
State-funded funerals on the increase across England
Funerals paid for out of the public purse used to be known as "paupers" funerals, but are now called "welfare" or "public health funerals" (PHF). They happen when people die in poverty, alone or without relatives who can afford to cremate or bury them.Responsibility usually falls on local authorities, with a recent snapshot survey by the Local Government Association revealing councils arrange an average of 12 funerals a day at an annual cost of about £6m. In collaboration with the BBC, CPC academics at the University of Southampton discovered about a quarter of all public health funerals are carried out by NHS hospitals, at an additional estimated annual cost of £1.36m.
Researchers analysed data from hundreds of Freedom of Information requests carried out by BBC South and discovered the number of state-funded funerals rose from 4,760 in 2014-15 to 7,020 in 2020-21.The size and demographics of the population in different parts of the country was also taken into account. While establishing an estimated rate of PHF per 1,000 deaths over the seven-year period, Prof Jane Falkingham said London emerged as a "real hotspot"."The biggest surprise for me was the rate in the Borough of Camden where nearly one in 10 of all funerals were actually 'public health' funerals."In some of our coastal communities too where we know we have high levels of deprivation, such as Blackpool and Hastings, it's around one in every 20 funerals."
The team also identified hotspots in areas with higher population density, greater homelessness and more overcrowding.Overall, a lack of funds was found to be a bigger driver of need for state-funded funerals, rather than loneliness or a lack of family.Camden Council said it was "proud" to offer a public health funerals service.A spokesperson, who said rates had been "stable" since the pandemic, added: "We remain bold in our action to create a fairer borough and help ensure no one is left behind."
Councillor Anna Railton, from Oxford City Council, said organising funerals can be "really complicated" and "time-consuming" and every effort is made to reclaim costs from estates.She said council staff have to work like detectives. "It involves going into the deceased person's home, trying to find a will and other important documents, and trying to track down next of kin, which can take months," she said."So you will be sat in a mortuary while this process takes place and the funeral you'll end up with is very basic."This is because while hospitals and councils strive to uphold the dignity of the deceased, they must also keep costs down to safeguard taxpayers' money.
"By default, it'll be a cremation," said Anna, "unless there are religious reasons or the council finds a will that says otherwise and if it's a burial there'll be no marker, just a bare patch of grass."My advice to people is to put thought into your wishes and put money aside because I think most people wouldn't choose to go through this process."
Some NHS Trusts have stopped carrying out public health funerals for people who die in hospital, transferring the responsibility to local councils instead.This has happened in east Dorset.Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council said taking over the local NHS trust's provision has cost about £21,000 extra a year.In 2024, BCP Council's funeral bill totalled £46,000.In Portsmouth, council papers revealed the "continued high demand in recent years" and the complex process of trying to claim money back from the estates of the deceased was "unsustainable".
Greatest need among men
The CPC's analysis backs up previous research which suggested the vast majority of people cremated or buried by the state are men. The data shows the rate at which men die in poverty or without family who can afford funeral fees is about three times higher than the one for women.Prof Falkingham believes one of the reasons for this was the difference in social networks between men and women, and cited other CPC research which suggests men are much more likely than women to enter into later life without a partner. She said: "There has been an increase in the number of unpartnered men, particularly in mid-life, who either have never had a partner or who are not currently partnered having experienced marital breakdown."These men are much more likely to lose touch with their children and become isolated."
The CPC research also highlights a need for data to be collated and coordinated nationally so future demand could be projected, especially in the light of increasing levels of deprivation and kinlessness.Responding to the research, the Local Government Association (LGA) called the rising number of public health funerals a "concern" and said it is essential "the most vulnerable in our society are treated with dignity".Councillor Heather Kidd, chair of the LGA's Safer and Stronger Communities Board, said: "Councils need long-term certainty and sustainable funding to ensure that public health funerals, along with other essential services, can continue to be delivered to the high standard required."
