
‘Ballerina' review: Familiar, fun spinoff powered by a fiery Ana de Armas
There are times we look for complexity and depth in cinema, and times when a few simple pleasures will do. Small joys, like arcane assassin guild rituals. Or Keanu Reeves hitting every syllable in 'consequences.' Or Ana de Armas with a flamethrower.
After four films that remapped Hollywood action, the John Wick franchise has its first feature spinoff. Ballerina is the first film in this universe not directed by Chad Stahelski, with Len Wiseman of the Underworld films in charge. This is usually the point at which franchises thin out and make peace with the idea that they'll be churning out variations until the public no longer cares. Sequels say you're a franchise, spinoffs say you're a business.
It would be difficult to argue that Ballerina is an advance over the Wick films. It is, however, a perfectly serviceable, enjoyable action film, and evidence that the aesthetic Stahelski and Reeves have developed over four films is replicable, if not easy to better. De Armas plays Eve Macarro, whose father, an assassin in the Ruska Roma family, married into a rival group of assassins called the Cult. Within minutes of the film starting, armed Cultists lay siege to the house where he's been hiding out for years, raising his daughter. Eve sees her father die, and vows revenge.
Twelve years later, Eve is a ballerina in training in New York City. She's also a killer in training; Ruska Roma offer classes for both. At first, Eve is tossed aside and bested by bigger male opponents. A key moment sees her trainer, Nogi (Sharon Duncan-Brewster), pull her aside and challenge her to 'improvise, cheat, fight like a girl.' It unlocks something in her. The jump to deadly killer is achieved in a few quick scenes—though we know that for Eve the assassin game isn't an end but a means to avenge her father's killing by the Cult and its leader, who goes by the Chancellor (Gabriel Byrne).
The John Wick series has innovated by degrees: first film gun fu and straight revenge drama, second one a larger universe as Wick goes abroad, the third with a greater focus on martial arts, the fourth with its team-ups and crazily elaborate set pieces. Besides offering a new protagonist, Ballerina doesn't bring a lot that's new to the universe. It bears the hallmarks of 87North action: fast, hard, syncopated, clear. At the same time, de Armas is allowed her own distinct style, where quickness and innovation compensate for her slightness. This in turn pushes Wiseman and the stunt coordinators to come up with unique action beats. Cornered in an icy barn, she uses ice-skating boots as flying blades. There's a great scene built around Eve tossing grenades. And there's the flamethrower, which feels just right for the fiery de Armas, whose Eve is lit from within by the thought of revenge.
Eve has been trained to be kikimora, a Slavic witch repurposed by the Ruska Roma as protector. Even though the film doesn't follow through on the idea, it's a smart contrast to Wick the avenging demon, baba yaga. As we already knew from the trailer, he's sent to end Eve's carnage and restore some calm to the assassin business. Reeves being part of the film feels like more of a marketing imperative than a storytelling necessity. It's still pleasurable to see him and de Armas spar, even better to see them communicate in clipped, pained sentences.
For someone who came up as a stuntman and fight coordinator, Stahelski proved surprisingly adept at drawing witty performances from the many distinguished actors who've turned up in the series. Wiseman doesn't seem to have the same touch. Recurring actors like Ian McShane and Anjelica Huston are somewhat flat here, and Byrne's villain never becomes interesting (an anomaly in the Wick universe). The only cameo that feels instinctively right is Norman Reedus, his distinctive features weathered like the Himalaya, playing another dad on the run with his little girl.
