European protected status a ‘game-changer' for Armagh Bramley apple growers
It means that only Bramley apples grown, picked and packed within the Armagh area can carry that name, similar to how Champagne must come from the Champagne region of France, or Parma ham from Italy's Parma province.
The pride of the Orchard County obtained the status in 2012 and since then has given its growers a 'real edge'.
Armagh traces its relationship with apples back to evidence of them growing close to the historic Navan Fort as far back as 1000 BC.
The real turning point came in 1884 when Henry Joseph Nicholson of Crannagael House returned from Nottingham with 60 Bramley seedlings.
They thrived in the local soil, laying the foundation for what is now more than 4,000 acres of thriving orchards across the region, and the county's nickname.
This legacy is celebrated at Armagh's annual food and cider weekend every September putting the Bramley in the spotlight.
Greg MacNeice, a fifth-generation apple grower and founder of Mac Ivors Cider, said while Bramley apples have always been a local favourite, PGI status boosted demand.
'The orchards have been here at Ardress since 1855 and my father, Sammy, still helps – just like his father did. Apples are part of who we are,' he said.
He explained that Armagh has got the right soil, the right slopes, a mild, damp climate and cooler temperatures that slow things down, adding that helps the apples develop 'that sharp flavour and firm texture people love'.
'It's not just the conditions though – it's the generations of knowledge, care and pride that go into every crop,' he said.
'PGI status has helped protect the heritage of our apple and given us a real edge in the market.
'If it's not grown in Armagh, it's not a true Armagh Bramley. That means consumers are guaranteed something authentic – fruit with a unique taste and texture you can't find anywhere else. It's also boosted demand – both at home and abroad – for a product that is trusted, traceable and rooted in place.
'It's one of only three products in Northern Ireland with PGI status and one of just a few across the island of Ireland. That's something we're incredibly proud of as a region.'
The apples also sparked a craft cider industry in Armagh.
Mr MacNeice said his family grow and press a blend of Armagh Bramley alongside bittersweet cider apples like Michelin, Dabinett and Harry Master's Jersey, as well as dessert apples such as Worcester Pearmain and Golden Delicious.
They have also started using foliar nutrition to feed their trees more precisely, keeping bees safe during blossom season, and are encouraging biodiversity by planting native trees and wildflowers throughout the orchards.
The Armagh Bramley apple continues to shape the landscape and identity of the region, offering visitors a unique lens through which to explore its agricultural heritage.
This year's food and cider weekend, including events from tastings and guided food trails to orchard tours, will take place from September 4 to 7.
A highlight of the weekend is an evening at Crannagael House, where local chefs from 4 Vicars create a menu paired with Mac Ivors cider and accompanied by insights from cider expert Gabe Cook.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
Let's Scotch the imitation spirits
After a landmark move in Argentina, Steph Innes looks at the benefits of Geographical Indication protection for Scotch whisky Sign up to our Scotsman Money newsletter, covering all you need to know to help manage your money. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Last month, Scotch whisky became the first-ever foreign product to gain Geographical Indication (GI) status in Argentina. Products labelled as Scotch whisky in Argentina will now be required to meet strict standards regarding the quality, method and location of distillation/maturation in order to comply with intellectual property (IP) law. The granting of this protection is encouraging not only for the Scotch whisky industry, but also underscores the demand for UK food and beverage exports generally, with GI-protected products comprising approximately 25% of all such exports last year. This milestone achievement in Argentina represents a significant commercial opportunity, given that the country is home to a growing consumer base with increasing appreciation for premium spirits. The successful GI application also demonstrates the effectiveness of coordinated industry efforts in securing robust intellectual property protections in key markets. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The protection afforded by GI status will help to combat the sale and distribution of counterfeit whisky products in Argentina. These products have the distinct look and feel of Scotch whisky, misleading consumers as to their authenticity and heritage, as well as undermining the premium reputation of genuine Scotch whisky brands. Geographical Indication status protects sales and the reputation of Scotch whisky (Picture: Adobe) Scotch whisky is a GI-protected product in the UK and European Union, as well as several other countries including Canada, India, China and Brazil. In other jurisdictions, it benefits from alternative measures, some of which offer weaker protections. Within territories that adopt a weaker IP protection regime, protecting the distinctiveness of Scotch whisky can be a significant challenge for producers and distributors. The most obvious threat takes the form of direct imitation, whereby products attempt to copy the branding and labelling of existing Scotch whisky brands. "Evocation", on the other hand, presents a more insidious form of challenge, involving sophisticated counterfeiters deliberately attempting to convince unsuspecting consumers that a product is genuine Scotch through the use of subtle descriptors which lead the consumer to mistakenly assume the authenticity and origin of that product. For example, in 2022, the Scotch Whisky Association was successful in stopping the use of 'Glen' in the name of a German whisky, given that the term, with its strong ties to the Scottish landscape, was suggestive of a genuine Scotch whisky and therefore misleading to consumers. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad However, even in jurisdictions that do recognise GI status, protecting the authenticity of Scotch whisky is not without its challenges. Many industry stakeholders are currently watching with interest the campaign launched by English distillers to obtain GI status for English whisky. Crucially, the proposed English definition of 'single malt' requires distillation at a single site but does not go as far as requiring the creation of spirit from malted barley at a single site, therefore differing from the long-established Scotch whisky process. Where the balance will be struck between tradition and innovation remains to be seen. Steph Innes says the challenges of protecting Scotch whisky will continue to grow as counterfeiters adopt increasingly sophisticated methods The challenges of protecting Scotch whisky will continue to grow as the industry continues to evolve across markets and counterfeiters adopt increasingly sophisticated methods. However, the Argentine success demonstrates that strategic legal action can secure meaningful protections. For the time being, GI status remains a powerful means by which to uphold the quality, calibre and rich tradition behind Scotch whisky.
The National
a day ago
- The National
The recent poll makes it clear – the EU door is open for Scotland
The news that there is overwhelming support among folks in five key EU members for an independent Scotland joining the bloc comes as no surprise – I've been having conversations with their representatives and diplomats for years. YouGov polled 2000 folks in Germany, and 1000 in Denmark, Spain, Italy and France asking: 'If Scotland voted for independence from the rest of the UK and asked to join the European Union, would you support or oppose allowing it to do so?' In Denmark, 75% support, 6% oppose; Germany, 68%/10%; Spain, 65%/13%; Italy, 64%/11%, and France, 63%/13%. I include the 'oppose' figures because it really is a slam dunk across all five countries: if people aren't actively in favour there are plenty don't know/don't cares, and little actual opposition. READ MORE: Police remove pro-Palestine protesters from John Swinney's Edinburgh Fringe show If anything, I'd love to see the numbers for all EU states and suspect they'd be similar, with potential Irish, Polish and other Scandinavian figures likely to be particularly intriguing. So we should be wary of the breathless 'we're Scots, everyone loves us!' attitude you'll find at the panglossian end of the Yes spectrum. There will be a serious negotiation and they'll argue hard for their interests (as indeed will we), but the upshot is clear – they want us in. The poll (and I really would urge reading it in full) also asked the question about the UK rejoining, and the numbers were less enthusiastic, but still remarkably positive given the last few years of nonsense, ranging from 51% in Italy to 53% in France, 60% in Spain and 63% in Germany. But, opposition was higher as were don't knows/don't cares. A salutary note for the UK's remainiacs, though – the EU deal you left isn't the one you'll get back. The UK had the financial rebate on the EU budget, opt-outs on passport-free travel, joining the euro and some aspects of judicial co-operation, and when asked about the UK joining but keeping them, all states bar Denmark (which has a couple of opt-outs too) were opposed. The UK, if it rejoins, will need to get over itself and join as a full, normal member. That causes no problems for Scotland given there are several dozen reasons why, like Ireland, we wouldn't want the opt-outs anyway (except for Schengen passport-free travel given, like Ireland, we only have one land border and let's assume the UK does not join any time soon). Even more salutary, the poll also asked 2000 or so UK folks whether they were in favour of rejoining, and 57% think they should keep the opt outs. Precisely the exceptionalist attitude that got the UK into this mess. So, for Scotland, game on. The last couple of weeks also showed other reasons why joining is urgent. The EU Commission president Dr Ursula von der Leyen came to Scotland to meet with visiting US president Donald Trump and agreed – or at least agreed in general terms yet to actually be agreed – a trade pact with the US. Where unease over the potential impact of the handshake has been voiced