logo
California sues Trump administration for sharing Medicaid data with ICE

California sues Trump administration for sharing Medicaid data with ICE

While preparing to slash health-care funding to millions of low-income Americans, the Trump administration is also illegally sharing their private health information with immigration officials engaged in mass deportations, California and 19 other states charged in a lawsuit Tuesday.
The 78 million Americans receiving health care through Medicaid, including 15 million Californians in the Medi-Cal program, provide personal information that their states forward to the federal government to verify their eligibility. But California Attorney General Rob Bonta said the states learned last month that the administration has disclosed the private Medicaid files to the Department of Homeland Security to create a database for raids and deportations by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
'The Trump administration has upended longstanding privacy protections with its decision to illegally share sensitive, personal health data with ICE,' Bonta said in a statement announcing the lawsuit, filed in federal court in San Francisco. 'In doing so, it has created a culture of fear that will lead to fewer people seeking vital emergency medical care.'
He spoke hours after the Senate voted 51-50 to approve President Donald Trump's budget bill, which would remove nearly 12 million low-income recipients from Medicaid over the next decade and increase costs for others in the program while lowering taxes, mostly for those with high incomes.
The bill, sent to the House for a final vote, would also provide nearly $30 billion for ICE enforcement and deportation programs, three times the agency's current budget, and another $45 billion to build more immigration detention centers.
Before casting the tiebreaking vote in the Senate, Vice President JD Vance said on X Monday night that other provisions of the bill, including what he described as 'the minutiae of the Medicaid policy,' were 'immaterial compared to the ICE money and immigration enforcement provisions.'
In the lawsuit, the states contend the disclosure to immigration officials of information about Medicaid recipients violated federal privacy laws and had not been authorized by Congress.
'The Trump administration silently destroyed longstanding guardrails that protected the public's sensitive health data,' the states' lawyers wrote. They asked a federal judge to halt any further transfers of patients' data and to prohibit immigration agencies from using the information to investigate, arrest or deport immigrants.
The Department of Homeland Security did not respond to a request for comment. But Bonta said the Trump administration has argued, without any supporting evidence, that sharing information with DHS would help combat fraud and ensure that only eligible people were enrolled in Medicaid. And he said many Californians are not applying for needed benefits because they fear showing up at government offices.
Laws passed by Congress make low-income people eligible for the program 'regardless of immigration status,' the attorney general said. 'This isn't about cutting waste or going after fraud. This is about going after vulnerable people,' and 'states and private hospitals will be the ones to pay,' he said.
While states lack authority to regulate federal agencies, California lawmakers are making new efforts to prevent state agencies from aiding Trump's deportations.
In addition to the state's 2018 'sanctuary' law and similar laws in many cities and counties that prohibit local officers from keeping undocumented immigrants in custody so they can be turned over to federal agents, Assembly Bill 322 would prohibit private data brokers from selling information about their customers' location to anyone, including ICE.
'We're seeing ICE raids across the state and we're seeing mothers, fathers, children being kidnapped from the streets across California,' Assembly Member Liz Ortega, D-San Leandro, said at a news conference last week announcing the legislation. The lead author is Assembly Member Chris Ward, D-San Diego.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump pleads ignorance after using antisemitic slur
Trump pleads ignorance after using antisemitic slur

Axios

time27 minutes ago

  • Axios

Trump pleads ignorance after using antisemitic slur

President Trump on Friday morning said he was unaware that the word "Shylock" is considered by some to be antisemitic, after using it during a Thursday night rally in Iowa. What to know: Shylock, the villain of Shakespeare's "The Merchant of Venice," was written as a greedy and vengeful Jewish moneylender who eventually is forced to convert to Christianity. What Trump said at the rally: "Think of that: no death tax, no estate tax, no going to the banks and borrowing from, in some cases, a fine banker. And in some cases, Shylocks and bad people." What the Anti Defamation League said via X: "The term 'Shylock' evokes a centuries-old antisemitic trope about Jews and greed that is extremely offensive and dangerous. President Trump's use of the term is very troubling and irresponsible. It underscores how lies and conspiracies about Jews remain deeply entrenched in our country. Words from our leaders matter and we expect more from the President of the United States." What Trump said the next day to reporters: "I've never heard it that way. To me, Shylock is somebody that's a money lender at high rates. I've never heard it that way, you view it differently than me. I've never heard that." Flashback: In 2014, then-Vice President Biden used the term "Shylocks" to refer to rapacious bankers, after which he apologized for his "poor choice of words."

