
Asia's oldest elephant, lovingly called ‘grandma', dies at 100
Vatsala, a tuskless female, spent the last three decades of her life in the Panna Tiger Reserve in Madhya Pradesh state where she was affectionately referred to as Dadi, meaning grandmother, by staff and caretakers.
She collapsed near a forest drain close to the Hinauta Elephant Camp on Wednesday afternoon, forest officials said. Despite efforts by veterinarians and forest rangers, Vatsala died at around 1.30pm, NDTV reported.
Originally from Kerala 's Nilambur Forest Division, she spent her early years transporting forest produce. Vatsala was relocated to Madhya Pradesh in 1972 and moved to Panna in 1993.
She was retired from duty in 2004, but continued to play a vital role in the camp.
'She was our pride,' Panna field director Anjana Suchita Tirkey told Indian media.
'She led the herd with dignity. During deliveries, it was Vatsala who stood close, like an experienced midwife, giving strength and calm. She wasn't just the oldest – she was the soul of our elephant family.'
Maniram Gond, her mahout for 30 years, told The Times of India that Vatsala never got angry. 'She was like a grandmother,' he said. 'Even in her last years, when she was fully blind, she'd lift her trunk the moment I called her name.'
Vatsala never mated, Mr Gond told the daily. She survived two violent attacks in 2003 and 2008 by a male elephant named Ram Bahadur who wanted to mate with her. The first left her with torn intestines and required more than 200 stitches. She recovered after nine months of treatment.
Although she had no calves of her own, staff said she acted as a natural matriarch to younger elephants in the camp, often walking beside them or comforting them during illness or deliveries.
In her final years, she was blind and suffered from digestive issues. Caretakers hand-fed her porridge and helped her move around the camp.
Her body was cremated at the Hinauta camp, her final home. No official Guinness World Record could be issued due to missing documentation from her early years, but forest officials estimated she was well over 100.
Asian elephants typically live up to 60 years in the wild and while individuals in captivity might live longer with access to veterinary care, Vatsala's age was exceptional.
Elephants, listed as an endangered species by the International Union for Conservation of Nature, are protected in India under the Wildlife Protection Act.
The South Asian nation is home to more than 27,000 wild elephants, representing over 50 per cent of the Asian elephant population. Their habitat is shrinking, however, and human-elephant conflict remains a major concern.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Families of Air India crash victims demand ‘justice and answers'
Families of the victims of the Air India crash have demanded 'justice and answers', after a report found the plane's fuel switches were cut off. The preliminary report from India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau, published on Friday, said both of the plane's fuel switches moved to the 'cut-off' position 'immediately' after take-off, stopping fuel supply to the engine. 'In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why did he cut-off. The other pilot responded that he did not do so,' the report reads. The London-bound Boeing 787 Dreamliner crashed into a medical college shortly after taking off from Ahmedabad Airport on June 12, killing 241 people on board. Another 19 people also died and 67 were seriously injured. In a statement, relatives of Akeel Nanabawa, his wife Hannaa Vorajee and their four-year-old daughter Sara Nanabawa, who died in the crash, described the report as 'the first stepping stone' and said the family are still 'working our way through the weight of our loss.' They added: 'Moving forwards, we require honesty, transparency, and an unwavering commitment to uncovering the full truth. 'We seek justice and answers, both of which are essential for us to find any sense of closure. 'We accept God's fate, but knowing what happened will help ease our hearts and allow us to begin the long journey of healing. 'Above all, we hope that by pursuing the truth, no other family will ever have to endure the shock, uncertainty, and profound sorrow that we have lived through this past month.' The cousin of sisters Dhir and Heer Baxi, who were flying home to London after surprising their grandmother for her birthday and died in the crash, said he was 'not satisfied' by the report. Speaking to the PA news agency, Ishan Baxi, who lives in Ahmedabad, said: 'We're still hoping for a more transparent and honest investigation that doesn't shy away from addressing possible mechanical flaws or lapses in protocol to avoid future potential accidents.' He added: 'I just hope the final report brings full clarity on what exactly failed and who's accountable. 'It shouldn't hide behind vague terms. 'More than anything, it should push for real changes so this never happens again.' Fuel switches are used at the end of every flight and in emergency scenarios such as a fire, director of aerospace and aviation at Cranfield University, Professor Graham Braithwaite said. They are designed so they cannot easily be 'accidentally' turned off and pilots would generally run through a checklist before doing so, he said. 'For obvious reasons, the two switches are a distance apart, so not a huge distance, but enough that you couldn't accidentally switch two when you're trying to switch one.' Prof Braithwaite said that if the switch had been moved by a person, that would have been a 'very unusual thing to do' at below 1,000 feet. The aircraft was about 11 years old, the fuel switches had been changed two years ago, and the crash was a 'really, really unusual event', he added. A lawyer advising some of the families affected by the crash said the findings were 'deeply concerning'. Demetrius Danas, an aviation lawyer at Irwin Mitchell, said: 'We're continuing to speak with and advise families who've been affected by the Air India crash. 