logo
Montana Farmers Union seeks to join lawsuit against tariffs on Canada

Montana Farmers Union seeks to join lawsuit against tariffs on Canada

Yahoo24-04-2025
An aerial view from a drone shows a combine being used to harvest the soybeans. (Photo by Joe Raedle | Getty Images)
The Montana Farmers Union on Monday filed a motion to intervene in a lawsuit brought by four Blackfeet Nation tribal members seeking an injunction against the Trump administration's tariffs on Canada.
The organization, which has been around since 1912, said that joining the case was a way to continue fighting 'on behalf of family farmers and ranchers.'
'The executive branch has overstepped its constitutional and statutory authority on these tariffs. Montana farmers and ranchers can't afford any more uncertainty or any more financial stressors – especially not random tariffs,' MFU President Walter Schweitzer said in a press release.
Plaintiffs State Sen. Susan Webber and Jonathan St. Goddard, both enrolled members of the Blackfeet Nation, originally filed the lawsuit in federal court earlier this month against the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, the United States of America, and Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem, arguing that the tariffs levied by the administration against Canada violates Indigenous treaty rights and exceeds presidential authority.
The suit claims the tariffs violate a 1794 treaty exempting tribes along the United States-Canadian border from being taxed or levied on goods between the nation. It also challenges the Trump administration's ability to use emergency powers to bypass Congress to impose tariffs. Trump has declared that the fentanyl drug crisis at America's borders constitute a national emergency, though Customs and Border Patrol have only seized 19 kilograms of fentanyl coming from Canada compared to 9,600 kilograms coming from Mexico.
Monday's step to intervene was taking action for Montana family farmers and ranchers who 'are facing dire financial and mental impacts if the tariffs remain in effect,' according to the release.
'MFU's members rely on a predictable and stable trade market and the tariffs imposed by the President not only exceed the President's constitutional and statutory authority, they've 'wallop[ed]' the agricultural community in Montana, as no one can 'plan or prepare,'' the proposed complaint states.
'Because of the President's tariffs, their goods will be more expensive to export, which will result in reduced profits and lost customers. Even worse, farms and ranches that have been in families for generations must be sold simply because the President's isolationist and unlawful approach is incongruous with the international market with which these farmers and ranchers have been dealing and relying upon for decades. MFU's members do not have robust markets in the United States for the crops they grow and those markets cannot be developed overnight,' according to court filings.
According to the Office of United States Trade Representative, Montana's largest market is Canada, with $869 million in goods exported to the state's northern neighbor in 2024 — 37% of total exports.
The top agricultural exports to Canada in 2024 included $113 million in live cattle; $106 million in dried legumes, $25 million in brewing and distilling dregs, $10.2 million in barley, and $10.1 million in cigarettes, according to Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
The complaint from MFU mentions several members who have been impacted by the tariffs.
One member, John Wicks, a fourth generation farmer from Liberty County, said he was in contractual discussions with a cross-border trading partner for his organic lentils, but was told they could not enter into a contract due to the instability of the trade market before the tariffs were imposed. Specifically, 'if American tariffs were going to be implemented, the partner would not take the crops,' harming Wicks financially, according to court filings
'Our Canadian partners either won't buy our crops or are offering significantly lower prices than our partners in the United States. Our partners in the United States know that our Canadian partners are doing this and are capitalizing on it by offering lower prices, so we're getting squeezed,' Wicks wrote in a declaration of support for MFU's filing.
As of Wednesday afternoon, District Court Judge Dana Christensen had not issued a ruling on whether he would allow Montana Farmers Union to intervene. A hearing for the preliminary injunction will be held next Thursday at the Missouri River Federal Courthouse in Great Falls. Attorneys for the federal government have filed a motion to move the case to the Court of International Trade in New York, arguing the District Court doesn't have jurisdiction over tariffs, but attorneys for the plaintiffs responded that case can be rightfully heard at the District Court as the lawsuit is over the constitutionality of executive orders.
'Farmers and ranchers have invested decades in developing reliable markets for our products,' Schweitzer said in the press release. 'Overnight, these random tariffs have destroyed markets that will take decades to rebuild. This is why the authority to impose tariffs resides in Congress because it provides a forum for public debate and input and ensures the benefit outweighs the harm.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thailand and Cambodia dispute whether cease-fire is holding
Thailand and Cambodia dispute whether cease-fire is holding

Boston Globe

timea minute ago

  • Boston Globe

Thailand and Cambodia dispute whether cease-fire is holding

Along the border area, it was unclear if fighting was continuing but signs of calm returned in places. Some families displaced by the fighting began returning to their homes. A Thai military spokesperson said Thailand halted all military activities as agreed upon but that Cambodian troops continued strikes and the Thai army responded with defensive action. 'Such actions represent a deliberate violation of the ceasefire and a serious breach of trust,' Major Gen. Vithai Laithomya said in a statement. Advertisement The Cambodian Defense Ministry denied the Thai account. 'After the ceasefire became effective, there has been no armed conflict on all front lines. This is the firm determination of the Cambodian leadership to implement the ceasefire,' ministry spokesperson Maly Socheata said. Military commanders from both sides are scheduled Tuesday to hold their first meeting after the ceasefire as agreed under the pact, she said. The meeting between the two national leaders Monday was hosted by Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim as annual chair of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations and held under U.S. pressure. Anwar called the ceasefire a 'vital first step towards de-escalation and the restoration of peace and security.' Advertisement Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the U.S. applauded the ceasefire declaration. 'President (Donald) Trump and I are committed to an immediate cessation of violence and expect the governments of Cambodia and Thailand to fully honor their commitments to end this conflict,' Rubio said in a statement. The fighting began Thursday after a land mine explosion along the border wounded five Thai soldiers. Both sides blamed each other for starting the clashes, which have killed 35 people and displaced 260,000 people on both sides. Trump had warned that the U.S. might not proceed with trade deals with either country if hostilities continue, giving both sides a face-saving justification for halting the clashes. The 800-kilometer (500-mile) frontier between Thailand and Cambodia has been disputed for decades, but past confrontations have been limited and brief. The latest tensions erupted in May when a Cambodian soldier was killed in a confrontation that created a diplomatic rift and roiled Thailand's domestic politics. Sopheng Cheang reported from Samrong, Cambodia.

