AI Marco Rubio impersonator ‘contacted US officials on Signal'
The imposter, who has not been identified by the authorities, sent voice and text messages using artificial intelligence technology (AI) to mimic the US secretary of state's voice and speech patterns, The Washington Post reported.
They contacted a member of Congress, a US governor and three foreign ministers, seemingly with the goal of 'gaining access to information or accounts,' authorities said.
Mr Rubio is the second member of Donald Trump's administration to be impersonated using AI, after a catfish pretending to be Susie Wiles, the chief of staff, contacted Republican lawmakers earlier this year.
In June, Mr Rubio's impersonator created a Signal account with the name 'Marco.Rubio@state.gov' to contact foreign diplomats and politicians, according to a State Department cable.
'The actor left voicemails on Signal for at least two targeted individuals and in one instance, sent a text message inviting the individual to communicate on Signal,' it reads.
It is likely to renew concerns about the use of the app by senior members of Mr Trump's administration after national security figures accidentally leaked US military plans to a journalist in March.
The State Department said it would 'carry out a thorough investigation and continue to implement safeguards to prevent this from happening in the future'.
FBI investigation into Wiles AI catfish
The FBI opened an investigation in May when a catfish using AI to pose as Ms Wiles, the US president's chief of staff, texted and called her contacts asking for cash.
Ms Wiles privately told colleagues that her phone had been hacked by and mined for contacts.
One Republican lawmaker said they had been asked to compile a list of people to be pardoned by Mr Trump, while another was asked for a cash transfer.
Hany Farid, a professor specialising in digital forensics at the University of California Berkeley, said the catfish attempts did not need to be particularly sophisticated to succeed when coupled with AI software.
'This is precisely why you shouldn't use Signal or other insecure channels for official government business,' he told The Washington Post.
In March, Pete Hegseth, the US defence secretary, accidentally leaked US military plans to bomb Houthi rebels in Yemen to the journalist Jeffrey Goldberg when he was accidentally added to a Signal chat by Mike Waltz, then the US national security adviser.
Mr Waltz was sacked by Mr Trump in May, then nominated as US ambassador to the UN. His confirmation hearings will reportedly take place next week.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
33 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump threatens to revoke Hollywood star's citizenship branding her 'threat to humanity
Donald Trump has threatened to revoke Rosie O'Donnell 's American citizenship, calling the comedian and longtime critic a 'threat to humanity' in a fiery post on Truth Social. 'Because of the fact that Rosie O'Donnell is not in the best interests of our Great Country, I am giving serious consideration to taking away her Citizenship,' Trump, 79, wrote Saturday. 'She is a Threat to Humanity, and should remain in the wonderful Country of Ireland, if they want her. GOD BLESS AMERICA!' The outburst followed O'Donnell's July 7 HuffPost interview, in which she discussed her decades-long feud with the former president and her 2024 move to Ireland, made ahead of Trump's reelection. 'I look at America and I feel overwhelmingly depressed,' said O'Donnell, 63, citing her need to protect her mental health and care for her 12-year-old son, who has autism. 'I knew what [the Trump administration] was planning to do, because I read Project 2025. I know what he's capable of. And I didn't want to put myself through another four years of him being in charge.' The outburst followed Rosie O'Donnell's July 7 HuffPost interview, in which she discussed her decades-long feud with the former president and her 2024 move to Ireland 'I picked up and left before the inauguration – because I wasn't going to take any chances.' O'Donnell and Trump's public feud began in 2006, after she criticized him on The View over his handling of the Miss USA controversy. Mocking his defense of then-titleholder Tara Conner, she called Trump a 'snake-oil salesman on Little House on the Prairie' and dismissed his claim of being self-made, pointing to his wealthy father. Trump hit back in a People interview, insisting his father 'never gave [him] tons of money' and threatening to sue. 'Rosie will rue the words she said,' he said at the time. 'Rosie's a loser. A real loser.' Since then, the two have traded jabs publicly, their mutual disdain well-documented. In the HuffPost interview, O'Donnell described her move as one of 'self-preservation.' 'I wasn't up for this battle,' she said. 'The cost was too high. I still believe in the virtue of the fight—I just couldn't do it personally.' Watching Trump's second term from abroad, O'Donnell added: 'I think it's as bad as everyone worried it would be. I believe fascism has taken a foothold in the United States.' She also criticized a new bill she claims grants Trump his own 'secret police,' with a budget 'greater than the money we give to Israel, which is already unbelievably high.' 'I look at America, and it feels tragic,' she said. 'I feel sad. I feel overwhelmingly depressed. I don't understand how we got here.'
