Boy (16) who suffered 'severe' injury after alleged delay amid doctors' row receives €1.9m
Dillon Brennan (16) was born on January 30th, 2009, at the hospital, which has been subject to investigation over patient safety, to Corinna Brennan, who is also his carer at their Athy, Co Kildare, home.
Advertisement
Mrs Brennan sued the HSE on behalf of her son for breach of statutory duty - alleged medical negligence - to adequately provide medical services to Mrs Brennan and her son in 2009 at the Co Laois hospital.
It was submitted that Mrs Brennan was due to give birth around January 25th, 2009, and had attended all of her antenatal appointments, culminating with a clinic at the hospital on January 29th, 2009, when no "significant abnormal conditions in relation to the pregnancy were present".
Mrs Brennan was admitted to the hospital on January 30th, 2009, five days after her due date, but had "slow and irregular" pain.
A cardiotocography trace (CTG) was carried out and was found to be "abnormal", as the unborn baby displayed "frequent decelerations" in his heart rate. However, despite the abnormal readings, the CTG was discontinued.
Advertisement
A second CTG was carried out at 8.45am the same morning that showed decelerations and abnormalities up to around 12.30pm.
It was claimed that then a syntocinon treatment - an injection involving the drug Oxycontin - was administered to augment labour.
It was claimed that the readings from the CTG were not reproduced in a legible fashion and were difficult to interpret.
A decision was made to deliver Dillon by emergency Caesarean Section, and Dillon was born at 1:36pm, allegedly 80 minutes after a decision to perform the Caesarean was made - 50 minutes outside the usual timeframe.
Advertisement
It was claimed that Dillon then suffered "extreme difficulties" with breathing, due to hypoxia, and that there was a delay in his resuscitation.
In addition, an altercation between members of the hospital staff occurred during the attempts at resuscitation of the plaintiff, it was alleged.
During a second attempt at intubation, a doctor was interrupted by an anaesthetic doctor without invitation who attempted to force an oxygen mask on the child, it was claimed.
It was alleged that the anaesthetist "brushed aside" the attending doctor and raised his voice, shouting "for f**k sake just bag him". The doctor was eventually able to drain meconium - a baby's first stool - from the child through suction, after which safe intubation was performed.
Advertisement
The doctor, it was submitted, was "considerably interrupted in his attempts to intubate and resuscitate the plaintiff by actions of the anaesthetist doctor".
In the aftermath of his birth, the plaintiff was noted as being in pain, jaundiced, vomiting with streaks of blood, having hypoxic metabolic acidosis, high blood pressure and in need of ventilation.
The plaintiff spent 11 days in intensive care, and an MRI scan showed the plaintiff's kidney and brain had an infarct resulting in "severe personal injuries", it was claimed.
At the High Court on Tuesday, Mr Justice Paul Coffey was told by John Healy SC, instructed by David O'Malley of Callan Tansey solicitors, for the plaintiff that a final settlement of €1.9 million for breaches of duty by the defendant, albeit without an admission of liability, could be recommended to the court for what he said was Mr Brennan's "turbulent" introduction to the world.
Advertisement
Mr Justice Coffey approved the settlement and addressed Mr Brennan, who was present in court, saying he was pleased to see Mr Brennan "looking so well and I wish you all the best for the future".
Reacting to the settlement, solicitor David O'Malley, in a statement on behalf the family, said that the family welcome it and "the security it will provide Dillon.
"They would like to acknowledge the efforts of the State Claims Agency and their legal representatives in facilitating mediation to resolve this case. The purpose of civil society is to prevent similar events reoccurring.
"The family questioned the birth, having witnessed the Portlaoise maternity enquiry and the aftermath in 2012.
"Unfortunately, the same avoidable failings, namely delayed delivery, inadequate CTG (cardiotocography) tracing and misuse of Oxytocin, still remain as main causes of hypoxia in Irish infants in 2025.
"Also, in the year 2025 there are no cooling units to counteract hypoxia in infants outside of Cork and Dublin.
"It truly is a second-tier maternity system outside of The Pale.