Russia welcomes Trump's cut to Ukraine's military aid but it could be deadly for Kyiv
Russia welcomes Trump's cut to Ukraine's military aid but it could be deadly for Kyiv

CNN

time32 minutes ago

  • CNN

Russia welcomes Trump's cut to Ukraine's military aid but it could be deadly for Kyiv

The reactions to the Trump administration's decision to pause some weapons shipments to Ukraine couldn't be more illustrative of the conflict: welcomed by the Kremlin, branded 'inhumane' by Kyiv. The Pentagon said on Wednesday that it was pausing some aid because it needs to review whether the assistance that is provided to Ukraine is aligned with US President Donald Trump's 'America First' agenda. But the move could have deadly consequences for Ukraine as the halt on shipments includes missiles for Patriots, the US-made air defense systems that are currently protecting millions of Ukrainian civilians from Russia's increasingly massive daily aerial attacks. Kyiv endured the biggest ever attack overnight into Friday, with 13 dreadful hours of explosions and buzzing overhead as Russia launched a record 539 drones towards the Ukrainian capital and 11 cruise and ballistic missiles, according to the country's air force. As the smoke began to clear over the city, Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky praised the military for shooting down or jamming the majority of the Russian drones and missiles. 'It is critically important that our partners continue to support us in defending against ballistic missiles. Patriots and the missiles for them are true protectors of life,' he said – a remark clearly aimed at trying to persuade Trump to reconsider the pause. Zelensky got a chance to make the case directly to Trump when the two spoke by phone on Friday. A readout of the call from Zelensky's office said the two leaders 'agreed that we will work together to strengthen protection of our skies.' 'We are ready for direct projects with the United States and believe this is critically important for security, especially when it comes to drones and related technologies,' the readout said. No other air defense system can match the Patriots in its effectiveness – but their power comes at a huge cost, their production is limited and the demand for them is growing rapidly around the world, especially in areas deemed by the Trump administration to be more strategically important – such as the Middle East or, southwest Asia and South Korea. The announcement by the US sent shockwaves through Ukraine, with presidential adviser Mykhailo Podolyak saying it would be 'very strange' and 'inhumane' to stop supplying missiles that are used to protect civilians. But despite the panicked reaction, the move was not entirely unexpected. Trump has threatened to withdraw Ukraine's support in a bid to force Kyiv to the negotiating table, and he has previously briefly paused shipments of aid. While the US was for a long time Ukraine's biggest supporter, singlehandedly covering about 40% of Ukraine's military needs, it has not announced any new aid to Ukraine since early January, when Trump returned to power. Meanwhile, European countries have stepped up their support of Ukraine. According to the German Kiel Institute, which monitors aid to Ukraine, Europe has now surpassed the US as the biggest donor – having supported Ukraine to the tune of 72 billion euro ($85 billion) in total military aid since the start of the full-scale invasion to the end of April, compared to 65 billion euro ($76.6 billion) from the US. But the numbers don't tell the whole story. 'Ukraine has a lot of different needs, and some of them can be filled by other suppliers, but some can only be filled by the United States,' Daniel Byman, director of the Warfare, Irregular Threats, and Terrorism Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), told CNN. 'For ballistic missiles in particular, only the US can provide this. A cut off in those leaves a huge gap in Ukraine and air defenses. And given the kind of daily and horrible Russian attacks, that's very consequential.' Russia has ramped up its airborne attacks against Ukraine in recent weeks. Ballistic missiles pose the deadliest threat and, according to Ukrainian officials, Russia fired as many as 80 of these in June alone. While Ukraine managed to shoot some of them down, likely with the Patriot system, the ones that slipped through caused unimaginable suffering. One ballistic missile strike killed 21 people in Dnipro last week. The week before that, 21 people were killed when a ballistic missile hit an apartment building in Kyiv. Deadly attacks like this will become more frequent if Ukraine loses access to the Patriots, which are widely considered to be among the best air defense systems available. They are capable of bringing down cruise and hypersonic missiles, short-range ballistic missiles and aircraft. According to analysts, the Ukrainian military has been using them in an extremely effective way, shooting down missiles that Moscow claimed were impossible to intercept, such as the Kinzhal ballistic missiles. At an estimated cost of about $1.1 billion for each system, the Patriots are by far the most expensive piece of equipment sent by allies to Ukraine. According to the CSIS, missile rounds for the Patriot come in at roughly $4 million each – an incredibly high price tag. But even if Ukraine had the cash to purchase these systems, which it doesn't, it would find it difficult to source them. 'The production pace of Patriot missiles is low. Not because the US doesn't want to produce more, but because it's very sophisticated – you can't produce thousands a year, you can produce hundreds and you have allies all over the world who need them,' Pavel Luzin, a senior fellow at the Centre for European Policy Analysis, said Thursday during a discussion at the NEST Center, a think tank. Lockheed Martin, which manufactures the Patriot missiles for the US Army, has been ramping up production to record levels – but even so, it is only able to make just over 500 per year, with a plan to increase production to 650 a year by 2027. A major $5.5 billion deal between US and German companies to begin manufacturing the Patriot missiles outside of the US for the first time was approved last year following a NATO order of up to 1,000 rounds – but the first deliveries are not expected until several years from now. Germany, which has donated several of its Patriot systems to Ukraine in the past, is looking into the option of purchasing some missiles for Ukraine from the US, the spokesperson for the German government said in a news conference on Friday. Sidharth Kaushal, a senior research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, a UK-based defense think tank, said that while global stockpiles of Patriot missiles are not 'critically low,' there are some grounds for concern about shortages. 'The requirement for Patriots, particularly in the Indo-Pacific, is growing significantly,' he said. He said that given that some of the missiles initially meant for Ukraine were diverted to other allies, including Israel, it was likely that the US wanted to – or even had contractual obligations to – deliver interceptors to countries who are, in some cases, located within range of Iranian missiles. Still, Kaushal said the US itself is highly unlikely to face any kind of urgent shortage of missiles. 'While the US has sent a considerable number of Patriot interceptors to Ukraine it has replenished stocks through buy-back schemes from Japan and more recent shipments were diverted from export customers rather than the US' own inventory,' he said in a note emailed to CNN. Zelensky said previously that Ukraine would need some 25 Patriot batteries to defend its airspace effectively. It has roughly half a dozen at the moment, although the exact numbers and their locations are closely guarded secrets. What is known, though, is that the Ukrainians are very worried about running out of the munitions – especially because the latest US pause doesn't concern future aid but impacts deliveries that have been approved and funded and were on their way to Ukraine, where the military was counting on receiving them in the very near future. 'One thing is not having future sales approved; another is stopping what is already in the pipeline. And so that's a very negative shift that is harmful for the future defense of Ukraine and the effect is going to be pretty quick. The Russian attacks are happening daily, and Ukraine relies on these systems to counter them,' Byman said. The pause in shipments is likely to give yet another boost to Russia. 'It's part of (the Russians') strategy. They believe that without the US support, Ukraine is more likely to collapse or at least make concessions… so it certainly increases the incentives for Russia to keep military pressure on Ukraine,' Byman said. The Institute for the Study of War (ISW), a US-based conflict monitor, said that previous delays in deliveries of aid to Ukraine have invariably accelerated Russian gains on the battlefield. When the US dragged its feet on military aid in late 2023 and early 2024, Russia pushed forward in Avdiivka in eastern Ukraine. When the US paused intelligence sharing with Ukraine in March, Russian forces advanced in Kursk. 'The suspension of US aid to Ukraine will reinforce Russian President Vladimir Putin's theory of victory that posits that Russia can win the war of attrition by making slow, creeping advances and outlasting Western support for Ukraine,' the ISW said. The pause in shipments will likely reinforce Putin's belief that time is on Russia's side – and that if he can delay negotiations for long enough, his troops will eventually outlast Western assistance to Ukraine. For Ukrainians, who have sacrificed so much trying to defend their country against a bigger, stronger aggressor, the absence of US military aid is not just yet another setback – it's potentially a disaster. CNN's Svitlana Vlasova, Kosta Gak and Victoria Butenko contributed reporting.

