‘Materialists': Matchmaker, matchmaker, make me a mess
I disagreed—'Past Lives' was my
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
Since A24 is treating this movie as a rom-com, I suppose I should as well. So, stop me if you've heard me say this a bazillion times before: All a rom-com (or a movie purporting to diss rom coms) needs to be successful is two characters whom the audience wants to see fall in love. That's it. The reason why the majority of these films fail is that the filmmakers needlessly overcomplicate matters to the point of convolution. These movies want to be about emotion, but the plot keeps getting in the way.
Advertisement
Dakota Johnson and Pedro Pascal in 'Materialists.'
Atsushi Nishijima
Advertisement
The sides of this film's love triangle are Lucy (Dakota Johnson), a matchmaker whose matches have resulted in 9 marriages; Harry (Pedro Pascal), the brother of her most recent success, whom she meets at her client's wedding; and John (Chris Evans, coasting on his charm), her struggling actor ex-boyfriend who lives with two roommates in the kind of cluttered (and realistic) apartment you don't normally see in New York City movies.
The movie works best when dealing with Lucy's job,
Meanwhile, Harry is referred to as 'a unicorn' several times throughout 'Materialists.' That's a familiar term in rom-com land—it means he's the perfect catch. Harry is rich, lives in a $12 million apartment so awesome that it distracts Lucy during foreplay, and has a confidence that sparkles and the rugged good looks of Pedro Pascal.
Conversely, John works for a catering company, barely has enough money to survive in Manhattan from day-to-day, and is chasing an acting career he clearly will never have. (The film's biggest laugh comes when you discover who wrote the bad play John is currently doing.) John is as broke as Harry is rich—in fact, Lucy admits that she ended their 5-year relationship because he was so poor. And yet, John still pines for her like a lost puppy.
Advertisement
In an odd move, John is treated less like the ex our hero should really end up with and more like the standard issue rom-com gay BFF who's always there when needed. (Lucy calls him for advice or support more than once.) Except he's straight, has no sass, and even fewer powers of observation.
Dakota Johnson and Chris Evans in 'Materialists.'
Atsushi Nishijima
Of course, to adhere to the rom-com tropes Song thinks she's mocking, things have to get complicated. They do so in the aforementioned dark subplot that is not handled well at all, despite the fine acting by Winters. See my rating description if you wish to know more.
Watching this film, I kept being reminded of Joan Micklin Silver's 'Crossing Delancey,' an infinitely better movie that skewers rom-com tropes by presenting an often infuriating protagonist played by Amy Irving. It even has a matchmaker. Might I suggest you rent that and bypass this altogether? Because, to be honest, I don't know why any fan of rom-coms would want to see 'Materialists.' It's designed to punish you for liking what you like, so why waste your money?
The film makes you think it's better and more respectable than the average rom-com, only to end the exact same way they all do. A24 made a killing by releasing what critics called 'elevated horror.' Now, the studio is peddling the 'elevated rom-com,' a new genre I hope I never have to see again.
