Candidates for mayor of Cambridgeshire and Peterborough
Paul Bristow - Conservative Party
Paul Bristow was the Conservative MP for Peterborough from 2019 until 2024, when he was narrowly defeated by Labour. After his selection as the Conservative candidate, he said he would focus on improving road and rail links, and securing jobs, investment and growth for the region.His campaign website says, among others priorities, that he wants to dual the county's main A-roads, introduce light rail in Cambridge and deliver a Fens reservoir.
Lorna Dupre - Liberal Democrat
Lorna Dupre is the leader of the Liberal Democrat and Independent Group on East Cambridgeshire District Council, and sits as the deputy leader of the Liberal Democrats on Cambridgeshire County Council. She is also chair of the Combined Authority's overview and scrutiny committee.The issues she is campaigning on include better public transport, access to skills for a changing workforce and co-operation to deal with climate change. She also says she wants "Cambridgeshire and Peterborough to be greener, fairer, and better connected".
Anna Smith - Labour Party
Anna Smith is the deputy mayor of the Combined Authority and was selected as the Labour candidate, after incumbent Nik Johnson announced he would not seek re-election. She was the leader of Cambridge City Council for two years, between 2021 and 2023.If elected, she says she will "drive growth and create opportunities for everyone in our region". Her campaign literature includes pledges to fix 100,000 potholes, continue the £1 Tiger bus pass and create a taskforce to cut violence against women and girls.
Follow Cambridgeshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
12 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Loophole in PM's swap plan means the more bogus an asylum seeker is, the less chance we have of kicking them out
FRENCH FARCE Loophole in PM's swap plan means the more bogus an asylum seeker is, the less chance we have of kicking them out MIGRANTS could dodge deportation under Labour's 'one-in, one-out' swap deal with France by lodging lengthy human rights appeals. The trial, which started yesterday, includes a clause where anyone making a human rights claim cannot be sent back until their case is heard in the courts. Advertisement 3 Small boat migrants could dodge deportation by lodging lengthy human rights appeals Credit: Getty 3 Lawyers will seize on a loophole to get round Sir Keir Starmer's migrant swap plan Credit: Getty 3 France has agreed to take back a limited number of boat migrants, pictured French President Emmanuel Macron Credit: AFP Tories last night warned lawyers will seize on the loophole to delay or block deportations. Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp said: 'This deal is likely to be completely unworkable and will be ruthlessly exploited by lawyers to prevent people being returned to France. 'This deal has no numbers in it — presumably because they are so small. 'Returning just six per cent of illegal immigrants, as reported, will have no deterrent effect whatsoever — because 94 per cent get to stay.' Advertisement READ MORE ON MIGRANTS HERE WE GROW UK's immigration hotspots revealed... how does YOUR hometown fare? France has agreed to take back a limited number of boat migrants — one for each the UK accepts legally from French soil. But conditions must be met before someone is removed. Britain picking up tab And Tories say that even those with human rights claims which have been certified as 'clearly unfounded' by officials cannot be sent back until their case is dealt with in the courts, which could take years. The Home Office denies this is the case. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said the Government won't set targets for how many will be deported. Advertisement She added: 'We will provide regular updates. People will be able to see how many are being detained, how many are returned. It is right we should be transparent. 'But we're not setting the numbers in advance, firstly because there is no fixed number in terms of the overall number of people to come through this system, and secondly because we're not going to provide (gangs) with that operational information.' Watch moment migrant boat arrives on Spain hols beach before they are chased & tackled by angry locals Ministers hope the new route — where migrants in France apply online — will offer a 'safe and legal' alternative to the boats. But those who have already crossed are not eligible, meaning thousands already here won't be affected. Advertisement Only around 50 people a week are expected to be returned, equivalent to only one in every 17 boat arrivals. The new legal route to Britain only applies to people already in France who have not tried to cross illegally. To qualify, they must prove they have close family in the UK, are at risk of being trafficked or exploited, or come from a country with a high level of successful asylum claims, such as Afghanistan. This Starmer/Macron wheeze has zero chance of working. Alp Mehmet, of Migration Watch UK Unaccompanied children, people with criminal records, and anyone who has previously been deported from the UK cannot apply. Advertisement The deal also reveals that Britain is picking up the tab for both directions of travel — paying for the transport of migrants we send back to France and those we bring in legally. Alp Mehmet, of Migration Watch UK, said: 'This Starmer/Macron wheeze has zero chance of working. "It won't discourage migrants, while smugglers will be tempted to pile more people into flimsy vessels.' The deal will remain in force until June 2026. But the legal route can be paused automatically if France slows down on taking people back. Advertisement More than 25,000 migrants have crossed in small boats in 2025, up 49 per cent on the same point last year.
