Iconic NYC eateries are flunking — and sometimes hiding — their health inspections
A slew of New York City's most iconic eateries have been slapped with C ratings — the lowest possible grade — by city health inspectors.
The violations ranged from evidence of mice, roaches and flies, to unclean employees and sloppy food prep.
But several of the C-listers displayed a notice reading 'grade pending,' an indication the restaurant is contesting the grade, or didn't post the grade at all. One eatery hid their dismal rating behind a trash can, The Post found.
Van Leeuwen Ice Cream
The upscale Spring Street creamery in Nolita was cited for 'evidence of mice' and lack of a proper hand-washing facility. The creamery, where a pint of ice cream runs $12, artfully obscured their C with an outdoor garbage pail.
An employee working the counter told The Post that her manager instructed employees to 'hide it with a trash can.'
'Health and food safety is of utmost importance to Van Leeuwen. Any issues have been promptly remedied and we are awaiting re-inspection,' a spokesman said.
Gallaghers
The famed midtown steakhouse, where a prime rib costs $78 before the fixings, proudly displayed their C rating after being dinged for posting a fake A in the window last year. The posh eatery had kitchen surfaces that were 'not properly washed' and 'conditions conducive to rodents, insects or other pests.'
'The issues that yielded us a C rating were not a reflection of food handling or sanitation. The issues cited were rectified immediately, yet that rating has still been on our window for six months as we have not been given an opportunity to be re-evaluated in all that time,' a spokesman said of city health inspectors.
Grimaldi's
The famed Brooklyn pizzeria in DUMBO was briefly shuttered in 2018 by the city over a mouse poop problem which forced a company official to take a food-protection certification class.
The restaurant still carries a C grade from the city, records show. During a November review, city inspectors found 'evidence of mice,' contaminated food, and insufficient barriers to prevent 'bare hand contact with food.' A 'grade pending' notice was visible from a window near the door.
Anna Shi, a Jersey-based finance professional, took her mother to Grimaldi's for lunch Wednesday and said the food was 'quite tasty' but added she 'probably wouldn't come back' after being informed of the restaurant's' history of sanitation troubles.
A restaurant manager declined to comment.
Flash Dancers
At the iconic jiggle joint in midtown the Health Department found evidence of 'live roaches' during a November visit. The agency also noted 'conditions conducive to rodents, insects or other pests.'
The burlesque house serves 'delicious fine dining' according to its website, and features a sprawling menu with sushi, prime ribeye steak, chicken wings and more.
But it does not display its grade at all. When The Post asked to see it, a bouncer showed the reporter the door and said, 'Have a nice day.'
The Renaissance Hotel Chelsea
At the Marriott-owned hotel, a basic room can cost nearly $600 a night. But their restaurant Carne — which offers a $145 bistecca alla Florentina — was cited for 'filth flies,' a catch-all term covering house flies, blow flies, bottle flies, flesh flies and drain flies. The eatery was also dinged for 'food contact surface not properly washed' and keeping food at incorrect temperatures. A 'grade pending' notice hung in the bar just outside main dining room.
'Living here for a long time, I don't really go less than B, just as a personal policy,' said TJ Zafarana, a 35-year-old designer milling around the lobby when The Post visited, saying was 'surprised' by the low grade.
A front desk attendant declined to comment.
The High Line Hotel
The High Line hotel in Chelsea — where customers shell out $500 a night for a regular room — took a C rating for its indoor coffee bar and cafe just off the main lobby. Health authorities zapped the indoor bar with violations for filth flies and evidence of mice over two inspections in 2024. DOH also noted a 'live animal' present in food or non-food areas.
'I come here every day,' said Sara, an artist, sitting next to the bar with dog Rosy, adding she was unbothered by the poor report card. 'I have nothing negative to say.'
The hotel did not display their health grade and refused to present it to The Post when asked.
'Our letter grading is pending, we are waiting for a re-inspection … I am not going to discuss this with you,' hotel general manager Abbey Rader said.
