logo
Modern couples are cutting these pricey traditions from their wedding budgets

Modern couples are cutting these pricey traditions from their wedding budgets

Yahoo3 days ago
Modern weddings are becoming more budget-conscious than ever before, according to new research.
A survey of 2,000 engaged Americans currently planning their wedding found the days of glamorous overspending may be less common with the current financial climate front of mind.
Twenty-two percent of those polled described their wedding budget as 'modest,' while only 5% said they were planning something extravagant.
An additional 16% said they were working with the 'bare minimum.'
The survey, conducted by Talker Research on behalf of JJ's House, also found that the average couple expects to spend a third (33%) of their combined annual income on the big day.
That translates to an average wedding budget of $21,058.
While it was once tradition for the bride's family to pay for the entire wedding, that model may be fading fast in today's financial climate.
The vast majority of couples (85%) now say they're footing the bill themselves, with only 14% receiving contributions from both sets of parents and just 10% relying on one side of the family.
Still, rising prices are testing the patience of even the most optimistic planners.
Venue rentals (39%), photography (34%), catering (34%) and attire (32%) were listed among the most surprising sticker shocks.
The average wedding dress budget alone came in at $7,497.
'We're seeing a clear shift toward weddings that reflect both budget constraints and personal values,' said a spokesperson for JJ's House. 'Couples are being more intentional with their spending, not because the day matters less, but because they're investing even more in the life that comes after it.'
Some couples are adapting to the economic climate by getting creative.
One in four (25%) have postponed the wedding to save more money.
Others have opted for DIY décor (27%), more affordable venues (24%) or secondhand outfits (19%) in place of designer brands.
Nearly half (46%) of brides said their bridesmaids will be paying for their own dresses, while only 27% plan to cover the cost for their wedding party.
Another 27% aren't having bridesmaids at all.
When it comes to attire, price was the top deciding factor (43%), followed by comfort (37%) and style (29%).
Sustainability and ethical sourcing ranked lower at 6%, though more than half (51%) believe younger generations will increasingly prioritize those values in future planning.
That shift is already happening in other areas.
Seventy-seven percent of respondents said they would consider lab-grown diamonds for financial reasons, while 67% would do so for ethical ones.
And 76% said it was important that their wedding reflect their values.
The survey also found that the average wedding guest list includes 107 people, and just 13% plan to host multiple events like welcome parties or next-day brunches.
One in five (19%) are postponing their honeymoon due to financial reasons, and 11% said they're skipping it entirely.
Despite the challenges, most couples are tackling planning as a team.
A strong 81% said both partners are involved, while only 33% said the bulk of responsibility falls on them alone. Just 7% said their partner is taking the lead.
Still, navigating family expectations remains tricky.
Thirty-one percent said they've experienced pressure to include specific traditions or customs even if they don't align with their values or budget.
'Couples today are walking a tightrope between tradition and reality,' the JJ's House spokesperson added. 'They still want a meaningful celebration, but there's a growing awareness that starting married life in debt or under pressure to impress isn't worth the cost.'Talker Research surveyed 2,000 engaged Americans (18+); the survey was commissioned by JJ's House and administered and conducted online by Talker Research between June 6 – June 17, 2025.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hybrid vs EV vs Gas: Which Actually Saves You the Most Money?
Hybrid vs EV vs Gas: Which Actually Saves You the Most Money?

Miami Herald

timean hour ago

  • Miami Herald

Hybrid vs EV vs Gas: Which Actually Saves You the Most Money?

In 2025, you can buy a Toyota Prius, skip the gas station for days, and still complain about the ride quality on potholes. That's the hybrid life: part monk, part commuter ninja. And with gas prices moonwalking toward $4 again, it's a lifestyle many Americans are still buying into-over 1.2 million hybrid sales last year alone. But the EV crowd is yelling louder every year: "Just go all electric!" So let's settle it - does the hybrid still make financial sense? Or is it a stepping stone past its prime? We did the math. Real numbers. Real assumptions. No "green halo" pricing fluff. Figure 1: 10-Year Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Over a 10-year period, electric vehicles (EVs) can be the most cost-effective option-but only under ideal conditions like access to home charging and sufficient annual mileage. According to DOE and Argonne National Lab, hybrids remain the lowest total cost of ownership for the average American, especially for those without dedicated charging infrastructure. Assumptions: ICE: $28K purchase, $1,500/year fuel, $600/year maintenanceHybrid: $30K purchase, $1,200/year fuel, $700/year maintenanceEV: $35K purchase, $400/year electricity, $300/year maintenance The hybrid buyer still spends a little more upfront than the gas car buyer, but makes it back over time. You're saving around $300 a year at the pump, and while maintenance isn't zero (hello, regenerative braking sensors), it's generally lower than ICE over the long haul. Add in federal tax credits or state perks, and hybrids remain one of the best deals on the road, especially if you're putting in 15,000+ miles per year. Clarification: While EVs offer lower operational costs, hybrids remain the cheapest total cost option for many average-use cases, per Argonne. Here's the truth: EVs are significantly cheaper to run - when you can charge at home. Charging at home averages $400/year in electricity, compared to $1,200 in gas for a hybrid. Plus, there's no oil to change, no spark plugs to replace, and your brake pads last longer thanks to regen braking. But that advantage flips quickly if you rely on public fast-charging, which can be 3x to 5x more expensive than home charging. According to DOE/Argonne, EVs relying heavily on public charging often end up more expensive than hybrids or ICE cars over 10 years. EVs can save you about $7,000 over 10 years - but only if you charge smart and often at home. The myth that hybrids are more expensive to maintain because of "two powertrains" doesn't hold up. Most hybrid systems are built like tanks. Inverters or battery packs rarely fail under warranty, and regenerative brakes reduce wear. Meanwhile, ICE cars need regular oil changes, timing belt swaps, and eventually, catalytic converter work. EVs? Lowest upkeep by far. Scheduled EV maintenance at 6 cents per mile, compared to 10 cents for gas cars. However, battery replacement costs remain a wildcard for EVs beyond the warranty period, usually past year 8 or 10. That risk keeps hybrids competitive. So, here's what the numbers and studies actually tell us: The hybrid still offers the lowest total cost of ownership for the average driver, especially those without home charging or lower annual can be more affordable, but only with access to home chargingand consistent vehicles remain the costliest long-term, due to fuel and maintenance costs. So no, hybrids aren't a "marketing mirage." They're still the smartest move for the gas-averse, chargerless majority. And EVs? They're the future, but not everyone's present. The real question is this: Will the hybrid stay a stepping stone or become the sensible forever car? Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Elon Musk says he has formed a new U.S. political party, the 'America Party'
Elon Musk says he has formed a new U.S. political party, the 'America Party'