If you have been affected by the issues raised in this story you can visit the BBC Action Line for support.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
21 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Why doctors are striking … again
When Labour came into power they agreed to give resident doctors, formerly known as junior doctors, a 22% rise over two years to end their strikes. They then turned their attention to updating the NHS, unveiling an ambitious 10-year plan to change the way the system is run. But now doctors have gone back to the ballot box. The Guardian's health policy editor, Denis Campbell, tells Helen Pidd that the British Medical Association (BMA), the doctors' union, says the value of their salaries has dropped 29% since 2008 thanks to inflation and serial low pay rises. They want this restored. But with public finances more stretched than ever, Wes Streeting is unlikely to accede. Denis explains why the BMA is saying this pay rise is 'non-negotiable', and also why it looks as if the resident doctors are losing public support. And even the support of their senior colleagues. What could this clash mean for Labour, trust in doctors – and patients?


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
I tried a 'holy grail' beauty item loved by Margot Robbie, Kim Kardashian and Victoria Beckham... so does it live up to the hype?
Daily Mail journalists select and curate the products that feature on our site. If you make a purchase via links on this page we will earn commission - learn more Eye creams have never really been on my beauty radar until recently. Any dark circles and puffiness under my eyes have never been so dire that I've felt the need to address them. But life in the toddler trenches, with a pint-sized pre-dawn alarm clock, has changed my tune. The caffeine intake is peaking and the sleep bank is in deficit, and naturally it's showing up right where I'd prefer it didn't: on my face. Recent scrolls through my camera roll have increasingly revealed that my crows feet are less cute laughter lines and more deep crevices, while the shadows underneath are just as scary some mornings. So when the opportunity came to trial Augustinus Bader's The Rich Eye Cream, it was a no-brainer. Slathering my (well, a small portion of my) tired skin with the same elixir apparently responsible for Victoria Beckham, Margot Robbie and Gigi Hadid's eternally youthful visage? Yes, please, right now. For the uninitiated, Augustinus Bader is the brand beloved by celebrities and twice crowned 'The Greatest Skincare of All Time' by Women's Wear Daily, along with more than 185 other industry awards. It was founded in 2018 by renowned stem-cell scientist and physician Professor Augustinus Bader, one of the world's foremost experts in stem cell biology and regenerative medicine. Inspired by his three decades of cutting edge research on skin healing and tissue repair, Professor Bader developed the proprietary TFC8® Trigger Factor Complex that powers all of the products in his eponymous skincare line. The patented technology is formulated with natural amino acids, high-grade vitamins and peptides naturally found in skin, to nourish and protect while supporting the skin's innate potential for renewal. After: Two weeks into using The Rich Eye Cream morning and night, dark circles are reduced, the skin is plumper and fine lines towards the inner corner of the eye appear reduced The original moisturisers, The Cream and The Rich Cream, hold almost mythical status as the absolute premium in luxury skincare, highly efficacious and backed by science. The cult 'blue bottles' are revered by industry insiders and beauty experts, and subsequent products added to the range, including The Face Oil and The Eye Cream, have been just as well received. Kim Kardashian has called the it her 'Holy Grail', while Hayley Bieber filmed herself applying The Cream in a GRWM (get ready with me) video on social media. Other A-listers who've raved about the brand include Alexa Chung, Naomi Campbell, Amal Clooney, Demi Moore and Jennifer Aniston. So does The Rich Eye Cream, which launched in February, live up to the sky-high expectations the preceding products have set? And does it justify its frankly eye-popping price tag? As the name suggests, the pint-sized product is a more decadently rich and dense version of The Eye Cream. And if it does everything it says on the box, it's a miracle in a 15ml jar. Promises include firming the delicate under-eye skin, reducing fine lines and wrinkles, intensely hydrating and illuminating, and visibly shrinking under-eye bags and dark circles. These proclamations are backed by impressive clinical trial results: In a 12 week study, participants experienced a 70 per cent reduction in puffiness, a 45 per cent improvement in fine lines, and a 68 per cent drop in dark circles, while hydration tripled. And in a consumer perception study of 110 users over the age of 35, a staggering 97 per cent agreed skin looks and feels firmer around the eyes, 95 per cent agreed skin elasticity feels restored, and 93 per cent agreed the appearance