Scottish Sun
12 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Rwanda hostel spruced up with £20m of Brit taxpayer cash to receive first deportees — from America
Some will enjoy hotel-quality facilities at Hope Hostel SCHEME TRUMPED Rwanda hostel spruced up with £20m of Brit taxpayer cash to receive first deportees — from America Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) THE Rwanda hostel spruced up with £20million of British taxpayers' money to house our unwanted migrants is to receive its first deportees — from America. Rwanda is taking in 250 migrants thrown out of the US under Donald Trump's mass removal programme. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Rwanda is taking in 250 migrants thrown out of the US under Donald Trump's mass removal programme Credit: Getty Some will enjoy hotel-quality facilities at Hope Hostel, which was readied under the then-Tory government's deportation scheme last summer. The £700million plan was ditched when Labour won the election. Trump is now pushing ahead with his scheme. A Hope Hostel source told The Sun yesterday: 'We are always ready to provide the best services to the customers.' Rwandan government spokeswoman Yolande Makolo confirmed those arriving in the country would be given support. She added: 'Under the agreement, Rwanda has the ability to approve each individual proposed for resettlement. 'Those approved will be provided with workforce training, healthcare and accommodation support to jump-start their lives in Rwanda.' The initial agreement — signed last month — is for 250 people but can be extended if both countries agree. Britain signed its agreement in 2022. Four UK arrivals were sent to Rwanda but that was under a separate voluntary scheme and did not involve their moving into Hope Hostel. Ismael Bakina, boss of the private operator of the hostel, said the US arrivals would be surprised at the quality of the services offered, adding: 'This is not a prison or a detention centre.' I visited Rwanda's £20m 'migrant hotel' where UK asylum seekers will stay – it's got Premier League on TV & footie pitch
The Sun
13 minutes ago
- The Sun
There's a really simple way to sort out our dysfunctional civil service, Keir – your latest gimmick is a waste of time
LABOUR is to make the civil service more 'working class' by offering internships only to those from 'lower socio-economic backgrounds'. Their eligibility will be judged on what job their parents did when they were 14. 4 4 Meaning that Sir Keir 'my father was a toolmaker' Starmer would make the cut. But his Chancellor Rachel Reeves, whose parents were teachers and therefore classed as 'professionals', would not. Talk about fiddling while Rome burns. Look, I'm not against limiting the number of Tristams and Jemimas who find themselves interning at the Houses of Parliament because 'Daddy' knows some politician 'from his club'. And the thought of some hand-picked, 'working class' realists rolling their eyes in despair behind the lectern every time the Government announces its latest, daft initiative is admittedly an appealing one. But what does 'class' actually mean these days, and how is it judged? Take me, for example. Born in 1962, my mum brought me up alone, I went to state school, and for several years we lived extremely happily with my godparents in their council house. Mum worked as a stable girl, then became a secretary, and eventually trained as a teacher — a job she was doing when I was 14. Which, according to the Social Mobility Commission that advises the Government on such matters, is a 'professional and managerial' occupation along with chief executive, doctor, journalist, engineer and nurse. So, along with Ms Reeves, that rules me out too. PM vows to drastically increase the numbers of channel migrants sent back to France 'Intermediate' occupations include driving instructor, IT engineer, shopkeeper and hotel manager, while 'working class' jobs are those such as cleaner, waiter and bricklayer. It's all very prescriptive and, let's face it, old-fashioned. Aside from a few Hyacinth 'Bouquets' in the suburbs, does anyone really care about class any more? And isn't this seeming Labour obsession with it just inverted snobbery? Back in the day when I was in charge of a busy newspaper department, I always recruited the best person for the job, regardless of their background. Pipe dream I met some immensely stupid people who'd been to private school, and some immensely smart ones who hadn't. And vice versa. Their education, class, religious beliefs, ethnicity, sexual preferences, eating habits, whatever, were irrelevant, and so too was whatever Mummy or Daddy did for a living. I looked for punctuality, enthusiasm, honesty, quick-thinking and a willingness to work hard. And that's what the civil service should be looking for too. Meanwhile, it's curious to learn that, despite its keenness to attract kids from lower socio-economic backgrounds, Labour's internships are still only being offered to undergraduates studying for a degree. Which rules out those bright 'working-class' kids for whom university is but a pipe dream for fear of racking up huge student debt. Such hard work A FRIEND of mine who runs a small business frequently regales me with amusing stories about the entitled attitude of some of those applying for junior positions. 'I don't work on Fridays,' said one applying for a 'full-time' role, while another stressed she would need at least a two-hour lunch break every day to return home and check on her new puppy. 'Some of them act like they'd be doing me a favour by turning up at all for the job I'd be paying them to do,' she laughs. I thought of this when I read this week that a 45-year-old asset manager on £330k a year took his employers to a tribunal after feeling 'shocked' and 'angry' at how small his £10k annual bonus was despite being 'almost entirely absent from work' while suffering from long Covid. Apparently, he thought his bonus (on top of his salary) should have been around £100k. For. Doing. Virtually. Nothing. Thankfully, common sense prevailed and the judge ruled in his employer's favour. But honestly, some people. Kinnock tax on health a big turn-off LABOUR'S former leader Lord Kinnock has called for the Government to slap VAT on private healthcare to help fund the NHS. Hmmm. Except it probably wouldn't because, chances are, it would simply result in a significant number of people giving up private healthcare to rely on the already overstretched NHS instead. Much like Labour's VAT raid on private schools which has forced many families to pull their children out and, instead, send them to the nearest good – and therefore oversubscribed – state school. Following the closure of the private Bishop Challoner School in Bromley, South East London, last month, state alternatives in the county received around 100 enquiries in just 48 hours. So it remains to be seen whether Chancellor Rachel Reeves – pictured this week at a holiday camp in Kent – takes the advice of Lord Kinnock, who has also suggested the introduction of a 'wealth tax' that, without doubt, would result in even more high-net-worth individuals departing these shores. Little wonder that, when polls suggested (wrongly) back in 1992 that he might win the general election, The Sun ran the front page headline: 'If Kinnock wins today will the last person to leave Britain please turn out the lights.' The public aren't stupid and Ms Reeves et al would be wise to remember that. JOB TO TACKLE CRIME 'IF I left my job, these would be the number one reason,' says a police officer. Is it lawless street thugs? The poor prosecution rates in courts? Or a lack of support from their superiors? Nope. It's too much support in the groin area. Namely the standard- issue cargo trousers that have been described by 69 per cent of officers as 'problematic'. 'They teach us all these good restraints and moves in public-safety training but I can't do half of them in these trousers,' says one officer. The study, by Lancaster University Law School, says officers have complained of crushed testicles, cuts, blisters and swelling from the tight, chafing fabric. Ouch. The Police Federation agrees, saying the restrictive uniforms are stopping officers from keeping their communities safe. In other words, it's tough to tackle crooks when your tackle's crooked. CHEERS TO OLD TIMERS AFTER emerging damp and starving from the I'm A Celebrity jungle last year, I was keen to indulge in a late night out. But post-8pm, the restaurants of Brisbane's Surfers Paradise were virtually deserted. Like Americans, they eat early. 'You Brits are party animals,' one muscle-bound waiter told me disapprovingly when I ordered an Aperol Spritz at, er, 8.30pm. Now it seems that restaurants in the UK are adapting to accommodate a growing trend for 6pm dining here too. Richard Piper, of Alcohol Change UK, says: 'Younger diners especially are making choices that reflect physical and mental well-being but also financial health. 'Earlier dining helps avoid expensive late-night drinking. People want to socialise without the hangover.' Great idea. So last week, a friend and I arranged to meet for dinner at 6pm. Trouble is, we were still there at 9.30pm, having scoffed and quaffed far more than if we'd stuck to our usual 8pm meeting time. Clearly, we're not cut out for this modern world. LIFE IN CHECK THE new grandmaster (shouldn't that be grandmistress?) of the Women's Chess World Cup is 19-year-old Divya Deshmukh from India. Former chess coach RB Ramesh says: 'She was a confident girl from a very young age. 'She didn't have that negative side to her, the one that tends to create self-doubt. That inner chatter that wrecks things, fortunately, was missing in her.' Maybe. Or perhaps, given that much of her spare time is spent practising chess moves, she isn't constantly on social media being fed impossible depictions of 'perfection' or hate-filled judgments from people who don't even know her.