"The family echoes calls by advocate groups to urgently review maternity care in Ireland. One cannot think of a more important right than the right to breathe and be protected at birth," said Mr O'Malley.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BreakingNews.ie
2 hours ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Physiotherapist who gave Botox-like drug to clients suspended for three months
A physiotherapist who administered an unlicensed Botox-like product to a number of clients and was found guilty of poor professional performance has been suspended for three months by the High Court. High Court president Mr Justice David Barniville confirmed the sanction of CORU the regulatory body of health and social care professionals to suspend the Dublin physiotherapist from the Register of Physiotherapists for three months starting in October. Advertisement Physiotherapist, Igor Castro, who operates a practice on O'Connell St in Dublin, appeared before a fitness-to-practise inquiry earlier this year over his use and promotion of Liztox, a Korean botulinum toxin product similar to Botox which is used for aesthetic treatments. The CORU fitness-to-practise committee found an allegation proven that Mr Castro had administered Liztox to three clients at his practice in October 2023. The committee also found it proven that the Brazilian native had posted one or more posts on his Instagram account between October and November 2023 promoting the fact that he was administering the Botox-like product to clients. In the High Court on Monday, CORU solicitor JP McDowell of Fieldfisher solicitors said the committee regarded it as a very serious matter 'and it goes to the issue of public safety.' Advertisement He said mitigating factors were considered including that Mr Castro had ' considerable insight into the error of his ways.' Confirming the suspension to begin in October, Mr Justice David Barniville noted that Mr Castro had made a full admission and was very apologetic for what happened . At the CORU fitness to practise committee inquiry last January the inquiry's chairwoman, Geraldine Feeney, said the committee made its findings on the basis of Mr Castro's own admissions and the uncontroverted evidence of a number of witnesses including an enforcement officer with the Health Products Regulatory Authority. She said Mr Castro's actions in administering Liztox when it was outside his scope as a physiotherapist also represented breaches of the profession's code of professional conduct and ethics. Ms Feeney added: Advertisement The committee observed that an expert witness had pointed out that Mr Castro was not legally qualified to administer an unlicensed product which was a 'potentially harmful substance'. Ireland Elon Musk's X to commence Labour Court appeal agai... Read More Ms Feeney said the physiotherapist had demonstrated extremely poor judgement and brought the profession into disrepute. She acknowledged that Mr Castro had co-operated fully from the outset with an investigation by the HPRA and subsequently the CORU inquiry and had made complete admissions about his conduct which she said had demonstrated insight into his wrongdoing. She noted that the committee was satisfied that there was little or no risk that Mr Castro would repeat the conduct in future based on his evidence, insight, and statement of regret. She acknowledged that he had provided the inquiry with several references which described him as a 'conscientious and good' physiotherapist. Ms Feeney said the committee was also impressed by the fact that Mr Castro was undertaking continuous education for the purpose of improving his skills and providing physiotherapy services.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Resident doctors' focus on pay is doing untold damage to the NHS
As a retired doctor, now 80, I feel sad as I watch our resident doctors struggle to exert pressure on the government to increase their pay packet (Wes Streeting 'thought he had struck deal to halt strike by doctors', 27 July). This behaviour will have far-reaching consequences, which are unlikely to be beneficial either to the doctors or the country. Clearly, the action will cause delays in treatment and probably unnecessary morbidity and mortality. This will make the NHS vulnerable to pressure from those who favour its abolition. Already, it has alienated large sections of the population whose support the doctors have always been able to count on previously. But the British Medical Association has assured resident doctors that it is necessary for them to put their livelihood ahead of the wellbeing of the public, to ensure that the NHS survives into the future. This is a false promise. The commitment of resident doctors and nurses has always been integral to the success of the NHS, and there is no doubt that this has been central to the incredible efficiency it has demonstrated since its inception. It was conceived as a non-commercial organisation. There have always been areas of the globe where doctors could earn more than at home. But for most, the attractions of the NHS outweighed pecuniary advantages available elsewhere. I fear that in setting their sights purely on increased remuneration, today's resident doctors are leading the NHS towards a change in its entire ethos, the ethos that made it a success. The BMA should concentrate on improving doctors' working conditions, as