Max Brenner Chocolate Bar
When The Post walked into Max Brenner's sprawling Union Square chocolate-themed restaurant Wednesday afternoon, it found the cavernous space mostly empty. Three older women sat at one table drinking Heineken.
Brenner was cited for filth flies and 'inadequate' personal cleanliness of staff. Executive Chef Jorge Paguay, 35, freely admitted to many of the issues.
'It's nothing about food, it was a couple of flies,' Paguay insisted. 'We have already fixed everything.'
City Winery
The sprawling restaurant and music venue in Hudson Square offering breathtaking views of the Hudson River, was dinged for not having their wipes stored in a 'clean and dry' or 'sanitizing solution' between uses. Past violations have included trouble with 'filth flies' and staff 'personal cleanliness.'
Multiple City Winery officials who met The Post duringanunannouncedvisitinsisted all issues had been corrected. One even suggested a kitchen tour — something COO Carl Segal quickly vetoed. A 'grade pending' sign was displayed in a window.
New York City restaurants have been required to post sanitary inspection grades since 2010, with the letters doled by DOH inspectors during random visits. A score of 0 to 13 is an A; 14 to 27 points is a B and 28 or more points is a C, according to the DOH.
The grades must be posted in a front window, on a door or outside wall where they are easily seen by passersby and failure to post the ratings could result in a $1,000 fine.
'The mice part is the hardest thing for us. They are constantly making new holes,' said Brooklyn restaurateur Ali Ahmed — who owns five eateries in the city, all of which have A ratings.
'Our exterminator comes in once a week and we pay him really well. And I think that's where these restaurants are just failing. Their extermination company is just not doing good by them. And that's the hardest battle.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
3 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Insurer Blue Shield of California's new parent company alarms consumer advocates
Last year, regulators approved a request by Blue Shield of California, the state's third-largest health insurer, to restructure and establish a new parent corporation in Delaware. The Oakland-based nonprofit got the go-ahead from the Department of Managed Health Care, or DMHC, to create an entity called Ascendiun Inc., which is now the out-of-state corporate parent of Blue Shield. The insurer said that the restructuring would allow it to better serve its members 'with less bureaucracy and faster results, while making health care more affordable.' But the transaction has raised alarm among a former high-level Blue Shield executive and consumer advocates, who complain that it was carried out with no public oversight and could allow the insurer to transfer money to a Delaware parent company with few strings attached. The activists claim that some of that money could be used to boost its spending on charitable endeavors. The company has accrued a surplus of more than $4 billion over the decades as it benefited from its former tax-exempt status, according to a regulatory filing. 'The move guts the ability of the DHMC to enforce Blue Shield's nonprofit obligations to the California public and gives Blue Shield's directors ... a virtually free hand to make use of Blue Shield's billions of dollars in charitable assets as they please,' wrote Michael Johnson, the insurer's former vice president of public policy, in a recent letter to Mary Watanabe, director of the department, which was reviewed by The Times. Johnson is calling for the department to rescind its approval and unwind the restructuring. The department maintains that the insurer is not subject to charitable trust rules as a nonprofit mutual benefit corporation. In a statement, the department said it 'maintains full regulatory authority and enforcement of all Blue Shield of California health plan operations,' and reviewed the transaction to ensure that it will not harm the plan's financial viability. Blue Shield's restructuring is reviving a longstanding debate about whether one of the state's largest insurers is reinvesting enough of its profit to lower its rates, better serve low-income residents and provide coverage for underserved areas of the state. Controversy over the company's role as a nonprofit previously aired in 2015 as it sought approval from the department for its $1.2-billion purchase of Care1st, a Medicaid health plan. Blue Shield has disputed Johnson's claims, noting that the state has determined it is not subject to the rules governing charitable nonprofits. In the Jan. 8 announcement of its restructuring, Blue Shield also disclosed that it was forming a for-profit subsidiary called Stellarus that would provide services to other health plans, such as delivering drugs to patients more inexpensively than pharmacy benefit managers. Ascendiun is structured as a nonprofit and Blue Shield and the company's Medi-Cal insurer, Blue Shield of California Promise Health Plan — the former Care1st — also would continue as nonprofits, the insurer said at the time. 