Pakistan adds THESE Chinese-made deadly missiles to its JF-17 fighters as threat of India-Pakistan war looms, concern for India due to...
Pakistan Air Force released images showing JF-17 fighter jets equipped with Chinese PL-15 missiles. (X)
India-Pakistan war: Amid the looming threat of an India-Pakistan war, the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) has reportedly equipped its JF-17C fighter jets with PL-15 air-to-air missiles. The PAF recently released pictures showing a JF-17C combat jet equipped with a PL-15 advanced missile, with experts saying that the image was meant to send a message to India that the country is ready for war, if it comes to that.
According to media reports, China has shipped PL-15 missiles to Pakistan in wake of the heightened tensions with India. Notably, China has delivered the PL-15 version meant for the Chinese Air Force, instead of the PL-15E, which is export variant of the ultra-long range missile.
Experts claims the delivery was made on emergency basis as the missile variants sent to Pakistan are likely from the stock reserved for the Chinese Air Force, which employs these missiles in its fifth-generation J-20 stealth fighter jets. How powerful is the PL-15 missile?
The PL-15 missile is an advanced, ultra long-range air-to-air missile, reportedly with a range between 200 to 300 kilometers, making it a major threat to the fighter jets of the Indian Air Force (IAF). As per reports, Pakistan has equipped its JF-17 Block III fighter with these long range missiles, enhancing the warplane's offensive capabilities, and making it more lethal than before in Beyond Visual Range (BVR) combat.
Pakistan's JF-17 Block III fighter jets are equipped with AESA radar, that enables the aircraft to easily track its target, and also comes with Helmet Mounted Display (HMD) technology, which allows the pilot to lock the target using his helmet.
The PL-15 missile has clipped wings, enabling it to be equipped in internal weapon bay of stealth fighters like the J-20, and integration with the JF-17 Block III, which comes with the advanced KLJ-7AESA radar, enhances Pakistan Air Force's ability to carry out long-range encounters, according to experts.
As per military experts, the PL-15 has similar range and maneuverability are similar to, and even surpass in some ways, West-made counterparts such as the US AIM-120D AMRAAM, which has a range of about 100 miles and is comparable to the European MBDA Meteor. Worry for Indian Air Force?
While PL-15 missile installed onboard the JF-17 Block III fighter jet is undoubtedly a major challenge for the Indian Air Force, but the IAF has counter measures for such advanced weaponry, as its Su-30MKI fighter aircraft, Rafale and Mirage 2000 fighter jets are also equipped with advanced BVR missiles like Meteor (150+ km) and Astra Mk2 (160+ km).
Additionally, the IAF's fighter jet fleet has more advanced radar and electronic warfare systems compared to their Pakistani counterparts.
According to defense experts, Pakistan would need powerful radar system and an excellent network support system, apart from experienced pilots to ensure that an advanced missile like the PL-15 is used to its full potential. They say that the Pakistan Air Force is lacking in all three of these fields, hence the PL-15 missile would not pose much a threat to India.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
‘Govt's failure to move beyond MoUs has left industrial engine sputtering'
Tamil Nadu has long been heralded as the industrial heartbeat of South India. From automobiles and electronics to textiles and petrochemicals, our state has stood as a symbol of innovation, enterprise, and economic resilience. Such a legacy demands vision, discipline, and above all, execution. As a man who steered Tamil Nadu's economic growth earlier, I am disturbed by this dangerous erosion in our industrial momentum under the current govt. Earlier this year, Chief Minister M K Stalin proclaimed that his govt facilitated industrial investments worth ₹6.64 lakh crore. A staggering figure at first glance. But scratch the surface, and the truth is far less flattering. As per the Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade and the Reserve Bank of India (Q4 2023-2024), the actual realised investment is more than a quarter of that amount. The remainder exists only in the form of MoUs and announcements. In the past four years, several flagship projects that could have reshaped our economic geography remain in planning purgatory. You Can Also Check: Chennai AQI | Weather in Chennai | Bank Holidays in Chennai | Public Holidays in Chennai The Chennai-Kanyakumari Industrial Corridor (CKIC), for instance, was conceived as part of the East Coast Economic Corridor. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like These Are The Most Beautiful Women In The World Undo The ambitious 590 km stretch was meant to revitalise 23 districts through better port connectivity and industrial expansion. Despite a ₹3,500 crore loan from the Asian Development Bank, the project has seen sluggish progress. Tenders such as EPC-15 and EPC-07, floated in 2020 and 2021, witnessed delays in finalisation. As of today, less than 10% of the proposed road length has seen tangible work. This corridor could have brought prosperity to our southernmost districts, but sadly, it remains largely on paper. The Chennai-Bengaluru Industrial Corridor (CBIC) was envisioned to bridge Tamil Nadu's northern districts with India's tech capital, Bengaluru. A special purpose vehicle was created, and a master plan for the Ponneri node was drafted. Although master planning has concluded, core infrastructure remains incomplete and major investments are yet to be grounded. Billed as Tamil Nadu's answer to Gujarat's Dholera and Maharashtra's Aurangabad