
Retail investors dump 68% of Nifty stocks chasing smallcap crorepati dreams. Is this a trap?
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
What's the psychology behind the sell-off?
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
The smallcap gamble
The experts highlight a minefield of specific, often overlooked, dangers:
Crippling Volatility and Liquidity Traps: "Smallcaps are inherently more volatile than largecaps, with lower liquidity and higher sensitivity to market or economic shocks," explains Karthick Jonagadla. This means portfolios can "magnify portfolio swings and potential losses." Sheth adds a critical point about exit strategy: "Smallcaps can be hard to exit in downturns. If there's a market correction or panic, these stocks fall harder and faster—and may not recover as easily."
Questionable Quality and Governance: The mad dash for returns often means due diligence is ignored. "Many small and midcap companies may lack the transparency, consistent performance, and robust governance standards that bluechip stocks maintain," Jonagadla warns. "Retail investors chasing rallies often ignore these critical qualitative factors."
The Peril of Herding and Stretched Valuations: When everyone rushes into the same few stocks, it creates a bubble. "As more retail investors crowd into the same set of smallcaps, these stocks can become highly overvalued, exacerbating the risk of a sharp correction when sentiment reverses," says Jonagadla. Sheth confirms that many of these stocks are now trading at "stretched valuations, without matching earnings support," exposing investors to severe valuation compression risk.
In a high-stakes gamble for explosive returns, a vast army of retail investors has systematically shedded its holdings in India's most formidable bluechip companies. Driven by a potent cocktail of impatience, profit-booking, and the intoxicating allure of finding the next multibagger , they are abandoning the perceived safety of Nifty50 stock to chase the "crorepati" dream in the volatile, high-octane world of small and mid-cap stocks.The numbers from the June 2025 quarter show that retail investors have pared stakes in 34 of 50 companies constituting the Nifty index, which means 3 out of every 4th bluechip stock saw small investors taking a bearish stance.The move is made all the more dramatic by the fact that many of these discarded giants have been stellar performers. Investors have been selling shares in companies like Bajaj Finance, which has rocketed 28.5% year-to-date, and defence stalwart BEL, up an impressive 29%. This paradox suggests a conscious, aggressive strategy: cash in the steady gains from the giants and redeploy the winnings onto the riskier, but potentially more rewarding, terrain of the broader market.What is driving millions of investors to collectively turn their backs on stability? Market experts point to a confluence of powerful behavioral triggers.Apurva Sheth , Head of Market Perspectives & Research at SAMCO Securities , identifies a core sentiment of frustration. "Looking at the investment behaviour of the retail investors in the recent past, it seems that they are fed up with the ongoing consolidation in the largecap stocks," he observes, adding that this phase of sideways movement has been "unduly prolonged." For investors seeing small-caps deliver triple-digit returns elsewhere, the steady, single-digit churn of a largecap leader can feel like stagnation.This impatience is fertile ground for the fear of missing out, or FOMO. Karthick Jonagadla , Founder of Quantace Research, says retail investors may be exiting bluechip Nifty stocks in favor of smallcap and midcap names, hoping to capture outsized gains in those segments.'The outperformance of these lesser-valued segments in previous cycles can generate a fear of missing out (FOMO), often leading retail participation to surge in already rallying stocks,' he explains.Sheth concurs, noting, "Retail tends to follow trends, and the recent outperformance of broader markets may have created a FOMO effect. Stocks that already ran up are being assumed to continue that momentum."For many, the decision is also tactical. Anand K Rathi, Co-Founder of MIRA Money, sees this as a "classic case of profit booking." He elaborates that it's a "common behavioral pattern where investors—retail or HNIs—tend to exit well-performing bluechip stocks to preserve gains and rotate capital into areas they believe have higher near-term upside or appear undervalued."However, Rathi issues a stern warning against this seemingly savvy move. "Investors frequently lose out on long-term wealth building while using this strategy," he cautions. "They enter risky equities without considering fundamentals and sell winners too soon, only to see their earlier holdings grow even more. Such reactionary investing, motivated more by short-term stories than by long-term convictions, may backfire."The exodus of retail investors has created a fascinating divergence when contrasted with the behavior of institutional "smart money." While retail sold, mutual funds increased their holdings in 33 Nifty companies, and foreign institutional investors (FIIs) were net buyers in 21.The schism is starkly visible at the individual stock