'This structure is not uncommon among health plans, as many across the country — including other nonprofit Blue Cross and Blue Shield companies — have made similar corporate reorganizations to better serve their membership,' the insurer said in its statement to The Times. Blue Shield was established in 1939 by the California Medical Assn. as the nation's first prepaid health plan to cover physician bills. It followed the creation of the first Blue Cross plan, in Texas, to pay for hospital bills. The California insurer did not pay federal taxes until a change in the law in 1986. And it was exempt from state taxes until the Franchise Tax Board revoked that status in August 2014 after a scathing audit that The Times first reported. The audit found that Blue Shield was operating similarly to a for-profit company, with executives instructed to 'maximize profitability.' The tax board also found that the insurer had stockpiled 'extraordinarily high surpluses' even as it failed to offer enough public benefits, such as more affordable coverage. Blue Shield denied the accusations but ultimately relinquished its tax-exempt status, even as it has continued to pursue an appeal of an order requiring it to pay more than $100 million in back taxes. Johnson contends that the new corporate structure will allow Blue Shield to move its assets around in pursuit of its business goals with little oversight beyond maintaining required reserves — especially given its parent company's incorporation in Delaware, a business-friendly state where most Fortune 500 companies are registered. The DMHC strengthened reserve requirements in approving the deal and it now totals about $2.1 billion, according to a regulatory filing, which Johnson says would allow Blue Shield to transfer about $2.4 billion to Ascendiun. Charles Bell, a healthcare advocate who was involved in last decade's debate over Blue Shield's charitable obligations, is troubled by the decision to establish an out-of-state parent. 'I think that the changes in corporate structure that were made are highly concerning, and it should have received a much higher level of public scrutiny and a lot more skepticism by the Department of Managed Health Care,' said Bell, advocacy programs director for Consumers Union, the publisher of Consumer Reports. The department said in its response to The Times that it 'may hold public meetings if a transaction meets certain requirements to qualify as a major transaction. Upon due consideration, the Department determined that the specific facts of this restructuring did not meet the criteria set out in law to hold a public meeting.' Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans have a long history of restructuring, including Blue Cross of California. That insurer broke ground when in 1993 it spun off a recently established for-profit subsidiary, Wellpoint Health Networks. Blue Cross was later required to distribute $3.2 billion to a pair of new nonprofits, the California Endowment and the California Health Care Foundation, which are still operating. Less than a decade later, Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans in more than dozen other states had converted to for-profits, typically highly controversial proposals, given questions about what was to become of their billions of dollars of assets. More recently, the nonprofits have converted into mutual insurance holding companies. That allows them to maintain their nonprofit status while funding for-profit ventures, such as in technology, said Brendan Bridgeland, an attorney with the Center for Insurance Research in Cambridge, Mass. What is unusual about Blue Shield of California's restructuring, he said, is that the DMHC allowed it to establish an out-of-state parent company. 