Lebanon bans dealing with Hezbollah financial entity
Keeping up military pressure on the Iran-backed group, Israel on Tuesday launched some of its heaviest airstrikes since a ceasefire in November, saying it hit training camps and weapons depots in eastern Lebanon. A security source in Lebanon said 12 people were killed, five of them Hezbollah fighters.
Hezbollah has faced mounting pressures since the war, including financial ones.
In the circular, dated Monday and reviewed by Reuters, Banque du Liban prohibited all licensed financial institutions in Lebanon from dealing directly or indirectly with unlicensed entities and listed Hezbollah's Al-Qard Al-Hassan as an example.
U.S. Special Envoy Thomas Barrack described the move in a post on X on Tuesday as a "step in the right direction."
The ban follows a visit by the U.S. envoy to Beirut last week, where he received Lebanon's reply to a U.S. proposal on disarming Hezbollah.
"Transparency and alignment of all financial intermediaries in Lebanon under the supervision of the Central Bank is a valued and necessary accomplishment," he said.
The U.S. Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions on Al-Qard Al-Hassan in 2007, saying Hezbollah used it as a cover to manage "financial activities and gain access to the international financial system."
Bolstered by its powerful arsenal, Hezbollah had long exercised decisive influence over Lebanese state affairs, but it was unable to impose its will in the formation of a post-war government in February.
Al-Qard Al-Hassan, founded in 1983, describes itself as a charitable organisation that provides loans to people according to Islamic principles that forbid interest. Israel struck some of its branches during its war with Hezbollah last year.
Operating as a not-for-profit organisation under a licence granted by the Lebanese government, it has more than 30 branches, mostly in predominantly Shi'ite Muslim areas of Beirut, southern Lebanon, and the Bekaa Valley.
A Lebanese official said the central bank move had been in the works for months, and reflected U.S. pressure on Lebanon to take action against Hezbollah's financial wing.
Nassib Ghobril, chief economist at Byblos Bank, said Lebanese banks were already careful to avoid dealing with Al-Qard Al-Hassan because it is under U.S. sanctions.
"The important point is that finally the authorities are addressing the shadow economy in Lebanon, which is the real problem," he said, adding that authorities had long failed to address its "toxic effects".
In June, the European Commission included Lebanon in an updated list of high-risk jurisdictions presenting strategic deficiencies in their national anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism.
Last year, global financial crime watchdog FATF placed Lebanon on its "grey list" of countries under special scrutiny.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Faced with a choice between saving his own skin and the lives of others, Netanyahu always chooses himself
Will the war in Gaza last for ever? It's not a wholly rhetorical question. There are days when I fear that the death and devastation that has gone on for 650 days will never stop, that it will eventually settle into a constant, low-level attritional war inside the wider Israeli-Palestinian conflict – a war within a war – that becomes a background hum to world affairs, the way the Troubles in Northern Ireland endured for 30 years. In this same nightmare, incidentally, I see Benjamin Netanyahu, who has already sat in Israel's prime ministerial chair for nearly 18 years, on and off, staying put for another 18 years or more, ruling the country until he is 100. Israelis don't want either of those things to happen. Polls show that only a minority trust Netanyahu, while an overwhelming majority – about 74% – want this terrible war to end. As the leader of one of the ultra-orthodox, or Haredi, parties that this week quit Netanyahu's ruling coalition – over the government's failure to pass a bill permanently exempting Haredi youth from military service – recently put it: 'I don't understand what we are fighting for there … I don't understand what the need is.' If the supposed benefit of the war eludes even Netanyahu's erstwhile partners in government, its cost is apparent to the entire watching world. Every day brings news of another 10 or 20 or 30 Palestinians killed in Gaza, often while queueing up for urgently needed food or water. The UN estimates that over six short weeks about 800 people have been killed in or around food distribution points, most of those deaths in the vicinity of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), the US-Israeli joint venture established after Israel decided that the UN could not be trusted to keep aid out of the hands of Hamas and whose brief record has been one of chaos and bloodshed. Even the most unwavering of Israel's defenders do not pretend that those killed in these incidents were Hamas fighters or posed any kind of military threat. It's just the utterly needless death of blameless civilians, day after day after day. Inside Israel, a war without end means the deaths of Israeli soldiers – and, recall, almost every (non-Haredi) Jewish, Druze and Circassian 18-year-old is a conscript – and another day chained in darkness for the 20 living Israelis still believed to be held hostage by Hamas and its allies in Gaza. Which is why three in four Israelis want this war over, immediately. So why doesn't it end? Some believe there may be movement towards a ceasefire and hostage-release deal in the coming days, with one US official saying it's 'closer than it's ever been'. If that's true, one contributory factor is worth explaining – because it is damning. Next week will see the end of the current session of the Israeli parliament, with the Knesset then in recess until October. During those three months, it is procedurally harder to bring down an Israeli government. So Netanyahu will soon be less vulnerable to the ultranationalists Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, who have long threatened to leave his coalition should he