logo
What Seniors Need To Know About Congress's Big Budget Bill

What Seniors Need To Know About Congress's Big Budget Bill

Forbesa day ago
President Donald Trump and Speaker of the House Mike Johnson (R-LA) speak to the press about the ... More so-called "big, beautiful bill." (Photo by Mandel NGAN / AFP) (Photo by MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images)
The massive 2025 budget bill, which Congress passed on July 3, would slash safety net programs for older adults, people with disabilities, and their family caregivers, though many of those cuts may not take effect for years. At the same time, the bill would lower taxes for some older adults.
The measure would reduce Medicaid spending by nearly $1 trillion over the next decade, largely by cutting the federal payments for the program and imposing a work requirement on many recipients, perhaps including some family caregivers.
It would block a Biden-era rule to require minimum staff to care for patients and residents of nursing homes while approving more spending to deport immigrants, which likely will make the current severe shortage of care workers much worse.
It also would increase the standard deduction for older adults, but excludes a tax break for family caregivers once promised by President Trump and fails to enhance tax-free savings that can be used to pay for long-term care.
Here is what some key provisions will mean for older adults and people with disabilities:
Medicaid: About 7.2 million seniors and 4.8 million younger people with disabilities are enrolled in both Medicaid and Medicare. More than half of Medicaid dollars are spent on them. Medicaid is run by the states but about 70 percent of its funding comes from the federal government.
The budget bill would slash Medicaid spending by nearly $1 trillion over the next decade. About $336 billion of those cuts would come from requiring states to impose work requirements on recipients, about $60 billion from increased paperwork faced by recipients, and about $120 billion from changes to so-called provider taxes, which effectively reduce federal contributions to the program.
Work requirement: Older adults and young people with disabilities generally are exempt from the work requirements. But because the law is so vaguely written, family caregivers of older adults may not be.
This would require low-income people to give up their Medicaid if they must leave a job to care for a loved one. In addition, experts expect that many eligible people will lose their benefits because they are unable to comply with onerous new paperwork requirements to prove they are exempt from the work rules.
States must impose work requirements by December, 2026, right after that year's congressional elections. They may do so sooner or could request a reprieve from the federal government until 2028 under certain circumstances.
Cuts to federal Medicaid contributions: The bill limits the ability of states to impose taxes on Medicaid providers, such as nursing homes and hospitals. That effectively will reduce the amount of Medicaid spending funded by the federal government, though the provider tax curbs will not take effect until 2028. Other changes limit federal contributions to states that expanded Medicaid under the 2010 Affordable Care Act. Those additional payments end on January 1.
All these cuts in federal Medicaid payments will force states to either cut benefits, limit eligibility, or raise taxes to make up for the lost federal dollars.
Since few states are likely to raise taxes, they'll be forced to limit Medicaid services in some way. Crucially, states are required by federal law to provide long-term care in nursing homes. They are allowed to provide home-based care—and all do-- but these are optional benefits and not required.
As a result, states are likely to respond to cuts in federal Medicaid payments by either reducing their home and community-based care or by cutting their payments to nursing homes.
Medicaid home and community-based care: Current law generally says states can provide home-based care only to people who otherwise would be living in a nursing home or other institutional setting. The bill gives states new flexibility to provide home-based care to people who do not need an institutional level of care, as long as they do not increase existing waiting lists for community care to do so.
The bill includes a small amount of money for states to implement this expansion. But given the massive cuts in federal payments, it seems improbable that states will be expanding HCBS anytime soon. In addition, the provision would not take effect until 2028.
Care workers: The bill would effectively repeal a Biden Administration rule aimed at requiring nursing homes to maintain minimum levels of staffing, including 24/7 RNs on site. Industry groups sued to block the rule and a federal district judge in Texas halted it.
At the same time, the budget bill would increase spending by more than $100 billion for border security and the Trump Administration's efforts to deport immigrants. Trump's promised mass deportations will make the existing shortage of medical and direct care workers much worse, increasing costs for families.
Taxes: The budget bill raises the standard deduction for older adults by $6,000. In 2025, a couple claiming the ordinary standard deduction, the current additional standard deduction for seniors, and the new standard deduction, could receive a total standard deduction of $46,7000. The senior deduction would be available even to those who itemize their deductions.
The extra deduction would be available only through 2028. It replaces President Trump's campaign promise to exempt Social Security benefits from tax, an idea never seriously considered by Congress. The Tax Policy Center estimates that fewer than half of seniors would benefit from the higher standard deduction.
Two other important tax provisions never made it to the final bill. A caregiver tax credit, which President Trump promised during the campaign, never was pushed by the White House and was not included in any version of the budget bill.
And a House provision intended to double contributions to tax-free Health Savings Accounts was dropped. Those HSAs can be used to pay long-term care insurance premiums and for some care.
The big budget bill will have profound effects on older adults, especially the poorest of them. But, at least in some states, they may not feel much of the impact for a while.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Are Lakers buying out LeBron James? Explaining latest viral update on superstar's contract amid trade rumors
Are Lakers buying out LeBron James? Explaining latest viral update on superstar's contract amid trade rumors