'Once you reach the point where the subsidiary starts transferring money up to the parent and it gets reallocated, then it's going to be out of their control,' Bridgeland said. Johnson's concerns are rooted in efforts last decade by healthcare advocates to have Blue Shield declared a charitable organization and to dig into its assets to improve patient care as a condition of its approval to acquire Care1st. Johnson worked at Blue Shield from 2003 until 2015, when he resigned to mount a public campaign to pressure the insurer over its nonprofit mission. Johnson has been involved in litigation with his former employer, which sued him in 2015 alleging he disclosed confidential information, including Blue Shield's communications with the Franchise Tax Board. In a settlement, he agreed to no longer retain or disseminate such documents. In seeking to retain its state tax-exemption during its audit by the board, which began in 2013, Blue Shield argued that should it dissolve, its assets could be distributed only to another nonprofit. Yet, the insurer told the DMHC, when the agency reviewed the proposed acquisition in 2015, that as a nonprofit mutual-benefit corporation it served only its enrollees and had no such obligations. Ultimately, the department decided that Blue Shield did not have the charitable obligations though it required the insurer, in approving the acquisition that year, to refrain from making 'misleading or inconsistent' statements regarding the distribution of its assets if it ever were dissolved. 'Through this process there have been inconsistencies in what Blue Shield has said. It was frustrating because we had to spend a lot of time and energy to make sure what was true,' the department's then director, Shelley Rouillard, said at the time. The insurer pledged as part of the Care1st acquisition to spend $200 million over the next decade on several initiatives aimed at providing better patient care. Nevertheless, patient advocates criticized the DMHC's finding that Blue Shield did not have charitable obligations, saying the state lost the opportunity to regulate how the insurer spent its billions in assets — and then failed to impose tougher conditions on the insurer, such as limiting its ability to impose rate increases deemed unreasonable. In his March letter, Johnson called on the DMHC to require Blue Shield to spend annually at least 5% of its total assets on community benefits, which might go, for example, to grants to community clinics in underserved areas of the state. Blue Shield defended its charitable spending, noting that it caps its annual profit at 2% and allocates additional revenue to such services as delivering COVID vaccines at no cost to the state, and funding nonprofits that advance mental health. 'Blue Shield … has consistently supported its members and California communities throughout the state,' the company said. Johnson also contends newly public documents show Blue Shield has continued to argue before state tax authorities that it is a charitable trust. In the opening brief of its back taxes case in 2020, the insurer cites a state Supreme Court case that it said confirms 'Blue Shield operates exclusively for the promotion of social welfare,' his letter notes. Blue Shield told The Times that it has provided 'consistent information to DMHC about its corporate restructuring' and that Johnson's letter provided 'no new evidence' regarding Blue Shield's status as a 'tax-paying not-for-profit mutual benefit corporation.' Johnson and the DMHC traded additional letters last week, with Johnson questioning why the department had not reviewed the new tax appeal documents or why they had not reviewed Ascendiun's articles of incorporation or bylaws prior to approving the restructuring. Janet Rickershauser, a nonprofits lawyer at Hurwit & Associates, said that the bylaws are important to understanding the parent company's operations, including the relationship of the subsidiaries to each other and the holding parent company. In a letter sent June 23 to Johnson, Jonathon Williams, an assistant chief counsel at the DMHC, said the department concluded it was 'not necessary or appropriate' to review the tax-appeal documents in its review of Blue Shield's application to restructure nor conduct a 'full evaluation of Delaware's corporation statutory scheme.' The department told The Times that it conducted a 'comprehensive review' of the articles of incorporation of Blue Shield and its Medicaid Promise Health Plan as required by state law. Although it did not review Ascendiun's bylaws or articles of incorporation, the department said it retained its regulatory authority over Blue Shield. Blue Shield said it would not release it bylaws because they are 'confidential company documents.' However, Rickershauser said that 'hiding the ball on the bylaws is preventing transparency into important aspects of how they're operating.'
