Councillors to vote on new agreement of Lake Taupō and the Upper Waikato River with local iwi
Photo:
RNZ / Rebekah Parsons-King
Councillors in Taupō will vote on a new joint management agreement of Lake Taupō and the Upper Waikato River with local iwi Ngāti Tūwharetoa today.
The legally required agreement has attracted controversy with one councillor calling in lobby group Hobson's Pledge to raise his concerns to a wider audience.
The purpose of the draft Joint Management Agreement (JMA) is to protect the water of Lake Taupō (Taupō Moana) and the Upper Waikato River. It would see the council and Tūwharetoa Māori Trust Board collaborate on work such as monitoring and enforcement, district plan reviews, resource consent application assessments, and enabling customary activities.
Tūwharetoa Māori Trust Board chair John Bishara said it's a very important day for both the board and council and he is looking forward to a positive result.
"What [the JMA] does is reaffirms our relationship and partnership with our wai and inclusion of the Taupō District Council."
The JMA is a legal requirement under the Ngāti Tūwharetoa, Raukawa, and Te Arawa River Iwi Waikato River Act 2010 (also known as the Upper Waikato River Act 2010), which mandates agreements between local authorities and Waikato River iwi trusts.
The council already maintains agreements with Te Arawa River Iwi Trust (signed in 2017) and Raukawa Settlement Trust (signed in 2013).
The council said "this agreement will enable the shared protection and restoration of these waterways for future generations."
"While the council could manage these responsibilities independently, protecting and restoring the environment is a shared responsibility. Ngāti Tūwharetoa, as mana whenua and legal owners of the beds of Lake Taupō, the Upper Waikato River, and many of the tributaries, have both the cultural and legal right to be involved."
But in a written statement Taupō District Councillor Duncan Campbell said he was concerned by the agreements financial implications, "treaty-framed governance language" and a lack of public consultation.
"The agreement should be subject to public consultation and independent legal review - not because I oppose partnership, but because I support good governance."
However Bishara said the Trust Board and council had been working together on the agreement for many years.
"There's always room for consultation, however I don't think that consultation is going to improve the document that we already have worked with the council. Look I see the council as being the governors like we are, they represent their people."
The Trust Board is the owner of the bed of Lake Taupō, including the Waikato River to Huka Falls and tributaries flowing into the lake, on behalf of ngā hapū o Tūwharetoa.
"We believe that the ownership of the lake and the water column above it is Ngāti Tūwharetoa's, so we have huge rights and interests," Bishara said.
Bishara said there has been opposition to bringing Lake Taupō into the agreement as the Upper Waikato River Act only covers the Waikato River, but he said it makes more sense to treat it as one connected system.
"It's indivisible... to distinguish them separately wouldn't be appropriate. I believe that the council do agree with that but it is an extension of the Waikato River Settlement."
Bishara said it has been a long journey and there a still many things to work out with the council, but he believes the board will get approval for the Joint Management Agreement.
Campbell said his concerns with the JMA weren't with the Treaty itself, but with the ambiguity and breadth of language used throughout the agreement, particularly clauses that speak to 'shared responsibilities', 'partnership' and decision-making influence without precise boundaries.
"When unelected parties are embedded in planning, consenting, enforcement, and land management processes, the line between co-management and co-governance blurs."
Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero
,
a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
25 minutes ago
- RNZ News
National pins re-election hopes on economy
Christopher Luxon is busy trying to convince people that National, not Labour, is the steady hand on the tiller amid choppy global waters. Photo: RNZ / Nick Monro Analysis: Saturday's National Party conference set out an early 2026 challenge to voters - stick with what we've got or risk it on who-knows-what. It's a line National used successfully in 2014 (remember Eminem-esque?), but that was a different National, and a different looking government. At roughly the same point in that electoral cycle, National was polling in the late forties. National in 2025 is struggling to get past the early thirties. Labour has emerged as the party New Zealanders think has the best handle on the cost of living, according to the Ipsos Issues Monitor. Of course, there is a long way to go yet. The prime minister knows this, and is counting on sunnier economic fortunes this time next year. But to borrow a well-worn Christopher Luxon phrase, the cost of living is the barnacle that won't get off the boat, and Luxon spent his speech - and much of the week leading up to it - trying to convince people that National, not Labour, is the steady hand on the tiller amid choppy global waters. The government is at pains to say it can't control global events, although it spent a lot of time criticising the previous government for blaming global events. The Trump administration's increased tariffs landed like a lead balloon on Friday, and prompted some late additions to the conference's run sheet. In his speech, Luxon acknowledged the tariffs, but said New Zealand can't just "batten down the hatch" and hope for the best. Trade minister Todd McClay took some time out of his rurals session to say he's already spoken to his US trade counterpart, and dispatched top trade diplomat Vangelis Vitalis to Washington. McClay will follow in the coming weeks. Domestically, National is still blaming the previous government for the economic conditions it inherited, and pitching