level. In IndusInd Bank, retail investors shed a significant 1.10% of their holdings. In the same period, FIIs saw a buying opportunity, aggressively increasing their stake by a massive 4.16%. A similar story played out in BEL, where a 0.72% retail exit was met with a 1.01% FII entry.This institutional conviction suggests a fundamentally different thesis. While retail chases short-term momentum, institutions appear to be capitalizing on the availability of high-quality assets, perhaps seeing long-term value where retail sees limited near-term upside. Jonagadla notes that some retail investors may be selling because they believe "further upside is now limited" in Nifty stocks that have already run up.However, Apurva Sheth offers another layer of nuance. The decline in direct share ownership might not be a complete abandonment of blue-chips. "Some of the reduced direct ownership in largecaps may also be explained by a shift to SIPs and mutual fund investing," he suggests. "Retail may prefer managed portfolios, especially in volatile markets, leading to declining individual holdings even in top-quality names."While the chase for multibaggers is exhilarating, market veterans are nearly unanimous in their warnings about the dangers of this strategy. They describe it as "classic late-cycle optimism" and a gamble that exchanges stability for fragility."This is a serious risk during bullish times," states Anand K Rathi. "It may seem profitable to sell largecaps with solid fundamentals and reallocate a significant portion to smallcaps but doing so exposes investors to high volatility and concentration risk."Apurva Sheth echoes this sentiment, emphasizing the danger for the average investor. "It's a significant risk, especially for inexperienced or emotionally driven investors," he says. "By exiting diversified bluechips (like RIL, HDFC Bank), retail is exchanging stability for fragility."Perhaps the most significant risk is the abandonment of a proven wealth-creation strategy. "Historical returns demonstrate that a core allocation to quality bluechip stocks underpins long-term wealth creation," reminds Jonagadla. "Sudden portfolio shifts based on short-term momentum can compromise overall diversification, making portfolios riskier than what retail investors may realize."Anand K Rathi stresses that this behavior can be self-destructive. "From the perspective of portfolio construction, these tactics have the potential to sabotage long-term objectives," he says. The very act of selling a steady compounder to buy a speculative asset can be the costliest mistake an investor makes.As Anand K Rathi aptly concludes, investors should build their portfolios with a clear principle in mind: "Balance, not blind rotation is the key.": Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
12 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Right to choose trading partners': Russia calls Trump's trade ‘threats' to India ‘not legal'
The Kremlin on Tuesday hit out at US President Donald Trump's recent remarks targeting India over its continued trade ties with Russia, calling such pressure tactics 'not legal'. Responding to Trump's announcement of a 25 per cent tariff on Indian imports, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said, 'We hear many statements that are in fact threats, attempts to force countries to cut trade relations with Russia. We do not consider such statements to be legal.' In a sharp rebuke of Trump's stance, Peskov added, 'We believe that sovereign countries should have and do have the right to choose their own trading partners, partners for trade and economic cooperation, and to choose for themselves the forms of trade and economic cooperation that are in the interests of a particular country.' The comments came days after Trump, in a July 31 post on Truth Social, vowed to impose steep tariffs on India for what he described as 'obnoxious' trade barriers. His threat included an unspecified 'penalty' for buying Russian crude. New Delhi has called Trump's threats 'unjustified' and vowed to protect its economic interests, deepening a trade rift between the two major economies.

Time of India
12 minutes ago
- Time of India
US Tech Jobs Under Fire? Marjorie Greene Demand Ban On Indian Work Visas Amid Tariff Tensions
Far-right US congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene has called on Donald Trump to halt the H1B visa programme for Indian nationals, claiming they are replacing American workers. Her remarks followed Trump's social media post threatening steep tariffs on Indian goods due to India's oil trade with Russia. Greene doubled down, urging an end to US funding for Ukraine and blaming former Democratic presidents for the ongoing war. The H1B visa debate has resurfaced, with powerful voices in Trump's circle offering conflicting views.#MarjorieTaylorGreene #TrumpIndiaTensions #H1BVisaBan #IndiaUSTrade #UkraineWarFunding #FarRightPolitics #TechJobsCrisis #USImmigrationDebate #ElonMuskH1B #TrumpVsIndia Read More

Economic Times
12 minutes ago
- Economic Times
SIP or stop? What smart investors should do in 2025's market volatility