In the first film, John Wick was motivated by grief too. Yet, when he fought, he was cold, precise, lethal. Eve is just as focused, but can't, or won't, shut out emotion in the heat of combat. Instead, it's fuel to her fire, that crucial, slight edge desperation and fury can offer. Maybe this is what Nogi wanted her to access when she told her to fight like a girl.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
4 days ago
- Time of India
Amanda Bynes, former Nickelodeon star starts Ozempic; shares her ‘goal' behind weight loss
Another one bites the dust. Amanda Bynes , known for her bright smile and Nickelodeon-cult classics, has jumped into the Ozempic bandwagon. The former child star shared the update via Instagram, revealing her actual 'motivation' that drove her to make the decision of starting Ozempic. What happened? Bynes recently revealed on Instagram that she's embarked on a weight-loss journey with Ozempic, the GLP‑1 receptor agonist originally approved for type 2 diabetes. In a candid video on June 22, she disclosed she currently weighs 173 lbs and is aiming for the 130‑lb mark, with the goal of looking 'better in paparazzi pictures.' Bynes, 39, said in a video posted to her Instagram Story, 'I'm 173 now so I hope to get down to like 130, which would be awesome so I look better in paparazzi pictures.' This latest chapter seems rooted in her long‑standing struggles: Bynes has previously shared battles with depression, body image, and addiction, culminating in a career hiatus in 2010. Her announcement also continues a pattern: in March 2024, she weighed 162 lbs and aimed for 110 lbs, taking steps toward healthier habits. This time, however, she's turning to medication to accelerate her transformation. and pledging to share the journey publicly, a rare insight into her process and personal growth. What is Ozempic? Ozempic (semaglutide) is a well-known prescription drug that's used to treat the blood sugar of people with type 2 diabetes. Ozempic is given as an injection under your skin. Ozempic is also used to lower the risk of cardiovascular events (heart attack, stroke, or death) in people who have type 2 diabetes and heart disease. The Food and Drug Administration first approved the injectable medication for treating diabetes in 2017; the agency approved a drug with a higher dose of the active ingredient in Ozempic, called semaglutide, to treat obesity in 2021, under the brand name Wegovy. Since then, talk of the drug has popped up across the internet. The prescription drug keeps gaining attention as celebrities, a tech mogul, and TikTok influencers have described taking it to lose weight in short time frames. Why Ozempic? Well, Ozempic is known for appetite suppression (it slows stomach emptying and promotes satiety), blood sugar regulation (originally for diabetes, but widely used off‑label for weight loss), and rapid effectiveness (users often experience noticeable drops in weight within weeks). For someone like Bynes – who has been open about her desire to feel good in photos and maintain confidence – this can be compelling. In an industry fixated on image, it's understandable why she'd choose a fast‑acting tool. Ozempic effects: While Ozempic offers rapid benefits, medical experts and users have flagged several concerns – some superficial, others more serious. Let's dive into what 'Ozempic hands,' 'feet,' and 'eyes' really mean. Ozempic hands and feet: First off, it should be noted that these aren't official medical diagnoses, but fairly common observations among users. Reports online claimed that 'Ozempic hands' and 'Ozempic feet' are one of the side effects of GLP-1 medications such as Ozempic, Wegovy, and Mounjaro. Netizens have speculated whether celebrities like Sharon Osbourne and Oprah Winfrey have started showing unexpected foot-related side effects. What exactly happens when one has Ozempic feet? 