Bush teams up with notorious Trump foes to trash 'colossal mistake' shuttering USAID
"Gutting USAID is a travesty, and it's a tragedy," Obama said in a video that was shown to departing USAID employees Monday, according to the Associated Press. "Because it's some of the most important work happening anywhere in the world."
Obama summed up the decision to shutter the agency as "a colossal mistake," and added that "sooner or later, leaders on both sides of the aisle will realize how much you are needed."
Bush, Obama and Bono spoke to departing USAID employees Monday in a videoconference as the agency officially was shuttered following the Trump administration's reporting that it was overrun with alleged corruption and mismanagement. The videoconference did not include members of the media, with the Associated Press reviewing and reporting on clips of the conference later that day.
USAID is an independent U.S. agency that was established under the Kennedy administration to administer economic aid to foreign nations. It was one of the first agencies investigated by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) in early February for alleged mismanagement and government overspending, with DOGE's then-leader Elon Musk slamming the agency as "a viper's nest of radical-left marxists who hate America."
USAID officially was absorbed by the State Department Tuesday.
Bush, who overwhelmingly has shied away from publicly criticizing Trump, lamented in his recorded message to the staffers that the end of USAID marks an end to his administration's work rolling out an AIDS and HIV program that is credited with saving 25 million people nationwide.
"You've showed the great strength of America through your work — and that is your good heart,'' Bush told USAID staffers, according to the Associated Press. "Is it in our national interests that 25 million people who would have died now live? I think it is, and so do you."
Bono of U2 fame recited a poem he wrote reflecting on USAID's closure and his claims that millions around the world will likely now die, according to the Associated Press.
"They called you crooks. When you were the best of us," Bono said.
Fox News Digital reached out to Obama's and Bush's respective offices Wednesday morning for additional comment, but did not receive responses.
Other longtime Trump foes, such as former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, thanked foreign service officers for their work before USAID's closure.
"In all my years of service, I found that foreign service officers and development professionals were among the most dedicated public servants I encountered," Clinton posted to X Tuesday. "Their work saves lives and makes the world safer. Today, and every day, I stand with them."
Obama and Bush overwhelmingly have remained tight-lipped on their views of Trump under his second administration, with both former presidents attending Trump's inauguration and not weighing in on the majority of Trump's policies. Obama has taken issue with Trump's "big, beautiful bill," which is clearing its final hurdles to passage and will fund Trump's agenda on social media, while Bush has consistently shied away from public rebukes of Trump in recent history.
Bono previously has claimed that cuts to USAID would kill hundreds of thousands of people, and had slammed Trump in 2016 as "potentially the worst idea that ever happened to America."
Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who was serving as acting administrator of USAID, announced the State Department absorbed USAID's foreign assistance programs Tuesday after decades of failing to ensure the programs it funded actually supported America's interests.
"Beyond creating a globe-spanning NGO industrial complex at taxpayer expense, USAID has little to show since the end of the Cold War," Rubio wrote in his announcement. "Development objectives have rarely been met, instability has often worsened, and anti-American sentiment has only grown."
"This era of government-sanctioned inefficiency has officially come to an end," he continued. "Under the Trump Administration, we will finally have a foreign funding mission in America that prioritizes our national interests. As of July 1st, USAID will officially cease to implement foreign assistance. Foreign assistance programs that align with administration policies—and which advance American interests—will be administered by the State Department, where they will be delivered with more accountability, strategy, and efficiency."
The shuttering comes after DOGE gutted USAID as part of Trump's effort to remove waste, fraud and abuse from the federal government earlier in 2025.
Trump repeatedly had touted DOGE's work uncovering fraud and mismanagement within the federal government, including in his March address before Congress celebrating that DOGE identified $22 billion in government "waste," including at USAID.
