logo
Ari Aster on Gruesome ‘Eddington' Ending, Full-Frontal Joaquin Phoenix and Soothing His Notorious Anxiety

Ari Aster on Gruesome ‘Eddington' Ending, Full-Frontal Joaquin Phoenix and Soothing His Notorious Anxiety

Yahoo3 days ago
SPOILER ALERT: This interview contains spoilers for, including the ending of, 'Eddington,' now playing in theaters.
Does anything relax Ari Aster?
More from Variety
Box Office: 'Superman' Still on Top as 'I Know What You Did Last Summer' Hooks $5.8 Million Opening Day Ahead of 'Eddington' and 'Smurfs'
Box Office: 'I Know What You Did Last Summer' Scares Up $2.2 Million in Thursday Previews, A24's 'Eddington' Earns $625K
Micheal Ward on Finally Having His Cannes Moment With 'Eddington,' What He Learned From 'Cool Cat' Joaquin Phoenix and Why His Next Film Should Excite 'Top Boy' Fans
The ramp-up to the celebrated indie filmmaker's latest release, 'Eddington,' reminds us just how much crushing anxiety informs his work and daily life. Take last week's exhaustive New York Times profile, in which Aster threatened to walk into traffic at the thought of answering routine publicity questions. But his demons aren't without benefits, having produced disruptive and culture-consuming movies like 'Hereditary,' 'Midsommar' and 'Beau Is Afraid.'
On a recent Zoom with Variety, Aster sat in the office of his distributor A24 and considered the things that bring him joy and calm.
'I like to read. I like watching movies. Making films provides a healthy level of distraction. Being idle isn't my thing,' he said. The director also confessed to enjoying junk food (calling himself an 'over-orderer' on apps like Uber Eats) and low-brow comedy (he couldn't name any recent favorites off the cuff). He meditates. Sadly, he does not partake in any of Bravo's 'Real Housewives' installments, as the Times hinted he might. Escapes from his prison of anxiety are minimal, but perhaps that's why we have 'Eddington.'
The Cannes selection follows antihero Joaquin Phoenix as Joe Cross, a New Mexico law enforcer whose personal life explodes in scandal and violence at the exact time COVID rattles the world and undoes his small town. The film was divisive from the jump, with some critics saying Aster's film is incendiary on purpose – meant to rile conspiracy theorists, incite liberal outrage and foreshadow the inevitability of a second Trump term. Variety's Owen Gleiberman, in his positive review, said some viewers might wonder if Aster had 'turned into some right-wing hipster auteur tossing cherry bombs attached to Fox News talking points.'
Political and social indictments aside, Aster crafts the kind of bleak ending he's become famous for. [Last chance to avoid spoilers] Much of the film's action centers on a haphazard mayoral campaign Cross is running while trying to keep the peace in his town. After smiting his opposition (Pedro Pascal) and quite a few others, Cross claims victory at a high price. A climactic action piece just before the film's final scenes brings Antifa to town – puppets of the elite paid to stage havoc in service of darker goals, the theory goes. Phoenix's Cross confronts them head on through air assaults, multi-car explosions and a town square shoot-out that feels like Paul Verhoeven guest directed 'Grand Theft Auto.' In the end, Cross takes a knife to the skull. Since this is an Aster movie, death is nowhere near the worst thing that can happen to his protagonist.
'I wanted it to feel as desolate as possible,' Aster said of the ending. Cross survives but is left paraplegic by the stabbing. He holds the mayor's office but can't enjoy its power and privilege, instead a symbol now cared for by his unhinged mother-in-law (the underrated Deirdre O'Connell). Cross spends his days reflecting on his sins and getting abused by caretakers. In a montage looking at Cross' new daily routine, Phoenix offers some rare full-frontal nudity from a male movie star ('If you got it, you might as well [flaunt it],' the director said of his lead).
One of the final glimpses we see of Cross is at the grand opening of a data center, built right next to the paltry town of Eddington. Many theorize that the data center, the construction of which is opposed by some locals and indigenous people, was the real evil in the story.
'What you'll see in the film is that I have some frustration towards one side of this ideological battle, but I'm terrified of the other side. And part of my frustration with that first side is that it's failing to meet the threat of the other side,' he said. 'This film is about a bunch of people who are in the same situation, and they're all boring, and they're all going at each other. But they're all subject to the same forces and the same big power that is working on them.'
Best of Variety
New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week
'Harry Potter' TV Show Cast Guide: Who's Who in Hogwarts?
Final Emmy Predictions: Talk Series and Scripted Variety - New Blood Looks to Tackle Late Night Staples
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NYT Connections Sports Edition today: Hints and answers for July 27, 2025
NYT Connections Sports Edition today: Hints and answers for July 27, 2025

