No Place For Abuse In Local Democracy
Ruapehu District Council Chief Executive Clive Manley is calling out the abuse and harassment directed at elected members, warning it has no place in local democracy and must stop.
'Serving your community as a councillor or board member is a privilege - but it also takes guts,' said Mr Manley. 'No one should face abuse, intimidation, or discrimination simply for doing their job.'
A Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ) survey found that nearly half of elected members nationwide have faced abuse, racism, gender discrimination, or other harmful behaviour.
'Unfortunately, Ruapehu elected members also report being subjected to abuse and harassment,' he said.
'This behaviour is deeply concerning and has no place in Ruapehu. Our democracy relies on people being able to speak freely and represent their communities without fear.
If harassment continues unchecked, it risks discouraging good people from standing and undermining the diversity and effectiveness of local government.'
Mr Manley noted that much of the abuse comes from a small group of repeat offenders, especially online.
'These individuals demonstrate little understanding of how local government operates and what it takes to be an elected member - or how hard they work.
As we head into the election period, we won't hesitate to ban people from Council's Facebook page if they cannot engage respectfully.'
With nominations for the 2025 local elections opening on Friday 4 July, Council is urging anyone considering standing to feel confident in doing so.
'Council is committed to supporting elected members and candidates stand for election and serve their community,' said Mr Manley.
'There are resources available to help people run a safe and successful campaign and to continue their work safely once elected.'
These tools include guidance on protecting privacy, staying safe in public and online, managing social media interactions, reporting abuse, and accessing support services and counselling.
Mr Manley said he has also discussed the issue with local Police, who have confirmed they will take any complaints of harassment or abuse extremely seriously.
'We want people from all walks of life to consider standing,' said Mr Manley.
'We need a council and community boards that reflect the diversity of our district - and no one should be put off because of bad behaviour by a small minority.'
'If you've got something to say and want to make a difference, we encourage you to step forward. You won't be alone - you'll have our full support.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
Fiji: 2025/2026 National Budget—A Socially Responsive Budget
27 June The Consumer Council of Fiji welcomes the 2025/2026 National Budget as a timely and decisive response to the financial strain felt by thousands of consumers across the country. This morning's Budget announcement can be seen delivering a meaningful relief through targeted measures that address the persistent cost-of-living pressures affecting households nationwide. A major highlight of today's announcement is the reduction of Value Added Tax (VAT) from 15% to 12.5%—a move set to ease financial pressures across the economy. This cut is expected to lower prices on essential goods and services, providing much-needed relief to households struggling with rising costs. The Council has long championed a fairer, consumer-focused tax regime, and this reform marks a positive shift toward alleviating the cost-of-living crisis. Consumer Council CEO Seema Shandil described the VAT reduction as both bold and necessary. 'This VAT reduction is a bold and welcome move,' she said. 'But now, the real work begins. For a long time, when VAT was increased, retailers were quick to pass on the added cost to consumers. Yet, when taxes are reduced, those savings are not always reflected on the shelves, instead, they're often absorbed as extra profit.' To address this issue and safeguard consumer interests, the Government has announced the establishment of a National Price Monitoring Taskforce. This initiative will bring together key enforcement agencies including the Consumer Council of Fiji, the Fiji Competition and Consumer Commission (FCCC), and the Fiji Revenue and Customs Service (FRCS). The taskforce will be responsible for ensuring that the tax and duty reductions are properly implemented by retailers and that consumers see the benefits of these changes in real terms. Ms. Shandil affirmed the Council's commitment to this effort, stating, 'We will be working shoulder-to-shoulder with our counterparts at FCCC, FRCS, and the Ministry to strictly monitor retail pricing. This is not a time for complacency. The Fijian people deserve to feel the full benefit of these decisions, and we will ensure that happens.' The Budget also includes significant reductions in import duties for a range of essential food items. Chicken portions and offals such as giblets and liver will now attract a reduced duty of 15 percent, down from 32 percent. Duty on fresh fruits and vegetables — including tomatoes, cabbage, lettuce, cucumber, eggplant, pumpkin, bananas, avocados, mandarins, watermelons and pawpaw remains at five percent. Other fruits and vegetables such as apples, carrots, grapes, mushrooms, celery, broccoli, and nuts will also remain duty free. Potatoes, garlic, onion, tea, and cooking oil will continue to be duty-free as well. Meanwhile, frozen fish, including salmon, and canned fish products will also see duty eliminated entirely. Ms. Shandil emphasized that these reductions have the potential to significantly improve household nutrition and food affordability. 