'Ozempic feet' is a side effect of rapid weight loss induced by the drug, referring to the changes in the feet due to a sudden loss of fat padding in the soles. This can lead to a feeling of walking on bone, soreness, and difficulty standing for extended periods. Additionally, the reduced fat can make veins and tendons more visible, potentially leading to a perceived older appearance. In simpler terms, Ozempic feet is the sagging and wrinkling of one's skin on the feet. Experts advise users to monitor these changes, adapt footwear and foot care, and seek professional advice from podiatrists or dermatologists if they occur. Similarly, 'Ozempic hands' is the consequence of rapid fat loss in fingers and hands, leaving tendons and veins pronounced, creating a gaunt or skeletal appearance. Ozempic face : Ozempic face is the consequence of rapid facial fat loss that can dramatically change appearance. It can trigger sunken cheeks, hollow eyes, sagging jowls, and thinner lips – all of which are common with rapid weight loss. Meanwhile, 'Ozempic mouth' describes deeper lines around the lips, an aged or sagging mouth area. Rapid weight loss can also kick off fine lines and cause crepey skin – as a result of dehydration. Loss of collagen/elastin only compounds the effect, leaving the face changed drastically. These changes are often noticeable within weeks of fat loss, with some Ozempic users saying they suddenly 'look 20 years older!' However, these are not medical danger – purely aesthetic – but emotionally distressing. Ozempic eyes: Vision risks and cosmetic effects Although Ozempic hands, feet, and face are not medical dangers that rapid weight loss poses, blurred vision is a common but more serious side-effect – as rapid blood sugar shifts affect the lens of the eye. However, this often resolves after 3 - 4 months. More seriously, Ozempic has been tentatively linked to non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) – an 'eye stroke' that causes sudden vision loss in one eye. Regulatory agencies in Australia and elsewhere have raised flags after reports of blindness in a small number of cases. Several users have described experiences like macular edema, floating 'squigglies,' eye pain, or sudden design changes in optics – all of which warrant immediate eye care attention. Selena Gomez's Slimmer Figure Sparks Ozempic Rumors, But Here's the Life-Threatening Truth Behind Her Weight Loss One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change


Hindustan Times
5 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Sitaare Zameen Par worldwide box office collection day 3: Aamir Khan film is #8 in the world; beats Materialists
Sitaare Zameen Par worldwide box office collection day 3: RS Prasanna's Aamir Khan and Genelia Deshmukh-starrer Sitaare Zameen Par was released in theatres on Friday and had a good weekend. As per Comscore, the film completed its first weekend at #8 worldwide, beating Kuberaa and Materialists. (Also Read: Sitaare Zameen Par box office collection day 3: Aamir Khan film to soon beat Laal Singh Chaddha; earns over ₹ 59 crore) Sitaare Zameen Par worldwide box office collection day 3: Aamir Khan's film had a shaky start and a good weekend. (AFP) According to the website, Sitaare Zameen Par earned an estimated $10,217,662 ( ₹ 88 crore) worldwide, beating Dhanush-starrer Kuberaa and Dakota Johnson-starrer Materialists. Taking the lead at the worldwide box office are How To Train Your Dragon, 28 Years Later, Elio, Lilo & Stitch, She's Got No Name, Mission: Impossible - The Final Reckoning and Ballerina. As per Sacnilk, the film collected ₹ 58.15 crore net and ₹ 69.75 crore gross in India, with an overseas collection of ₹ 26 crore, taking it to ₹ 95.75 crore worldwide. Sitaare Zameen Par is well on its way to crossing the ₹ 100 crore mark soon, and it remains to be seen how it performs during the week. While Materialists released on 13 June, both Sitaare Zameen Par and Kuberaa hit screens worldwide on 20 June. It would be interesting to see if the Aamir-starrer can beat Ballerina's collections and climb up in the ranking. Sitaare Zameen Par worldwide BO Amount Day 1 ₹ 20 crore Day 2 ₹ 55 crore Day 3 ₹ 88 crore About Sitaare Zameen Par Sitaare Zameen Par is the spiritual sequel to the 2007 hit film Taare Zameen Par, which also saw Aamir play the lead. The film tells the story of a basketball coach who receives a DUI and is mandated by the court to teach a group of neurodivergent individuals the sport. Genelia plays the wife. Sitaare Zameen Par received good reviews upon release and has held its own during the weekend, after a shaky start with a ₹ 20 crore worldwide collection on opening day. By day two, the film brought in ₹ 55 crore worldwide.


