How bad is the tariff news for NZ, really?
ARNE DEDERT / AFP
New Zealand has been hit with a higher tariff rate than Australia on exports to the US - but economists say the situation could have been worse.
It was revealed on Friday that New Zealand exports would
have a 15 percent tariff
applied, up from 10 percent announced earlier.
Australia remains at 10 percent.
Brad Olsen, chief executive at Infometrics, said that was a clear challenge for New Zealand.
"There is now a wedge between us and Australia."
There were other parts of the world that previously had a higher tariff rate that were now on the same level as New Zealand, such as Europe.
"Wine, for example, under the original tariffs, we might have had a slight advantage. Now we don't."
But he said it was not necessarily true that the country would have been better off had it negotiated a deal.
He said New Zealand did not have a lot to "give up" in those negotiations, and it could have
ended up being costly
.
"I'm a little bit surprised by comments, including from the opposition's trade spokesperson, that the government failed to achieve a lower tariff rate.
"The comments seem to make the implication that New Zealand could have found a way to come up with a trade agreement that might have given us a lower tariff rate.
"That might be true, but we have no idea what we would have had to give up to achieve that… some of what had to be given up by other countries to get a 15 percent tariffs rate is consequential - Japan and other countries had to give up to half a trillion dollars of further investment into the US."
He said the impact on New Zealand's trading partners might not be as bad as had been expected, which should prove positive for the economy.
"It will be slightly more challenging to export to the US from a New Zealand point of view, but our trading partner activity might not be hit as bad as was feared in April. That's probably a net benefit for us."
Mike Jones, chief economist at BNZ, said the increase was not unexpected given indications of the past few weeks.
"It's obviously unhelpful for NZ exports into the US, particularly how we line up with those coming from Australia and the UK, given the lower 10 percent baseline tariff rate for those countries.
"Beef and wine exports could be affected. It's interesting in this context that we've seen the NZD/AUD exchange rate fall a little today in the wake of the announcements."
Kelly Eckhold, chief economist at Westpac, said he thought New Zealand was in roughly the same position as in April.
"On one hand, the tariff is higher, so there is a bigger direct cost, but it's a bit lower for a lot of our trading partners, so it's better for the economy than would otherwise be the case."
He said how the lingering elements of uncertainty played out over the coming weeks would be important.
"The legal basis of these tariffs, whether they're going to be able to continue or need to be replaced with a different type of tariff, is an issue. And the sectoral tariffs have not yet really been negotiated.
"While I don't think these things affect the sort of goods New Zealand trades with the US, there may be some impact on our trading partners."
He said it seemed strange that the US was calculating tariffs based on which countries exported more than they imported.
"The concept that US authorities have had of countries ripping them off by selling more stuff to America than they're been buying is quite myopic.
"We're only talking about goods trade here, we buy a lot of services from the US.
"In large part, the trade imbalance is a cyclical rather than a structural story.
"In the last few years, the economy has been relatively weak compared to the US. We're not sucking in as many imports, and the exchange rate has been lower than would normally be the case, which has encouraged export revenues.
"I would have thought trade policy metrics like tariffs would be determined on the basis of structural, not cyclical factors.
"All those things could easily be the other way around in a few years' time."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
The people quietly preserving a place for cash
The Reserve Bank is doing its once-every-two-year survey to understand how New Zealanders use, store and spend cash. Photo: 123RF As Kiwis' cash use comes under scrutiny, shopkeepers and emergency savers are among those quietly preserving a place for physical currency. At present, the Reserve Bank is doing its once-every-two-year survey to understand how New Zealanders use, store and spend cash. Dunedin residents, unscientifically surveyed by RNZ on Tuesday, said they were using cash for everything from groceries to public transport, pocket money, cheese rolls and, in Sheryn Wilson's case, to give to the less fortunate. "Occasionally, I'll get out $20 in change and give it to my granddaughter to give to the people along here. That's basically all I use it for. To give the homeless... but that's it," Wilson said. Physical money remained second preference to using a bank card, although she believed it was worthwhile to have a backup stash for emergencies. "It feels strange now to use cash. It feels old-fashioned and kind of dirty," she said. Clive Cockle said he always carried cash but tended to default to swiping his card. He said he also kept at least a few dollars for emergencies. However Daniel, who did not want his last name identified, said he actively avoided cash to try to restrain his spending. "I find it hard to save money if I've got cash lying around - I'll just spend it straight away. If I've got cash, every time I open my wallet, it's gone," he said. Clive Cockle said he keeps at least a few dollars for emergencies. Photo: VNP / Daniela Maoate-Cox This year, the Reserve Bank's random postal survey would ask people how they preferred to pay, how often they used cash, how easy it was to deposit and withdraw coins and notes, and whether they stored cash - and why. Reserve Bank's cash manager Ian Woolford said people's habits were shifting. The last survey found fewer people using cash day-to-day, but those who did used it more often and more people said they valued it for privacy and safety. "The work that we're doing is to make sure that consumers - citizens - can use it when and as they please," he said. The Dairy and Business Owners Group said it was becoming harder for shopkeepers to manage cash. Chairperson Ankit Bansal said some people