in various member state capitals, it is clear that the EU acting with one voice was taken seriously, to the extent the current US administration takes anything seriously. But more on that as the actual details emerge, closer to home, the first draft of the catchily named Multiannual Financial Framework was unveiled, the EU budget for 2028-2034. At €1.78 trillion (yes, trillion), it is a big old number but only 1.26% of the EU's Gross National Income. This is still a significant increase, and while this is only the EU Commission's first proposal and it will be hotly debated by the member states and EU Parliament, it shows a more assertive EU Commission, and more spending on an EU level. It was only released late last Tuesday so a lot of analysis will be done on the coming weeks, but a few things are clear. There will be a significant increase in EU defence, both in procuring new kit and in defence research and development spending. Scotland's universities and defence companies risk being excluded. The budget for renewables technology, research and the move to the just transition is in for significant increases – and again, our companies and researchers risk being left out – as well as on the infrastructure spending where Scotland has an urgent need for better grid connections to sell our abundant clean green energy. Agriculture and European food production continue to be supported, with €291 billion being ring-fenced for direct payments to farmers as part of a €387bn budget for other supports. NOT many Scots farmers voted for Brexit, but even so, have endured the triple whammy of having lost subsidy and access to the single market as well as being on the chopping block for any future UK trade deals, there's plenty of good news for Scots farmers in joining the EU. Cohesion policy – the EU structural funds Scotland made such good use of in building infrastructure and training – take a hit, with a smaller budget and less prominence. But it's still €392bn and non-members won't get buttons from it. The EU is moving on apace in a fast-changing world, and where the UK Government has made some steps in achieving a better mood music, there's no substitute for actual membership. I would welcome the UK getting serious about rejoining the EU, but in my heart of hearts, I just can't see it because too many UK politicians are running scared of populists. Scotland, however, has it all to play for.
The Herald Scotland
2 days ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump's stunning 39% tariff give Swiss watches hard time
The Swiss government said it viewed the White House's new tariffs with "great regret." The Swiss Federal Council said it remained in contact with U.S. authorities about the tariffs and "continues to strive for a negotiated solution." Guitars, bagels and booze: How Canadians became reluctant warriors in Trump tariff fight Only Laos and Myanmar (also known as Burma), at 40%, and Syria, at 41%, fared worse than Switzerland in terms of Trump's fresh tariffs on their goods. The Alpine country now has until Aug. 7 to work out a trade deal with the United States or chocolate, jewellery and, yes, watches, will be subject to levies more than double the 15% rate for most European Union imports into the United States. Switzerland's pharmaceuticals sector was not included in the tariffs. Switzerland shipped about $63 billion of goods to the United States in 2024, according to the office of the United States Trade Representative. That's about one-sixth of its total exports. Going the other way, goods exported from the United States to Switzerland totaled an estimated $25 billion last year, a trade deficit of $38 billion. The U.S. was Switzerland's top market in 2024 for perhaps its most famous good: timepieces. They accounted for about 17% of exports, or about $5.4 billion, according to Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry. July jobs report: employers added 73,000 jobs; unemployment rises Still, for the Swiss watch, Trump's 39% tariffs may amount to bad timing. The industry has struggled with weak demand from China, the Federation of the Swiss Watch Industry says. The trade uncertainty unleashed by Trump's tariffs over the last few months has meanwhile boosted the value of the Swiss franc currency, making the nation's watches more expensive for tourists who buy them while on vacation. Over the last decade, some brands of Swiss watch have also lost out on market share to the Apple Watch. Overall, Swiss watch exports have been falling. They were down as much as 10% in May. More: Trump's new tariffs slam trading partners, U.S. stock market: Live updates Financial markets in Switzerland were closed for a national holiday on Aug. 1, giving respite to the shares prices of producers such as Richemont and Swatch Group. But Watches of Switzerland Group, a retailer that sells Rolex and other timepieces in the United Kingdom and the United States, saw its U.K.-listed share prices fall nearly 8%. Critics of tariffs argue that the additional costs of goods are typically passed to the consumer. Analysts at Jefferies Global Research and Strategy told Bloomberg that if the 39% tariff goes ahead for Switzerland, it could require price increases in the United States for Swiss watches of more than 20%.
