Nigel Farage's plan to restore non-dom tax breaks in exchange for £250k given to UK poorest 'could cost taxpayer £34billion'
Nigel Farage 's plan to restore tax breaks for wealthy foreigners in exchange for an annual fee could cost £34billion over five years, experts warned today.
The Reform leader unveiled the Britannia card today, which would allow non-doms to live in Britain but pay no tax on their foreign income and property if he wins power.
They would instead have to pay a one-off £250,000 'Entry Contribution' that Reform says would be passed on to the UK's lowest-paid workers.
Mr Farage was forced to deny he was lurching to the left to woo Labour voters in the north and Midlands to Reform as he unveiled the scheme.
He said he was no 'Robin Hood stealing from the rich' and said he hoped 'tens of thousands of people will come to the United Kingdom on this ticket'.
Tax Policy Associates' Dan Neidle warned today that the scheme would 'provide a very large and expensive tax windfall to a small number of very wealthy people who are already here'.
'Office for Budget Responsibility data shows that this would amount to £34bn of lost Government revenue over five years,' he said.
'That would have to be funded by either tax increases or spending cuts.'
He also suggested it would discourage highly skilled professionals from coming to the UK because they would not be able to pay the fee.
Reform may struggle to convince people that the fee would last a lifetime, given the recent upheaval to the non-dom system, he added.
At a press conference, flanked by Reform's Doge boss Zia Yusuf, Mr Farage was asked if he was attempting to give low-income workers free money to win over their votes.
'Nice try, but the idea that I'm somehow putting forward a profoundly left-wing concept today could not be further from the truth,' he said.
'We're saying we want people who make loads of money to come in to Britain in huge numbers and pay lots and lots of tax and buy lots of houses and spend lots of money.'
Reform is choosing to help those who work and have been 'hammered', he added.
Asked whether he had an overall costing for the policy, given Mr Neidle's analysis, he replied: 'Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear. I'm not clever enough to answer any of that.
'That just sounds completely off the wall nonsense. I'm really sorry, but I think what we've got here is a very attractive offer.
'People are fleeing this country in droves. Our economy is in trouble. There are fears of wealth taxes coming in. All the mood music is bad.'
The scheme is designed to make the UK a more attractive place to wealthy individuals, as it would reinstate the non-dom regime which Labour abolished in April.
Non-domiciled status allows people who live in the UK, but who have a permanent home elsewhere, to only pay tax on the money they earn in the UK.
It can be used to shield any overseas income and profits from UK taxes, unless they are transferred into the country.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves is reportedly seeking to soften the changes, however, after fears that it is leading to an exodus of wealth creators.
It comes after three of Britain's richest men – including a top investment banker -became the latest to join an exodus of the super-rich amid a government crackdown on wealthy non-doms.
In April, Ian and Richard Livingstone, brothers who own a £9bn property empire in the UK and abroad, an online casino and plush Monte Carlo hotel, were revealed as having quit the UK for Monaco, according to corporate documents.