were relying on dairies for small cash withdrawals when there were not banks nearby. But the reduced number of bank branches and the increase in 'cashless' banks made it hard for shopkeepers to maintain a float. Bansal said stores needed easy bank access because holding money on site was a safety risk. "Banks - this is their job. Essentially we're seeing them picking and choosing what services they're providing. So I hope to see some action on the banks," he said. Retail New Zealand chief executive Carolyn Young said cash was on the way out, although not in the near future. Fewer than one in ten nationwide retail transactions were now in cash, she said. "It's certainly always diminishing, but how long that tail is, we're not sure," Young said. Shopkeepers were not supportive of New Zealand First's recent members' bill, which would require making it mandatory for stores to take cash for purchases up to $500, she said. "Retailers... understand that cash is important, but they don't want to be dictated - that it's mandated. Part of it is what do people want and how do we make sure that that's working. It's not broken at the moment. We don't think that it's necessary," Young said. Jamie Jermain, the co-founder of the SquareOne app that helps children understand finance and managing their money, found some children didn't know what cash was. He said a tool kit was needed to teach children about money and it's value when cash is increasingly invisible in a digital world. "In this day in age, what kids are getting more and more used to seeing is their parents essentially tapping this magic wand on a terminal. They [young people] don't have that connection with money, they don't see how it works on a day-to-day basis," Jermain said. Educating children on how to earn, save and responsibly spend money is crucial for learning good money habits when children get older, Jermain said. "Those lessons are with them for life," he said. The Reserve Bank's survey closes on 10 October. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Waimakariri's new councillors may get 22% pay bump
Deputy Mayor Neville Atkinson and Mayor Dan Gordon. Photo: Waimakariri District Council. Photo: LDR / SUPPLIED Waimakariri's mayor and councillors are set for pay rises of up to 22 percent after October's election. Councillor pay rates will jump from $58,110 to $71,026. Speaking at a council meeting on Tuesday, outgoing Deputy Mayor Neville Atkinson said councillors were "well worth" the increased pay rate. The mayor's salary is set to rise 4 percent, from $158,057 to $164,728, while the deputy mayor's salary is proposed to jump 22 percent, from $74,674 to $91,271. The pay jumps are due to an increased remuneration pool. Atkinson said voting on pay rises is "silly" when it is already set by the Remuneration Authority. "It is imposed on you and it has always seemed silly to me that we have to vote on this, when it is already imposed on us. "If you want to give it to charity you can, but if you want to take it, then good on you - you are well worth it." Atkinson said there was plenty of commentary on social media about what bonuses councillors allegedly claimed. "It talks about the bonuses which we actually don't get. We don't get flying allowances - we don't want them, and we don't get lunch allowances - we don't want them. "We want to look after ratepayers' money. "But this extra money will allow people to make a conscious decision of whether they want a full-time job alongside being a councillor or not." Retiring councillor Al Blackie said while councillors did not do it for the money, they did have a big workload. ''A little bit more money in the pot can only be a good thing in encouraging young people and particularly young women to stand.'' Councillor Tim Fulton said his only concern was the ''gaps'' in the childcare allowance, which will increase from $6000 a year to $7500 a year per child. He said it did not take into account the sacrifices a spouse of an elected member might have to make when arranging childcare. Waimakariri District Council governance manager Sarah Nichols said the childcare allowance could not be used to pay a partner or grandparents. ''It is generally used for an independent person or for childcare facilities. ''We have had a handful of members who have claimed it in the time we've had it, and it has never been for anywhere near the total amount allowed.'' The Hurunui District Council last week voted against offering a childcare allowance, despite the support or four councillors. There was no opposition expressed by the 10 councillors or Mayor Dan Gordon to the remuneration package presented, which also includes payrises for community board members. The Remuneration Authority recently completed a review how it determines local government remuneration and well recommended no changes. It considers population, economic growth and the geographic area of the district when setting the remuneration pool for the deputy mayor councillors' salaries. Pay rates across the country vary from about $20,000 at the lower end, to more than $300,000 for Auckland mayor. The payrises for the deputy mayor and remaining nine councillors will be finalised after the local government elections on October 11. LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Kmart denies sourcing any products from factories linked to forced labour in China
By Bronwyn Herbert and Lucy Kent , ABC Ramila Chanisheff is representing the Australian Uyghur Tangritagh Women's Association. Photo: ABC / Patrick Stone An Australian-based Uyghur group has filed legal action in the Federal Court against Kmart, alleging the retail giant is sourcing some of its products from factories linked to forced labour camps in western China. Kmart has denied the allegations. Ramila Chanisheff, representing the Australian Uyghur Tangritagh Women's Association (AUTWA), has sought documents from Kmart - requesting the retailer prove its public claims of operating a "sustainable" and "ethical" company, with products free from slavery or forced-labour. The court action is seeking preliminary disclosure of documents relating to Kmart's supply chains that could be linked to labour in the Uyghur homeland, now known as the Xinjiang. Ramila Chanisheff and Freya Dinshaw from the Human Rights Law Centre (right). Photo: ABC / Patrick Stone Australia, unlike the United States and some European nations, does