that it needs a second term to truly sort it out. The party's putting a stake in the ground and saying next year's election will be all about the economy. Last Monday's 10-minute sermon from the podium , which set out the steps National had taken to address the cost of living, was a harbinger of what was to come at the weekend. Inside the cavernous National Air Force Museum, Luxon told media New Zealanders would have a "very simple choice" at the next election: "Do you trust the guys that actually crashed the economy and have no plan, or do you trust the guys in the government that's actually inherited a mess and is sorting it out and is making progress before that election?" Luxon did not mention the other "guys in the government" on Saturday. That's not unusual. This was, after all, a National Party event, full of National Party stump speeches. The party's deputy Nicola Willis, however, gave Luxon a shout-out for the "energy" it takes to keep Winston Peters and David Seymour under control. While joking he was targeting 100 percent of the vote in 2026, Luxon said after his speech that it was natural to disagree with his coalition partners, but they were aligned on the things that mattered. National leader Christopher Luxon speaks at the party's annual conference. Photo: RNZ / Giles Dexter National party supporters that RNZ spoke to were largely happy with how things were going, and how Luxon was keeping things in line. "We are very co-ordinated, very co-ordinated. We respect each other's policies and respect each other's decisions," said one member. "They're very aggressive people that he's in Parliament with, but he's handled it extremely well," said another. "It's like you're the mother in the house, and you have to herd two cats, who do co-operate sometimes, and other times they've got other agendas. From a managerial point of view, I think he's doing excellently in the light of the type of political system we've got." Some expressed wariness of what Peters would do next year, others sung from Luxon's songsheet that this was the maturity of MMP on display. "It's taking some managing, but it's all good. It's what MMP is about." "Everybody's looking at next year's election again, and obviously they want to get back in. So there's a bit of leverage, and nobody's got more experience at that than Winston." They were also convinced the country was going in the right direction, and that Luxon was the right person to steer it there. "We're starting to turn the corner. The last 18 months has been the clean-up job, and we're actually getting ready to turn the tank around now." "It just takes time, and people have got to be patient. They're doing everything that they possibly can, it's just a timing issue. Everybody's impatient." National's membership thinks the polls will firm in their favour as the public look more critically at the alternative. A Labour Party bereft of policy, juggling the niche demands of the more extreme Greens and Te Pāti Māori. Luxon wants the country to "say yes" to more. More mining, more infrastructure, more housing, more tourism, more growth. Opening up more concessions on Department of Conservation land, and charging international visitors to visit some DOC sites is part of that "say yes" strategy. Twenty to forty dollars is not a large sum to fork out for people who have paid thousands to come here, and it adds $62m to the conservation estate that New Zealanders won't have to pay for. There are still some implementation issues to work through. It remains to be seen whether New Zealanders will have to take a passport or bank statement to Cathedral Cove to get out of a fee. It's a small change, and one the government did not campaign or consult the public on, or put in its latest quarterly plan. There will be more to come as parties start to differentiate themselves and sound the election battle drums. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
NZ Herald
11 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Tūwharetoa disappointed as Taupō District Council delays water agreement
The draft Joint Management Agreement aims to protect the water of Lake Taupō (Taupō Moana) (pictured) and the Upper Waikato River. Photo / RNZ, Libby Kirkby-McLeod Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. The draft Joint Management Agreement aims to protect the water of Lake Taupō (Taupō Moana) (pictured) and the Upper Waikato River. Photo / RNZ, Libby Kirkby-McLeod By Pokere Paewai of RNZ The Tūwharetoa Māori Trust Board says it is disappointed the Taupō District Council has chosen to draw out the process for its joint water management agreement with the iwi by deferring it to the next council. Councillors voted on Thursday to defer discussion of the draft Joint Management Agreement (JMA) until the next local government elections are held in October, after concerns over a lack of public consultation on the agreement were raised. The purpose of the draft JMA is to protect the water of Lake Taupō (Taupō Moana) and the Upper Waikato River. It would see the council and Tūwharetoa Māori Trust Board collaborate on work such as monitoring and enforcement, district plan reviews, resource consent application assessments and enabling customary activities. The council has legal obligations to form agreements with Waikato River iwi trusts under the Waikato River Act 2010.
RNZ News
13 hours ago
- RNZ News
Senior Labour MP Megan Woods won't contest seat at next election
Megan Woods at the last Election Night. Photo: RNZ / Niva Chittock Senior Labour MP Megan Woods has announced she will stand as a list-only candidate at the next election. Woods has held the Wigram seat since 2011. Announcing the move on Facebook, she said it had been a difficult decision, but she could not commit to serving a full six-year boundary cycle. "When I first stood, I made a commitment to myself - I'd only run if I could commit to serving the full six-year boundary cycle. "In 2014 and 2019, when we had new boundaries, I could say 'absolutely yes' to a six-year commitment. This time, I can't." - more to come