do a deal that ends the war. Hence the speculation of an imminent move. Underpinning it is the assumption that until now Netanyahu has preferred the hostages to remain in their dungeons, and Palestinian civilians to keep dying, than to risk his hold on power. In other words, if a deal is done soon, it will be a deal that could have been done sooner – but which was delayed to keep Netanyahu in the prime minister's seat. Confidence in ascribing such self-serving and amoral motives to Netanyahu is boosted by a comprehensive New York Times investigation into the past 21 months, which methodically confirms with hard evidence what has long been assumed by most analysts: that 'Netanyahu prolonged the war in Gaza to stay in power'. The paper focuses on several key moments when a ceasefire was within reach, when Israel's own military commanders were urging it, but when Netanyahu chose to walk away, fearing that if he did not, Ben-Gvir and Smotrich would pull the plug on his government. Stripped of power, Netanyahu would lose much of the armour that protects him as he stands trial on corruption charges. Like his fellow nationalist would-be autocrat, Donald Trump, Netanyahu has a mortal fear of going to jail. So in April 2024, Netanyahu was poised to present a proposal for a six-week pause in the war to his cabinet. It would have brought the release of more than 30 hostages and negotiations for a permanent truce. The plan was written and ready to go. But cabinet minutes obtained by the paper show that, at the last minute, Smotrich, who, like Ben-Gvir, wants Israel to occupy Gaza and to rebuild Jewish settlements there, warned that if Netanyahu were to sign the rumoured 'surrender', his government would be finished. The proposal was quietly shelved and the war went on. At that point, the death toll in Gaza stood at 35,000. Today it is estimated at 58,000. Of course, it's possible a deal would have fallen away in April 2024, that Hamas would have said no, or that it would not have lasted. But there was a chance – and it is at least possible that 23,000 lives might have been saved. That was not the last such opportunity. In July last year, international mediators gathered in Rome believing the stars were at last aligned for a ceasefire. But, according to the New York Times, Netanyahu suddenly introduced six new demands that scuppered any prospect of an agreement. Earlier, Ben-Gvir had barged into the PM's office, warning him not to make 'a reckless deal'. Once again, Netanyahu put his own political survival ahead of the lives of Israeli hostages and Palestinian civilians. You would think that record would be enough to see Netanyahu repudiated by the Israeli electorate: the evidence against him is so devastating. But he will present himself at the next election, which could be just six months away, as the man who vanquished Israel's mightiest enemies. Hezbollah no longer threatens Israel from the north; Bashar al-Assad is gone; and Iran has been humiliated, its air defences gutted, its nuclear ambitions dented. Hamas still exists, but Israel is no longer encircled by a 'ring of fire' shaped by Tehran. Netanyahu says that success is all down to him, while the failures that led to the Hamas massacres of 7 October 2023 are the fault of everyone else. As an electoral pitch, it may even work. This week I spoke to the revered Israel journalist Ilana Dayan for the Unholy podcast. She described how Israelis were stuck for so long in 7 October, but now 'October 8th at least has dawned on us. We finally can ask, and have to ask, the tough questions with regard to our leadership, with regard to the tragedy in Gaza, with regard to this endless war. History will judge the leadership, but it will judge us too.' Israelis will indeed have to face a great reckoning for the destruction they have wreaked in Gaza. But the first to be judged should be Benjamin Netanyahu, who had the power of life and death in his hands and chose the death of others, so that his political career might live. He should bear the shame of it until his final breath. Jonathan Freedland is a Guardian columnist Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.
BreakingNews.ie
an hour ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Syrian government forces preparing to return to province amid renewed clashes
Syrian government forces are preparing to return to a southern region after renewed clashes broke out between Druze armed groups and members of Bedouin clans, leaving tens of thousands of people displaced in a worsening humanitarian crisis. The government forces had withdrawn from the province of Sweida following a ceasefire agreement announced on Wednesday that halted much of the violence that plagued the area earlier in the week, but which ultimately did not stop the fighting. Advertisement Officials were negotiating with Druze factions on an agreement to re-enter the area to impose stability and protect state institutions, according to two Syrian officials. They said an agreement was reached, but later said the deployment was delayed, without giving an explanation. Tens of thousands of people remained displaced by the violence and the United Nations has been unable to bring in much-needed humanitarian and medical aid because of ongoing clashes. Clashes began on Sunday between Druze militias and local Sunni Muslim Bedouin tribes. Government forces intervened, nominally to restore order, but ended up taking the Bedouins' side against the Druze. Israel later in the week launched air strikes against Syrian forces in defence of the Druze. Bedouin fighters gather in front of a burning shop (Ghaith Alsayed/AP) The fighting killed hundreds of people over four days, with allegations that government-affiliated fighters executed Druze civilians and looted and burned homes. Advertisement Israel launched dozens of air strikes on convoys of government fighters and even struck the Syrian Defence Ministry headquarters in central Damascus. The Druze form a substantial community in Israel, where they are seen as a loyal minority and often serve in the Israeli military. A truce mediated by the