"Forty-five million dollars for diversity, equity and inclusion scholarships in Burma," Trump said as he rattled off various examples of federal waste. "Forty million to improve the social and economic inclusion of sedentary migrants. Nobody knows what that is. Eight million to promote LGBTQI+ in the African nation of Lesotho, which nobody has ever heard of. Sixty million dollars for indigenous peoples and Afro-Colombian empowerment in Central America. Sixty million. Eight million for making mice transgender."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump Aims to Shut Trade Loopholes China Uses to Evade Tariffs
(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump's two-tiered trade deal with Vietnam aims squarely at practices China has long used to skirt US tariffs: The widespread legal shifting of production to Southeast Asian factories and the murkier and illegal 'origin washing' of exports through their ports. NYC Commutes Resume After Midtown Bus Terminal Crash Chaos Struggling Downtowns Are Looking to Lure New Crowds Massachusetts to Follow NYC in Making Landlords Pay Broker Fees What Gothenburg Got Out of Congestion Pricing California Exempts Building Projects From Environmental Law The agreement slaps a 20% tariff on Vietnamese exports to the US and a 40% levy on goods deemed to be transshipped through the country. With details still scarce, economists said much will hinge on the framework Washington establishes to determine what it sees as 'Made in Vietnam' and what it sees as transshipments. Complicating matters is the fact that Chinese businesses have rushed to set up shop across Southeast Asia since Trump launched his first trade war back in 2018. The lion's share of Vietnam's exports to the US are goods like Airpods, phones or other products assembled with Chinese components in a factory in Vietnam and then shipped to America. That's not illegal. 'A lot will depend on how the 40% tariffs are applied. If the Trump administration keeps it targeted, it should be manageable,' said Roland Rajah, lead economist at the Lowy Institute in Sydney. 'If the approach is too broad and blunt, then it could be quite damaging' for China, Vietnam and for the US, which will have to pay higher import prices, he said. The think tank estimates that 28% of Vietnamese exports to the US were made up of Chinese content in 2022, up from 9% in 2018. Pham Luu Hung, chief economist at SSI Securities Corp. in Hanoi, said a 40% levy on transshipped goods would have limited impact on Vietnam's economy because they aren't of Vietnamese origin in the first place. Re-routed exports accounted for just 16.5% of Vietnam's shipments to the US in 2021, a share that's likely declined over the past couple of years amid stronger enforcement actions by both governments, Hung said. 'An important caveat is that the rules of origin remain under negotiation,' Hung said. 'In practice, these rules may have a greater impact than the tariff rates themselves.' Devil in Details Duncan Wrigley, chief China economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics, said he's skeptical the latest deal will be effective in stamping out Chinese exports via Vietnam to the US. 'The devil is in the details, but I think China's exports will either go via other markets to the US, or some value-added will be done in Vietnam so the product counts as made in Vietnam, rather than a transshipment,' he said. As officials across Asia rushed to negotiate lower US tariff levels with their US counterparts this year, Chinese businesses have been just as quick to ramp up their exports through alternative channels in order to skirt punitive US levies. Shipments from China to Southeast Asia have reached record highs in Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand and Vietnam this year. And there's been a 'significant increase in correlation' to the region's increase in exports to the US during the same period, Citigroup Inc. economists said in a recent report. Much of that is likely due to the shifting of legitimate production across the region. Goods destined for the US market may be sent from their factories in Southeast Asia, and what they make in their factories in China will be sent to the rest of the world, said Derrick Kam, Asia economist at Morgan Stanley. 'If you try to represent that in the trade data, it will look exactly like rerouting, but it's not,' Kam said. 'It's essentially the supply chain working itself out.' But it's transshipment that's been a major concern for Trump's top trade advisers including Peter Navarro, who described Vietnam as 'essentially a colony of communist China' during an April interview with Fox News. And it's not just been happening in Vietnam. Not long after Trump unveiled his 'Liberation Day' tariffs on April 2, garment makers in Indonesia started receiving offers from Chinese companies to be 'partners in transshipment,' said Redma Gita Wirawasta, chairman of the Indonesian Filament Yarn and Fiber Producers Association. Chinese products would be rerouted to Indonesia, undergo minimal processing like repacking or relabeling, then secure a certification that they were made in the Southeast Asian country, Wirawasta said. When the goods are then exported to the US, they'd be subject to the 10% universal levy that Trump has imposed on nearly all countries, instead of the tariff for China that still equates to an effective level of over 50%, even after a recent 'deal' that lowered levies from a peak of 145%. With the huge scope for arbitrage, coupled with little policing, that process will prove tough to stamp out. 