US demands clarity from allies on their role in potential war over Taiwan, FT reports
Elbridge Colby, the U.S. under-secretary of defense for policy, has been pushing the matter during recent talks with defense officials of both countries, the report said, citing people familiar with the discussions.
According to the newspaper, the reported request caught both Tokyo and Canberra off guard, as the U.S. itself does not offer a blank cheque guarantee to defend Taiwan.
Reuters could not verify the report. The U.S. department of defense did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The U.S is Taiwan's most important arms supplier, despite a lack of formal diplomatic ties. Taiwan has faced increased military pressure from China, including several rounds of war games, as Beijing seeks to assert its sovereignty claims over the island. Taiwan rejects China's assertion of sovereignty.
Colby was deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development during President Donald Trump's first term. Colby is known for arguing that the U.S. military should prioritize competition with China and shift its focus from the Middle East and Europe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Australia PM touts green steel as iron ore miners meet Chinese steelmakers
By Lewis Jackson and Melanie Burton SHANGHAI (Reuters) -Australia and China should cooperate more closely over green steel, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said in Shanghai on Monday, even as he called on the world's largest steelmaker to address excess capacity for the metal. China relies on Australia for roughly two-thirds of the iron ore consumed by its vast steel industry, a trade that will earn Canberra A$105 billion ($68.90 billion) this financial year, according to the latest government estimates. However, attempts to clean up an industry responsible for roughly a tenth of all emissions put that trade for Australia at risk as decarbonisation requires higher grades of iron ore, found in countries like Guinea and Brazil. Green steel refers to metal produced using renewable energy such as hydrogen to limit or eliminate the use of coal, cutting carbon emissions. Speaking before a meeting between Australian iron ore miners and Chinese steelmakers, Albanese framed green steel as a way to grow Australia and China's decades-long trade relationship. "Achieving the goal of the Paris Agreement would require the decarbonisation of steel value chains, presenting an opportunity for Australia and China to progress our long-term economic interests," he said. Albanese also offered to work with China to reduce overcapacity in its steel industry, which is fuelling record exports that are in turn triggering a wave of tariffs and duties from trade partners like Vietnam and South Korea. Australia could lose as much as half its revenue from the sector if it fails to start producing green iron, a specialised lower emissions product, as other countries start making steel using renewable energy, a think tank said last year. Successfully building a green iron industry could double those revenues, the report suggested. Australian iron ore is too low-grade to be directly processed into green steel so it needs an additional processing step. When this step is undertaken with renewable energy such as hydrogen or biomass instead of coal, it is called green iron which becomes a low-carbon base for green steel production. Top iron ore miners Rio Tinto, BHP Group, and Fortescue, who also attended the meeting, all have green iron projects underway, with Fortescue set to produce green iron from a pilot plant this year. Fortescue founder Andrew Forrest, in China with Albanese, said the relationships forged between Chinese steelmakers and Australian miners strengthened the bonds between both countries and security issues were a "distraction." Forrest was responding to a question about whether a debate around security that emphasises China's risk was detrimental to the two countries' economic relationship, in the context of China framing itself as a more stable partner than the United States. Australia and New Zealand both said they did not receive adequate warnings of live-fire drills by China's navy in the Tasman Sea between Australia and New Zealand earlier this year. "Australia has a multilayered relationship, as it must, with China, and to really build up the strength of a bilateral relationship you need those strong friendships, that very real business trust between each other," Forrest said. ($1 = 1.5239 Australian dollars) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Bloomberg
27 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Albanese Reaffirms Taiwan Stance as He Starts China Visit
Australia opposes any unilateral moves to change the Taiwan Strait status quo, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said as he began a trip to China to maintain steady ties with his country's top trading partner. 'It's important that we have a consistent position, which Australia has had for a long period of time,' Albanese said at a news conference in Shanghai on Sunday. 'We don't support any unilateral action there. We have a clear position, and we have been consistent about that.'
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nine denies Lattouf contempt over pro-Israel lobbyists
Pro-Israel lobbyists harassed for complaining about an ABC radio host's views on Palestine want another media company to be prosecuted for revealing their names. Antoinette Lattouf was ousted from her casual position on ABC Radio Sydney's Mornings program in December 2023. She was awarded $70,000 for her unlawful termination in June. Federal Court Justice Darryl Rangiah found the national broadcaster removed her from air following pressure from an orchestrated campaign by pro-Israel lobbyists. Nine of those who complained had their names suppressed in February as the hearing started. The group returned to court on Monday, asking Justice Rangiah to refer Nine-owned newspapers to a registrar for prosecution for alleged contempt of court. Prominent barrister Sue Chrysanthou SC argued at an earlier hearing Nine failed to promptly take down or amend January 2024 articles published in the Sydney Morning Herald and The Age containing the names of four individuals who complained. It took the publisher six weeks to remove the names despite repeated letters, she said. A separate article by the Nine-owned Pedestrian TV also identifying some of the complainants was taken down in April. There had been no apology nor a promise to not divulge the names in the future. "All of the respondents are completely unrepentant in relation to the infringement of the order," Ms Chrysanthou said in June. The contempt case has also been brought against journalists Michael Bachelard and Calum Jaspan, editors Bevan Shields and Patrick Elligett and Nine's in-house lawyers Larina Alick and Sam White. Nine's barrister Tom Blackburn SC denied there was any contempt at all when the hearing continued on Monday. His clients could not have breached the court's order suppressing any names or identities because the wording did not specify who the order related to, he argued. 'It's just impossible that there could be a wilful and contumacious contempt in this case in circumstances where we didn't know who the protected people were," he said. The case against the two journalists was "utterly hopeless" as neither had the power to remove or amend the articles, Mr Blackburn said. Similar submissions were made regarding the "incoherent" case brought against the two in-house lawyers. Mr Blackburn argued the case should not be referred to a registrar and that the pro-Israel group should be made to pay his clients' legal costs. Ms Chrysanthou urged Justice Rangiah to refer the matter on, saying the judge only needed to be convinced there was an arguable case of contempt. Nine knew exactly who the suppression order referred to and eventually removed the precise names of the complainants from the articles, she said. Justice Rangiah will deliver his decision at a later date.