US, Turkey and Arab countries was announced on Wednesday. Under the accord, Druze factions and clerics were to maintain the internal security in Sweida as government forces pulled out, Syria's interim president Ahmad al-Sharaa said on Thursday. By late Thursday clashes were flaring again between the Druze and Bedouin groups in parts of Sweida. State media reported Druze militias carried out revenge attacks against Bedouin communities, leading to a new wave of displacement. The governor of the neighbouring province of Daraa said in a statement that more than 1,000 families had been displaced to the area from Sweida as a result of 'attacks on Bedouin tribes by outlaw groups'. Advertisement The UN's migration agency said on Friday that nearly 80,000 people had been displaced altogether since clashes started on Sunday. It also noted that essential services, including water and electricity, have collapsed in Sweida, telecommunications systems are widely disrupted, and health facilities in Sweida and Daraa are under severe strain. Bedouin groups and supporters arrived on Friday from other areas of Syria to join the fight. On the outskirts of Sweida, groups of them gathered in front of buildings that had been set ablaze. In Israel, members of the Druze community had called for intervention to protect the Druze in Syria. But elsewhere in the region, Druze leaders have rejected Israeli intervention. Advertisement The spiritual leader of the Druze community in Lebanon, Sheikh Sami Abi al-Muna, said on Friday at a gathering of Druze officials in Beirut that sectarian clashes in Syria 'give an excuse for Israeli intervention and for blowing up the situation in the region'. 'We do not accept to request protection from Israel, which we believe is harmful to our history and identity,' he said.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: US firms to develop Syria energy masterplan after Trump lifts sanctions
DAMASCUS, July 18 (Reuters) - U.S.-based firms Baker Hughes (BKR.O), opens new tab, Hunt Energy and Argent LNG will develop a masterplan for Syria's oil, gas and power sector, Argent LNG CEO Jonathan Bass said on Friday, in a partnership aimed at rebuilding energy infrastructure shattered by 14 years of civil war. The move marks a swift turnaround as U.S. companies enter a country previously under one of the world's tightest sanctions regimes that U.S. President Donald Trump lifted at the end of June. The companies plan to help explore and extract oil and gas and produce power to help get the economy running as the government seeks to put Syria back on the map. The plan comes after a dash by other companies, many from Gulf Arab states, to sign deals to bolster Syria's power generation and ports infrastructure. Details of the plan have not been previously reported. "We are initiating the development of a comprehensive masterplan for energy and power generation in Syria, based on a preliminary assessment of opportunities for near-term improvements in generation capacity and service delivery," Bass told Reuters via phone. "Our efforts aim to support the revitalization of the energy sector in coordination with relevant stakeholders,' he added. "This includes potential activities across the value chain—from exploration and production to electricity generation, including combined-cycle power plants," he said, declining to elaborate further. Argent LNG, which is developing a liquefied natural gas export facility in Louisiana, in January signed a non-binding agreement to supply Bangladesh up to 5 million metric tons of the fuel annually, the first major U.S. LNG supply deal since Trump began his second term. Reuters received no immediate response to emailed questions to global energy services provider Baker Hughes and Texas-based electric utility Hunt Energy. The plan is to begin with areas west of the Euphrates River, under control of the Syrian government. Syria's east, where much of its oil is produced, remains controlled by the Syrian Democratic Forces, a U.S.-backed and Kurdish-led armed group that Washington has urged to integrate with the new authorities in Damascus following the ouster of former Syrian strongman Bashar al-Assad. After 14 years of war, Syria's electricity sector is severely damaged, generating only 1.6 gigawatts of electricity, down from 9.5 GW before 2011. Billions of dollars of investment are needed to fix the sector, so the cash-strapped state is looking at private investment or donors to foot the bill. In May, Syria signed a memorandum of understanding with Qatar's UCC Holding to develop $7 billion worth of power generation projects, including four combined-cycle gas turbine power plants and a 1,000-MW solar power plant in southern Syria. In a post on LinkedIn on Thursday, Syrian Finance Minister Yisr Barnieh said the three U.S.-based companies were forming a coalition to invest in Syria and develop the country's energy sector. "This visit signals a growing interest among American companies and investors in engaging with Syria," he said. Bass, Hunt Energy CEO Hunter L. Hunt, and a senior executive at Baker Hughes arrived in Syria on a private jet on Wednesday morning and were meeting with Barnieh when Israel conducted a series of airstrikes on Damascus that shook the city, Bass said. "It was big," said Bass, who has been working on the energy project since visiting Damascus and meeting with Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa in April. He was part of both state-led and informal efforts to lobby Trump to meet with Sharaa. The landmark meeting took place in mid-May with a big push from the leaders of Turkey and Saudi Arabia, and Trump announced the end of Syria sanctions. As they are slowly phased out, investor interest in Syria has grown. A week of violence in the southern province of Sweida, however, has darkened the mood in the country and left at least 321 people dead, according to the Syrian Network for Human Rights, a human rights group. "To work in Syria, there are potholes, there are ditches, it has craters," said Bass. "If you don't have the team that's willing to accept craters, don't come."