Meanwhile, Goldman Sachs' top banker, Richard Gnodde, worth over £130m, is understood to have ditched London for Milan.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wales Online
37 minutes ago
- Wales Online
Keir Starmer warns Wales that Nigel Farage will treat us like 'fools' in scathing attack
Keir Starmer warns Wales that Nigel Farage will treat us like 'fools' in scathing attack The Prime Minister said Nigel Farage 'takes people for fools' Keir Starmer speaking at the Welsh Labour conference at Venue Cymru in Llandudno (Image: Welsh Labour TV/PA ) Prime Minister Keir Starmer has attacked Nigel Farage saying he has "no plan" for Wales. In a speech to Welsh Labour members at their conference in Llandudno he said the Reform UK leader 'isn't interested in Wales'. Referencing Mr Farage's visit to Port Talbot where he said his party wanted to look at reopening mines in Wales and said that the blast furnaces at the Tata plant in Port Talbot should be restarted. The Prime Minister criticised both of those saying the Clacton MP's plan for Port Talbot would result in the current progress towards the electric arc furnace being stopped and jobs being lost. For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here . The Port Talbot proposal was widely criticised as being unrealistic. Mr Farage himself admitted it would cost 'in the low billions' and industry experts and members said not only is the cost prohibitive but it is impossible to restart a closed blast furnace. He didn't directly criticise the reopening of coals mines suggestion by Mr Farage but did use the opportunity to highlight things his administration had done in terms of committing money to coal tip regeneration and miners' pensions. "Nigel Farage isn't interested in Wales, he's interested in Nigel Farage, he takes people for fools. Article continues below "Just look what he said earlier this month, going to Port Talbot pretending he's got a plan to reopen the blast furnace, he's got no idea what he's talking about. He's got no plan at all. "Let's be clear. What Reform's plans would be mean in practice. Cancelling the electric arc furnace, cancelling the construction work that's on track to start in just a few weeks time, cancelling the 5,000 jobs it'll bring. "That's all you ever need to know about Reform," he said. Reform UK is polling to take seats in the Senedd and a recent UK Parliamentary poll by YouGov showed they would take 23 seats off Labour. Plaid Cymru would also do well at the expense of Labour. Less than a year ago, in the July general election, Labour took 27 of the 32 seats available. You can read that story here. The Senedd election in May 2026 is widely seen as being a huge test for both Eluned Morgan and Keir Starmer. Polling shows Labour could slip from the party in power, for the whole of the devolution period, to third with 18% of the vote. The most recent polling for Wales by YouGov is here. Article continues below The next election will be fought under a new voting system, with new constituencies and will increase the number of Senedd members from 60 to 96 at a cost of billions.
Telegraph
43 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Lord Hermer's denial of two-tier justice is a disgrace
This week, Lord Hermer was asked by the BBC about two-tier justice, the idea that the British state treats ethnic minorities more favourably than the white working class. This perception, so corrosive to faith in the rule of law, has become widespread since the crackdown on the Southport unrest last summer. Never one to read the public or political mood, Starmer's lawyer ally simply issued a blunt and contemptuous denial. Such claims are 'frankly disgusting', he said, and indeed 'offensive' to police, prosecutors and courts. He added that instead of criticising the British justice system, politicians 'need to get behind it, not seek to undermine it'. (Perhaps he should have a word with the justice secretary, Shabana Mahmood, who earlier this year had to intervene to block sentencing guidelines which she herself labelled 'two-tier'.) It's a woefully tone-deaf performance, suggesting that Hermer doesn't even understand why the Government's response to the Southport unrest gave rise to charges of unfairness. He argued that people were wrong to compare the policing of London Gaza marches, often awash with anti-Semitism but 'not producing violence', with the Southport unrest, since this saw attacks against police officers. No one would say violent rioters shouldn't be treated robustly. But what Hermer ignores is the way the state dealt fiercely with white, working-class Southport rioters in a way it never does with more favoured groups. Just weeks before, when rioters in ultra-diverse Harehills, Leeds, overturned a police car and set a bus on fire, the police reportedly ran away. Meanwhile, days into the Southport unrest, when armed Muslim mobs formed supposedly in order to protect their local communities, the police let them have free rein. In Birmingham on August 5, the result was a pub being attacked, with a man outside it suffering a lacerated liver, amid other disorder. Even more than this double-standard though, it is the punitive crackdown on online speech that has caused there were many who found themselves charged and remanded in custody for social media posts, the most high-profile is Lucy Connolly, imprisoned for 31 months for a single nasty tweet (which she later deleted) on the night of the Southport murders. As the Telegraph disclosed earlier this month, Lord Hermer personally approved the prosecution of Mrs Connolly for stirring up racial hatred, despite having the constitutional power not to. Hermer has also declined to seek to review lenient sentences for gang grooming offenders – but in his political judgement, it was in the public interest for Connolly to face up to seven years in prison over one nasty tweet. Former Attorney General Suella Braverman says she would not have consented to the charge. 