GOP Lawmakers Issue Ultimatum to Demand Changes to Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' or Face Rejection: 'All Three of Us Have to Be Yes'
Senators Ron Johnson (R-WI), Rick Scott (R-FL) and Mike Lee (R-UT) are demanding significant changes to the Senate version of what Trump has dubbed his "big, beautiful bill," warning that they will vote as a bloc against the measure if their conditions are not met.
"There's no way I vote for this thing next week," Johnson told reporters, citing concerns that the bill would add to the deficit rather than reduce it, The Hill reported. "All three of us have to be yes or none of us are yes."
The legislation, which Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) hopes to bring to the floor next week, has already drawn opposition from moderates including Josh Hawley (R-MO) and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) over proposed cuts to Medicaid. But conservatives now pose an equally serious obstacle, calling for deeper cuts and a faster repeal of renewable energy tax credits passed under the Biden administration.
Scott is pushing for dramatic changes to the federal Medicaid funding formula, including a rollback of the enhanced match rate for states that expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act.
"The focus should be on: How do we take care of what Medicaid's original purpose was? It's children and the chronically ill," he argued, adding that half of adults covered by Medicaid expansion are not working and are not disabled.
Senate moderates like Hawley, Murkowski and Susan Collins (R-ME) have raised alarms about the impact of Medicaid cuts on rural hospitals, while hardliners insist the deficit must be addressed urgently.
Lee, meanwhile, wants a more aggressive phaseout of green energy subsidies. "Green New Deal subsidies that don't terminate by 2028 will effectively become permanent," he warned followers on X. Murkowski and other senators warn sudden withdrawal of clean energy subsidies would cost jobs and waste billions of already invested dollars.
The internal standoff comes amid a new Congressional Budget Office projection that the House-passed version of Trump's agenda would add $3.4 trillion to the national debt. While Johnson acknowledged historic spending cuts in the legislation, he cautioned that the cuts are outweighed by new spending provisions.
Despite efforts by Thune to bridge divides within the caucus, the fate of the bill remains uncertain.
"The deficit will eat us alive if we don't get it under control," Lee posted on X. "If not us, who? If not now, when?"
Originally published on Latin Times
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
an hour ago
- Int'l Business Times
Big Automakers Report US Sales Jump On Pre-tariff Consumer Surge
Several leading automakers including Detroit giants General Motors and Ford reported increased US car sales in the second quarter on Tuesday as consumers fast-forwarded purchases ahead of US tariffs. Sales were particularly brisk early in the quarter as expectations of US President Donald Trump's coming tariffs dominated the news. Besides the US companies, Japanese automakers Toyota and Honda and South Korean brands Kia and Hyundai all reported increased sales compared with the 2024 stretch. "They were able to capitalize on the tariff-induced fear and that drove sales, especially in the early part of the quarter," said Garrett Nelson, equity analyst at CFRA Research. While the auto industry has been near the center of Trump's efforts to reset global trade, consumers have yet to see significant price increases due to tariffs. That is because companies have relied on existing inventories that include vehicles imported before tariffs took effect. Prices are expected to rise more in the second half of 2025, but market demand and supply forces could constrain such hikes, analysts said. GM notched a 7.3 percent rise in vehicle deliveries to 746,588 behind a continued solid performance in pickup trucks and SUVs, as well as good sales of models geared towards customers seeking affordable vehicles. These include the Chevrolet Equinox and Chevrolet Trax, a lower-priced vehicle imported from South Korea. Ford, meanwhile, scored a 14.2 percent jump in sales to 612,095, reflecting the boon from a popular program that offered customers employee pricing on many models. Most of Ford's leading vehicles saw higher sales, including the best-selling pickup F-series, as well as the Ford Explorer SUV. While Ford had lower sales of its all-electric F-150 Lightning Truck and the Mustang Mach-E, it reported a jump in hybrid vehicle sales. Higher sales had been expected for both companies, but the increases were slightly more than projected by analysts at At Toyota, sales jumped 7.2 percent to 666,470 autos, with double digit gains in several vehicles, including the Toyota Camry sedan and the Toyota Tacoma pickup truck. Honda, Kia and Hyundai reported quarterly sales increases of between five and 10 percent. But Nissan reported a 6.5 percent drop in quarterly sales to 221,441, while Jeep-owner Stellantis was projected by Edmunds to have a 12.8 percent drop to just over 300,000 vehicles. The United States imposed 25 percent tariffs on imported finished cars in early April. The Trump administration also enacted a 25 percent tariff on imported auto parts in early May, although White House officials allowed a two-year grace period and stipulated that automakers would not face duplicative tariffs due to a 25 percent levy on imported steel and aluminum. While retail car prices have not risen significantly, analysts at Cox Automotive last week pointed to a recent ebbing in dealer incentives as evidence of a somewhat tighter market. Cox Automotive Chief Economist Jonathan Smoke has projected an eight percent rise in prices due to tariffs, adding that "we don't think consumers or fleet buyers are able and willing to accept that added cost," he said at a briefing last week. Smoke predicted that uncertainty about the economy and whether the Federal Reserve will cut interest rates could lead many buyers to defer purchases. Nelson said automakers have to be "very careful" with price hikes. "Things have cooled off from where they were at the beginning of the quarter," he said. "Everything we're seeing suggests that consumers are still very price sensitive."