Advertisement
★1/2
MATERIALISTS
Written and directed by Celine Song. Starring Dakota Johnson, Pedro Pascal, Chris Evans, Zoe Winters. At Coolidge Corner, AMC Boston Common, Landmark Kendall Square, Alamo Drafthouse Seaport, AMC Causeway, suburbs. 116 min. R (profanity, discussions of sexual assault)
Odie Henderson is the Boston Globe's film critic.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
an hour ago
- Tom's Guide
I didn't like Ari Aster's black comedy starring Pedro Pascal and Joaquin Phoenix — but not for the reasons most people are hating it
Ari Aster's "Eddington" has been making noise at film festivals for a while now, but it only came out in U.S. theaters this past weekend. So on opening night, I headed to my local theater to watch Joaquin Phoenix and Pedro Pascal face off in this dark comedy set in the early days of COVID-19. Fast forward two and a half hours and I walked out of my theater deeply disappointed. That's not a unique reaction to seeing this movie. "Eddington" is currently at 67% "fresh" according to critics on Rotten Tomatoes and 64% "hot" by audiences. People are either loving this movie, or they're hating it, and there are plenty of people on both sides of the divide. HBO Max gives you tons of hit shows and movies, from HBO Originals to A24 movies and more. Ironically, that's pretty fitting given the subject matter of Ari Aster's modern Western. The film's main purpose is to hold up a mirror to the divisiveness of America that kicked into high gear in 2020 and is still pervasive today. If it had held to that purpose, I'd probably be writing a different, more positive review. Here's a bit more about what "Eddington" is about and why I'd wait until it hits HBO Max to watch it. "Eddington" is set in a New Mexico town of the same name, during May 2020, as COVID-19 makes its way through the U.S. It stars Joaquin Phoenix as Joe Cross, the sheriff for Sevilla County, where Eddington resides, and Pedro Pascal as Ted Garcia, the mayor of the small town of a couple thousand people. At this point, the pandemic has already set everyone on edge, with some, like Joe, thinking that too many freedoms are being rescinded and others, like Ted, thinking that it's what is required for the town to survive. But that's not the only force at work here. Joe is friendly towards conspiracy theories, and both his wife (Emma Stone) and his mother-in-law (Diedre O'Connell) fully go down the rabbit hole. Meanwhile, Ted is trying to get an AI data center built to bring money to Eddington, but it's unclear how much of that money might make it his way directly. These factors all combine to convince Joe he needs to run against Ted in the upcoming mayoral race, and he deputizes his deputy sheriffs (Luke Grimes, Micheal Ward) to help him take down Ted. But those plans get thrown into chaos once the Black Lives Matter protests following the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis, Minnesota, begin in Eddington. After reading that synopsis, you could see why people might take issue with this movie. COVID-19, political polarization, conspiracy theories — these are all subjects ripe for pissing off just about anyone. But I felt Ari Aster did a masterful job holding up a mirror to the way we were — and still are. I don't think any particular group of people comes off looking good in this movie, and that's intentional. Nor does anyone come off as wholly evil and irredeemable until the third act of the movie (more on that later). You'd go into the movie expecting the liberal Ted to be the good guy, but he's clearly flawed. He's politically ambitious, has some skeletons in his closet, and is possibly in the pocket of a big tech company. He also spouts COVID-19 information more than once in an effort to highlight how serious the disease is, and despite his liberal facade, would love to see the local homeless man, Lodge (Clifton Collins Jr.), locked up and off the streets. You'd also expect right-wing Joe to be the bad guy, but it's clear that he's got some good intentions in his heart. He buys groceries for a man who wasn't allowed to shop without a mask, and when the Sheriff's office learns the news about George Floyd, his first reaction is to ask his Black sergeant, Michael, if he's doing okay after seeing something so traumatic. Then there are the townspeople, and they're just as flawed. This movie really shines as a black comedy when it focuses on the high school students in the community, who organize the protests in Eddington and don't really know the substance of the chants and ideology they're spouting. It's genuinely hilarious, and had me and the rest of the theater laughing out loud. For most people, this is why they hate "Eddington." They either don't want to revisit the traumatic time that was 2020 yet, or they're pissed that the liberals in the movie are portrayed in a bad light. But for me, this is what worked about the movie. What didn't work was the tonal shift the movie takes in the third act. I don't want to spoil what happens, in case you decide to see this movie. But in the final third of "Eddington," things take a turn from a black comedy/modern Western to a shocking horror movie. Granted, that's a type of movie Ari Aster typically excels at ("Hereditary" as a prime example), and if "Eddington" had been a horror movie from the start, then perhaps it would have worked. But the shift is so jarring when it happens, and by the time I walked out of the theater, the same people who were once laughing were talking about how much they didn't like the movie. I wouldn't go as far as the person I overheard calling it the "worst movie they've ever seen," but I was definitely checking my watch by the end to see how much longer I'd need to sit through the movie. So I can't recommend you sit in a theater for two hours and 28 minutes to watch this story play out, especially since it's probably about 28 minutes too long in the first place. If you want to watch "Eddington," wait for it to hit HBO Max in the coming months and stream it then. Malcolm has been with Tom's Guide since 2022, and has been covering the latest in streaming shows and movies since 2023. He's not one to shy away from a hot take, including that "John Wick" is one of the four greatest films ever made. Here's what he's been watching lately: Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Music Review: Elton John's 'Live From the Rainbow Theatre With Ray Cooper' spotlights a rich catalog