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Are Lakers buying out LeBron James? Explaining latest viral update on superstar's contract amid trade rumors

LeBron James seems like he'll stay front and center of the NBA's headlines this offseason. His agent Rich Paul's comments after LeBron opted-in to his Los Angeles Lakers contract for 2025-26 made many wonder whether James is seeking a trade. Advertisement There's also been a suggestion of a buyout, but that hasn't gained the same traction. Well, at least until a viral parody account posted on X on July 4 that James and the Lakers are working on a buyout. MORE: A major update in LeBron James' trade talks from Lakers Are Lakers buying out LeBron James? No, the Los Angeles Lakers are not buying out LeBron James. They also aren't working toward a buyout with LeBron. It would be entirely illogical for the Lakers to buy out James. He was a second-team All-NBA choice in 2024-25. Why would they get rid of him for nothing in return? While trades don't appear to be forthcoming, LeBron's name value plus talent give him legitimate trade value if he ends up requesting a deal. Advertisement But for now, it's full speed ahead for LeBron with the Lakers. MORE NBA NEWS:

Elon Musk's $71 Billion Wealth Wipeout Dwarfs Next 7 Billionaire Decliners Combined
Elon Musk's $71 Billion Wealth Wipeout Dwarfs Next 7 Billionaire Decliners Combined

Yahoo

time39 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk's $71 Billion Wealth Wipeout Dwarfs Next 7 Billionaire Decliners Combined

The world's richest person is worth less in 2025 than at the end of 2024, with Tesla Inc (NASDAQ:TSLA) CEO Elon Musk seeing his wealth take a hit as he battles with President Donald Trump. What Happened: The share price of Tesla has been highly volatile since Trump won the 2024 presidential election. Tesla shares hit new all-time highs in December 2024, driven by optimism for the electric vehicle leader and the strong relationship between Musk and Trump, which could help address regulatory issues and attract new fans. Tesla stock also traded over $400 at the start of 2025. Trending: GoSun's Breakthrough Rooftop EV Charger Already Has 2,000+ Units Reserved — Musk's work done with the government through the Department of Government Efficiency led to a call for boycotts against Tesla, and may be a reason for the weakened demand globally in 2025. Several recent falling outs between Musk and Trump have caused Tesla shareholders to worry about the future and have led to a significant decline in Musk's wealth in 2025. Musk is worth an estimated $361 billion according to Bloomberg. While that figure is significant and higher than second-place Mark Zuckerberg ($252 billion), it is down $71.2 billion year-to-date in 2025. For context, Musk has lost more in his net worth in 2025 than the next seven highest 2025 decliners combined, who are listed below with their rank on the list, net worth and YTD decline. 273. Dustin Moskovitz, Facebook co-founder, Asana Inc (NYSE:ASAN) founder: $11.4 billion, -$16.9 billion YTD 7. Bernard Arnault, LVMH (OTC:LVMUY) CEO: $162 billion, -$14.4 billion YTD 168. Mike Sabel, Venture Global (NYSE:VG) co-founder: $15.3 billion, -9.4 billion YTD 169. Bob Pender, Venture Global co-founder: $15.3 billion, -$9.4 billion YTD 9. Sergey Brin, Alphabet Inc (NASDAQ:GOOGL) co-founder: $152 billion, -$6.6 billion 8. Larry Page, Alphabet Inc co-founder: $162 billion, -$6.5 billion 189. Sukanto Tanoto, Royal Golden Eagle founder: $14.1 billion, -$6.3 billion Musk has lost more wealth than these seven individuals combined. In fact, the $71.2 billion drop in his net worth is so steep, it would rank as the 23rd largest fortune in the world on its own. That means in 2025 alone, Musk has lost more money than the total net worth of all but about 20 It's Important: Tesla stock is down 16.7% year-to-date in 2025, which has significantly impacted Musk's wealth, as he owns approximately 12% of the company. Other stakes in SpaceX and xAI have held up better but are less volatile, as they are privately held and don't experience the same valuation spikes as Tesla stock does on a day-to-day basis. Regardless of how much Musk and Trump are worth, the Tesla CEO's net worth is significantly higher, but investors may soon learn which figure truly matters when it comes to valuing Tesla. Trump has threatened to investigate the subsidies that Tesla receives and is again speaking critically of electric vehicles. Tesla investors should also keep in mind that Trump was once strongly opposed to autonomous vehicles and stated that he would ban them from the road. The president appears to have had a change of heart or been influenced by Musk to make it easier to get autonomous vehicles on the road today. Musk previously set a Guinness World Record in 2022 with the largest single-year wealth drop, with his net worth declining between $180 billion and $200 billion. It is unlikely that Musk could see such a significant drop again in 2025, but continued battles between Musk and Trump could be a storyline to watch. Read Next: Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: Schedule your free call with a financial advisor to start your financial journey – no cost, no obligation. These five entrepreneurs are worth $223 billion – they all believe in one platform that offers a 7-9% target yield with monthly dividends Image created using photos from Shutterstock. Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article Elon Musk's $71 Billion Wealth Wipeout Dwarfs Next 7 Billionaire Decliners Combined originally appeared on

