&w=3840&q=100)
Motilal Oswal sector of the week: NBFCs; REC, PFC among top bets
One of the most critical aspects of the final guidelines is their non-retrospective nature. Under-construction projects that have already achieved financial closure will remain governed by the existing provisioning norms. This move ensures a seamless transition for lenders and protects existing loan books from sudden provisioning shocks.
For new loans sanctioned on or after 1st October 2025, standard asset provisioning has been eased considerably. NBFCs are now required to set aside 1 per cent for standard under-construction project loans, including infrastructure and CRE-RH (commercial real estate - residential housing), and 1.25 per cent for under-construction CRE loans. Once projects reach the operational phase—i.e., repayment of principal and interest begins—the provisioning falls to 0.4 per cent for general project finance, 0.75 per cent for CRE-RH, and 1 per cent for CRE.
To further support infrastructure and long-gestation projects, the RBI has allowed delays in the Date of Commencement of Commercial Operations (DCCO)—up to three years for infrastructure projects and up to two years for non-infrastructure projects, including CRE. However, additional specific provisions will be required during the deferment period: 0.375 per cent per quarter for infrastructure loans and 0.5625 per cent per quarter for non-infrastructure loans. These can be reversed once commercial operations begin.
From a sectoral perspective, the impact on NBFCs is expected to be manageable. Large project financiers like PFC and REC already carry standard asset provisions in excess of 1 per cent, which cushions them from any meaningful hit. For others with exposure to project finance, the incremental provisioning burden may be partially passed on to borrowers through loan pricing, thus limiting the impact on profitability.
In conclusion, the RBI's final guidelines are a well-balanced and constructive reform. They provide regulatory certainty, support infrastructure financing, and promote financial stability without being disruptive. For NBFCs, the new norms enhance visibility and strengthen the risk-reward framework in project lending.
REC – Targte Price: ₹460
REC reported healthy performance in FY25, with a 5 per cent Y-o-Y profit after tax (PAT) growth in 4QFY25 supported by one-offs in interest income. While loan growth guidance has been revised to 12–13 per cent due to elevated prepayments, spreads improved 70bp Q-o-Q and NIMs remained steady at 3.63 per cent. Asset quality strengthened, with GS3 at 1.35 per cent and a target of net-zero NPAs by FY26. Under the revised RBI project finance guidelines, REC remains well cushioned with Stage 1 and 2 provisioning at 0.95 per cent. We model FY25–27 PAT CAGR of 11 per cent, RoA/RoE of 2.6 per cent/20 per cent, and a 5.7 per cent dividend yield by FY27.
PFC – Target Price: ₹485
PFC delivered strong operational performance in FY25, with 20 per cent Y-o-Y PAT growth to ₹173.5b, driven by healthy disbursements, improved asset quality, and a ₹12b write-back from the KSK Mahanadi resolution. The final RBI guidelines on project finance are favorable, with lower provisioning norms and no retrospective application. PFC is well placed under the revised framework, with Stage 1 and 2 provisioning at 1.13 per cent as of Mar'25. We estimate an FY25–27 PAT CAGR of 8 per cent, RoA/RoE of 3 per cent/18 per cent, and a dividend yield of 5 per cent in FY27E. =========================
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
37 minutes ago
- India.com
Indian Stock Markets End Week Lower Amid Trade Deal Concerns, Profit Booking
Mumbai: The Indian equity markets closed lower for the week as investors turned cautious ahead of the crucial July 9 US-India trade deadline and the start of the corporate earnings season, experts said on Saturday. Both benchmark indices -- the Sensex and the Nifty -- slipped 0.7 per cent each on a weekly basis, as broader market sentiment remained clouded by global uncertainty and profit booking after the recent rally. The Nifty ended the week at 25,461, while the Sensex closed at 83,432.89. The indices had started the week with a strong breakout, but the momentum faded amid concerns over a possible delay in finalising trade agreements. However, reports suggesting an interim deal between India and the US helped limit the downside in the latter half of the week. According to Ajit Mishra of Religare Broking Limited, the pullback was largely driven by investors booking profits following recent gains. 'The cautious tone was evident with the looming trade deadline. However, optimism around a potential agreement between India and the US acted as a cushion,' he noted. India's fiscal health remained strong, supported by a robust Rs 2.69 lakh crore dividend transfer from the RBI, which helped contain the fiscal deficit at just 0.8 per cent of the annual target. June GST collections also remained firm, rising 6.2 per cent year-on-year (YoY) to Rs 1.84 lakh crore. Vinod Nair, Head of Research, Geojit Financial Services, said, 'The week saw some consolidation after sharp gains in previous sessions. Global cues remained mixed, and investors preferred to stay on the sidelines ahead of the US tariff decision." 'FIIs turned cautious due to high valuations, but support from DIIs kept the market from falling sharply,' Nair mentioned. From a sectoral perspective, defensive sectors like IT and healthcare outperformed, supported by stock-specific action and stable demand. Meanwhile, rate-sensitive sectors such as banking, auto, and realty witnessed pressure from profit booking. FMCG stocks also edged lower. Defence stocks, however, saw strong buying after the government cleared several high-value contracts. Technically, the market entered a consolidation phase. Bajaj Broking Research noted that the Nifty has formed a small bear candle with a higher high and low on the weekly chart, signalling consolidation amid stock specific action after the recent strong upward move. 'Key support levels are seen around 25,150–25,200, coinciding with the 20-day exponential moving average, while resistance is expected near the 25,600–25,740 zone,' according to Angel One. 'A breakout above this range could trigger the next leg of the rally,' the brokerage added.