On Elton John's new concert album, the songs steal the show. Deep cuts from John's rich catalog are given the spotlight on 'Live From the Rainbow Theatre With Ray Cooper.' The 13-song set was culled from a six-show residency in London in May 1977, with John at the piano and his longtime percussionist, Cooper, joining him for the second half of the show. The album initially received a limited release on vinyl for Record Store Day and will be available digitally and on CD for the first time beginning Friday. While John, of course, performed his biggest hits during the residency, the album wisely focuses on often overlooked material, pointing to the astounding quantity of quality songs John produced early in his career. That includes 'Cage the Songbird," a lilting tribute to Édith Piaf from the underrated 1976 LP 'Blue Moves.' Another highlight from that album is the cabaret jazz ballad 'Idol,' which shows John could have thrived in a lounge had the rock star thing not worked out. The piano man's playing here is closer to Liberace than Little Richard, because ballads predominate, and Cooper's role is tastefully restrained. Even when the tempo gets brisk on 'Better Off Dead,' the song is delightfully hammy operetta rather than rock 'n' roll. From start to finish, John sings with relish: He knows how good these songs are. 'Where To Now St. Peter?' features an especially vigorous vocal, including full-throated falsetto. 'Live From the Rainbow Theatre' underscores John's lyricist Bernie Taupin's vital role in their songwriting partnership. The album opens with 'The Greatest Discovery,' a pairing of sweet sentiment and a charming melody, while 'Ticking' is a gripping tale set in Queens that anticipated America's epidemic of gun violence. John introduces 'Ticking' and two other songs by noting he doesn't perform them often, or often enough. Banter elsewhere is mostly brief and stiff, but his droll wit does surface in one exchange with a spectator. 'How are you tonight? Nice handkerchief,' John says, before telling the rest of the audience, 'He hasn't washed that in three years.' The 1977 performances took place as punk and disco were knocking John off his pop pedestal and ending his years-long reign as a consistent hitmaker. 'Live From the Rainbow Theatre' offers a reminder that not all of his superb songs were singles.
Hamilton Spectator
2 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Music Review: Elton John's ‘Live From the Rainbow Theatre With Ray Cooper' spotlights a rich catalog
On Elton John's new concert album, the songs steal the show. Deep cuts from John's rich catalog are given the spotlight on 'Live From the Rainbow Theatre With Ray Cooper.' The 13-song set was culled from a six-show residency in London in May 1977, with John at the piano and his longtime percussionist, Cooper, joining him for the second half of the show. The album initially received a limited release on vinyl for Record Store Day and will be available digitally and on CD for the first time beginning Friday. While John, of course, performed his biggest hits during the residency, the album wisely focuses on often overlooked material, pointing to the astounding quantity of quality songs John produced early in his career. That includes 'Cage the Songbird,' a lilting tribute to Édith Piaf from the underrated 1976 LP 'Blue Moves.' Another highlight from that album is the cabaret jazz ballad 'Idol,' which shows John could have thrived in a lounge had the rock star thing not worked out. The piano man's playing here is closer to Liberace than Little Richard, because ballads predominate, and Cooper's role is tastefully restrained. Even when the tempo gets brisk on 'Better Off Dead,' the song is delightfully hammy operetta rather than rock 'n' roll. From start to finish, John sings with relish: He knows how good these songs are. 'Where To Now St. Peter?' features an especially vigorous vocal, including full-throated falsetto. 'Live From the Rainbow Theatre' underscores John's lyricist Bernie Taupin's vital role in their songwriting partnership. The album opens with 'The Greatest Discovery,' a pairing of sweet sentiment and a charming melody, while 'Ticking' is a gripping tale set in Queens that anticipated America's epidemic of gun violence. John introduces 'Ticking' and two other songs by noting he doesn't perform them often, or often enough. Banter elsewhere is mostly brief and stiff, but his droll wit does surface in one exchange with a spectator. 'How are you tonight? Nice handkerchief,' John says, before telling the rest of the audience, 'He hasn't washed that in three years.' The 1977 performances took place as punk and disco were knocking John off his pop pedestal and ending his years-long reign as a consistent hitmaker. 'Live From the Rainbow Theatre' offers a reminder that not all of his superb songs were singles. ___ More AP reviews:
