MPs to reintroduce bill in name of girl, 9, who died in pollution-linked death
She became the first person to have air pollution listed as a cause of death following a landmark inquest in 2020.
Sian Berry, Green MP for Brighton Pavilion will present the bill to the House of Commons with a speech on Tuesday July 1, with the aim of making clean air a human right under UK law.
If passed, the bill would require the Government to achieve clean air throughout England by January 1 2030, setting out a pathway to bring the country in line with World Health Organisation air pollution guidelines.
She has so far been backed by cross-party Labour, Liberal Democrat, SNP and Independent MPs but hopes that more will support the bill and it will be picked up by the Government in the next King's Speech.
Ella's mother Rosamund Adoo Kissi-Debrah has long campaigned for the Government to introduce stricter air pollution limits since her daughter died.
In 2022, a similar version of Ella's law was steered through the House of Lords by Green Party peer Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb.
It was later sponsored by Caroline Lucas MP in the Commons until Parliament was dissolved for the 2024 general election.
Ms Berry said: 'Deaths like Ella's, and the millions of lives blighted by preventable diseases caused by air pollution, can be a thing of the past if Governments start taking the right action now.
'Rosamund's campaign is gaining momentum and communities across the country are raising air pollution as a key problem in their local area, so it is great to have representatives from all parties joining together to press for a legal right to breathe clean air.
'Finally passing Ella's Law will save lives, as it will make sure we get new targets, and the funding for local areas to achieve them by cutting down on the many causes of toxic pollution, from road traffic to wood burning.'
Ms Adoo Kissi-Debrah said: 'I am delighted Sian and the cross-section of MPs are taking forward Ella's Law in parliament.
'Tackling air pollution should not be a partisan issue, it affects us all, in every constituency in the country.
'I believe that everyone has a right to breathe clean air, no matter where they live, the colour of their skin or their socio-economic background.
'We know that air pollution affects most people in this country, but the harshest effects are felt by poorer and marginalised communities.
'I hope this Labour Government will therefore take forward this Bill to protect all children and adults from the devastating effects of breathing toxic air.'
The announcement comes as campaigners, health professionals, local authorities and schools across the country will mark Clean Air Day on Thursday.
In the UK, toxic air pollution is estimated to cause between 29,000 and 43,000 premature deaths every year, according to The Committee on the Medical Effects of Air Pollution.
Sarah Sleet, chief executive at Asthma + Lung UK, said: 'These early deaths represent a failure of government to act as current policies and targets do not do enough to protect public health.
'Toxic air has a detrimental impact on the millions of people living with a lung condition in the UK – with four out of five telling us that it makes their breathing difficulties worse.
'We need action now to protect the public's lungs.'
Ella's estate, over which Ms Adoo-Kissi-Debrah acts as administrator, sued the Environment Department (Defra), the Department for Transport and the Department of Health and Social Care for compensation over her 'illness and premature death'.
In October last year, three Government departments settled the claim brought by law firm Hodge Jones & Allen for an undisclosed sum, and issued a statement telling Ms Adoo-Kissi-Debrah 'we are truly sorry for your loss' and that no child should have to suffer as Ella did.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
12 minutes ago
- The Guardian
New Zealand to charge foreign tourists to visit most famous sites
New Zealand plans to start charging international tourists fees to enter its famous natural sites and will make it easier for businesses to operate on conservation land as part of a controversial proposal to 'unleash' growth on ecologically and culturally protected areas. The government plans to start charging foreign visitors NZ$20-40 ($12-24) per person to access some sites. Initially, those would probably include Cathedral Cove/Te Whanganui-a-Hei, Tongariro Crossing, Milford Track and Aoraki Mount Cook. The fees are likely to be imposed from 2027. The conservation minister, Tama Potaka, said those fees could generate NZ$62m a year 'so we can keep investing in the sites that underpin so much of our tourism sector'. The government's announcements form part of a wider shake-up of conservation law that will also make selling or exchanging conservation land easier and allow more activities to go ahead on conservation without needing a permit. 