With global uncertainty rising and market volatility back in focus, many investors are asking, "Should I continue my SIPs or pause them?" In this exclusive conversation, ET Markets speaks to Chirag Muni, Executive Director at Anand Rathi Wealth, to decode the current scenario and outline the right mutual fund strategy for today's market. ADVERTISEMENT Excerpts: Q. Let's begin with Trump's move. The U.S. has imposed a 25% tariff on Indian imports. Do you see this as an alarm or an opportunity for SIP investors? Chirag Muni: While the 25% tariff sounds severe, markets haven't reacted sharply, partly because there's still a lack of clarity. The market did open lower but recovered quickly, possibly also due to the monthly expiry. In the long term, India's macroeconomic fundamentals remain strong. Our export dependency on the U.S. isn't significant enough to cause a massive dent. Preliminary estimates suggest that the GDP impact may be around 0.2%–0.3% if the full tariffs are there are talks of penalties related to India's continued imports of Russian oil, but these are still unconfirmed. Overall, from a 3–5 year perspective, India's outlook remains positive. So, market dips should be seen as an opportunity rather than a reason to panic. It's a good time to accumulate on dips.Q. Some investors are panicking and considering redeeming mutual fund investments. Should they hold or exit? And what about continuing their SIPs? ADVERTISEMENT Chirag Muni: If you're already invested, stay put. Rebalance only if your equity exposure is above 75–80%. If you're between 60–70%, there's little reason to worry. As for SIPs — absolutely continue. SIPs work because of rupee cost averaging. When markets fall, you get more units; when markets rise, fewer. This naturally reduces your average cost per unit. ADVERTISEMENT For example, let's say you started an SIP in January investing ₹10,000 monthly. If the NAV fluctuated between ₹9 and ₹13, your average cost would still be favorable compared to investing a lump sum at a peak.Q. Should new investors start an SIP now or wait for a dip? ADVERTISEMENT Chirag Muni: Timing the market is tough. We did a study over the past 25 years, even if someone invested at the peak of each month, they earned ~11.19% returns. Those who invested at monthly lows got ~12.65%, and a disciplined mid-month investor earned ~11.84%.So, the difference isn't significant. If you have investable surplus, start now. Waiting rarely helps in the long run. ADVERTISEMENT Q. What's your view on step-up SIPs in the current environment? Chirag Muni: Step-up SIPs are incredibly effective and often underutilized. Let's say a 25-year-old starts a ₹5,000 SIP and continues for 35 years — they might build a corpus of ₹3.5 crore. But if they increase the SIP by 10% annually, the corpus could grow to ₹9.4 crore! Even a ₹25,000 SIP can become ₹17.5 crore over 35 years, but with a 10% annual step-up, that corpus can grow to ₹47 crore. So yes, step-up SIPs are a powerful way to grow wealth over time.Q. Investors often wonder... which date of the month is best for SIPs? Chirag Muni: We looked at 25 years of data and tested SIPs started on every date of the month. The return difference between the best and worst-performing dates was just 0.15%. So, the date doesn't matter. What matters is consistency. Pick a date you're comfortable with and stick to it. Q. Do SIPs outperform lump sum investments? Chirag Muni: Yes, especially in volatile markets. In 20 out of 24 calendar years, SIPs offered a better average entry cost than lump sum investing. Over the last 10 years, SIPs outperformed lump sum in 90% of cases. Rupee cost averaging helps navigate volatility effectively — making SIPs the better choice for most retail investors.Q. What's an ideal investment horizon for SIPs? Chirag Muni: A minimum of 3–4 years is essential. Over three years, 90% of SIPs deliver positive returns. If you hold for five years, the probability of 10%+ returns goes up to 85%. For 15 years, it becomes 95%. Also, even if the first year shows negative returns, holding on for three more years often delivers 11–12% CAGR. So patience and discipline are key.Q. Given current domestic and global uncertainty, should investors review or rebalance their SIPs? Chirag Muni: Absolutely. While SIPs are automated, reviewing your portfolio annually is important. Evaluate scheme performance, asset allocation, and market cap exposure. If a scheme underperforms for a long time or your allocation becomes skewed, consider rebalancing. Regular monitoring is essential for long-term success. Q. Where should SIP investors focus: large, mid, or smallcap funds? Chirag Muni: Largecaps are less volatile, but mid and smallcaps offer higher return potential over longer horizons. From 2014 to 2024: Largecap (Nifty 100): Avg return ~12.6% Avg return ~12.6% Midcap: Avg return ~16.8% Avg return ~16.8% Smallcap: Avg return ~14% If you have a 5+ year horizon, a higher allocation to mid and smallcaps can make sense. Diversify across market caps for balanced growth.Q. What's a good market cap allocation mix for current conditions? Chirag Muni: Right now, a balanced allocation could be: Largecap: 55% 55% Midcap: 22–23% 22–23% Smallcap: ~20% This mix offers relative stability with growth potential. Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts/brokerages do not represent the views of Economic Times.