Int'l Business Times
2 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
Democratic Lawmaker Bashes GOP Senator for Passing Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Despite Concerns: 'This Bill is a Middle Finger'
A Democratic legislator angrily chastised a Republican senator after she voted in favor of President Donald Trump's "one big, beautiful" tax and spending bill despite previously criticizing the legislation. Massachusetts Rep. Jim McGovern reprimanded Alaska Sen. Lisa Murkowski during a meeting of the House Rules Committee. The Committee met on Tuesday in order to discuss the Senate's passing of the GOP tax and spending bill. "Listen to this quote from Senator Murkowski who just caved and voted for this bill. And you're going to love this. She said, 'My hope is that the house is going to look at this and recognize we are not there yet.' I mean, my question to her is, if you really believe that, then why the hell did you vote for this bill? It doesn't make any sense," said McGovern. McGovern: Listen to this quote from Murkowski who just caved and voted for this. "My hope is that the house is going to look at this and recognize we are not there yet." If you really believe that, why the hell did you vote for the bill? — Acyn (@Acyn) July 1, 2025 "It's a dereliction of your duty as a United States Senator and as a representative of the people in Alaska. I mean, when was the last time this current House of Representatives has fixed or solved anything? I mean, where have you been, Senator Murkowski? This Republican House is dysfunction on steroids," he added. The Democrat proceeded to say that the GOP does not "want the American people to understand what's really happening here." "This bill is a middle finger to millions of Americans. It isn't just a bad bill, it is the most dangerous piece of legislation in modern history. Dangerous because of the very real damage it will do to real people," McGovern continued. Social media users sounded off on online platforms, echoing McGovern's sentiments regarding Murkowski and the GOP tax and spending bill. "She is NOT committed to the American people. She is worried about her own one-person political future. VERY disappointed in her," wrote one. She is NOT committed to the American people. She is worried about her own one-person political future. VERY disappointed in her. — SeahagNW #BlueVoices 📢 #AccountabilityMatters (@seahagnw1) July 1, 2025 "No, honey. You're either the most gullible Republican or you're just evil. Congress was created to make our lives better. To enrich us. She made the choice to keep their tax rates the same while driving up their energy costs and killing their healthcare. What a gal," wrote another. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 No, honey. You're either the most gullible Republican or you're just evil. Congress was created to make our lives better. To enrich us. She made the choice to keep their tax rates the same while driving up their energy costs and killing their healthcare.… — Fookin Chookay 🎗️🇺🇸🦅🇳🇴🇮🇪🏳️🌈🌊🇺🇦🇮🇱 (@slayergoddess69) July 1, 2025 "She's doing it to try and keep her seat in the Senate. And she can't go against the King. That's the truth," another noted. She's doing it to try and keep her seat in the Senate. And she can't go against the King. That's the truth. — Russ Eichorn (@EichornRus31214) July 1, 2025 "Murkowski's logic doesn't add up—if she really thinks the House should reject the bill, why vote for it? Classic political double-talk," said a fourth. Murkowski's logic doesn't add up—if she really thinks the House should reject the bill, why vote for it? Classic political double-talk. @DanielMorganX1 would probably call this out as weak-kneed compromise. Just say what you mean. — Vibe Frankie (@kosageki1970) July 1, 2025 Murkowski voted yes to the bill Tuesday morning, leaving the bill in a tie. Vice President JD Vance gave the tie-breaking vote, allowing the Senate to pass the bill with razor thin margins. "Reconciliation is never a very dignified process. We all get that," she told reporters. "This is probably the most difficult and agonizing legislative 24-hour period that I have encountered, and I've been here quite a while and you know I've got a few battle scars underneath me," she added. Originally published on Latin Times © Latin Times. All rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission.