'These are real changes with the potential to impact the nutritional security of families. With key staples now cheaper to import, we expect retailers to bring down prices accordingly, and we will be watching closely.' In addition to food and tax relief measures, the Budget also includes targeted support in other areas that directly affect consumers. A ten percent bus fare subsidy can also be seen to help ease the financial burden on daily commuters and support lower-income earners who rely heavily on public transportation. This subsidy acts like a small "pay raise" by reducing their cost of living. A 10% reduction directly cuts daily transport costs, leaving more money for other expenses. Furthermore, a VAT refund scheme has been announced for residential construction projects valued up to $120,000. This measure is expected to reduce construction costs and encourage more families to invest in building or upgrading their homes. The newly implemented progressive measures, designed to support vulnerable populations and foster healthier living, represent a positive step forward. A 5% monthly increase for social welfare recipients and government pensioners will enhance financial resilience amid rising living costs. Simultaneously, the elimination of the 15% duty on no-sugar-added juices makes nutritious beverages more affordable, encouraging healthier consumption habits. Conversely, the new 15% duty on unhealthy processed snacks like puffed chips serves as a deterrent against excessive consumption of these foods. Together, these policies demonstrate a balanced approach to economic relief and public health improvement, helping build a more secure and health-conscious society. Whilst the Consumer Council reiterates its support for the budget's direction but stresses that the implementation phase will be critical, retailers are urged to pass on every cent of the savings to their customers. The Council will not hesitate to take action against non-compliance. Consumers are also encouraged to remain vigilant and report any instances where price reductions are not being honoured after the measures take effect. Complaints can be made through the Council's toll-free helpline 155 or via its email platform complaints@
NZ Herald
5 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Never mind the swear words, politicians need to raise debate quality
I don't believe people are genuinely shocked by the language we're all hearing every night on our streaming TV shows. What is shocking is the standard of argument being employed by politicians and parties as they seek to score points with silly populist arguments. On my Facebook and Instagram feeds, the Labour Party has been trying to tell me that the Government is to blame for soaring butter prices. It has posted a chart of butter prices pointing out that they have doubled since the National-led coalition came to power. That's annoyed me on a number of levels. Despite the fact it seems to enrage many Kiwis, soaring dairy prices are clearly a net gain for the economy. We sell a lot more internationally than we consume locally and the current dairy price spike is expected to bring in an additional $10 billion in export revenue over this year and next. It's exactly what our economy needed. The impact on consumers is overstated. Butter prices have doubled in two years. You used to be able to get a 500g block for about $4.50 now it's about $8.50. That's an extra $4 a week, far less than petrol prices fluctuate on a regular basis. Also, there are numerous butter substitutes and blends that haven't risen nearly that much. I understand why someone on the Labour Party team has tried to milk the dairy price story (sorry for the pun). It is a headline grabber and an easy online meme. I bet the analytics on it look great. But it makes no sense in the real world. The Government has no control over international dairy prices. There are things a government could do to reduce the cost of butter for local consumers. They could subsidise the price with taxpayer money. Or they could impose price controls on farmers and force them to sell a certain amount locally. These would be terrible policies, and there is no chance Labour is about to adopt them. So butter prices would be exactly the same right now if they had won the last election. More broadly, inflation is running rampant like it was throughout 2021 and 2022. It has edged up to 2.5% but remains within the Reserve Bank's 1-3% target band. The same Stats NZ release that included the butter price graph also pointed out that annual rent price increases haven't been below 2.8% since 2011. Of course, much lower inflation isn't all good news. The fact it is underperforming so badly is giving economists confidence that inflation will stay subdued. The economy is struggling to get any momentum and there is no doubt a lot of people are doing it tough. There's no shortage of real issues with this recovery, which the current Government ought to take some responsibility for. Labour could legitimately be attacking the Government on unemployment and job security. There are tens of thousands more people on the Jobseeker benefit now than there were when Labour was in power. I don't mean to single out Labour either. The National Party spent a lot of time in opposition attacking Labour for letting those Jobseeker numbers rise. It also drives me crazy when the Government holds press conferences after the Official Cash Rate announcement to take credit for falling interest rates. Interest rates are falling because inflation is under control and the economy is underperforming. If they go much lower, it will be because things are getting worse, not better. Meanwhile, in the past week, we've had David Seymour running 'victim of the day' social media attacks on opponents of his regulatory standards bill. Seymour says he is being 'playful' and having 'fun' with his line, suggesting opponents are suffering from 'Regulatory Standards Derangement Syndrome'. Surely if the bill is worth putting before Parliament, then it must have been aimed at delivering some sort of meaningful change to the status quo. Let's have a grown-up debate about what that intended change is. What's frustrating about political debate in 2025 is that politicians are so quick to build 'straw man' arguments because they seem easy to sell as memes and headlines. A 'straw man', for the record, is where you present a weak version or flawed version of your opponent's argument so you can easily dismiss it. It's lazy and doesn't do anything to boost the quality of policy-making in this country. It's probably too much to ask, but wouldn't it be nice if our politicians were confident enough in their view to employ the opposite of a 'straw man' argument? That's called a 'steel-man' argument. It requires you to consciously present the strongest and most charitable version of your opponent's argument. Then you explain why it still doesn't stack up. It requires you to do a bit of homework and think through the logical basis for your argument. I'm pretty sure all the leaders of our political parties are smart enough to do that. But we seem to be following a depressing international trend which sees social media debate reduce everything to simplistic points which appeal to an increasingly tribal political base. New Zealand has a cyclical recovery underway that would have happened, at a greater or lesser pace, regardless of who was in power. Scrapping over that is pointless. We need to be looking ahead to how we lift the economy at a structural level and enable higher levels of cyclical growth. That requires some serious work and will need a higher quality of debate than what we've been seeing this year. This column will take a two-week break as the author is on holiday with his family. Liam Dann is business editor-at-large for theNew Zealand Herald. He is a senior writer and columnist and also presents and produces videos and podcasts. He joined theHeraldin 2003.
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
New Plymouth resident claims moral victory over fate of overgrown pohutukawa
Alana Brough is the daughter of first-term councillor Max Brough. Photo: RNZ / Robin Martin The daughter of a New Plymouth councillor is claiming a victory of sorts, after facing a hefty fine and a years-long battle with council over who was responsible for a massive pohutukawa outside her home. Lines company Powerco has sent in contractors to remove the 15m-tall pohutukawa at no cost, after it had grown through powerlines on Ballance St. Alana Brough, who is the daughter of first-term councillor Max Brough, was overjoyed and baked for the contractors, who were bringing down the tree in the rain. "The tree's coming down, whoohoo," she said. "I had a phone call from Powerco to say it was in the lines, and then [the contractor] Asplundh said they could come and cut it out at no charge." Brough got into a stoush with council, after asking it to trim the branches of the pohutukawa, which had grown in the leafy suburb of Vogeltown for decades, Council said no, because the tree straddled Brough's property and the footpath, and it had not planted it, while she argued it was in the berm and the NPDC's responsibility. After discovering the pohutukawa would cost $10,000 to trim, Brough planted dwarf fruit trees and a vegetable garden in her berm against council rules in an act of defiance, but was threatened with a $1000 fine, plus $50 for each day the garden remained, so pulled it out. She remained defiant as the tree came down. "It's a council tree on council land, it's up to the council to take care of it," Brough said. "Then Powerco have come in and said it is hazardous, because it's up above the power lines." Brough would still have to pay a $1300 bill to mulch the remnants of the tree, but was still happy with the outcome. The pohutukawa would cost $10,000 to trim, but Powerco removed it for free. Photo: RNZ/Robin Martin "I think it's amazing what Powerco are doing, although it makes sense, because it's under their powerlines and, if there's a storm and it comes down, it is a hazard. The contractors have been amazing, working in the pouring rain to remove this tree." Not everybody was thrilled, with one neighbour expressing their frustration on social media. "Absolutely gutted this is happening," they said. "The beautiful pohutukawa tree that we have seen out our lounge window for 25 years is being removed today." NPDC parks and open spaces manager Conrad Pattison said work on trees was prioritised according to the safety risk they posed, either to the public or infrastructure. "We've found no immediate safety issues regarding this pohutukawa, but we'd relook at it if that changed," he said. "This tree straddles the boundary between the public pathway and the private property, but we didn't plant it. If the property owner wants it removed, she can do that, but at her cost." In a statement, Powerco said it monitored trees growing close to powerlines, but it was the property owner's responsibility to keep their trees a safe distance from overhead lines. "Tree owners are sent a 'cut or trim notice', if their tree is encroaching on power lines, which is a safety risk. Powerco will cover the reasonable cost of the first cut, if the tree has not previously been cut by a Powerco contractor. "The tree on Ballance Street is being removed today to eliminate the risk to Powerco's network." Powerco said property owners were legally required to keep trees a minimum safe distance away from overhead power lines under the Electricity (Hazards from Trees) Regulations 2003. For more information about trees near powerlines, including Powerco's first-cut policy, click here . Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