Hans India
2 hours ago
- Hans India
Indian stock markets end week lower amid trade deal concerns, profit booking
The Indian equity markets closed lower for the week as investors turned cautious ahead of the crucial July 9 US-India trade deadline and the start of the corporate earnings season, experts said on Saturday. Both benchmark indices -- the Sensex and the Nifty -- slipped 0.7 per cent each on a weekly basis, as broader market sentiment remained clouded by global uncertainty and profit booking after the recent rally. The Nifty ended the week at 25,461, while the Sensex closed at 83,432.89. The indices had started the week with a strong breakout, but the momentum faded amid concerns over a possible delay in finalising trade agreements. However, reports suggesting an interim deal between India and the US helped limit the downside in the latter half of the week. According to Ajit Mishra of Religare Broking Limited, the pullback was largely driven by investors booking profits following recent gains. 'The cautious tone was evident with the looming trade deadline. However, optimism around a potential agreement between India and the US acted as a cushion,' he noted. India's fiscal health remained strong, supported by a robust Rs 2.69 lakh crore dividend transfer from the RBI, which helped contain the fiscal deficit at just 0.8 per cent of the annual target. June GST collections also remained firm, rising 6.2 per cent year-on-year (YoY) to Rs 1.84 lakh crore. Vinod Nair, Head of Research, Geojit Financial Services, said, 'The week saw some consolidation after sharp gains in previous sessions. Global cues remained mixed, and investors preferred to stay on the sidelines ahead of the US tariff decision." 'FIIs turned cautious due to high valuations, but support from DIIs kept the market from falling sharply,' Nair mentioned. From a sectoral perspective, defensive sectors like IT and healthcare outperformed, supported by stock-specific action and stable demand. Meanwhile, rate-sensitive sectors such as banking, auto, and realty witnessed pressure from profit booking. FMCG stocks also edged lower. Defence stocks, however, saw strong buying after the government cleared several high-value contracts. Technically, the market entered a consolidation phase. Bajaj Broking Research noted that the Nifty has formed a small bear candle with a higher high and low on the weekly chart, signalling consolidation amid stock specific action after the recent strong upward move. 'Key support levels are seen around 25,150–25,200, coinciding with the 20-day exponential moving average, while resistance is expected near the 25,600–25,740 zone,' according to Angel One. 'A breakout above this range could trigger the next leg of the rally,' the brokerage added.