Telegraph
42 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Trump imposes 30 per cent tariffs on EU and Mexico
Donald Trump has said he will impose 30 per cent tariffs on the European Union and Mexico from next month. The US president said both levies would take effect on August 1 as he announced the move on letters posted to his Truth Social account. In his letter to the European Union, Mr Trump said that the US trade deficit was a national security threat. 'We have had years to discuss our Trading Relationship with The European Union, and we have concluded we must move away from these long-term, large, and persistent, Trade Deficits, engendered by your Tariff, and Non-Tariff, Policies, and Trade Barriers,' he wrote. 'Our relationship has been, unfortunately, far from Reciprocal,' he added. The EU tariff is markedly steeper than the 20 percent levy Mr Trump unveiled in April, as negotiations with the bloc continue. EU countermeasures Responding to the announcement, Ursula von der Leyen, the European Commission president, said: 'Imposing 30 per cent tariffs on EU exports would disrupt essential transatlantic supply chains, to the detriment of businesses, consumers and patients on both sides of the Atlantic. 'Few economies in the world match the European Union's level of openness and adherence to fair trading practices. 'The EU has consistently prioritised a negotiated solution with the US, reflecting our commitment to dialogue, stability, and a constructive transatlantic partnership. 'We remain ready to continue working towards an agreement by August 1. At the same time, we will take all necessary steps to safeguard EU interests, including the adoption of proportionate countermeasures if required.' Brussels, alongside dozens of other economies, had been set to see its US tariff level increase from a baseline of 10 per cent on Wednesday, but Mr Trump pushed back the deadline to August 1 just days before the elevated rates were due to take effect. Mexico targeted over drugs and migration In the letter to Claudia Sheinbaum, the Mexican president, Mr Trump acknowledged that her country has been helpful in stemming the flow of undocumented migrants and fentanyl into the United States. But he said the country has not done enough to stop North America from turning into a 'Narco-Trafficking Playground'. The duties are higher than the 25 percent levy Mr Trump imposed on Mexican goods earlier this year, although products entering the United States under the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement are exempted. Canada earlier received a similar letter setting out 35 percent tariffs on its goods. The EU tariff is markedly steeper than the 20 percent levy Mr Trump unveiled in April, as negotiations with the bloc continue. The EU, alongside dozens of other economies, had been set to see its US tariff level increase from a baseline of 10 percent on Wednesday, but Mr Trump pushed back the deadline to August 1 just days before the elevated rates were due to take effect.
Telegraph
42 minutes ago
- Telegraph
The Ayatollahs are falling, but they still threaten the West
Iran's Islamic regime is weaker than it's ever been. Reeling from Israel and the US's historic attacks and the devastation of its terror proxies across the region, the Supreme Leader's ruthless 35-year grip on power is wobbling. Desperately trying to cling to power, the regime's clerics have resorted to issuing a fatwa against President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. This religiously decreed death warrant is an appeal to Muslims world-wide and Iran's latest attempt to radicalise Western societies. As we mark the 20th anniversary of the 7/7 terror atrocities in London, it is especially disturbing that the fatwa even gives licence to suicide attacks. This isn't, however, merely a case of statecraft by death threat. The fatwa is just as much a warning to ordinary Iranians bravely campaigning for their freedom, as the fatwa broadly includes the punishment of death for anyone challenging the Supreme Leader. The alarming return of the fatwa has been accompanied by mass detentions across Iran with over 700 arrested in recent weeks. Having casted any opposition to the regime as a crime against God, Iran's theocratic authorities have been carrying out a horrifying wave of executions. I myself have lived with the threat to my life from the regime. I've already endured threats of beheading while standing outside the Foreign Office in London and I'm endlessly grateful to the British security services for their exceptional work in protecting me and my fellow peace-loving travellers. Since founding the Iranian Front for the Revival of Law and National Sovereignty to provide a voice to the people of Iran, the danger has only increased. Fatwas aren't something to be taken lightly. Tehran's long arm extends all the way around the world courtesy of its Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps terror army, proxies and lone wolf extremists. They all stand ready to enforce the hardline religious will of the regime. It is high time that the international community recognised that fatwas are as much of a threat as Iran's nuclear ambitions and ballistic missile programme, for which we owe Israel and the US much gratitude for degrading. Nearly four decades ago, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini issued a fatwa against British author Salman Rushdie, accusing him of blasphemy for the simple act of writing a book. This seemingly historical relic returned abruptly to global prominence when, in 2022, a murderous Islamist, inspired by this dormant fatwa, brutally assaulted Rushdie and nearly killed him. This chilling incident reminded the world that fatwas retain their lethality long after issuance. Fatwas constitute an international license for assassination and terror, activating sleeper cells composed of indoctrinated youth worldwide. Western leaders must urgently recognise that these fatwas are not meaningless religious proclamations; they are strategic tools of international terrorism. Through vast financial resources plundered from Iran's population, Tehran meticulously finances global information networks dedicated to brainwashing vulnerable young individuals who seem utterly impervious to the brutal nature of the regime, including here in the UK. Indoctrinated and radicalised, these youths become human weapons, primed to act upon the mere whisper of a cleric's command. This may start with harmless, if misguided, slogans and protests but it can quickly accelerate into criminality and acts of violence. Like a scorpion whose nature is to sting, the Iranian regime's defining immutable characteristic is violence, and its growing number of fatwas suggests that it is seeking to export incitement and terrorism while it desperately attempts to reassert control over the long-suffering Iranian public. The international community must respond decisively to neutralise this threat. Much of the hard work has been achieved through the military strikes on Iran's nuclear programme and military assets but its international terror franchises, radicalised useful idiots and fatwas remain strategic weapons. Only by dismantling this regime can the world effectively eliminate an existential threat and provide the Iranian people with the opportunity for a better future.
