Trump administration to cut all USAID overseas roles and axe thousands of staff
In a Tuesday state department cable obtained by the Guardian, secretary of state Marco Rubio ordered the abolishment of the agency's entire international workforce, transferring control of foreign assistance programs directly to the state department.
The directive affects thousands of USAID staff globally, including foreign service officers, contractors and locally employed personnel across more than 100 countries. Chiefs of mission at US embassies have been told to prepare for the sweeping changes to occur within four months.
'The Department of State is streamlining procedures under National Security Decision Directive 38 to abolish all USAID overseas positions,' the cable reads, adding that the department 'will assume responsibility for foreign assistance programming previously undertaken by USAID' from 15 June.
The state department did not respond to a request for comment.
Among those who cleared the cable was Howard Van Vranken, a former ambassador to Botswana.
The decision to close the agency comes after the Trump administration – under the so-called 'department of government efficiency' (Doge) – eliminated 83% of USAID's programs in a six-week purge after Donald Trump took office.
Rubio announced in March that 5,200 of the agency's 6,200 programs worldwide had been terminated, with the surviving initiatives being absorbed into the state department.
The closures followed an executive order from Trump on his first day back in the White House on 20 January freezing foreign assistance pending a review.
While a waiver was subsequently announced for humanitarian assistance, questions were raised about USAID's future after its website disappeared on 1 February. Two days later, staff received an email telling them not to come to work following a weekend during which its servers were removed and leadership and senior staff fired or put on disciplinary leave.
Rubio declared himself that agency's acting administrator after staff were locked out of its Washington headquarters.
Amid the cuts, Elon Musk, the billionaire tech entrepreneur and then de facto leader of Doge, gleefully boasted of feeding USAID 'into the woodchopper', while disseminating false claims about its programs – including one assertion that they included a $50m project to provide condoms in Gaza, a claim that was subsequently proved to be untrue.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump and the GOP working on an ‘agenda 2027' to tell voters what to expect if they retain Congressional control
President Donald Trump and his White House are influencing GOP congressional candidates and advising who to run and who to stand down as Republicans try to keep control of both chambers of Congress in midterm elections next year. The White House is strategizing to make sure Republicans win enough seats and is putting together 'a 2027 policy agenda' so Trump, who plans to join candidates on the campaign trail, can explain what continued GOP control of the House, Senate and the White House could look like, a White House official told Politico. This strategy includes telling which Republican candidates to run for office and which to 'stay put,' the official said. For example, Iowa Republican Rep. Zach Nunn was weighing a gubernatorial run when the president told him to 'stay put,' the outlet reported. Nunn this month announced he was running for re-election. 'After prayerful consideration with his family and the strong support from President Trump, Zach is more committed than ever to maintaining the Republican majority and advancing the America First Agenda,' the congressman's campaign spokesperson said. The president has also publicly endorsed Nunn. The president also advised Michigan GOP Rep. Bill Huizenga to avoid running for Senate. Trump instead publicly backed Senator Mike Rogers this week, saying he 'has my Complete and Total Endorsement — HE WILL NOT LET YOU DOWN!' Earlier this month, Trump met with Iowa Senator Joni Ernst to encourage her to run for re-election, Politico previously reported. Questions about Ernst's political future swirled after her viral remark about proposed Medicaid cuts: 'We all are going to die.' 'President Trump is the unequivocal leader of the Republican Party — just look at those who have bet against him in the past because they are no longer around,' White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told Politico. 'The President will help his Republican friends on Capitol Hill get reelected, and work to pick up new seats across the country.' Democrats are likely hoping for a repeat of the 2018 midterms, when they destroyed Republicans' trifecta by taking control of the House during Trump's first term. 'I'm sure there's some memories from 2018, but it's all about these last two years of his presidency and his legacy, and he doesn't want the Democrats nipping at his heels all the time for the last two years,' Tony Fabrizio, the pollster for Trump's 2016 and 2024 campaigns, told Politico. Trump has acknowledged the power he has to influence voters. He recently suggested holding rallies for candidates, two White House officials told the outlet. The president reportedly told one of the officials last week: 'We're going to have to campaign in the states and really get out there a lot, huh? Because really, it's just me that can pull them out in a lot of places.' Republican strategists have said they plan to use the threat of Trump's third impeachment, should Democrats take the House, to compel voters. 'We know what the stakes are in the midterm elections,' John McLaughlin, a Trump pollster, told NBC News this week. 'If we don't succeed, Democrats will begin persecuting President Trump again. They would go for impeachment.' The White House also plans to use its 2024 campaign strategy as a guide, targeting young and working-class voters that came out to support Trump in droves. 'One of the main strategies is to put Trump on the ballot in the midterms,' one of the White House officials told Politico. 'We'll have a midterm agenda that we're running on. Not only here's what we've done, but here's what we're going to do next.' Democrats are eating up that idea. Democratic National Committee spokesperson Rosemary Boeglin told the outlet: 'The White House has the DNC's full support in their plans to put Trump on the campaign trail with frontline Republicans to tell the American people that they took money out of their pockets, took food off their table, and took away their health care in order to give massive handouts to billionaires.'