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

NYT Connections Sports Edition today: Hints and answers for July 27, 2025

Connections: Sports Edition is a new version of the popular New York Times word game that seeks to test the knowledge of sports fans. Like the original Connections, the game is all about finding the "common threads between words." And just like Wordle, Connections resets after midnight and each new set of words gets trickier and trickier—so we've served up some hints and tips to get you over the hurdle. If you just want to be told today's puzzle, you can jump to the end of this article for the latest Connections solution. But if you'd rather solve it yourself, keep reading for some clues, tips, and strategies to assist you. What is Connections Sports Edition? The NYT's latest daily word game has launched in association with The Athletic, the New York Times property that provides the publication's sports coverage. Connections can be played on both web browsers and mobile devices and require players to group four words that share something in common. Each puzzle features 16 words and each grouping of words is split into four categories. These sets could comprise of anything from book titles, software, country names, etc. Even though multiple words will seem like they fit together, there's only one correct answer. If a player gets all four words in a set correct, those words are removed from the board. Guess wrong and it counts as a mistake—players get up to four mistakes until the game ends. Players can also rearrange and shuffle the board to make spotting connections easier. Additionally, each group is color-coded with yellow being the easiest, followed by green, blue, and purple. Like Wordle, you can share the results with your friends on social media. Here's a hint for today's Connections Sports Edition categories Want a hint about the categories without being told the categories? Then give these a try: Yellow: Periods of time in a game Green: Grand Prix Blue: HOF'ers Purple: Hollywood boxers Here are today's Connections Sports Edition categories Need a little extra help? Today's connections fall into the following categories: Yellow: Interval Green: F1 Grand Prix Locations Blue: 2025 Baseball Hall of Fame Class Purple: Starts of Boxing Movies Looking for Wordle today? Here's the answer to today's Wordle. Ready for the answers? This is your last chance to turn back and solve today's puzzle before we reveal the solutions. Drumroll, please! The solution to today's Connections Sports Edition #307 is... What is the answer to Connections Sports Edition today Interval - PERIOD, SPELL, STINT, STRETCH F1 Grand Prix Locations - ABU DHABI, BAKU, MONTREAL, MONZA 2025 Baseball Hall of Fame Class - ALLEN, PARKER, SABATHIA, SUZUKI Starts of Boxing Movies - CINDERELLA, MILLION, RAGING, ROCKY Don't feel down if you didn't manage to guess it this time. There will be new Connections for you to stretch your brain with tomorrow, and we'll be back again to guide you with more helpful hints. Are you also playing NYT Strands? See hints and answers for today's Strands. Check out our for Mahjong, Sudoku, free crossword, and more.

‘Fantastic Four' Underwhelms, ‘Superman' Soars Higher At Box Office
‘Fantastic Four' Underwhelms, ‘Superman' Soars Higher At Box Office