Wes Streeting has offered BehrmanCookham Dean, Berkshire On Sunday I cancelled my subscription to the British Medical Association after being a member for 39 years, in disgust at its insistence on going ahead with the strike of resident doctors in pursuit of a 29% pay rise, despite having had a 22% rise over the previous two years. It is hard to know what is the correct rate of pay for resident doctors, but no other group in the health service is seeking such a rise in pay, and the decision to strike seems to ignore patients, as well as all the other staff alongside whom they work. I believe that improvement in the working conditions of doctors and all other groups should be sought through discussions, as the government has offered, not strikes. Whatever the appropriate pay should be for resident doctors, they should be glad that they don't get the equivalent of the £2 per hour we were paid in the 1980s for each of the 60 hours a week we had to be in the hospital over and above our basic 40-hour David CameronBelhaven, East Lothian I do have a lot of sympathy for our resident doctors, even though I was on call on Sunday as a consultant. It is not just that pay has been eroded, but also that the cost of becoming a doctor has gone up, as has the cost of living in general. Unlike in most other higher-paid professions, half of doctors are women. The cost of childcare has gone up significantly since my day. There is no more cheap hospital accommodation. And the student loan system is misogynistic in principle, the interest accumulating during maternity leave. Women earn less during their careers but end up paying back a lot more for their student loans as a group. And because of the forced itinerant lifestyle, most doctors get their foot on the housing ladder quite late, having to pay increasingly unaffordable GemmekeEastleigh, Hampshire Wes Streeting rightly points out that 90% of resident doctors voted for strike action, with a 55% turnout (Resident doctors' strike undermines union movement, says Wes Streeting, 25 July). That means just under 50% of all resident doctors voted in favour. He fails to point out that Labour is in power on the votes of 34% of the 60% who turned out – about 20% of the electorate. The doctors' result looks more convincing as a test of opinion, whatever you think of the pay WestLondon Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Letterkenny and Sligo: New surgical hubs proposed for hospitals
The minister for health in the Republic of Ireland has now backed the development of two new surgical hubs in the north west, insisting the decision is based on announcement comes after concerns were raised by some Donegal-based clinicians when the regional Health Service Executive (HSE) initially identified Sligo as the preferred location for a new surgical hub in the Jennifer Carroll MacNeill confirmed on Monday a second unit will also be developed at Letterkenny University Hospital and dismissed claims this decision was politically motivated. It remains unclear whether patients from Northern Ireland will be able to access services at either site once operational. "This is the right thing for Donegal - it is the right thing for the north west," the minister said. "From a data perspective and a planning perspective, this was simply the right decision."The investment at Letterkenny University Hospital will include the development of a new surgical hub, along with expanded cancer treatment Sligo, a new stand-alone surgical hub with two operating theatres will be constructed near the town's university MacNeill described the announcement as "an important milestone" in delivering improved care for patients at both said the projects would make "a real and lasting difference" to people's lives in the region and emphasised that increasing surgical capacity in both locations was a priority for the Irish government."These investments align with our Ambulatory Elective Day Care Strategy and the National Cancer Control Programme," Carroll MacNeill said."They will ensure that patients in the northwest have timely access to high-quality surgical and oncology care." Hope to be operational 'within two years' The minister visited Letterkenny University Hospital on Monday to make the announcement. "This was the right decision— not because of a series of meetings, but because, from a data perspective and from a future planning perspective, this was simply the right decision," Carroll MacNeill said. "It's not anything political - this is the right thing for Donegal - this is the right thing for the north west and I hope we'll see the benefits of these two surgical hubs which will deliver quicker surgeries for people in a very short time."Carroll MacNeill said she hoped both hubs would be operational within two years. Regional executive officer for HSE west and north west, Tony Canavan, said the new units could help reduce waiting lists for elective procedures in Donegal and Sligo, but said questions remained over staffing the facilities. "In Letterkenny, the hub we're proposing to develop will also include day beds for people receiving oncology treatments—15 brand new beds, along with 15 replacement beds," he explained."That will mean people from Donegal can receive their chemotherapy close to home and will be able to plan for that in the future as well."However, Mr Canavan cautioned that staffing the new units would be a "challenge".