of crow's feet is reduced. Further, 96 per cent agreed under-eye bags appear reduced, and 98 per cent agreed eyes look replenished and rejuvenated. Those are some seriously promising stats, and I have visions of restoring my eyes to pre-parenthood youthfulness. After just two weeks, I've only just dipped my toe in, but early impressions? So far, so glowy. Powered by the aforementioned TFC8 along with powerhouse ingredients like niacinamide, vitamins B5 and C, The Rich Eye Cream intensely hydrates and adds visible radiance. The cream is thick and a little goes a long way. You can apply with your finger tip, or with the included applicator which, with its hefty weight despite its diminutive size, feels incredibly luxe. The metal wand de-puffs and boosts circulation as it massages the eye cream into the under-eye area, and its cool touch adds 30 seconds of facial-like luxury to my rushed morning skincare routine - we take what we can get. Immediate effects are an instant dewy radiance around my eyes as the dense cream melts into my skin. After two weeks of using The Rich Eye Cream morning and night, there's a noticeable improvement in the texture and appearance of the skin around my eyes. I look refreshed, as though I'm getting a good eight hours. The delicate and thin skin in this area appears firmer and plumper, and upon inspection of the before and after photos, the fine lines towards the inner corner of my eyes are far less noticeable. Augustinus Bader is the brand beloved by celebrities and twice crowned 'The Greatest Skincare of All Time' by Women's Wear Daily's Beauty Inc, along with more than 185 other industry awards The Rich Eye Cream is powered by the brand's patented TFC8 technology along with powerhouse ingredients like niacinamide, vitamins B5 and C Make up glides on with ease after applying the cream in the morning, and the radiant glow remains visible beneath tinted SPF and foundation, so my highlighter and concealer have remained unused in my bathroom cabinet for a fortnight. Is it worth the price? Obviously, many will deem splashing hundreds on an eye cream ludicrous. This is a luxury, even with the 20 per cent discount for those willing to commit to auto-replenish their stash at least three times. If you have the cash to spend, and prioritise buying high-quality, high-efficacy skincare, then this is certainly a worthy product to invest in. Augustinus Bader is a premium skincare brand and it lives up to all the hype. I'll be scraping every morsel out of this little jar of radiance and pondering the fiscal responsibility of opening a dedicated skincare savings account to work towards my next top-up.


Times
an hour ago
- Times
From the archive: Found — the virus that causes cancer
From The Times: July 17, 1925 It can now be stated that the discovery of the virus believed to be the cause of cancer, which was made by Dr Gye and Mr Barnard FRS, has been investigated and confirmed by Dr Murray, of the Imperial Cancer Research Fund, to whom the matter was referred by the Medical Research Council. This fact is, of course, of first-rate importance, since it testifies to the validity of the results obtained. It was, of course, inevitable that attempts would be made to immunize animals against the new germ. Considerable progress has been achieved already in this direction. This work must on no account be confused with 'cure', to which it bears no relationship. The possibility of a successful vaccination against cancer has, however, now appeared on the scientific horizon. The Lancet this week publishes the complete paper of Dr Gye and Mr Barnard. It is important to notice that the new work effects a reconciliation between two schools of opinion which, only a week ago, seemed to be irreconcilable: the view that cancer is due to a parasite or germ and the view that it is due to some change in the body, as a consequence of which certain cells turn traitor or rebel, and, defying the law of the body, seek their own exclusive welfare. This last view held the field and had the support of the most distinguished authorities. They pointed to a long chain of discoveries and observations, all of which seemed to support their conclusion. Thus cancer could be caused by employing tars and paraffins as 'irritants'; it could be caused by parasitic worms; and it could be caused by X-rays and radium. Further, it assuredly was caused by chronic irritation from, for example, a sharp tooth, a gall stone, a betel nut held in the cheek, a 'fire basket' carried round the waist, and so forth and so on. • The Times view: It is time to be optimistic about cancer It appeared that a disease capable of being produced by factors so widely different and so diverse could not possess any one 'cause'. Gye has solved the riddle by showing that both views of cancer — the germ theory and the growth theory — are right. Cancer is caused by a germ; but the germ cannot grow of itself. It requires a 'third partner', a 'growth-producing substance', to prepare the ground for its activity. Explore 200 years of history as it appeared in the pages of The Times, from 1785 to 1985: