
Anniston City Council candidates lay out visions at Thursday forum
The forum had been organized by the Calhoun County Area Chamber & Visitors Center and was moderated by Jakob Williamson, the chamber's public affairs director.
'Thank you to everyone watching online as well for taking the time to review the candidates vying for your votes,' Williamson said, addressing a crowd of around 250. 'We want to thank the Anniston City Meeting Center for hosting us tonight and thank the Chamber of Public Affairs Committee for organizing this event on behalf of the voting constituents of the city of Anniston.'
Ward 1 Candidates
Brenton Tolson framed his campaign around the idea of "political maturity," emphasizing community empowerment and reeducation. He called for Annistonians to gain control over their political processes, stressing the importance of local business development and early youth mentorship.
"As your councilman, I will establish a political program of re-educating our community and to open our community's eyes," he said. Tolson also focused on the need for employment and educational reform to combat poverty and guide youth toward shaping the city's future.
Lewis Downing, the incumbent councilman, leaned on his deep ties to Ward 1 and the city's history, pointing to his family's long-standing downtown business and his own upbringing on East 10th Street.
'There's a vibrancy here now that we haven't felt in decades,' Downing said, highlighting the city's potential for industry, commerce and growth at McClellan. He pledged continued investment in infrastructure and a stronger municipal airport, with a promise to 'always stand up for this community that we all love.'
Ben New emphasized his record of volunteer service and city planning experience.
'We developed a comprehensive plan and rewrote the entire zoning ordinance,' New said. He positioned himself as a pro-business candidate with a focus on controlled growth, citing the city's rising operational budget. 'The city is growing. If you want someone who can grow the ward, grow the city, you want to elect me.'
John Squires laid out four main priorities: free trash pickup, stronger education accountability, job creation and ending food deserts, that is, the lack of a neighborhood store for general groceries. Drawing from experience working for the Department of Labor, he expressed frustration at economic development not translating into jobs.
'We had over $54 million worth of construction, but how many jobs?' he asked. Squires also vowed to bring a grocery store to west Anniston to address long-standing food access issues.
Ward 2 Candidates
Dann Huguley, a pastor and lifelong Anniston resident, pledged to bring transparency and fiscal responsibility to City Hall. He criticized the lack of follow-through on earmarked funds, such as the beer tax for education. 'Too often, our tax dollars have not served the purpose they were intended for,' Huguley said. He also emphasized housing revitalization and economic incentives for small business development.
Demetric 'DD' Roberts, the incumbent, pointed to his hands-on record in the community and ongoing projects.
'You may have seen me out picking up trash with our Anniston Changers,' he said. Roberts said safety and infrastructure are top concerns, as is more street lighting and surveillance to deter illegal dumping. He noted progress on waste collection, food access, and attracting businesses, pledging to remain the 'boots on the ground' candidate.
La Sha' Robinson, a business owner and zoning committee member, said she would bring a community-first mindset to City Hall.
'I'm committed to listening to your concerns and working tirelessly to address issues that matter most,' she said. Robinson advocated for clarity in zoning policies, more community gardens, and increased access to educational and hygiene resources through nonprofit work.
Erica Tolson focused on direct service and accountability, calling for city-funded trash pickup, mosquito control, and street lighting. 'We need to do something about our city,' she said. Tolson expressed strong interest in school partnerships and pledged to collaborate closely with residents. 'I want you to ride my back. I want you to tell me what I'm doing wrong,' she said.
Ward 4 Candidates
Ashley Wilson, a teacher, said she is running on a platform of public safety, infrastructure repair, and economic growth.
'I will show up, and I will work so hard for the people of Ward 4,' she said. Wilson emphasized her commitment to education and open communication with constituents, promising regular updates and two-way dialogue. 'I will take your questions, even the hard ones, and work to get answers.'
Julie Moss has a background in marketing and development, outlined a platform based on transparency, neighborhood support, and smart growth.
'Let's cut the red tape, simplify procedures and improve communication,' she said. Moss said she would focus on revitalizing city departments, improving partnerships with hospitals and schools, and attracting long-term investment through stronger leadership and planning.