'Chinese exporters and their affiliates and partners in Southeast Asia are highly skilled at adapting to changing rules, identifying loopholes, and sometimes overstating the extent of value-add by non-China countries,' said Gabriel Wildau, managing director at advisory firm Teneo Holdings LLC in New York. Some final assembly or transshipment may shift to rival Southeast Asian transshipment hubs like Cambodia, Thailand and Singapore, or farther afield to Turkey, Hungary or Poland, Wildau said. 'Another possibility is that the definitions and enforcement mechanisms are fuzzy, rendering the latest deal cosmetic and toothless,' he said. 'Rigorous enforcement would also require a significant boost of resources to enable US customs to verify compliance with the tougher rules of origin.' There have been efforts across the region to at least be seen to be making an effort to curb the practice. Indeed, Vietnam has made a big deal about cracking down on trade fraud and illegal activity in recent months. In April, South Korea said it seized more than $20 million worth of goods with falsified origin labels — the majority of which were destined for the US. The Airfreight Forwarders Association of Malaysia issued a warning in May as Chinese brokers promoted illegal rerouting services on social media. Malaysia has centralized the issuance of certificates of origin with its Ministry of Investment, Trade and Industry, while tapping its customs agency to help curb transshipment. Thailand has expanded its watch list for high-risk products, including solar panels, cars and parts, and is mulling stricter penalties for violators. Red Tape Casey Barnett, the president of the American Chamber of Commerce in Cambodia, is already seeing the changes in action. One factory that exports to major US retailers, including Walmart, Home Depot and Lowe's, said that customs officials were very carefully reviewing their products before being sent to the US, he said. 'It's creating some additional paperwork and a little bit of red tape here,' Barnett said. A senior manager at a logistics company in Cambodia, who asked not to be identified because the matter is sensitive, said export processing time has now stretched to as much as 14 working days — double what it was before. But in Indonesia, getting a certificate of origin is fairly quick and painless when goods are marked for export, often just requiring a product list and a letter to the provincial trade office, according to Wirawasta. Authorities prioritize checking products that enter the country to ensure they pay the right duties and comply with regulations, he explained. It's rare for them to inspect factories where an export good was supposedly made. So much so that sometimes, Chinese companies don't even need to muster up some local processing. 'The T-shirt could be finished in China, with a 'Made in Indonesia' label already sewn on,' Wirawasta said. 'Some traders won't even bother to unload the goods from the shipping container,' he added. 'Unloading costs money.' --With assistance from James Mayger, Spe Chen, Nguyen Kieu Giang and Jacob Gu. SNAP Cuts in Big Tax Bill Will Hit a Lot of Trump Voters Too America's Top Consumer-Sentiment Economist Is Worried How to Steal a House China's Homegrown Jewelry Superstar Pistachios Are Everywhere Right Now, Not Just in Dubai Chocolate ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Live updates: Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill' awaits House vote
Update: Date: 4 min ago Title: Speaker Johnson says he expects final passage of Trump agenda bill later this morning Content: Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters that he expects final passage of the president's sweeping domestic policy bill around 8 a.m. ET, noting that President Donald Trump has been speaking with members throughout the night. Timing for passage of the bill is fluid, however, and it's not yet clear exactly when a final vote will take place. 'He was directly engaged, as he always is, and that was very important. He — members wanted to hear certain assurances from him about what's ahead, what the future will entail, and what we're going to do next, and all of that. And he was very, very helpful in that process,' said Johnson. 'I talked to him multiple times today, tonight, this morning. I mean, he was up, engaged as late as 1am. He may still be up for all I know. He doesn't really sleep a lot, so, you know, directly engaged wanting to know, play by play, what was happening and how he could help and all that.' Johnson also laid out his estimate for the timeline going forward for the morning. 'The group will go down, get the votes necessary to pass the rule. We'll proceed to debate, probably two to three hours for that. There's an hour allotted, but Leader Jeffries gets a Magic Minute. I think he goes about an hour. Mine will be much shorter than that, and we'll proceed a final vote, and we'll be passing this bill, I expect, maybe around 8, 8:30 this morning, maybe sooner, maybe sooner,' he told reporters. 'We'll be gathering on the floor shortly. I'm going to collect — somebody's driving in, they're about to arrive and we'll be moving forward here shortly,' he added. Update: Date: 16 min ago Title: House GOP holdouts fall in line and agree to bring Trump agenda to floor Content: A group of House Republican holdouts fell in line behind President Donald Trump and agreed to allow his agenda to come to the floor — reversing course after days of threatening to block the bill from a final vote. That includes some House hardliners who have complained that the package would add $3.3 trillion to the deficit over the next decade, as well as moderate-leaning members who have concerns about Medicaid cuts. The tally was 219 to 213 with only one GOP no vote: Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick. The House cleared a key procedural hurdle and voted to advance