Indian Express
20-06-2025
- Indian Express
This Salman Khan and Rani Mukerji-starrer was reportedly funded by Chhota Shakeel, ensuing scandal exposed Bollywood-underworld nexus
In the late 90s and early 2000s, the Mumbai underworld made inroads into the world of films. The connection between the mafia and the Hindi film industry dates back to the 1960s, when Haji Mastan would often be seen socialising with the biggest stars of that era, such as Dilip Kumar and Sanjeev Kumar. Later, when Dawood Ibrahim became the most feared gangster in Mumbai, his associates were known to pressure film stars into doing movies for them. The attempt was to convert black money into white. The Bollywood-underworld nexus was properly exposed during the making of the 2003 film Chori Chori Chupke Chupke, directed by Abbas-Mustan and starring Salman Khan, Preity Zinta, and Rani Mukerji. Preity was the only one who testified against the underworld in the ensuing trial, while all other witnesses turned hostile. At a 2018 India Today event, she reflected on the scary experience. 'For the record, if I knew that everyone was going to back out, I also would have. It was a scary time in my life. I should have been protected. Whatever I said in court was on TV ten minutes later,' she recalled, making a reference to her colleagues turning hostile, and going on to mention the assassination attempt on filmmaker Rakesh Roshan's life. Also read – The producer of an Amitabh Bachchan film was kidnapped in broad daylight by Pathan mafia; Dilip Kumar got the investigation started She continued, 'I don't think there was anything happening on that set. But there was definitely fear going around. Because Rakesh ji (Roshan) had been shot. Everyone was paranoid. People would keep their phones switched off, worried that they will get a call.' She added, 'I was fine till they were scaring me, but once they started abusing, I lost it. I can take stress, but not people abusing me. I learnt that if you get a call from +92, don't pick up! Luckily I was famous. Had I not been, it would've been tough. They all said why did you have to be the one to do all this?' But my way of thinking was different. I didn't have a family, I didn't have children.' Because of her testimony, several individuals involved in the film were arrested. Chhota Shakeel's henchman Anjum Fazlani, who was arrested in connection with the case, was acquitted in 2010. 'Even Salman Khan, who had deposed before the court in March could not identify Fazlani, and he was declared hostile,' the accused's lawyer, Prakash Shetty, told Hindustan Times. During the trial, Salman is said to have suggested that he may or may not have met Fazlani, but couldn't recall. In 2003, the Special Court in Mumbai convicted financier Bharat Shah and sentenced him to a year in prison. But Shah walked free because he'd already spent 14 months in custody. His co-producer Nazim Rizvi was reportedly the man who was sent by Chhota Shakeel to sign Salman and other stars for the film. Salman would later go on to testify that he wasn't under any pressure. According to journalist Hussain Zaidi's book Dongri to Dubai: Six Decades of the Mumbai Mafia, Rizvi made many unsuccessful attempts at getting Salman on board, and Fazlani was assigned the job only because Rizvi failed. Based on the information that the Mumbai police accessed by tapping the phones of suspects, it was discovered that the underworld had code names for Bollywood personalities. Bharat Shah was 'BS', Salman was 'Pehelwan', and Shah Rukh Khan, who managed to give Rizvi the slip several times, was 'Hakla'. Also read – When Anurag Kashyap was kidnapped by a gangster after Satya: 'Unhone khana khilaya…' Zaidi wrote in his book, 'Rizvi also would regularly visit Salman and say politely, 'Excuse me, Salman Khan. Could you please speak to Shakeel bhai?' The muscular movie star did not take him seriously at all and snubbed him regularly. Rizvi was very often dragged kicking and screaming to the gates and kicked off the set by the security guards there.' After Rizvi failed one too many times, Fazlani was sent to secure Salman's services. 'Fazlani walked in and handed the phone over to Salman, telling him that Shakeel was on the line and wished to speak with the actor. Salman took the phone and found himself backed into a corner, with no possible way to deny Shakeel his demands. Salman was forced to work in the film Chori Chori Chupke Chupke . Shakeel funded it, pumping 15 crore rupees into this first venture. It was later established that Salman, Rani, Abbas-Mustan, and the others had participated in the film under duress as their lives were in danger and so, they were not detained further, nor were charges filed against them,' Zaidi wrote. The release of Chori Chori Chupke Chupke was delayed due to the investigation, but the movie was eventually released in theatres some months later. It earned moderately positive reviews, which singled out Preity's performance as a sex worker-turned-surrogate. According to Zaidi, Chhota Shakeel pumped Rs 15 crore into the project, via Bharat Shah and Rizvi. According to a Guardian report, Rizvi was also accused of trying to kill Hrithik Roshan, who was code-named 'Chikna', and his producer father Rakesh, code-named 'Takla'.