CNBC

time3 hours ago

  • CNBC

Elon Musk says he has formed a new U.S. political party, the 'America Party'

Elon Musk said Saturday that he has formed a new political party, the "America Party," which he claims will give Americans "back your freedom." "By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!" Musk wrote on X, one day after he posted a poll on the platform asking his followers if they support creating the "America Party." Musk, the world's richest man, suggested Friday that the new party could focus "on just 2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts." "Given the razor-thin legislative margins, that would be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws, ensuring that they serve the true will of the people," Musk said Friday. Musk did not say where the party may be registered. It did not appear to be registered with the Federal Election Committee. He also said that the party would caucus independently and that "legislative discussions would be had with both parties," according to a reply to a user on X. Musk was the largest donor during the 2024 presidential campaign, giving more than $280 million throughout the cycle, predominantly to presidential candidate Donald Trump, although he also supported other Republican candidates. If Musk chooses to get involved in any competitive congressional races in 2026, it could make a significant difference in a close contest. The Tesla CEO's post comes after a public feud with Trump erupted. It was a dramatic turnaround for the two men, who had been close allies during the early days of the second Trump administration. But their relationship deteriorated as the two men exchanged barbs on social media, mainly due to Musk's vocal opposition to Trump's "big, beautiful bill," CNBC has reported. Musk had previously spearheaded Trump's efforts to slash the federal government through the controversial "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE), but stepped back from his role in May after his involvement with the program began to negatively impact his business. Since feuding with Trump, Musk has publicly floated the idea of a new political party, particularly amid his continued strong opposition to Trump's sweeping domestic policy package, which passed last week. "It is obvious with the insane spending of this bill, which increases the debt ceiling by a record FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS that we live in a one-party country – the PORKY PIG PARTY!!" Musk said Monday. "Time for a new political party that actually cares about the people," he said.

DOJ's $225M Seizure Puts Human Cost of Crypto Scams in Focus, Former Acting U.S. Attorney Says
DOJ's $225M Seizure Puts Human Cost of Crypto Scams in Focus, Former Acting U.S. Attorney Says

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

DOJ's $225M Seizure Puts Human Cost of Crypto Scams in Focus, Former Acting U.S. Attorney Says

The U.S. Department of Justice is sending a message with its recent effort to seize $225 million in crypto tied to pig butchering scams: these funds were stolen from victims. At least, that's the takeaway from Phil Selden, a member at Cole Schotz PC and former acting US Attorney for the District of Maryland. The DOJ moved to seize these funds last month through a forfeiture motion, although it has yet to publicly identify any individuals accused of stealing the funds. But that's the point, Selden said. "This is a tone-setting case," said Selden, who's now a member at law firm Cole Schotz PC. "We have victims on American streets, and the Department made clear they didn't want to wait for an arrest to actually ensure that the crypto was actually seized." This tone, Selden said, sets the direction for the Department of Justice under Matthew Galeotti, the new head of its criminal division. Selden describes Galeotti as an experienced, methodical prosecutor used to taking down New York's toughest organized crime rings. Galeotti, Selden said, understands how criminal networks move money, how they exploit weak regulatory frameworks, and most importantly, how they hurt everyday people 'This isn't just a tech story or a finance story," he continued. "It's a story about families losing their savings, and small towns losing their banks.' That small town bank was Heartland Tri-State Bank, a Kansas-based agricultural lender that became illiquid and collapsed in 2023 after its CEO, Shan Hanes, embezzled nearly $50 million and moved the funds to crypto wallets at the direction of pig butchering scammers. Hanes was also the largest victim in the DOJ's complaint. 'In Hong Kong or Shanghai or New York or San Francisco, there's a financial institution on every corner. In Kansas, there's not,' Selden said. "If you don't have a good bank, it's hard to build or maintain a business, it's hard to get capital for that tractor or that crop cycle.' Selden anticipates that criminal charges are on the horizon, but he thinks the DOJ didn't want to wait for an arrest to ensure the crypto was seized and could be returned to its owners. Extradition of overseas suspects is one possible path, he explained, though it's a slow and complicated process that relies on mutual legal assistance treaties. Another strategy could involve luring suspects into U.S. jurisdictions where arrests are easier to carry out, such as Guam or other American territories. Even without arrests, extraditions, and high-profile trials, Selden believes the case has already done its job. It sends a message to victims that their losses are being taken seriously. 'Crypto crime isn't abstract; it isn't offshore,' Selden said. 'It's impacting real people, real communities, and the Department of Justice wants Americans to know it has their backs.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store