
Trump's tariffs give chocolate makers in Canada, Mexico an edge over U.S. firms
LONDON/NEW YORK — U.S. President Donald Trump's trade tariffs are meant to boost domestic manufacturing.
But in the chocolate industry, they're doing the opposite: ramping up the cost of importing already-pricey cocoa and hurting the competitiveness of local factories versus Canadian and Mexican outfits that supply the U.S., according to conversations with 11 industry executives, representatives, experts and traders.
Under the United States-Mexico-Canada free trade pact (USMCA), which the Trump administration has confirmed remains in place, Canada and Mexico can export chocolate to the U.S. tariff-free no matter where they sourced their inputs of cocoa, a tropical crop that does not grow in the United States.
Canada also has zero tariffs on imports of raw and semi-processed cocoa like butter and powder, while Mexico grows its own beans, meaning factories both north and south of the U.S. border can produce more cheaply than those domestically who now have to pay tariffs of between 10 to 25 per cent on cocoa inputs. The rates could rise to 35 per cent on Aug. 1.
A government official said that the White House continues to monitor trends in trade and commerce and listen to industry feedback to deliver on Trump's economic agenda.
Top U.S. chocolate maker Hershey, which mainly makes chocolate in the U.S. but has plants in Canada and Mexico, has estimated it would face US$100 million in tariff costs in its third and fourth quarters if the levies remain in place.
Smaller firms like Somerville, Massachusetts-based Taza Chocolate, which produces chocolate from scratch using imported cocoa, have no alternatives to U.S. manufacturing.
Taza in May had to pay $24,124 in duties on a container of cocoa from Haiti, subject to the blanket 10 per cent tariff imposed by Trump, a Customs and Border Protection invoice showed. Taza faces a customs check of more than $30,000 to release its next container of cocoa from the Dominican Republic, founder and CEO Alex Whitmore said.
'For a company our size, that's our profit margin gone so the immediate thought is OK, the rules have changed, we just need to create the most cost-effective solution for the consumer,' said Whitmore.
He initially explored offshoring part of Taza's manufacturing to Canada to benefit from USMCA terms, but decided against it given the significant investment of both money and time that would require, in a volatile business environment.
'Right now, the environment is so uncertain that we're just hunkering down and hoping this will pass,' Whitmore said. 'A lot of us business owners are kind of frozen.'
Customs data compiled for Reuters by Trade Data Monitor (TDM) shows Canada's chocolate exports to the U.S. grew by 10 per cent in volume terms in the five months to end-May, indicating some Canadian manufacturers are taking advantage of the opportunity created by tariffs.
Companies benefiting are mostly Canadian and Mexican contract chocolate makers, or multinational contractors like Barry Callebaut that have a significant footprint in Canada and Mexico, industry sources said.
Barry Callebaut, which has just under half its North America chocolate factories in Canada and Mexico, declined to comment.
Its CEO Peter Feld said at its July post-results conference call: 'On tariffs ... we have operations in the U.S., we have operations in Canada, we have operations in Mexico. So we can actually navigate this environment in the right way.'
Contract chocolate firms produce raw chocolate that U.S. factories add ingredients to and sell as American chocolate.
Tariffs - a pillar of Trump's 'America First' economic agenda - come at a delicate time for U.S. chocolate makers as consumers are already buying less after absorbing double-digit inflation over the past several years.
In chocolate specifically, prices have risen sharply as cocoa tripled in value to hit record highs in the first four months of last year, and remains well above historical averages because of adverse weather and disease in top growers Ivory Coast and Ghana.
Under pressure from rising input costs, Hershey earlier this month rolled out double-digit price hikes across its confectionary products like Reese's cups to retailers like Walmart and Kroger.
Cocoa accounts for about 30 to 50 per cent of the cost of a bar of chocolate.
Hershey said its recent price hikes were not related to tariffs. Taza has raised its wholesale prices by 10 per cent since a year ago, and the price of its chocolate bars on its website rose in June to $6.99 from $5.99 previously, but Whitmore also said tariffs would cause further price hikes.