Forbes

timean hour ago

  • Forbes

‘Fantastic Four' Underwhelms, ‘Superman' Soars Higher At Box Office

Marvel Studios' summer tentpole The Fantastic Four: First Steps underwhelmed this weekend with just $118 million domestic and $100 million internationally, slightly ahead of what were frankly conservative estimates but realistically behind potential for such a major MCU release. Meanwhile, DC Studios' Superman soars higher at the box office past $500 million, after previously opening higher than Fantastic Four. Ebon Moss-Bachrach and Joseph Quinn star in "The Fantastic Four: First Steps." Fantastic Four Misses A Step In a surprise turnabout, it was Superman eating into The Fantastic Four: First Steps' weekend gross, rather than Marvel's summer tentpole acting as a speed bump for DC's cinematic reboot. Superman went from a trajectory toward $550 million to suddenly staring confidently at $600 million or more, if last weekend's upset moral victory is a sign of things to come. It's not a disaster, by any stretch (sorry, pun kind of intended), but a $218 million global bow for Marvel's biggest film of the year is not the champaign-popping result they wanted. Especially not after the previous two MCU releases this year underperformed. Fantastic Four debuting to less than Superman is a bad sign for the MCU in more ways than merely this film's own box office prospects. Marvel 'First Family' is meant to set up the two-part Avengers: Doomsday and Avengers: Secret Wars payoff, as well as setting the foundations for a soft reboot of the MCU (with X-Men serving as the other major players in laying the new groundwork). The Fantastic Four: First Steps did come in more than 10% ahead of Superman internationally, and the MCU tends to enjoy good overseas holds. However, overall lower opening weekend global sales combined with the fact Superman is holding far better than expected (particularly with families and younger viewers compared to Fantastic Four's alarming drops among those demographics), means we have to wait to see whether First Steps can match the Man of Steel's stamina. Right now, it appears Superman could wind up flying as high as $630 million, or as low as $590 million, but most likely somewhere north of $600 million at this point. The Fantastic Four: First Steps, on the other hand, might now have the more modest trajectory once anticipated for Superman. There's still a broad range of outcomes, however, because the A- Cinemascore and great 87% 'Certified Fresh" rating from critics via Rotten Tomatoes mean strong positive word-of-mouth just like Superman enjoyed, except Fantastic Four's numbers are actually a bit higher. Which usually spells good news for second and third weekend holds, particularly internationally – again, where the MCU gets most of its money. If Fantastic Four can build upon its lead with foreign audiences and make up lost ground there, it could allow the Marvel film to exceed Superman's international holds (which are still good, make no mistake, but still significantly weaker than domestic) and wind up making more worldwide despite a potentially (probably, to be frank) lower domestic haul than DC Studio's successful superhero revival. Fantastic Four And Family Films My guess is that what we're seeing is part of a much broader trend that's taking place, and it's displacing a lot of previously chart-topping genres and franchises. And it isn't a major surprise, if you follow annual box office charts much. So far this year, the top of the worldwide box office charts is dominated by family movies targeted heavily toward children and parents. China's Ne Zha II purportedly at the very top with $1.9 billion, followed by Lilo & Stitch with a huge $1 billion, A Minecraft Movie at $955 million, Jurassic World: Rebirth with $718 million to date, How to Train Your Dragon at $606 million so far, and then some adult-appealing Mission Impossible - The Final Reckoning closing out at about $595 million and F1 currently at $510 million and still going strong. Only then, at the bottom of the top 10, do we finally see Superman's $503 million gross (so far), Captain America: Brave New World at $415 million, and Thunderbolts with just $382 million. Now, these placements will change eventually, as other upcoming films inevitably bump some of these films from the top 10 box office charts. More important for the moment is that Jurassic World will remain in third place for a while, after it hits roughly $850 million. How to Train Your Dragon and Superman will face off over who has the highest $600+ grand total, with a near-tie possible. The Fantastic Four: First Steps will wind up somewhere in high-$500 millions or the $600 millions. F1 will race its way toward $575 million to perhaps even $600 million Likewise, Zootopia 2 and Avatar: Fire & Ash are both going to wind up high on the top-10 list by the end of the year, with Avatar 3 at the very top and Zootopia 2 almost surely among the top-5. So the final year-end chart will probably look something like this: Notice the top seven spots are dominated by child-leaning family movies, and the two that aren't (Avatar 3 and Jurassic World) are still popular with kids and teens as well as parents. F1 at the bottom is the only true adult drama entry on the list, the other nine being multi-demographic films with large or predominant family attendance, as well as big youth turnout overall. Superheroes are now mostly relegated to second-tier box office status and the bottom of the top-10. And even those impressive numbers for Jurassic World tell another story. Jurassic World: Rebirth is still in the weekend top-three and stomping its way toward maybe $850 million despite lousy audience grades and weak reviews. That's a big number, but it's also a huge comedown from the billion-plus box office of the preceding three chapters in the franchise. Meanwhile, the live-action adaptation of How to Train Your Dragon looks to finish around $625, which is higher than I personally expected (I figured between $500-600 million), and should become the highest grossing entry in the entire franchise, topping its animated predecessors. And of course, both Lilo & Stitch and Minecraft overperformed and are in the elite tier of the year-end box office. Ne Zha II is a whole special story, having made the bulk of its enormous gross in China, and I always have questions about how (*ahem*) accurate the accounting is. That said, it's still clearly a big hit and will get a North American release later this year, so we'll see how that goes. But regardless, it's another example of rekindled surging power of family entertainment at the top of box office charts. While family movies have always been popular and typically pepper the annual box office top-10, superhero cinema and certain other recurring tentpole franchises usually take several of the