Zelensky Reveals Details of Key Trump Call: 'Very Important and Useful'
Zelensky Reveals Details of Key Trump Call: 'Very Important and Useful'

Newsweek

time42 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

Zelensky Reveals Details of Key Trump Call: 'Very Important and Useful'

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said he held a "very important and useful" call with U.S. President Donald Trump on Friday, July 4. The call comes after the Trump Administration canceled a planned shipment of weapons to Ukraine over concerns about the diminishing level of U.S. stockpiles. Russia is also amassing tens of thousands of troops at Ukraine's border, and is pounding Ukrainian cities with drone and missile strikes. Zelensky, posting to Telegram, said he and Trump agreed to work to increase the protection of Ukraine's skies, and that teams from both countries would meet on that. He said the Ukrainians also discussed in detail the possibility of joint production by the two countries' defense industries, including projects on drones and related technologies. They also discussed mutual purchases and investments, Zelensky said. Zelensky congratulated Trump on Independence Day and thanked him for the support of the American people during Ukraine's defense against Russia's invasion. A day before, Trump had spoken with Russian President Vladimir Putin, but emerged "very disappointed" with the conversation. Putin had told Trump that Russia was focused on meeting its goals in the Ukraine war. Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 to halt Kyiv's move towards the west, including ambitions to join NATO and the European Union (EU). This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store