'We don't have a two-tiered justice system', insists Hermer. We have an 'independent justice system'. But can anyone really look at the state response to Southport and claim it 'independent' from politics? Sir Keir Starmer politicised the justice system the moment he claimed all of those involved were 'far-Right thugs', who had come from out of town to cause chaos. In reality, subsequent analysis of the arrest data along with a recent report by the police inspectorate have poured cold water on those claims. Politicians were also swiftly claiming that online speech was a principal cause, with Hermer himself crowing that 'you cannot hide behind your keyboard'. This narrative was no less dubious – no one needed to be told by social media to be angry about the horrific murders of three children. Yet both became reasons for the police, the CPS and the courts to throw the book at people like Connolly over tweets. '[T]heir intention was always to hammer me', as Lucy told the Telegraph earlier this year. Lucy's two-tier treatment continues to this day. First, she was denied release on temporary license to care for her daughter and sick husband. This is a privilege which even murderers are sometimes granted, and which has been granted to others at Lucy's prison. Now she says she's being cruelly mistreated in prison. Does Hermer seriously think it's 'disgusting' to see this as unfair? Hermer can deny two-tier justice all he likes, but the more the public hears about cases like Connolly, the more the charge rings true. A recent YouGov poll found public confidence in the judicial system at an all-time low, with the proportion expressing 'no confidence at all' rising four per cent since last June. Berating people who feel these concerns will not make them go away.
Telegraph
43 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Amazon sellers hit by ‘massive delays'
Amazon sellers are warning of 'massive delays' at one of the online retailer's flagship UK warehouses ahead of its Prime Day sales event next month. Some small businesses have complained that deliveries to the online giant's warehouse have not been accepted for weeks – with claims that trucks have been turned away from one of Amazon's vast fulfilment centres in Nottingham because staff say they are 'full'. Third-party Amazon sellers typically send their products to the online giant's fulfilment centres before they are shipped to customers. Laura Crawford, the founder of baby products business Mama Bamboo, claimed bungled deliveries and delays of more than a month had cost her business £20,000. Ms Crawford said she had threatened legal action against Amazon over the delays. On Amazon's seller forums, multiple small sellers have complained of 'massive delays' at the warehouse, with packages going missing for weeks. One seller complained: 'We've had thousands of pounds of stock being turned away for weeks.' A source close to Amazon insisted its delivery network was operating normally and that there were no unexpected delays at the warehouse. The company is currently preparing for Amazon Prime Day, its annual sale, a particularly busy time for the online retailer. Ms Crawford said her business was 'at the mercy' of giants such as Amazon and despite corresponding with John Boumphrey, Amazon's UK chief, the issue had not been resolved. She said her deliveries had been handled by Swiss transport company Kuehne + Nagel. In an email seen by the Telegraph, Kuehne + Nagel representatives said Amazon staff have been 'telling drivers they are full' and that it was 'causing issues with our relationships with the vendors'. Ms Crawford said she was 'wholly accountable for every delivery to our customers', but that Amazon 'do not take any such accountability for failures to their sellers'. An Amazon spokesman said: 'The build up to Prime Day is always a busy period for our operation. If any of our sellers should experience any issues, we will do all we can to support.' When contacted by The Telegraph, Amazon said Ms Crawford's delivery had been accepted as of Friday. Late payments The delay claims come a week after Amazon was rapped by Britain's groceries regulator over alleged late payments to suppliers. The Groceries Code Adjudicator, which has the power to fine Britain's biggest retailers up to 1pc of turnover for breaches under an industry code of conduct, said it was investigating Amazon's supplier practices after multiple complaints. In a report from the regulator, Amazon came bottom in a survey detailing complaints by suppliers against retailers. It found 13pc of grocery suppliers said they had raised a complaint with Amazon in the past year, compared to 3pc at the next-worst retailer. Of the investigation, an Amazon spokesman said: 'While we are disappointed with this decision, we welcome the opportunity to further demonstrate our ongoing compliance. 'We have already made significant improvements to our grocery supplier experience, including to payment practices, with supplier contacts on this reducing year-on-year.'