The municipal election will be held Tuesday, Aug. 26. Voters will choose council members from Wards 1, 2 and 4, as well as the city's next mayor.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
31 minutes ago
- Fox News
FNC Correspondent Matt Finn reports on Latest Trump Approved ICE raids
Matt Finn, Fox News National Correspondent, joined Guy Benson to discuss the latest on what happened during Trump administration-approved ICE raids of marijuana farms in California. Matt also shares his experience in Westwood, CA and how disgusting it looks today despite high rental and housing prices.


Forbes
36 minutes ago
- Forbes
McDonald's AI Breach Reveals The Dark Side Of Automated Recruitment
Millions of McDonald's job applicants had their personal data exposed after basic security failures ... More left the company's AI hiring system wide open. If you've ever wondered what could go wrong with an AI-powered hiring system, McDonald's just served up a cautionary tale. This week, security researchers revealed that the company's McHire website—a recruitment platform used by over 90% of McDonald's franchisees—left the personal information of millions of job applicants exposed to anyone with a browser and a little curiosity. The culprit: Olivia, an AI chatbot from designed to handle job applications, collect personal information, and even conduct personality tests. On paper, it's a vision of modern efficiency. In reality, the system was wide open due to security flaws so basic they'd be comical if the consequences weren't so serious. What Went Wrong? It didn't take a sophisticated hacker to find the holes. Researchers Ian Carroll and Sam Curry started investigating after Reddit users complained that Olivia gave nonsensical responses during the application process. After failing to find more complex vulnerabilities, the pair simply tried logging into the site's backend using '123456' for both the username and password. In less than half an hour, they had access to nearly every applicant's personal data—names, email addresses, phone numbers, and complete chat histories—with no multifactor authentication required. Worse still, the researchers discovered that anyone could access records just by tweaking the ID numbers in the URL, exposing over 64 million unique applicant profiles. One compromised account had not even been used since 2019, yet remained active and linked to live data. As Carroll told Wired, 'I just thought it was pretty uniquely dystopian compared to a normal hiring process, right? And that's what made me want to look into it more.' Why Security Fundamentals Still Matter Experts agree that the real shock isn't the technology itself—it's the lack of security basics that made the breach possible. As Aditi Gupta of Black Duck noted, the McDonald's incident was less a case of advanced hacking and more a 'series of critical failures,' ranging from unchanged default credentials and inactive accounts left open for years, to missing access controls and weak monitoring. The result: an old admin account that hadn't been touched since 2019 was all it took to unlock a massive trove of personal data. For many in the industry, this raises bigger questions. Randolph Barr, CISO at Cequence Security, points out that the use of weak, guessable credentials like '123456' in a live production system is not just a technical slip—it signals deeper problems with security culture and governance. When basic measures like credential management, access controls, and even multi-factor authentication are missing, the entire security posture comes into question. If a security professional can spot these flaws in minutes, Barr says, 'bad actors absolutely will—and they'll be encouraged to dig deeper for other easy wins.' And this isn't just about AI or McDonald's. Security missteps of this kind tend to follow each new 'game-changing' technology. As PointGuard AI's William Leichter observes, organizations often rush to deploy the latest tools, driven by hype and immediate gains, while seasoned security professionals get sidelined. It happened with cloud, and now, he says, 'it's AI's turn: tools are being rolled out hastily, with immature controls and sloppy practices.' Automation and the Illusion of Security McDonald's isn't alone in betting big on AI to speed up hiring and make life easier for franchisees and HR teams. Automated chatbots like Olivia are supposed to streamline applications, assess candidates, and remove human bottlenecks. But as this incident shows, convenience can't come at the expense of basic digital hygiene. Simple safeguards—unique credentials, robust authentication, and proper access controls—were missing entirely. The rush to digitize and automate HR brings with it a false sense of security. When sensitive data is managed by machines, it's easy to assume the system is secure. But technology is only as strong as the practices behind it. Lessons for the Future If there's a lesson here, it's that technology should never substitute for common sense. Automated hiring systems, especially those powered by AI, are only as secure as the most basic controls. The ease with which researchers accessed the McHire backend shows that old problems—default passwords, missing MFA—are still some of the biggest threats, even in the age of chatbots. Companies embracing automation need to build security into the foundations, not as an afterthought. And applicants should remember that behind every 'friendly' AI bot is a company making choices about how to protect—or neglect—their privacy. The Price of Convenience The McDonald's McHire data leak is a warning to every company automating hiring, and to every job seeker trusting a bot with their future. Technology can streamline the process, but it should never circumvent or subvert security. The real world isn't as neat as a chatbot's conversation tree. If we aren't careful, the push for convenience will keep putting real people at risk.