DOJ files misconduct complaint against federal judge
DOJ files misconduct complaint against federal judge

Axios

timea minute ago

  • Axios

DOJ files misconduct complaint against federal judge

The Department of Justice filed a misconduct complaint against federal Judge James Boasberg"for making improper public comments about President Trump and his Administration," Attorney General Pam Bondi announced Monday. The big picture: The D.C.-based U.S. District Court chief judge has previously angered the Trump administration with his rulings on deportations. Boasberg has been the target of an impeachment effort by Trump and House Republicans after the George W. Bush-appointed judge questioned the administration's decision to disregard an order against the deportation of hundreds of Venezuelans. Driving the news: Bondi said on X that she had directed the DOJ to take the action because the judge's comments "have undermined the integrity of the judiciary, and we will not stand for that." Representatives for the DOJ did not immediately respond to Axios' request for comment on what the complaint specifically refers to and Boasberg's chambers did not immediately respond to Axios' Monday night phone message seeking comment on the matter. Catch up quick: Boasberg raised the ire of the administration in March when he ordered that flights deporting alleged Venezuelan gang members should turn around. The White House said it ignored the judge's order because it was issued after the flights had already departed and left U.S. jurisdiction. The Trump administration defended its decision to follow through with the deportations under the Alien Enemies Act, an 18th century war time law. The president said Boasberg "should be IMPEACHED" over the matter — prompting Chief Justice John Roberts to issue a rare statement saying that impeaching a federal judge is "not an appropriate response" to disagreeing with a ruling. Meanwhile, Boasberg said in April that he found probable cause to hold the administration in contempt for defying his order.

Justice Department files misconduct complaint against judge in key deportations case
Justice Department files misconduct complaint against judge in key deportations case

NBC News

time2 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Justice Department files misconduct complaint against judge in key deportations case

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department filed a complaint Monday alleging misconduct by a federal judge overseeing several cases involving the Trump administration, including a challenge to the legality of deportation flights to El Salvador in March. The complaint against U.S. District Chief Judge James Boasberg, filed by Attorney General Pam Bondi's chief of staff Chad Mizelle, alleges that Boasberg made improper comments during a judicial conference in March. 'While there,' Mizelle wrote, 'Judge Boasberg attempted to improperly influence Chief Justice Roberts and roughly two dozen other federal judges by straying from the traditional topics to express his belief that the Trump Administration would 'disregard rulings of federal courts' and trigger 'a constitutional crisis.'" NBC News has not verified the remarks, which Mizelle said took place on March 11. The conference was not open to the public. 'Although his comments would be inappropriate even if they had some basis, they were even worse because Judge Boasberg had no basis,' Mizelle added in his five-page letter to D.C. Circuit of Court of Appeals Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan. Mizelle went on to say in the complaint that the Trump administration has complied with 'all' court orders, and that Boasberg didn't identify any violations of court orders to justify what Mizelle called 'his unprecedented predictions.' Boasberg did not immediately respond to a request for comment Monday night. 'Today at my direction, @TheJusticeDept filed a misconduct complaint against U.S. District Court Chief Judge James Boasberg for making improper public comments about President Trump and his Administration,' Bondi wrote in a post on X. 'These comments have undermined the integrity of the judiciary, and we will not stand for that,' she added. Boasberg is assigned to several notable cases involving the Trump administration, none more high-profile than the Alien Enemies Act case, filed in mid-March when three deportation flights took off from the U.S. en route to El Salvador. During an emergency hearing at the time, Boasberg ordered that any planes that were midair and bound for El Salvador return to the United States after Trump's executive order invoking the Alien Enemies Act for deportations was made public. The judge later found cause to initiate contempt proceedings to determine whether the Trump administration was in willful violation of court orders. The process, however, has been temporarily paused by an appeals court. 'Having assumed President Trump would defy court orders, Judge Boasberg issued a [temporary restraining order] and threatened sanctions—all on a false premise," the complaint says, noting that the judge spoke at the conference days before ruling from the bench in the deportations case. "Such conduct violates litigants' trust in an impartial judiciary and falls below the standards that safeguard the integrity of the judiciary and public confidence in that integrity.' Mizelle asked Srinivasan to refer the matter to a special investigative committee to determine whether Boasberg's conduct constituted 'conduct prejudicial to the effective and expeditious administration of the business of the courts.' He also asked for Boasberg's Alien Enemies Act case to be reassigned to another judge while the investigation proceeds, and to impose disciplinary action, including a public reprimand and referral to the Judicial Conference for consideration of impeachment‑related recommendations, if the committee finds willful misconduct.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store