. As the U.S. population rapidly ages and climate change intensifies heat waves worldwide, I believe simply telling people to move to cooler regions isn't realistic. Developing age-appropriate solutions that allow older adults to safely remain in their communities and protect the most vulnerable populations could help address the hidden yet significant effects of extreme heat. (Eunyoung Choi, postdoctoral associate in Gerontology, University of Southern California) This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article here: