'Absurdity' of A-G's opposition must be terminated, Israeli gov't tells High Court
After receiving an extension for its response to the High Court of Justice on the attempts to fire Attorney-General Gali Baharav-Miara, the government on Sunday doubled down on its position in its response, explaining that it is unreasonable to force the government to work with a legal adviser 'that is actively working against its policies.'
The position, authored by Justice Minister Yariv Levin and Diaspora Affairs and Combatting Antisemitism Minister Amichai Chikli, pointed to what it described as 'absurd,' that the government can't be legally represented by its own lawyer -the attorney-general - in the rising list of cases where they clash.
'We expect the court to acknowledge this absurdity. The Attorney-General worked systematically to cut the cord between her office and the government, we now expect the court to finish it off,' reads the position. Part of the issue, which has been long-present in legal debate, is that the attorney-general wears two hats: it heads the prosecution, meaning it represents the government's position in significant cases, and it also is the chief legal adviser to the government and considered the weightiest interpreter of the law.
When her interpretation of the law differs from the government, her office can't represent it, leading to the sticky situation the two authorities are in today.
A ministerial committee is scheduled to convene tomorrow to discuss her dismissal, the hastened solution Levin has been pushing, after he failed to fill the positions needed for the public-professional committee that would oversee the process, hand in hand with the government. Petitions to freeze the hearing have been submitted, which the government insisted in its decision should be wholly rejected.
Levin's decision to leave the process instead in the hands of ministers has faced fierce criticism for politicizing a delicate and sensitive topic. Proponents argue that the situation is so dire as to make the work relationship between the government and the attorney-general obsolete.
In the last line of the decision, the ministers note that an injunction against the ministerial hearing would be 'wildly exceptional' and 'fundamentally opposed to the legal principle by which legal overview should take place after an act has been committed, not before.' The government called for the injunction requests to be rejected.
The decision did not address the attorney-general's position, concretized in several advisery opinions over the past few weeks, that the legislation to dismiss her has far-reaching consequences for the legal advisery as a whole and for whoever her successor may be - it would politicize a powerful key position, viewed by some as one of the only checks on power on the government.
The Movement for Quality Government in Israel (MQG) said that the government's response 'clearly reveals the serious flaws' in its dismissal attempts.
'Instead of presenting a real legal justification for changing the mechanism, the government is trying to explain why it needs to dismiss the attorney general right now and why it needs to do so by changing the rules of the game. The response indicates that the government is aware of the weakness of the move from a legal perspective and is trying to justify a decision that was made in a clear conflict of interest,' it explained.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Post Office could be owned by its workers, government says
The Post Office could be turned into an employee-owned business, the government has suggested, as it launched a public consultation over the future of the service. The business, which operates counters or shops in more than 11,500 locations around the country, is fully state-owned and subsidised by the tax payer. Plans for mutualisation have been under discussion for more than a decade, but were sidelined as the scandal around the wrongful conviction of subpostmasters unfolded. "It's clear we need a fresh vision," said Post Office Minister, Gareth Thomas, launching a Green Paper on the service's future. The government said it wanted to transform the organisation's culture in the wake of the scandal which saw hundreds of subpostmasters wrongly accused of false accounting and theft at the branches they were running on the basis of data from faulty software. The consultation will run for 12 weeks and be the "start of an honest conversation about what people want and need from their Post Office in the years ahead", the minister said. It will look at how to meet changing consumer needs while also strengthening the relationship between the business and its postmasters. Mr Thomas also announced a further £118m to support the work already underway to deliver changes in the Post Office. The Green Paper puts proposals such as changing the Post Office's ownership model back on the table, providing and opportunity for staff, taxpayers and other stakeholders to share their views, before the government draws up its strategy. Post Office to offload all directly-owned branches
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
Under Trump, the government mobilizes in response to fringe theories
After President Donald Trump wrongly suggested that Social Security funds were going to millions of dead people, his administration spent weeks revamping the agency's database. When Trump seized on a debunked claim that South Africa's government was systematically massacring White farmers, U.S. officials developed plans to resettle 1,000 of them.
News24
an hour ago
- News24
Netanyahu aide faces indictment, accused of leaking top Israel military secrets on Gaza war
Jonatan Urich, an aide to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, faces indictment on security charges. He is accused of leaking top secret military information during Israel's war in Gaza. The charges are baseless, Urich's attorneys said. An aide to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu faces indictment on security charges pending a hearing, Israel's attorney general has said, for allegedly leaking top secret military information during Israel's war in Gaza. Netanyahu's close adviser, Jonatan Urich, has denied any wrongdoing in the case, which legal authorities began investigating in late 2024. Netanyahu has described probes against Urich and other aides as politically motivated and on Monday said that Urich had not harmed state security. Urich's attorneys said the charges were baseless and that their client's innocence would be proven beyond doubt. Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara said in a statement late on Sunday that Urich and another aide had extracted secret information from the Israeli military and leaked it to German newspaper Bild. READ | 'Window of opportunity' in Gaza truce talks between Hamas and Israel closing amid sticking points Their intent, she said, was to shape public opinion of Netanyahu and influence the discourse about the slaying of six Israeli hostages by their Palestinian captors in Gaza in late August 2024. The hostages' deaths sparked mass protests in Israel and outraged hostages' families, who accused Netanyahu of torpedoing ceasefire talks that had faltered in the preceding weeks for political reasons. Netanyahu vehemently denies this. He has repeatedly said that Hamas was to blame for the talks collapsing, while the militant group has said it was Israel's fault no deal had been reached. Four of the six slain hostages had been on the list of more than 30 captives that Hamas was set to free if a ceasefire had been reached, according to a defence official at the time. The Bild article in question was published days after the hostages were found executed in a Hamas tunnel in southern Gaza. It outlined Hamas' negotiation strategy in the indirect ceasefire talks and largely corresponded with Netanyahu's allegations against the militant group over the deadlock. Bild said after the investigation was announced that it does not comment on its sources and that its article relied on authentic documents. The newspaper did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Monday. A two-month ceasefire was reached in January this year and included the release of 38 hostages before Israel resumed attacks in Gaza. The sides are presently engaged in indirect negotiations in Doha, aimed at reaching another truce. In his statement on Monday, Netanyahu said Baharav-Miara's announcement was 'appalling' and that its timing raised serious questions. Netanyahu's government has for months been seeking the dismissal of Baharav-Miara. The attorney general, appointed by the previous government, has sparred with Netanyahu's cabinet over the legality of some of its policies.