'Understandably, all they want is to be provided with answers.' The only surviving passenger on the plane was Briton Vishwash Kumar Ramesh, who previously told The Sun it was a 'miracle' he was alive but felt 'terrible' he could not save his brother Ajay. Some 169 Indian passengers and 52 British nationals were killed, making it one of the deadliest plane crashes in terms of the number of British fatalities. If the final investigation takes more than a year to complete, an interim report would be issued on the anniversary of the crash, Professor Braithwaite said, adding that interim recommendations could be made at any time. The preliminary report says that all crew members had been breathalysed on their arrival at Ahmedabad airport, which found they were 'fit to operate the flight'. No significant bird activity was spotted near the flight path and the aircraft started to lose altitude before crossing the airport perimeter wall. Investigators have identified 'components of interest for further examinations', the report says. Fuel samples taken from tanks used to refuel the aircraft were 'satisfactory'. Statements have been taken from Mr Ramesh and witnesses by investigators, who will also be looking at the post-mortem examination reports of the crew and the passengers. An Air India spokesman said: 'Air India stands in solidarity with the families and those affected by the AI171 accident. 'We continue to mourn the loss and are fully committed to providing support during this difficult time.' The spokesman added: 'Air India is working closely with stakeholders, including regulators. 'We continue to fully co-operate with the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) and other authorities as their investigation progresses. 'Given the active nature of the investigation, we are unable to comment on specific details and refer all such inquiries to the AAIB.'


Sky News
3 hours ago
- Sky News
Backlash as Air India crash report points to possible human error - here's what experts think
As investigators continue to piece together the full picture, early findings of the Air India crash are pointing towards a critical area of concern — the aircraft's fuel control switches. The flight, bound for London Gatwick, crashed just moments after taking off from Ahmedabad airport on 12 June, killing all but one of the 242 people on board the plane and at least 19 on the ground. According to the preliminary report by India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB), the two engine fuel control switches on the plane were moved from the "RUN" to "CUTOFF" position. These switches control fuel flow to the engines and should only be used when the aircraft is on ground, first to start the engines before a flight and later to shut them down at the gate. They are designed so they're unlikely to be changed accidentally, pointing to possible human error on the Air India flight. The findings include the final conversation between the pilots and show there was confusion in the cockpit as well. When one pilot asked the other why he cut off the fuel, he responded to say he did not do so. Moments later, a Mayday call was made from the cockpit, but the plane could not regain power quickly enough and plummeted to the ground. Captain Amit Singh, founder of Safety Matters Foundation, an organisation dedicated to aviation safety, told Sky News: "This exchange indicates that the engine shutdowns were uncommanded. "However, the report does not identify the cause - whether it was crew error, mechanical malfunction, or electronic failure." Previous warning of 'possible fuel switch issue' "The Boeing 787 uses spring-loaded locking mechanisms on its fuel control switches to prevent accidental movement," Mr Singh explained. But a previous bulletin from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) "warned that these switches might be installed with the locking feature disengaged," he said. This could "make them susceptible to unintended movement due to vibration, contact, or quadrant flex", he added. Speaking to Sky News, aviation expert Terry Tozner said: "The take-off was normal, the aircraft rotated at the correct speed left the ground and almost immediately, the cut-off switches were selected to off, one then two. "But nobody has said with any clarity whether or not the latch mechanisms worked okay on this particular aircraft. So we can only assume that they were in normal working order." In India, there has been a backlash over the findings, with some saying the report points to pilot error without much information and almost dismisses the possibility of a mechanical or electric failure. Indian government responds India's civil aviation minister Kinjarapu Ram Mohan Naidu has been quick to respond, saying: "We care for the welfare and the wellbeing of pilots so let's not jump to any conclusions at this stage, let us wait for the final report. "I believe we have the most wonderful workforce of pilots and crew in the whole world." 0:34 Both pilots were experienced, with around 19,000 flying hours between them, including more than 9,000 on Boeing 787s. The report says the aircraft maintenance checks were on schedule and that there are no signs of fuel contamination or a bird strike. So far, no safety recommendations have been issued to Boeing or General Electric, the engine manufacturers. Concern over destroyed flight recorder Mr Singh said "the survivability of the flight recorders also raises concern". The plane's rear flight recorder, designed to withstand impact forces of 3,400 Gs and temperatures of 1,100C for 60 minutes, "was damaged beyond recovery". "The Ram Air Turbine (RAT), which deploys automatically when both engines fail and power drops below a threshold, was observed as deployed in CCTV footage when the aircraft was approximately 60ft above ground level," Mr Singh said. "This suggests that the dual engine failure likely occurred before the official timestamp of 08:08:42 UTC, implying a possible discrepancy." Mr Singh said it was also "of particular note" that the plane's emergency locator transmitter (ELT) did not send any signal after the crash. "Was the ELT damaged, unarmed, mis-wired, or malfunctioning?" he said. The report has generated more questions than answers on topics including human error, power source failures and mechanical or electrical malfunction. The final report is expected to take a year. Meanwhile, families grapple with the unimaginable loss of loved ones in one of the worst disasters in India's aviation history.