Daily Mail
29 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Trump complains that 'nobody' gives US credit but US will provide 'more' food aid for starving Gaza
President Donald promised additional U.S. food aid to combat starvation in Gaza Sunday, while complaining the nation doesn't get credit and vowing to press other nations to do more. He faced repeated questions about the ominous situation there while meeting with EU Commission President Ursuala von der Leyen at his Turnberry golf course in Scotland. Trump complained about 'one-sided' trade and view-obstructing wind turbines – but also said the U.S. might do more amid reports of starvation in suffering in the war-ravaged territory amid Israel 's bombardment. 'People don't know this – and we didn't certainly get any acknowledgement or thank you, but we contributed $60 million to food and supplies and everything else,' said Trump. 'We hope the money gets there, because you know, that money gets taken. The food gets taken. We're going to do more, but we gave a lot of money.' 'Nobody acknowledged it. Nobody talks about it,' Trump complained. 'And it makes you feel a little bad when you do that. And you know, you have other countries not giving anything.' 'The US is going to do more aid for Gaza but we'd like to have other countries participate,' Trump said. 'It would be nice to have at least a thank you' – Trump said, raising a demand for appreciation that also featured in Trump's blowup with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in the Oval Office. Trump spoke after Israel announced it would provide 10-hour 'tactical' pauses to allow food aid deliveries amid the humanitarian crisis and the breakdown in talks for a ceasefire that would free remaining hostages that Hamas took after the October 7 attack on Israel. It has made other allowances for aid since beginning its attacks following the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas attack inside Isreal. But the blockade and difficulty for people to move and access food and medecine has led to reports of widespread hunger. 'If we weren't there, I think people would have starved, frankly – they would have starved. And it's not like they're eating well, but a lot of that food is getting stolen by stolen by Hamas. You know, they're stealing the food. They're stealing a lot of things. You ship it in, and they steal it, then they sell it,' Trump said. He held out the prospect of more U.S. releif. In his push to have others join, Trump said, 'We're going to mention that to the European Union today. Yeah, that's an international problem. It's not a US problem. It's an international problem.' The EU announced an aid package worth €120 million for Gaza in January. British PM Keir Starmer, who meets Trump Monday, said he is working on air drops for Gaza. He is also expected to press Trump to renew ceasefire talks. Tho two sat down in a ballroom at Turnberry after the president played a round of golf with his son, Eric. It was his second day of golfing, on a trip where he is set to attend the opening of a new golf course in Aberdeenshire.
The Guardian
29 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Global moral consensus is just wishful thinking
In his opinion piece (From Gaza to Ukraine, peace always seems just out of reach – and the reason isn't only political, 20 July), Simon Tisdall says 'ending major conflicts, and easing the suffering of millions, is a moral imperative that demands a determined collective response from all concerned. That way lies peace. That way lies salvation'. If that is really the case then all hope is lost. There already is a 'determined collective response' from all concerned, which is a pledge to fight to the bitter end, whatever the cost to their victims in lives or suffering. For Vladimir Putin and Benjamin Netanyahu, freedom from moral constraints, incorporating manifestly immoral behaviour and open contempt for international law, is an existential necessity. To expect either of them to abandon the territorial ambitions on which they have staked their political futures lies somewhere between naivety and sheer wishful thinking. Given that, all talk of 'moral imperatives', without enforceable international law when their noble aspirations are breached, is no more than impotent bleating from the sidelines. The treaty to establish the international criminal court in 1998 failed to sign up China, India or the Gulf states. Indeed the map of those countries that have ratified the ICC looks suspiciously like the former Commonwealth, with the addition of South America. More significant are those countries who signed up to the treaty, but which have refused to ratify it, for various stated reasons, but ineluctably because their current politicians need immunity from its rulings – the former superpowers US and Russia, and Israel. None of their leaders could survive in office if they were made internationally accountable to enforceable laws with a clear moral basis. Sadly but paradoxically, the only people with the political and military clout to bring the war criminals to justice in the name of morality turn out to be the ones perpetuating the war crimes. Alex WatsonStroud, Gloucestershire Simon Tisdall rightly argues that peace remains elusive not just due to geopolitics, but a collapse in global moral consensus. Yet we must ask: has that consensus ever truly been global – or has it been curated through western lenses? Britain recently announced an inquiry into violent policing at Orgreave in 1984 and the subsequent collapsed prosecution of 95 miners, but still refuses to apologise for Jallianwala Bagh, where hundreds of unarmed Indians were massacred under imperial command in 1919. Where is the moral clarity? Tisdall speaks of the 'rules-based international order'. But when Donald Trump bombed Iranian nuclear sites – installations once fostered by Eisenhower's Atoms for Peace programme – where were the rules? Would the same be done to Pakistan or China? The west routinely turns a blind eye when its allies commit horrors. Yes, Russians ignore Ukraine. But did the UK not join the US in Iraq, a war based on phantom weapons of mass destruction? Have we ever truly atoned for the destruction of Falluja, or the millions displaced in Afghanistan? I agree that peace demands moral revitalisation. But that renewal must begin at home: in Washington, London, Paris. A world that arms first and negotiates never cannot preach morality. Diplomacy has been replaced by drone strikes, and summits by air raids. The UN has become a mute witness, bypassed by the very powers that once built it. Until we stop dividing the world into 'worthy victims' and 'collateral damage', there will be no peace. There is no lesser life. And there is no moral order unless it applies to all. Let truth precede justice. And only then will peace KalyanasundaramChennai, India Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