top-5 and tend to reside in the higher positions of the charts. But aside from rare billion dollar grossers like last year's Deadpool & Wolverine, superhero movies are settling into a lower tier at the box office, in the 'new normal' that sees viewers pickier about what they spend their dollars on, favoring family entertainment and looking for unique adaptations of familiar franchises. With so many superhero films and streaming series, not to mention plenty of animated superhero films and shows as well, parents and families are far less obliged to hit the multiplex for most of these pictures. Instead, they choose to watch them at home later, and reserve their theater seats for those predominantly kid-friendly family films. Unless a superhero film offers something really extra that makes it must-see, or unless it nails the appeal to families with young kids, those crucial family and youth demographics aren't as interested in keeping up in theaters. Binging on the shared-world ahead of major crossovers is easier and more appealing, it seems, and helps more easily work in viewings of the streaming shows. Fantastic Four And Marvel's Future That Marvel can't sustain the mind-boggling levels of success they enjoyed through their Infinity Saga isn't surprising, nor is it a sign of failure on their part. What Marvel is, and what it represents, has evolved and changed now. Marvel is at the 'what now?' point. Conversely, DC Studios has captured audiences' attention by stepping into that place the MCU once occupied with a fresh, fun new world being introduced, and it invites all ages to the party while everybody experiences it for the first time together. Marvel is now setting up their own soft reboot of sorts, but will audiences buy into it? They did with the DCEU's final dying gasps giving way to the newly introduced DCU in Superman, so maybe despite some underperformance for the MCU ahead of their own reset, they could enjoy some boost from the Avengers sequels coming up (although danger of underperforming always exists) and then introduce a whole new MCU that rekindles the sense of newness and joy. But even if both the DCU and MCU experience a new love affair with audiences, I suspect it will still never reach the heights of the Infinity Saga's recurring billion dollar franchise sequels and $2+ billion Avengers 'event' releases. Successful sustainable superhero cinematic universes will probably financially look more like Marvel's Phase One and Phase Two, or DCEU's first set of movies (Man of Steel, Batman v Superman, Suicide Squad, Wonder Woman, Justice League), where only the Avengers or major sequels/team-ups score $1 billion and the rest fall in the $500-700 million range. That means budgets will have to get under control, and there will be less releases each year, while streaming spinoffs become more attractive less 'tested' characters. If James Gunn and Peter Safran can guide DC Studios toward tweaking their approach in Superman but otherwise delivering on the potential to give audiences what they experienced with the original MCU build-up and payoff, then they'll be rewarded with solid success that might not quite achieve the Infinity Saga's heights, but will still be enormously successful and popular. And I'm going to say something controversial to some, but here it goes: the more Gunn and Safran make sure the rest of the DCU movies maintain the same appeal to families and kids, the more successful it will be. Dogs? Humor? All-ages fun? Yes, all around. I know everybody wants some idealized world where each franchise director is given exclusive visionary control and every film can be its own thing, but I'm talking about a different level of success that builds a whole DC world around an inclusive 'all fans welcome' approach and pointedly wants to create young fans who will remain fans for decades to come. I agree that a grounded Batman can coexist with a fantastical Superman, but that's easier in the comics than in live action cinema, and crucially there is a difference between what comic book fans' cultural expectations are compared to the much larger mainstream global film audience who are fans of these superheroes. Folks showing up to the Marvel movies responded the way they did because it all was within a shared world and it felt like it. Audiences bring those expectations and subconscious assumptions or judgments with them into the cinema, and it matters for their sense of buy-in. This has become more obvious as we've seen the differences between Marvel's and DC's successes and failures over the years. Superman had an aesthetic and sensibility, as well as tonal balance and sense of humor, that works for superhero movies meant for all audience members. It feels very similar to Sam Raimi's Spider-Man and Spider-Man II, and most of all the director's Doctor Strange In the Multiverse of Madness. We all remember how successful those films were, and I think leaning into that for the overall DC world works extremely well if the family audience appeal is front and center. It's actually not dissimilar to the aesthetics of Zack Snyder's Watchmen movie, which I long said would be an excellent aesthetic template (minus the graphic violence, sex, and profanity) for adapting the DC universe to film in a shared world. Perhaps leaning into Superman's family-friendly aspects most of the time, and allowing for leaning more toward Watchmen for the slightly 'edgier' or darker films like Brave and the Bold (might it eventually be retitled Batman and Robin?), but even that film could use the grittier tone while tilting back the other way by having Robin/Damian as the main character instead of Batman/Bruce. For Marvel, and for The Fantastic Four: First Steps, the evolved aesthetic approach is an interesting introduction to what the potential future of the MCU might look like, with a world growing out of Fantastic Four's history merged with the existence of Mutants and X-Men. It makes sense that when previous superheroes like Iron Man, Captain America, and others are rebooted with new actors, it will happen in a new world with new aesthetic changes to avoid repetition and to allow entirely new approaches and inspirations. At least, I hope that happens, but it depends a lot on the success of Fantastic Four, and on the success of Avengers: Doomsday and Avengers: Secret Wars. Let's find out how Fantastic Four: First Steps does through the weekdays as word-of-mouth spreads, and then how strongly it holds – I'm especially interested in what those international figures tell us over the next seven days, because that's where we'll get the best glimpse of Fantastic Four's box office future, and what it might mean for the rest of the MCU's plans. Superman's own numbers will separately tell us whether it's headed for the lower end or higher end of those $600+ expectations.