the bill in the early hours of Thursday morning – after House GOP leaders held open the vote on the rule to govern debate for a lengthy period of time as they worked to flip 'no' votes and win over key holdouts. GOP leaders believe they will now have the votes to actually pass Trump's giant tax and spending cuts package when it does come to a full floor vote, but it is not yet certain. Final passage is expected later Thursday morning, after debate, though timing remains fluid. Update: Date: 1 min ago Title: GOP Rep. Ralph Norman flips, says he will back bill after assurances from Trump Content: Rep. Ralph Norman, a conservative who has previously said he was opposed to the Senate-passed version of President Donald Trump's sweeping domestic policy bill, said late last night he will back the bill in the procedural vote and final passage, after receiving assurances from Trump that his concerns will be addressed. 'It's the right thing to do at the right time,' Norman told reporters. Norman said that the president had given conservative holdouts assurances that the green energy tax credits, as well as other conservative priorities, would be 'dealt with' — though Norman refused to say if that would happen by executive order or by future legislative action — during their meeting at the White House yesterday. Some Republicans have been vocal in their opposition to the Senate's slower timeline to phase out some energy tax credits, and Norman said it was important for them to get assurances on that from the White House. 'We got clarification on what's going to be enforced. We got clarification on how the IRAs were going to be dealt with. We got clarification on the tax cuts — and still we'll be meeting tomorrow on the specifics of it. But no, I feel comfortable with this,' Norman said. Pressed on how they can trust leadership will continue to take them seriously, if they still fold, Norman said, 'We get the best we can get, and we go as far as we can go to get for the American people, what we need. That's not bluffing. The reason we have credibility, they know we'll vote no.' He added, 'Now look, this is a game of — and it is a game — of getting the most you can for your consistency. And we're doing that, I'll do that. As long as I'm up here, I'll do that.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Province touts positive fiscal numbers for N.B., but economist urges caution
While a report on the New Brunswick economy is showing largely positive numbers, one economist warns the financial winds may have already shifted. The provincial government released its "2024 Economy in Review" on Wednesday. The report indicates the provincial economy grew by 1.8 per cent last year, slightly up from 1.7 per cent growth in 2023. In a statement on the province's website, Finance Minister René Legacy said that while there was uncertainty, "these results are encouraging." But Herb Emery, an economist at the University of New Brunswick, said any results may already be out of date. "It fits with sort of an attempt that's going on in the region to put forward a positive spin," "We already know that those statistics are out of date, and we're forecast to have the slowest growth in New Brunswick of all the provinces in the upcoming year." The 'real economy' Emery said none of the positive economic movement is related to the "real economy," including manufacturing. He points to a population that increased 2.7 per cent as a complicated driving factor in the positive economic numbers. While the province said the increase was largely attributable to immigration from outside Canada, it also includes migration from within Canada, and the demographics wouldn't point to an economic boon for the province. "A lot of that immigration wasn't working age population," Emergy said. "It's just people who want to reside here and have sources of income like pensions from somewhere else." Emery also said much of the positive job numbers, employment rose by 2.9 per cent, aren't economically sustainable. "It's really been government spending and government employment that's been driving a lot of that growth," he said. Trump and Carney Emery said the future of the province's economy will largely be affected by two men, Prime Minister Mark Carney and U.S. President Donald Trump. With Trump, the issue is his capricious treatment of Canada since he started a trade war, and the usually strong trading relationship between Canada and the United States. "This is Trump's thing … you have to get Donald's approval to get into anything," Emery said. "By creating that kind of world where it's your relationships with people and not rules, it's going to create a lot of transaction costs." As for Carney, the prime minister will have several competing visions about what projects to support and where to cut expenditures, Emery said. It's not certain the province will come out in a better position. "We're so heavily dependent on the federal government to do anything in this province … that if those federal transfers get squeezed, if not cut, in the next five years … then we're going to have our own fiscal crisis in the province that's going to limit what we can do in terms of economic development. Among other findings in the report on 2024: Employment rose 2.9 per cent, the fourth consecutive year of growth. The labour force grew 3.5 per cent, making for a higher unemployment rate, which, at seven per cent, was still lower than it was during most of the last 50 years. Labour shortages eased, turning to levels close to those before the COVID pandemic. Average weekly earnings were about $1,145, up 3.7 per cent, which is not as high as the national increase. Retail and manufacturing sales were up 3.3 per cent and 1.6 per cent respectively.