The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘Why did he cut off?': what the report on the Air India Flight 171 crash found
A preliminary report from investigators looking at the Air India Flight 171 crash, which killed 260 people on 12 June, has been published. Seconds after takeoff, both of the Boeing 787 Dreamliner's fuel-control switches moved to the 'cutoff' position. This starved the engines of fuel, and they began to lose power. The report says: 'In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other: why did he cut off? The other pilot responded that he did not do so.' It did not identify who said what. Turning off the fuel requires the operation of two switches, centrally located on the flight deck – neither of which are the kind of simple push-button that could be brushed against accidentally or moved without force. Deliberate, malicious intent from either pilot would appear unthinkable given the record of the Air India officers in the cockpit. Switching off by mistake would also seem incredible. And yet human error cannot be excluded: as a pilot who flew Boeing jumbos for many years says, turning the switches on and off is something that pilots do – at the correct moment – on every flight, with the kind of muscle memory that makes a movement automatic. But this time the fuel was cut off after takeoff, while the landing gear was not raised. At the time of takeoff, the co-pilot was flying the aircraft while the captain was monitoring. Seconds later, the switches flipped back to 'run', the report says, which started the process of relighting the engines. One of the engines was in the process of regaining power at the time of the crash, while the other engine had relit but had not yet regained power. Both fuel control switches were found in the 'run' position at the crash site. The report said CCTV footage obtained from the airport showed a ram air turbine (RAT) was deployed during the initial climb immediately after takeoff. The small wind turbine acts as a backup power source during emergencies, and is normally only deployed during complete power failure. At 8.07am (UTC) the aircraft was cleared for takeoff. At about 8.09am, one of the pilots transmitted: 'Mayday, Mayday, Mayday.' The air traffic control officer did not get any response. The report also found: 'Both thrust levers were found near the aft (idle) position. 'However, the EAFR [enhanced airborne flight recorder] data revealed that the thrust levers remained forward (takeoff thrust) until the impact.' The report said both pilots had an 'adequate rest period prior to operating the said flight'. It added that the crew underwent a preflight breath analyser test and 'were found fit to operate'. The report said that the takeoff weight was 'within allowable limits'. It added that there were 'no dangerous goods' on the aircraft and there was no adverse weather. It added that fuel samples taken from the bowsers and tanks used to refuel the aircraft were tested and 'found satisfactory'. 'No significant bird activity' was observed in the vicinity of the flight path. The report said that in December 2018, the US Federal Aviation Administration issued a special airworthiness information bulletin based on reports from operators of model 737 planes that the fuel control switches were installed with the locking feature disengaged. The airworthiness concern was not considered an unsafe condition that would warrant an airworthiness directive – a legally enforceable regulation to correct unsafe conditions. The same switch design is used in Boeing 787-8 aircraft, including Air India's VT-ANB, which crashed. The report added: 'As per the information from Air India, the suggested inspections were not carried out as the SAIB was advisory and not mandatory.' After Boeing was forced to ground a different model, the 737 Max, for more than a year after two fatal crashes – as well as the mid-flight blowout of a panel from a 737 Max – aviation experts no longer have implicit faith in Boeing's machinery and software. Investigators are still to examine 'components of interest' but it seems significant that they have made 'no recommended actions' regarding the Boeing 787 or the engine, for airlines or manufacturers. As one senior industry source and ex-pilot put it: 'There's nothing here that is likely.' Aviation's safety record – statistically the safest mode, despite recent tragedies – has long depended on examining not just the crashes but the near-misses, every deviation from the norm. Early speculation usually differs from the eventual cause or combination of causes, after manufacturers and airlines have tried to expunge every known risk. The investigation continues. The report said wreckage had been moved to a secure area near the airport. Both engines had been retrieved and were quarantined at a hangar in the airport. Additional details were being gathered 'based on the initial leads', it added. While a very limited amount of fuel samples could be retrieved from the APU filter and refuel/jettison valve of left wing, the report added the testing of these samples would be done at a suitable facility. Data downloaded from the forward enhanced airborne flight recorder was 'being analysed in detail'.