corridors, the Coimbatore-Salem-Chennai High-Tech Corridor was supposed to be our gateway to next-generation manufacturing. Today, industrial parks such as Sipcot Krishnagiri remain underutilised. With five strategic nodes — Chennai, Hosur, Coimbatore, Salem, and Tiruchirappalli — the Tamil Nadu Defence Industrial Corridor was launched to position the state as a defence manufacturing hub. MoUs worth ₹11,794 crore were signed, but only ₹3,861 crore (33%) has been actualised. The fallout of such inertia is not just economic, it is human. In terms of employment, based on standard projections, Tamil Nadu could have generated more than 400,000 direct jobs had these corridors progressed as intended. Tamil Nadu is increasingly losing out to more agile states that offer clearer approvals, proactive governance, and visible outcomes. Our state's Human Development Index tells its own story. While Chennai stands at 0.841, districts such as Nagapattinam lag at 0.699. Industrial corridors, if executed properly, would have reduced this disparity. Instead, the gap is widening. Tamil Nadu's Gross State Domestic Product for the financial year 2024-25 is ₹17.23 lakh crore, with manufacturing contributing approximately 35%. Yet the foundation of that industry, sectors like logistics, warehousing, and transport, are underperforming. The Coimbatore Multi-Modal Logistics Park has faced slippage in timelines. The warehousing policy promised in 2023 is still awaiting approval. In its tenure, the AIADMK hosted two successful Global Investors Meets in 2015 and 2019, collectively drawing more than ₹3 lakh crore in investment. The govt facilitated land acquisition, sped up clearances, and ensured that MoUs translated into operational businesses. It is not too late to change course. But it requires political will and administrative discipline. The AIADMK proposes a three-pronged approach to industrial renewal. The first is time-bound corridor execution. Every corridor must be governed by a Chief Minister-chaired task force with quarterly targets. For CKIC, tenders must be finalised and project design groundwork started post mid-2026, with a deliverable milestone of 100 km of road by mid-2027. For the CBIC, fast-track plans to operationalise the Ponneri node, aiming for readiness by the first quarter of 2027. Tamil Nadu must also move beyond the Chennai-centric model. By 2027, the AIADMK proposes to develop 25 district-level MSME clusters with pre-zoned, plug-and-play infrastructure. Focus areas include technology and electronics in Madurai and Sivaganga; defence manufacturing in Salem and Hosur; and agro-processing and food tech in the Cauvery Delta and southern districts. To improve transparency, a digitised, single-window clearance system with real-time tracking is proposed along with a dynamic land bank registry to help industries locate viable plots and a RERA-style industrial oversight authority to audit project progress and ensure accountability. Industrial development is not a vanity project. It is an unending commitment to economic equity, youth employment, and regional prosperity. The DMK govt's failure to move beyond MoUs has left our industrial engine sputtering. Our entrepreneurs wait. Our youth emigrate. Our investors look elsewhere. The AIADMK is committed to changing this. We believe Tamil Nadu can — and must — lead India's next phase of industrial growth. It is time to move from paper corridors to real factories, from rhetoric to results. (The writer is Leader of the Opposition in the Tamil Nadu Legislative Assembly and a former Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu) Email your feedback to
The Wire
5 hours ago
- The Wire
'IAF Lost Fighter Jets to Pak Because of Political Leadership's Constraints': Indian Defence Attache
During a seminar on the India-Pak air battle, Captain (IN) Shiv Kumar conceded, saying 'I do agree we did lose some aircraft.' The Indian embassy in Jakarta has said that the 'presentation conveyed that the Indian Armed Forces serve under civilian political leadership unlike some other countries in our neighbourhood'. An Indian Air Force (IAF) fighter jet practices touchdowns on the Ganga Expressway highway. Photo: PTI New Delhi: The Indian Air Force lost fighter jets to Pakistan on the night of May 7, 2025 during its targeting of Pakistan's terror-linked sites 'only because of the constraint given by the political leadership to not attack the military establishment or their air defenses,' India's defence attache to Indonesia, Captain (Indian Navy) Shiv Kumar, acknowledged at a seminar in Indonesia last month. The seminar on ' Analysis of the Pakistan–India Air Battle and Indonesia's Anticipatory Strategies from the Perspective of Air Power ' was organised on June 10 by Universitas Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadarma in Indonesia. In a 35-minute presentation made at the seminar, Captain (IN) Shiv Kumar conceded that even though he 'may not agree (with an earlier Indonesian speaker's claim) that we lost so many aircraft, but I do agree we did lose some aircraft.' [Watch 3:50:00 onwards] During the initial phase of aerial combat, IAF suffered losses at the hands of the Pakistan military. While Pakistani officials claimed to have shot down as many as six Indian jets, including Rafales, Indian authorities only confirmed the loss of some aircrafts, declining to specify numbers. The Chief of Defence Staff, General Anil Chauhan, later emphasised in Singapore that the real issue was not the number of jets lost, but why they were lost: 'What is important is that–not the jet being down, but why they were being down,' he stated in an interview to Bloomberg. 