1 Warren Buffett stock I'm staying well away from
1 Warren Buffett stock I'm staying well away from

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

1 Warren Buffett stock I'm staying well away from

Investors always pay close attention to which stocks Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway is buying – whether or not it's the CEO himself making the decisions. And one stands out to me. Constellation Brands (NYSE:STZ) looks like a classic example of being greedy when others are fearful. But despite the stock being down 31% in the last year, I'm staying away from this one. it's one of the largest US alcohol producers and marketers. And the industry as a whole looks as though it's in a transition phase at the moment. One of the biggest developments is the well-documented shift towards more premium products. This has been happening across beer, wine, and spirits. Constellation Brands isn't oblivious to the ongoing changes. The company has been looking to position its portfolio to align with this trend by divesting some of its lower-priced lines. This looks like a good strategy to me. But there's another ongoing trend that looks more problematic, which involves beer and wine losing market share to spirits. That's a problem for a firm where beer accounts for 85% of overall revenues. Despite growth in some of its premium divisions, the category as a whole being in decline is a big concern. The Berkshire Hathaway investment managers might be seeing something, but I don't know what that is. In the UK, Diageo (LSE:DGE) is also going to contend with challenges to the alcohol industry in general. These include the rise of GLP-1 drugs, which could well weigh on overall demand. I think, however, the FTSE 100 firm has a more attractive portfolio for dealing with these risks. Its sales predominantly come from spirits, with smaller contributions from beer and wine. The strength of Diageo's spirits portfolio is well-documented. But even in its relatively minor wine division, the company is firmly positioned towards the luxury end of the market. Through a joint venture with Moët Hennessy Louis Vuitton, Diageo has access to some of the top champagne names. These include Dom Pérignon, Moët & Chandon, and Veuve Clicquot. Its beer division primarily consists of Guinness, which some analysts have speculated the firm might be looking to sell. But I don't think this would be a particularly welcome development. Guinness sales have been strong recently, underscoring the shift towards premium lines across categories. So I see the division as another reason to be optimistic about Diageo's portfolio. A lot of recent attention has been focused on UK shares trading at lower multiples than their US counterparts. But that's not so obviously the case with Constellation Brands and Diageo. Despite a lower dividend yield and a higher price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio, Constellation Brands trades at a lower free cash flow multiple than its FTSE 100 counterpart. This means that — in one important respect — the stock is cheaper. On balance, however, I think Diageo is in a stronger position to deal with the challenges the alcohol industry is facing. That's why it's the stock I've been buying for my portfolio. The post 1 Warren Buffett stock I'm staying well away from appeared first on The Motley Fool UK. More reading 5 Stocks For Trying To Build Wealth After 50 One Top Growth Stock from the Motley Fool Stephen Wright has positions in Berkshire Hathaway and Diageo Plc. The Motley Fool UK has recommended Constellation Brands and Diageo Plc. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. Motley Fool UK 2025 Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store