Because cocoa can't be sourced domestically, Hershey said in May it is 'engaging with the U.S. government to seek an exemption' for cocoa.
It declined to comment on whether it was counting on imports from its Canada and Mexico plants to help mitigate tariff costs.
M&Ms maker Mars, which said Tuesday it is investing $2 billion in its U.S. manufacturing, including chocolate, has not changed its sourcing structure and continues to make 94 per cent of its U.S. products locally. A Lindt LISN.S spokesperson said the Lindor truffle maker will decide on possible changes to its sourcing after Aug. 1.
Paolo Quadrini, director general of Mexican chocolate and candy association Aschoco Confimex, said U.S. tariffs are 'creating new opportunities for Mexican companies.'
'The sentiment among companies and entrepreneurs, as well as requests from U.S. chocolate companies to manufacture in Mexico, is real and has been increasing,' he said.
The chocolate market in the U.S., the world's top chocolate consumer, is worth $25 to 30 billion, according to investment bank TD Cowen, and imports from top supplier Canada account for about 10 per cent of that total, while those from No. 2 supplier Mexico account for some 2.5 per cent.
Tareq Hadhad, CEO of mid-sized Nova Scotia-based chocolate maker Peace by Chocolate said tariffs had largely prompted Canadian and American firms to opt for locally produced goods but that contract chocolate makers in Canada had benefited from the new trade dynamic.
'It's an advantage for them,' he said.
(Reporting by May Angel, Helen Reid and Jessica DiNapoli; Editing by Lisa Jucca and Anna Driver)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Canadian hockey brand pulls product line that faced criticism for demeaning women
A Canadian hockey brand has pulled controversial clothing from its online store after a line of T-shirts and hoodies it sold was criticized for demeaning women and girls as sex objects. HockeyBenders, a company that has become popular in rinks across the country and boasts a large following of kids and teenagers online, sold $35 T-shirts with the slogan 'Barduzz, Gettin Huzz,' which it has pulled. Loosely translated from locker-room slang, it means, 'Scoring goals, getting hoes.' A hoodie version, available in children's sizes, was also taken down after a Globe and Mail article that examined misogynistic attitudes within the game, particularly at the teenage levels. The company, which tours arenas and shopping malls around Canada, attracting crowds of cheering kids and interviewing groups of teens in clips posted to the internet, came under fire for slogans on its clothing and in marketing videos. Katherine Henderson, the CEO of Hockey Canada, recently called the shirts 'disgusting,' while Andrea DeKeseredy, a former sexual-assault counsellor who studies gender violence, said the slogans point to a broader problem of misogynistic attitudes in minor hockey that are not being questioned. HockeyBenders founder Cole Lequier, 25, could not be reached for comment about the company's decision to drop the products from its website. Ms. DeKeseredy called the removal of the clothing from the HockeyBenders retail website a start to addressing what she sees as a bigger problem. 'I think taking the shirt down is a great first step, and I give them credit for doing so. I am hopeful this is due to some deep reflection on the influence they have over children as opposed to a decision made solely to protect their business interests, especially in relation to the large retail stores across Canada that carry their clothing,' Ms. DeKeseredy said. She is alarmed that a brand producing T-shirts and videos with messages that degrade women grew popular at the same time the Hockey Canada scandal and its allegations of group sexual assault by former world junior players loomed over the game. Two weeks ago, five players − Michael McLeod, Carter Hart, Alex Formenton, Dillon Dubé and Cal Foote − were found not guilty of sexual assault. Mr. McLeod was also found not guilty of a second charge of being party to sexual assault. The National Hockey League called the behaviour of the players 'unacceptable,' despite the judge's decision. 'For many Canadians, regardless of the outcome of the trial, this has become an opportunity to think about the ways hockey culture shapes the kids who play it,' Ms. DeKeseredy said. 'That extends to HockeyBenders who have a huge platform that could be used to help create some positive changes as we move forward. I hope they continue to sincerely listen.' Ms. Henderson, named Hockey Canada CEO in 2023, wants to confront such attitudes in the game. Cathal Kelly: NHL delivers a lesson after the Hockey Canada verdict: Be nice, or else 'While Hockey Canada continues our efforts to address issues in hockey culture, any merchandise targeted towards young hockey participants that promotes negative messages about girls and women reminds us that we all still have significant work ahead of us,' Ms. Henderson said. Mr. Lequier started the business from his parents' home in Barrie, Ont., trademarking it in 2023. In a recent Instagram post, he said the company has sold more than 100,000 hoodies (including versions with innocuous slogans that don't mention women). The brand is in 150 retail stores, and has more than two million followers on social media. HockeyBenders responded to previous inquiries from The Globe with an unsigned e-mail that said the men behind the company believe the humour is all in good fun: 'The boys are two hardworking young hockey entrepreneurs and make videos for people to enjoy and laugh that's it. And like to keep everything they do positive. They like to stay in their own lane with their fans and followers!' the e-mail said, verbatim. On Instagram, Mr. Lequier described the void he believes HockeyBenders fills in the game. 'I felt like, growing up, there wasn't many hockey clothing brands that had relatable slogans and sayings for hockey players,' Mr. Lequier said. 'So, I saw a huge, huge gap in the market.' HockeyBenders regularly interviews teen hockey players in rink lobbies about the game, and often about women, and posts those clips to TikTok and other online platforms, which drive popularity and profit for the brand. They are asked their preferences in girls, and 'how many blondes' and 'how many puck bunnies' they connect with on social media. Here's everything you need to know about the Hockey Canada sexual-assault trial In one video, a player claiming 100 such girls was dubbed 'lover boy.' Another player, with just a few, was praised as a 'quality over quantity guy.' Mr. Lequier did not respond to questions about whether HockeyBenders obtains parental consent before interviewing young players and posting clips online. The criticism of the HockeyBenders clothing and videos echoes a similar controversy in the early 2000s, when a website known as the Junior Hockey Bible, laced with misogynistic language, went viral in Canada. It offered a lengthy glossary of hockey terms for women, calling them 'swamp donkeys' and 'puck sluts.' It advocated team group sex and players letting their teammates watch, adding, 'Many true team players will let their girlfriends be watched.' The site, which was a marketing venture designed to promote a hockey clothing brand known as Gongshow Gear, gave tips on 'tag-teaming your local puck bunny' and advice for those girls: 'You have a job to do in the bedroom, concentrate your efforts on that role.' When Gongshow's founders were confronted about the site in 2004, they took it down and issued a public apology. The Junior Hockey Bible has since been scrubbed from the internet. Reached by The Globe recently, Gongshow Gear declined to comment.


CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Hilary Weston, fashion mogul and former Ontario lieutenant-governor, dead at 83
Ontario Lt.-Gov. Hilary Weston delivers the throne speech at Queen's Park in Toronto on Thursday, Oct. 21, 1999. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Kevin Frayer Hilary Weston, an Irish-Canadian fashion mogul and former lieutenant-governor of Ontario who devoted time to issues tied to women, volunteerism and youth, has died at 83. In a statement Sunday, her family said the philanthropist and writer was shaped by an 'enduring generosity and a deep commitment to helping others.' 'Our mother lived with unwavering devotion to her family and a belief in the power and importance of community and service,' said Galen Weston Jr., who is her son and chairman and former president of Loblaw Companies Ltd. 'Brilliant, brave, companionate, and beautiful, she brought a touch of magic to everything she did — in her decades of public service, philanthropy and her remarkable business career. Her greatest joy was the life she created for her family and friends — filled with warmth, love and fun.' Born in Ireland on Jan. 12, 1942, Weston was the eldest of five children. She spent her early years as a fashion model to support her widowed mother and younger siblings. She married W. Galen Weston, known as Galen Weston Sr., in 1966 and moved to Toronto in the 1970s. She spent 10 years, beginning in 1986, working with luxury clothing brands Holt Renfrew and Brown Thomas & Co., as well as department store company Selfridges Group. Her charitable works include the Weston Family Foundation and the Hilary and Galen Weston Foundation following her husband's death in April 2021 at the age of 80. They were married for 55 years. Known for their connection to the Loblaw grocery store chain, the Westons are one of Canada's wealthiest families. She also co-authored two books on homes and gardens. In 1997, Weston became Ontario's lieutenant-governor and held the role until 2002, during which time she looked to highlight the contributions of volunteers, women and youth. She was given the Order of Canada in 2003 for outstanding achievement, dedication to community and service. At the time, she was the second woman to receive the award. In the family's statement, daughter Alannah Weston Cochrane said her mother loved a challenge. She also said Weston had elegance and high standards that 'were matched by her warmth and sense of humour.' 'But it was her vision, coupled with her enormous capacity for hard work, that made her a great female leader,' she said. 'Her insight, wisdom and strength as well as her belief in individuals made almost anything possible.' Irish Deputy Prime Minister Simon Harris said in a statement he was 'deeply saddened' by Weston's death. 'Hilary was a very proud Irish-Canadian who served both Ireland and Canada with distinction and generosity,' he said. 'She made a lasting contribution to Irish-Canadian relations. 'I extend sincere condolences to her children, Alannah and Galen, and the entire Weston family.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 3, 2025. Aaron Sousa, The Canadian Press


Japan Forward
an hour ago
- Japan Forward
Do Not Open Japan-US Trade Deal to Distorted Interpretation
このページを 日本語 で読む A trade deal was concluded by the Shigeru Ishiba administration and the Donald Trump administration. But, were the provisions of the agreement actually finalized? It is difficult to dispel doubts on that score. There are stark differences in how the Japanese and US sides explain provisions on new investment in the United States. This is a cause for concern in the actual implementation of the agreement. One of the main pillars of the Japan-US agreement sets reciprocal tariffs and auto tariffs the US imposes on Japanese imports at 15%. However, no written agreement has been drawn up. Isn't that the cause of the differences in perception between the two sides? Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba should have spoken directly with President Trump immediately after the agreement was reached to share his views. His failure to do so has created a major problem. If things continue as they are, it is possible that the US side will try to force its own interpretation on Japan. If that were to happen, Japan's national interest might well suffer damage. The Prime Minister and Minister for Economic Revitalization Ryosei Akazawa should clarify the reasons for these differing perceptions during the extraordinary Diet session that convened on August 1. They have a duty to explain to the satisfaction of the Japanese people that the agreement will be appropriately implemented. US President Donald Trump speaks at the White House on July 31 (©Reuters via Kyodo) Regarding Japanese investment in the United States, Trump posted on social media that Japan will invest $550 billion USD (approximately ¥80 trillion JPY) in the United States. Furthermore, he said, the US will receive 90% of the profits. In response, the Japan side has explained that the $550 billion in question is actually the upper limit for investments, loans, and loan guarantees. Of this, the "90%" of the profits the US would stand to make from the deal are from investment projects. That amounts to just 1% to 2% of the $550 billion, according to Akazawa. As for the issue of rice, the US side claims that Japan's imports of American rice will increase by 75%. However, Japan has not provided any specific details. Won't this really amount to sacrificing Japan's agricultural sector? US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has also declared that he intends to review Japan's compliance with the agreement quarterly. He has further threatened that tariffs will be raised to 25% if Trump is not satisfied. That would provide leeway for Trump to unilaterally scrap the agreement. The lack of a joint document sharing a mutual understanding of what the agreement entails has left a legacy of problems. The Japanese side prioritized an early conclusion to the talks. That allowed the delay of the time-consuming task of hammering out a written agreement. Their excuse was to avoid a situation where an agreement could not be reached by the Trump-imposed deadline of August 1. On that date, Trump's reciprocal tariffs on Japan were scheduled to rise to 25%. Even if that is true, it will end up counterproductive if the agreement comes to be distorted by the US interpretation. Above all, the Ishiba government should urge the Trump administration to quickly align their respective views. We should realize that, unless both sides share a mutual understanding, economic uncertainty from Trump's tariffs will not dissipate. Author: Editorial Board, The Sankei Shimbun このページを 日本語 で読む