'In the spirit of saying yes to more jobs, more growth and higher wages', the government would 'unleash a fresh wave of concessions' including in tourism, agriculture and infrastructure at some locations, the prime minister, Christopher Luxon, said on Saturday. Conservation land is protected, publicly owned land and makes up a third of New Zealand territory. It covers areas with biodiversity, historic or cultural value. Some businesses such as ski fields and grazing already operated on conservation land but many other businesses struggled to gain the same permission, Luxon said. It is the latest policy that seeks to loosen regulation on natural sites and species to enable economic growth. In 2024, the government passed a law that could see contentious mining and infrastructure projects fast-tracked for approval. It has also proposed a law change to make it easier for companies to kill protected wildlife in order to pursue certain infrastructure projects. Conservation and climate initiatives have also faced budget cuts. But critics say the changes risk harming the environment and vulnerable species. New Zealand has high rates of endemic biodiversity but some species are in worrying decline, with a high proportion threatened or at risk of extinction. Green party co-leader Chlöe Swarbrick said Luxon was putting profit above the protection of nature. 'That tells us everything we need to know about who he thinks he works for. It's not regular people, future generations or a healthy environment,' she said in a statement to the Guardian. Nicola Toki, the chief executive of New Zealand's largest conservation organisation, Forest & Bird, said the latest reforms 'represent the most significant weakening of conservation law in a generation' and would increase pressure on vulnerable species. 'They shift the focus from protection to exploitation, dismantling the very purpose of our national parks and conservation lands.'
The National
29 minutes ago
- The National
Campaigners win legal battle against 171-turbine Sutherland wind farm
Scotland's highest civil court ruled that minister had not given adequate reasons for the approval of the Strath Oykel wind farm near Rosehall. Resident could be surrounded by 171 turbines if built, with what has been dubbed as a 'ring of steel'. German developer Energiekontor lodged the application in 2022. The turbines were expected to remain in place for 35 years within the Strath Oykel Forest. READ MORE: Storm Floris Live: Latest warnings, transport cancellations and road closures One campaigner from the No Ring of Steel (NOROS) group, Tisi Dutton, told STV News that ministers must now 'reconsider the application'. She said: 'I believe the legal process is being followed as it should be. It's now up to ministers to reconsider the application. 'The encirclement of the strath is at the forefront of NOROS' thinking. We will request that ministers follow the refusal, as has been recommended by the two reporters. 'We're not against windfarms per se, but you've got to have the right development in the right place.' The development proposal had faced more than 150 objections, was unanimously rejected by Highland Council, and a public inquiry took place in October 2024, in which councillors did not waver after they were asked to reconsider by the Government. Reporters working on behalf of the government also recommended that the plans be refused. However, the government green lit the project, with Highland Council responding with a legal challenge. Judges have now ruled that ministers failed to provide adequate reasons, with ministers arguing the development will 'provide a contribution to renewable energy targets and carbon savings' and 'will provide economic benefits which also weigh in its favour.' READ MORE: How war became a route to growth for the west With Strath Oykel known for its wildlife and fisheries, Dutton said: 'It's endangerment of the significant area of conservation which is the River Oykel and it's there to protect critically endangered freshwater pearl mussels and endangered Atlantic salmon. 'Freshwater pearl mussels are very susceptible to any pollution and any kind of mitigation has been found to be usually and most likely to be unsatisfactory in protecting these creatures. She added: 'We're, in a way, guardians of this strath – of its biodiversity – but also of its community because if you destroy the river you destroy employment. 'If you destroy the beauty of the place you destroy tourism, and the river and tourism are two key areas of employment here. 'It's heartbreaking and it's constant, but Noros will keep going within the planning framework. It's immensely important that we keep fighting against the developments that threaten this strath.' Scottish Government ministers now have four options under consideration: they may invite further public comment on the planning application; issue a revised approval; uphold the recommended refusal put forward by two independent public inquiry reporters; or initiate a new public inquiry under the oversight of a different reporter. The Scottish Government can now:
Cambrian News
an hour ago
- Cambrian News
'Unpalatable' cuts for Powys health board to find £35m savings
At a board meeting on 30 July, members heard the latest position the health board finds itself in, is an expectation from the Welsh Government to find £35.6 million of cuts this year.