not prohibit goods imported from China's Xinjiang region. The US has banned goods from that region since 2021, over credible evidence that many products are manufactured there using forced labour - particularly involving Uyghur Muslims and other minority groups. Jennifer Kanis, a solicitor from Maurice Blackburn representing AUTWA, said the legal case was designed to compel Kmart to, "prove their public position". Jennifer Kanis says they're testing whether Kmart was engaging in misleading or deceptive conduct under consumer law. Photo: ABC / Patrick Stone By cross-referencing Kmart's supplier list with "numerous credible reports" connecting companies in the Xinjiang region to forced labour, the plaintiffs say they will allege they found a match for at least two factory suppliers. The application alleges at least two garment suppliers are linked to the use of Uyghur forced labour in the Uyghur region. In a statement, Kmart said it was disappointed AUTWA took this course of action and had invited the association to meet with them "several times" to understand their concerns. "Kmart has been in correspondence with the applicant's lawyers for over 12 months and has provided extensive details of our Ethical Sourcing Program," the spokesperson said. "For over 15 years, we have had in place an Ethical Sourcing Program, which helps us to identify and mitigate modern slavery risks, including the risk of forced labour, in our operations and supply chains. "Suppliers in the Kmart Ethical Sourcing Program are regularly monitored through activities including our site visits, audit programs and investigations if we receive any reports or complaints of concern." The spokesperson also said it was the first Australian retailer to publicly disclose its factory list on its website for transparency. Human rights groups and the United Nations have previously accused China of committing crimes against humanity and possible genocide against the Uyghur population and other mostly-Muslim ethnic groups in the north-western region of Xinjiang. The Chinese government has repeatedly denied these claims. Freya Dinshaw from the Human Rights Law Centre, said alarm bells had been "ringing for a long time" regarding forced labour risks, especially in the Chinese garment industry, and pointed out that "85 percent of the cotton in China comes from the Xinjiang region". Australian retailers, she said, "have been on notice for some time" regarding these risks. The allegations against Kmart also sheds light on the potential shortcomings of Australia's current Modern Slavery Act. Professor Justine Nolan of the Australian Human Rights Institute said while Australia was considered a leader when it introduced the Act in 2018, the law primarily imposed a mandatory reporting obligation for large companies (those with over $100 million in annual consolidated revenue) to identify modern slavery risks, but not an obligation to act on those findings. And a quarter of Australian companies were not complying with their basic reporting requirements, because there is "no significant enforcement framework," according to a Federal Government review led by John McMillan in 2023. "A non-compliance rate of 25 percent just by false reporting or not reporting: that shows that the law that we currently have are not sufficient and that we really do need reforms," Professor Nolan said. She said other jurisdictions, such as the European Union and the United States, have moved further, adopting laws that mandated human rights due diligence and implementing forced labour import bans, which Australia lacks. A 2023 independent review of the Act confirmed deep inadequacies and found that "no meaningful change had been shown for people at the greatest risk of modern slavery". Last month the Australian government released a consultation paper aiming to strengthen the Modern Slavery Act, focusing on streamlining existing mandatory reporting criteria. "The reforms they are proposing are useful, not sufficient," Professor Nolan said. "We're still not tackling the root causes of the problem and we need to think about introducing an obligation to act, not just an obligation to report." Australia continues to import an estimated $27 billion worth of goods at risk of forced labour into the country every year with no laws that would prevent the importation of such goods, according to a 2023 report from human rights group Walk Free, an arm of Andrew Forrest's Minderoo Foundation. Chanisheff hopes Kmart can prove beyond reasonable doubt they were not linked to forced labour. Photo: ABC / Patrick Stone Ramila Chanisheff said if Kmart could prove beyond doubt that they were not linked to forced labour, the association would be satisfied. However, if links were found, AUTWA's call to action would be for Kmart to "divest" from those suppliers. "You can get your cotton from elsewhere," she said. Kanis, said a successful outcome would be greater transparency and accountability in relation to being able to make claims about ethical sourcing, ensuring these were not "empty claims". Chanisheff, who was born in East Turkestan/Xinjiang, but raised in Australia, still has family and friends in the province. She believes Australians do care about how their products and that "consumers can make a difference". Professor Nolan said without stronger laws, Australia risks becoming a "dumping ground" for goods made with forced labour if other countries implement effective import bans. She also noted a "willingness among Australian companies to go further" and align with global standards, but the current modern slavery law, introduced to federal parliament in 2018 is "not sufficient". Chanisheff, who was born in East Turkestan/Xinjiang, still has family and friends in the province. Photo: ABC / Patrick Stone "Seven years is a long time to wait for people who are working in modern slavery every day," she said. In a statement, the Attorney-General Michelle Rowland said the federal government "is committed to combating modern slavery" and "its immediate priority is implementing its response to the statutory review of the Act to strengthen its operation." Minister Rowland also said the public consultation process "will inform the development of balanced measures to support and incentivise Australian businesses to take actions to eliminate modern slavery risks and practices, and combat them in their supply chains" . - ABC