Forbes
38 minutes ago
- Forbes
Republicans Block Epstein Files Release As Backlash From Some Top MAGA Figures Dwindles
Some Republicans on Monday blocked a measure to release documents detailing the federal government's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, while others in his base suggested they'd move on from the controversy surrounding the Justice Department's decision to withhold the files. President Donald Trump waves as he walks from Marine One to board Air Force One at Joint Base ... More Andrews, Maryland on July 15, 2025. (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images) AFP via Getty Images Seven Republicans on the House Rules Committee opposed an amendment sponsored by Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif., that would have required Congress to vote whether to release the documents, while one Republican, Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C., voted with the five Democrats on the committee in favor of the measure. Democrats have seized on the anger among some in Trump's base over the Justice Department's announcement last week that it would not release any new details on the Epstein probe, despite suggestions from some top Trump officials that more information was forthcoming. Some of the right-wing backlash—which included calls for Attorney General Pam Bondi to resign—has died down since Trump urged his supporters over the weekend to move on from the controversy and defended Bondi. Right-wing activist Charlie Kirk, who previously called for the purported Epstein list to be released, said Monday he is 'done talking about Epstein for the time being' and would trust Trump's administration to 'solve it,' watering down his criticism last week of the Trump administration's handing of the memo. Conservative commentator Dinesh D'Souza also told his viewers it was 'time to move on' from the Epstein probe and unify behind Trump by 'recognizing you can't win 'em all.' Republican leaders in Congress have also echoed Trump, including Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., who told reporters Monday 'I think the president's expressed his views on it, and so I'll just leave it at that,' while House Majority Leader Mike Johnson, R-La., also said 'the White House has a lot more information about that than I'm privy to . . . so I'll have to trust that they'll make the right decision.' 'We have a PERFECT Administration, THE TALK OF THE WORLD, and 'selfish people' are trying to hurt it, all over a guy who never dies, Jeffrey Epstein. For years, it's Epstein, over and over again,' Trump wrote on Truth Social Saturday, calling the Epstein files 'Radical Left inspired Documents' written by Democrats. Contra Not all Republicans in Congress have fallen in line with Trump's messaging strategy. Rep. Eric Burlison, R-Mo., told Axios 'I don't understand why they're hiding what they're hiding,' while Rep. Michael Cloud, R-Texas, told the outlet 'there's just some things that don't pass the sniff test.' Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., also continued to express disappointment over the Justice Department decision, telling The New York Times 'it's definitely a full reversal on what was said beforehand, and people are just not willing to accept it,' referring to previous statements from administration officials suggesting the documents would be released. The Justice Department in a memo last week said it would not release any more files on its investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. It also repeated its determinations that Epstein died by suicide in jail and that no so-called 'Epstein list' of clients exists. Trump's base has largely targeted Bondi over the agency's refusal to release the documents, with some calling for her termination, after she said in a Fox News interview earlier this year the purported list was on her desk. The White House walked back the statement last week and said Bondi was referring to the documents in their entirety. Further Reading Tucker Carlson Blasts Pam Bondi For 'A Bunch Of Ludicrous Claims' About Epstein Files—As Backlash Mounts (Forbes) Trump Sounded Hesitant About Releasing Epstein Files In Newly Resurfaced Interview (Forbes) Pam Bondi Under Fire From MAGA —Megyn Kelly, Laura Loomer And More—Over Epstein Probe (Forbes)