Today's NYT Wordle Hints, Answer and Help for July 29 #1501
Today's NYT Wordle Hints, Answer and Help for July 29 #1501

CNET

timean hour ago

  • CNET

Today's NYT Wordle Hints, Answer and Help for July 29 #1501

Looking for the most recent Wordle answer? Click here for today's Wordle hints, as well as our daily answers and hints for The New York Times Mini Crossword, Connections, Connections: Sports Edition and Strands puzzles. Today's Wordle puzzle might be tricky, depending on how correctly you place all those vowels -- and perhaps your knowledge of another language. If you need a new starter word, check out our list of which letters show up the most in English words. If you need hints and the answer, read on. Today's Wordle hints Before we show you today's Wordle answer, we'll give you some hints. If you don't want a spoiler, look away now. Wordle hint No. 1: Repeats Today's Wordle answer has no repeated letters. Wordle hint No. 2: Vowels Today's Wordle answer has three vowels. Wordle hint No. 3: First letter Today's Wordle answer begins with O. Wordle hint No. 4: It's Greek to me Today's Wordle answer is the final letter of the Greek alphabet Wordle hint No. 5: Meaning Today's Wordle answer can refer to someone that is last in a line or some kind of ranking. TODAY'S WORDLE ANSWER Today's Wordle answer is OMEGA. Yesterday's Wordle answer Yesterday's Wordle answer, July 28, No. 1500 was SAVVY. Recent Wordle answers July 24, No. 1496: QUAKE July 25, No. 1497: GOFER July 26: No. 1498: HAUNT July 27, No. 1499: WHOLE

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store