New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
The ‘silent disease' sneaking up on men — and 4 ways to battle it
Turns out that more men need to bone up on their bone density. Some 2 million US men suffer from osteoporosis, a slow-developing 'silent disease' that makes bones weak and brittle, according to the National Spine Health Foundation. Another 16 million men have osteopenia, which describes mild osteoporosis or pre-osteoporosis. Despite its prevalence, a new survey commissioned by The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center found that only 1% of men are concerned about low bone density. 4 Osteoporosis, which makes bones weak and brittle, affects 2 million US men. Graphicroyalty – No bones about it — this could be a grave error. Falls are the leading cause of injuries and injury-related deaths in adults 65 and older. Even minor falls can result in bone fractures if there has been a decrease in bone density and strength. 'Unfortunately, there are no warning signs before it presents with a fracture,' Dr. Paul Lewis, an interventional radiologist at Wexner, told The Post of osteoporosis. 4 Walking and other weight-bearing exercises may help stave off osteoporosis. The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center The good news is that there are prevention strategies — Lewis has four recommendations. First, men should start discussing testosterone with their doctor at the age of 30. Testosterone tends to decrease with age. Low T contributes to weaker bones and increases the risk of osteoporosis in men. Workouts that build bone density and improve balance should also be on their radar in their 30s and 40s. Think weight-bearing exercises like walking, hiking and stair climbing, resistance training with weights or bands and yoga or other balance exercises. 'Some exercises can combine into helping your heart as well, such as pickleball, tennis or other sports,' said Lewis, an associate professor at Ohio State's College of Medicine. 'Other practical options are walking the golf course instead of riding the cart, taking the stairs instead of the elevator [and] actively playing with your children or pets.' 4 Men in their 30s and 40s should look into workouts that build bone density and improve balance. junky_jess – Lewis warns that not participating in resistance training can mean a loss of up to 3% of bone mass a year. Don't push too hard, regardless of the activity — Lewis cautions that doing too much or exercising the wrong way, like with poor form, can lead to injury. Also, consider lifestyle changes. Tobacco use, more than two alcoholic drinks a day, physical inactivity, poor nutrition, falls related to environmental hazards and neuromuscular conditions increase the risk of osteoporosis. And finally, Lewis recommends getting a screening test, like a DEXA scan. 4 The DEXA scan, which reveals body composition and bone density, is shown here. Olga Ginzburg for NY Post The low-dose X-ray measures bone density to diagnose osteoporosis. If you do develop osteoporosis and spinal fractures, kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty are treatment options. In kyphoplasty, a small balloon is carefully inflated to make room in the fractured vertebra. A synthetic material known as bone cement is injected into the space. In vertebroplasty, bone cement is injected directly into the fractured vertebra without a balloon. 'Both procedures aim to relieve pain, restore vertebral height and enhance spinal stability, allowing patients to regain function and mobility,' Lewis said. 'They are performed under a twilight sedation and fluoroscopic imaging guidance. Patients experience minimal downtime and faster recovery compared to open surgery.'
Buzz Feed
a day ago
- Buzz Feed
This Affordable Moisturizer Is *Incredibly* High Rated
To make the claim that something is 'the best' takes a lot of consideration and research on our part. But, after several praises sung by experts in skincare, tons of positive ratings and some of the most convincing testimonies from people like myself, it's finally time for us to name the original CeraVe Moisturizing Cream as the best moisturizer out there to date. We've given this unassuming and ubiquitous hydrator this title for reasons such as its accessible price point and its truly all-purpose usage that's compatible with even the most sensitive skin types. However, after a dermatologist that we interviewed for a recent story said that the CeraVe cream was one of their 'favorite moisturizers in the entire world,' we knew it was more than just a good product. When board-certified and Texas-based dermatologist Dr. Seemal R. Desai at Innovative Dermatology previously spoke to HuffPost about the best products to manage crepey skin, he explained that moisturizers with thick emollients are what help to replace the ceramides and lipid concentration in the skin, which can help with overall hydration. And like all of the products in CeraVe's line, be it their cult-favorite face washes or targeted serums, this custard-like cream is formulated with three essential ceramides that are fundamental for not just hydration, as mentioned earlier, but for helping to maintain a healthy skin barrier. The formula also contains hyaluronic acid, a tried-and-true humectant that draws moisture into the skin. As a long time sufferer of this common skin condition, I can personally attest to how beneficial the CeraVe Moisturizing Cream has been to managing any irritation, redness and flaking that occurs. In fact, it's the only moisturizer I've continuously used on my body for the past decade because I know it won't exacerbate my incredibly dry and finicky epidermis. Other users of this $14 cream have made similar claims as myself and have even attributed the formula for improving the appearance of fine lines and wrinkles and managing painful skin cracking brought on by the winter elements. Others state that it's the perfect priming layer to wear underneath makeup. As if these assuring words and endless endorsements from dermatologists weren't enough, you can read on to just a few of the promising reviews we found for the CeraVe cream, a product that might be one of the highest rated items we've seen on Amazon. Or grab yourself a long-lasting 8- or 19-ounce tub from any of the above retailers. Get it from Amazon for $13.52+ (available in two sizes).