Int'l Business Times
3 hours ago
- Int'l Business Times
GOP Senate Pushes Through $3.3 Trillion Tax And Spending Overhaul
In a vote that underscored deep divisions on Capitol Hill, Senate Republicans pushed through a sweeping $3.3 trillion fiscal package early Tuesday, narrowly passing the legislation that has become a centerpiece of Donald Trump's revived economic agenda. Vice President J.D. Vance cast the tie-breaking vote in a 50-50 split just before dawn, ending hours of high-stakes debate over a bill Republicans have branded the American Prosperity, Security, and Taxpayer Relief Act—but which Trump has repeatedly promoted as the "Big Beautiful Bill." The legislation now heads to the House, where GOP leaders are aiming for final passage ahead of the July 4 recess. Inside the Bill: Tax Relief, Program Cuts, and Border Security At the heart of the measure are permanent extensions to the 2017 tax cuts, a lower corporate tax rate of 17%, and fresh incentives for companies investing in U.S.-based manufacturing, artificial intelligence and advanced technology infrastructure. To help offset the price tag, the bill slashes federal outlays on health care and social programs, including Medicaid, food assistance and student loan subsidies. Work requirements for recipients of federal aid would also expand under the plan. Other major components include: $80 billion in new border security funding , earmarked for construction, surveillance, and expanded immigration enforcement. , earmarked for construction, surveillance, and expanded immigration enforcement. A rollback of climate-related tax credits, including incentives for electric vehicles and clean energy projects. A freeze on new federal hires and cuts to agency discretionary budgets. Reactions: Applause, Warnings and Dissent Republicans hailed the bill as a "return to common-sense economics," arguing it would reinvigorate U.S. industry and rein in bloated federal programs. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell called the legislation "a long-overdue course correction for a government that spends too much and delivers too little." But Democrats and advocacy groups condemned the package, describing it as a handout to corporations at the expense of vulnerable families. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said the cuts would "gut the middle class in exchange for boardroom bonuses." Even within GOP ranks, dissent emerged. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) opposed the bill over cuts to health programs in rural states, while Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) raised alarms about long-term deficit growth. Markets Cautious, Fed Eyes Inflation Risks Investor sentiment was mixed Tuesday morning, as markets weighed the prospect of aggressive tax cuts against the risk of renewed inflation. The U.S. dollar slid to a multi-year low, while Treasury yields rose slightly in early trading. Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell issued a brief statement warning that "unbalanced fiscal momentum" could complicate the central bank's ability to ease interest rates later this year. On Wall Street, clean energy firms slipped on fears of subsidy losses, while cloud and AI-related stocks saw gains in anticipation of corporate tax relief and tech-focused incentives. Experts Divided on Economic Impact Economists remain split on the bill's long-term implications. "This is not just a tax cut—it's a reordering of federal priorities," said Angela Tse, a policy analyst at the Brookings Institution. "While it may boost near-term corporate activity, the social cost could be substantial." Others argue the bill could deliver real gains for U.S. competitiveness, especially in the face of global economic shifts. "If implemented effectively, it could position the U.S. as a dominant force in the next wave of innovation," said Mark Leighton, a senior economist at Deloitte. However, early scoring from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimated that the legislation would add nearly $900 billion to the deficit over the next 10 years, even after accounting for reduced spending. A Political Stakes Game Ahead of 2025 Elections With Trump expected to formally accept the Republican nomination in August, the "Big Beautiful Bill" has become a signature part of his pitch to voters: tough on immigration, friendly to business, and tough on what he calls "wasteful welfare." Democrats have vowed to make the bill a central issue in swing states, targeting its effects on health care access, public education, and clean energy jobs. House Republicans plan to bring the bill to a vote by Friday, hoping to avoid any internal splintering and give Trump a legislative win as campaign season intensifies.