'After the loss, we changed our tactics and we went for the military installations. So we first achieved suppression of enemy air defences and then that's why all our attacks could easily go through using Brahmos missiles,' the Indian defence attache added. He seemed to be referring to the Indian attack at various Pakistani air bases on May 10, 2025. The Indian defence attaché's view highlights a critical factor: IAF fighter jets were operating under strict political orders from the Modi government not to target Pakistani military installations or air defence systems. This self-imposed limitation by the government was intended to prevent escalation of conflict in a nuclear environment. It was possibly based on the premise that the Pakistan military will not target Indian fighter aircraft flying in the Indian airspace, when India was not hitting any Pakistani military targets. Pakistan refused to impose any such limitations and as claimed by its Deputy Chief, the Pakistan Air Force chief changed the orders from deter to destroy once IAF sent its munition to the Pakistani terror sites. This led to the loss of IAF fighter jets because the political directions had meant that IAF had to carry out their missions while deliberately avoiding the most threatening enemy assets, which are typically prioritised in air campaigns to secure air superiority. Recognising the tactical disadvantage, Indian military leadership quickly adjusted their approach. Within days, the IAF revised its tactics, enabling the missions on May 10, 2025 to use Brahmos and other missiles, which could be fired from a longer distance, to hit Pakistani targets. Meanwhile, the Indian Embassy in Jakarta, Indonesia, released a statement saying Captain Kumar's remarks were taken "out of context". Here's the statement: "We have seen media reports regarding a presentation made by the Defence Attache at a Seminar. His remarks have been quoted out of context and the media reports are a mis-representation of the intention and thrust of the presentation made by the speaker. The presentation conveyed that the Indian Armed Forces serve under civilian political leadership unlike some other countries in our neighbourhood. It was also explained that the objective of Operation Sindoor was to target terrorist infrastructure and the Indian response was non-escalatory." The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
India Today
5 hours ago
- India Today
Defence attache says jets lost to Pak due to constraints. Then, a clarification
The Indian Embassy in Indonesia on Sunday said the remarks made by its defence attache at a recent seminar, in which he indicated that the Indian Air Force (IAF) lost jets to Pakistan during Operation Sindoor due to political constraints, were 'taken out of context' and 'misrepresented'.The clarification followed after the Congress latched onto the Navy officer's admission and accused the Modi government of misleading the nation on military losses suffered during a four-day conflict with Pakistan in DEFENCE ATTACHE SAIDDuring a presentation at a seminar in Jakarta on June 10, India's defence attache to Indonesia, Captain (Indian Navy) Shiv Kumar, acknowledged that the IAF lost 'some aircraft' when it struck terror-linked sites under Operation Sindoor. He said the Indian forces had been directed not to target Pakistan's military infrastructure or air defences. 'Only because of the constraint given by the political leadership to not attack the military establishment or their air defences,' he said, explaining why the IAF suffered the loss of fighter Kumar also stated that, after the initial setback, Indian forces adjusted their strategy: 'After the loss, we changed our tactics and we went for the military installations... we first achieved suppression of enemy air defences and then... all our attacks could easily go through using BrahMos missiles.' advertisementEMBASSY SAYS REMARKS MISREPRESENTEDAfter the Navy officer's remarks came to light and stoked controversy back home, the Indian Embassy in Jakarta issued a sternly-worded clarification.'His remarks have been quoted out of context and the media reports are a misrepresentation of the intention and thrust of the presentation made by the speaker,' it said in a post on X. According to the mission, the attache was simply reiterating that Operation Sindoor's aim was to target terrorist infrastructure and the civilian government's orders to the military were to maintain a non-escalatory posture.'The presentation conveyed that the Indian Armed Forces serve under civilian political leadership, unlike some other countries in our neighbourhood,' the embassy added, in a veiled jab at INDICTMENT OF GOVERNMENT: CONGRESSThe Congress was quick to seize on the defence attache's remarks. The party's communications chief Jairam Ramesh demanded transparency.'Why is the PM refusing to preside over an all-party meeting and take the Opposition into confidence? Why has the demand for a special session of Parliament been rejected?" he Congress leader Pawan Khera called the developments 'a direct indictment' of the Modi government and Defence Minister Rajnath up the attack, he said, 'They know they've compromised national security, and they're terrified of what the Congress Party will expose before the people of India.'Khera cited earlier statements from Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan, who had acknowledged losses during the early phases of Operation Sindoor but did not offer specific month, Gen Chauhan told Bloomberg in Singapore that India changed tactics after the loss of aircraft, shifting to deeper strikes and more aggressive suppression of enemy air top military general had also rejected Pakistani claims of having downed six Indian jets, calling them 'absolutely incorrect.'He had asserted that the losses were tactical lessons: 'What is important is not the jet being down, but why they were being down.'- Ends