India.com
2 hours ago
- India.com
Targeted Witch Hunt: Anil Ambani Under Siege
Targeted Witch Hunt: Anil Ambani Under Siege In a move that has reignited accusations of a relentless smear campaign against Anil Ambani by corporate rivals, the State Bank of India (SBI) has branded Reliance Communications' (RCom) loan account as 'fraud' without giving any hearing to the former telecoms tycoon. SBI said it had reported Anil Ambani as a fraud to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) on July 1, 2025. Surprisingly, the SBI may have misused its powers of an ex-parte order, issued without a personal hearing, which cites a 2020 forensic audit alleging ₹12,692.31 crore in fund diversions from a ₹31,580 crore loan dating back to 2016. Ex-parte orders are issued in emergency and SBI's reliance on the forensic audit report available with it for 5 years shows no emergency. SBI's action echoes a failed attempt by Canara Bank in November 2024, which was stayed by the Bombay High Court in February 2025 for procedural violations. Ambani's legal team has slammed SBI's move as a 'gross violation' of natural justice, RBI guidelines, and judicial precedents, pointing to a pattern of regulatory overreach that consistently overshadows positive developments in Ambani's business ventures. The SBI's fraud classification is marred by procedural flaws, including the withholding of the full forensic audit report and reliance on a December 2023 show-cause notice (SCN) issued under outdated RBI guidelines, superseded by revised directives in July 2024. Ambani's counsel argues that SBI's failure to respond to communications for nearly a year led him to believe the matter was resolved, and the selective targeting of Ambani—while SCNs against other non-executive directors were withdrawn—suggests a vendetta possibly fueled by corporate rivalries. This is not an isolated incident; in May 2025, Reliance Power faced allegations of submitting fake SBI guarantees for a government tender, leading to a temporary blacklisting, though Ambani avoided personal liability. Similarly, in August 2024, SEBI banned Ambani and 24 entities from the stock market over alleged fund diversion at Reliance Home Finance, a decision currently under appeal. These incidents, often amplified by media, coincide with positive milestones, such as Reliance Power's debt-free status and a joint venture with a US defense contractor in July 2025, fueling speculation of a coordinated effort to tarnish Ambani's legacy. The pattern of regulatory and legal actions against Ambani is striking, particularly as they often emerge during periods of business recovery. For instance, the SEBI ban followed Reliance Infrastructure's reported net worth recovery to ₹33,000 crore, while SBI's fraud tag came amid Reliance Power's expansion into clean energy and defense, including a deal to supply artillery shells to a German firm. The 2020 UK bankruptcy declaration, where Ambani claimed to have 'nothing meaningful' in personal wealth, garnered global headlines, yet subsequent court reliefs, like the Delhi High Court's 2021 status quo order on RCom's fraud classifications, received less attention. Critics argue that these actions, often stalled by courts for procedural lapses—as seen in the Bombay High Court's rebuke of Canara Bank's 'cut, copy, paste' fraud order—reflect a broader agenda, possibly linked to Ambani's past rivalry. SBI's latest move also disregards protections under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), particularly Section 32A, which shields companies under the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) from pre-insolvency liabilities once a resolution plan is approved. RCom, managed by a Resolution Professional since May 2018 with a debt of ₹48,216 crore as of March 2025, awaits National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) approval for its resolution plan. Yet, SBI persists in targeting Ambani for pre-CIRP loans, a move critics say undermines the IBC framework and risks derailing RCom's revival. This echoes earlier controversies, such as the 2018 allegations of fund diversion at Reliance Naval and Engineering, which led to insolvency proceedings but no conclusive evidence against Ambani personally. The recurring cycle of high-profile accusations, followed by judicial stays or dismissals, as seen in the Canara Bank case and SEBI's ongoing appeal, underscores a pattern of regulatory aggression that legal experts predict will face another judicial rebuke, further exposing the apparent witch hunt against Anil Ambani. Pattern of Smear Campaign: The SBI fraud tag, SEBI ban, and Reliance Power tender controversy illustrate a pattern where regulatory actions coincide with Ambani's business recovery efforts, such as Reliance Power's debt-free status and defense contracts. These incidents, often amplified by the media, are frequently stalled by courts due to procedural flaws. Procedural Violations: SBI's ex-parte order, like Canara Bank's failed fraud tag, violates RBI's Master Directions on Frauds and principles of natural justice by denying Ambani a hearing and full audit disclosure. The SEBI ban also faces challenges for similar reasons. Selective Targeting: SBI's withdrawal of SCNs against other RCom directors while pursuing Ambani, despite his non-executive role, mirrors the selective scrutiny in the Reliance Power tender case, where only the SECI chief faced consequences. Judicial Precedents: The Bombay High Court's February 2025 stay on Canara Bank's fraud tag and the Delhi High Court's 2021 order highlight a judiciary critical of banks' overreach. The SEBI ban's appeal and SBI's order are likely to follow suit. Corporate Rivalry: While speculative, the timing of actions against Ambani, are often linked to his rivalry. IBC Protections: SBI's pursuit of pre-CIRP liabilities disregards IBC Section 32A, aligning with criticisms of banks undermining insolvency processes, as seen in Reliance Naval's case. Other Incidents: The 2024 SEBI ban and 2025 Reliance Power tender controversy, alongside earlier issues like Reliance Naval's insolvency, reflect a consistent pattern of regulatory scrutiny that often lacks conclusive evidence against Ambani personally but generates significant negative publicity.
